Blog List

Monday, 24 July 2017

PARTICLE BOARD

Author
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Particleboard with veneer
Particle board, also known as particleboard and chipboard, is an engineered wood product manufactured from wood chipssawmill shavings, or even sawdust, and a synthetic resin or other suitable binder, which is pressed and extrudedOriented strand board, also known as flakeboardwaferboard, or chipboard, is similar but uses machined wood flakes offering more strength. All of these are composite materials[1] that belong to the spectrum of fiberboard products.

Characteristics[edit]

The cross section of a particle board
Particle board is cheaper, denser and more uniform than conventional wood and plywood and is substituted for them when cost is more important than strength and appearance. However, particleboard can be made more attractive by painting or the use of wood veneers onto surfaces that will be visible. Though it is denser than conventional wood, it is the lightest and weakest type of fiberboard, except for insulation board. Medium-density fibreboard and hardboard, also called high-density fiberboard, are stronger and denser than particleboard. Different grades of particleboard have different densities, with higher density connoting greater strength and greater resistance to failure of screw fasteners.
A major disadvantage of particleboard is that it is very prone to expansion and discoloration due to moisture, particularly when it is not covered with paint or another sealer. Therefore, it is rarely used outdoors or in places where there are high levels of moisture, with the exception of some bathrooms, kitchens and laundries, where it is commonly used as an underlayment - in its moisture resistant variant - beneath a continuous sheet of vinyl flooring.
The advantages of using particleboard over veneer core plywood is it is more stable, (unless it gets wet), much cheaper to buy, and somewhat more convenient to use.

History and development[edit]

The particleboards originated in Germany. Firstly produced particleboard is dated back to 1887, when Hubbard made so-called "artificial wood" made from wood flour and albumin based adhesive, consolidated under high temperature and pressure. [2]
Although the use of two or three layers of wood veneer is ancient, modern 4' x 8' sheets of plywood with 5-11 core layers of veneer were invented in the early 20th century, and began to become common by the Second World War. During the war, phenolic resin was more readily accessible than top grade wood veneer in Germany, and Luftwaffe pilot and inventor Max Himmelheber played a role in making the first sheets of particleboard, which were little more than pourings of floor sweepings, wood chips, and ground up off-cuts and glue.[citation needed] The first commercial piece was produced during World War II at a factory in Bremen, Germany.[clarification needed] For its production, waste material was used - such as planer shavings, offcuts or sawdust - hammer-milled into chips and bound together with a phenolic resin. Hammer-milling involves smashing material into smaller and smaller pieces until they can pass through a screen. Most other early particleboard manufacturers used similar processes, though often with slightly different resins.
It was found that better strength, appearance and resin economy could be achieved by using more uniform, manufactured chips. Producers began processing solid birch, beech, alder, pine and spruce into consistent chips and flakes; these finer layers were then placed on the outside of the board, with its core composed of coarser, cheaper chips. This type of board is known as three-layer particleboard.
More recently, graded-density particleboard has also evolved. It contains particles that gradually become smaller as they get closer to the surface

Manufacturing[edit]

Particleboard or chipboard is manufactured by mixing wood particles or flakes together with a resin and forming the mixture into a sheet. The raw material to be used for the particles is fed into a disc chipper with between four and sixteen radially arranged blades (the chips from disk chippers are more uniform in shape and size than from other types of wood chipper). The particles are then dried, after which any oversized or undersized particles are screened out.
Resin is then mist-sprayed through fine nozzles onto the particles. There are several types of resins that are commonly used. Amino-formaldehyde based resins are the best performing when considering cost and ease of use. Urea Melamine resins are used to offer water resistance with increased melamine offering enhanced resistance. It is typically used where the panel is used in external applications due to the increased water resistance offered by phenolic resins and also the colour of the resin resulting in a darker panel. Melamine Urea phenolic formaldehyde resins exist as a compromise. To enhance the panel properties even further the use of resorcinol resins typically mixed with phenolic resins are used, but this is usually used with plywood for marine applications and a rare occasion in panel production.
Panel production involves various other chemicals—including wax, dyes, wetting agents, release agents—to make the final product water resistant, fireproof, insect proof, or to give it some other quality.
The particles then pass through a mist of resin sufficient to coat all surfaces and are then layered, first into a continuous carpet. This 'carpet' is then separated into discrete, rectangular 'blankets' which will then be compacted in a cold press. A weighing device notes the weight of flakes, and they are distributed into position by rotating rakes. In graded-density particleboard, the flakes are spread by an air jet that throws finer particles further than coarse ones. Two such jets, reversed, allow the particles to build up from fine to coarse and back to fine.
The sheets formed are then cold-compressed to reduce their thickness and make them easier to transport. Later, they are compressed again, under pressures between 2 and 3 megapascals (290 and 440 psi) and temperatures between 140 and 220 °C (284 and 428 °F). This process sets and hardens the glue. All aspects of this entire process must be carefully controlled to ensure the correct size, density and consistency of the board.
The boards are then cooled, trimmed and sanded. They can then be sold as raw board or surface improved through the addition of a wood veneer or laminate surface.

Furniture design[edit]

Particle board has had an enormous influence on furniture design. In the early 1950s, particle board kitchens started to come into use in furniture construction but, in many cases, it remained more expensive than solid wood. A particle board kitchen was only available to the very wealthy.[citation needed] Once the technology was more developed, particle board became cheaper.
Some large companies base their strategies around providing furniture at a low price. To do this, they use the least expensive materials possible. In almost all cases, this means particle board or MDF or similar. However, manufacturers, in order to maintain a reputation for quality at low cost, may use higher grades of particle board, e.g., higher density particle board, thicker particle board, or particle board using higher-quality resins. One may note the amount of sag in a shelf of a given width in order to draw the distinction.
In general the much lower cost of sheet goods (particle board, medium density fiberboard, and other engineered wood products) has helped to displace solid wood from many cabinetry applications.

Safety[edit]

Safety concerns are two part, one being fine dust and chemicals released when particleboard is machined (e.g., sawing or routing). Occupational exposure limits exist in many countries recognizing the hazard of wood dusts.[3] Cutting particle board can release formaldehyde, carbon monoxide, hydrogen cyanide (in the case of amino resins) and phenol (in the case of phenol-formaldehyde resins).[4] The other concern is with the slow release of formaldehyde over time. In 1984 concerns about the initial indoor level of formaldehyde led the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to set standards for construction of manufactured homes. Particleboard (PB), medium density fibreboard (MDF), oriented strand board (OSB), and laminated flooring have been major sources of formaldehyde emissions. In response to much consumer and woodworker pressure on the industry, PB and MDF are at least now available in "no added formaldehyde" (NAF) versions, which are not yet commonly used by 2015. Many other building materials such as furniture finish, carpeting and caulking give off formaldehyde, as well as Urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, which is banned in Canada for installation in a residential closed cavity wall.[5] Formaldehyde is classified by the WHO as a known human carcinogen.[6]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

External links[edit]


For further information log on website :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_board

SAWDUST( DISAMBIGUATION )

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sawdust is the material composed of fine particles of wood.
Sawdust may also refer to:

Places[edit]

See also[edit]

For further information log on website :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sawdust_(disambiguation)

TALK : WOODWORKING

Author
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Woodworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Woodworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
 Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconThis article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
 C This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
Checklist icon
 ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Note icon
This article is within of subsequent release version of Engineering, applied sciences, and technology.
Taskforce icon
This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.

Untitled[edit]

The 'atay' page is somewhat pathetic, to say the least! I am quite into writing some stuff, but first I was wondering what anyone thinks about renaming it 'Woodwork'; it seems that this more acurately reflects the whole field of working with wood, and not just the process (of woodworking). Also does anyone have any ideas on how woodwork, joinerycarpentry, etc. are to be related? And how are we going to link all these (and other 'manual arts') from HomePage?
Sam - All valid comments. "Woodwork" seems like a fair candidate as it is a noun, whereas "woodworking" is a verb gerund (gee, you can't tell that I've been working in English language lately, can you?). "Woodwork" sounds like a "global" subject (like "computer" or "sport") so I think it is a the best launching point for links to joinery, carpentry, wood sculpture. Adding things to the homepage is the domain of the project administrators - LarrySanger and JimboWales, if you've got a good argument they'll listen. Welcome to the 'pedia - we need more Australians :) - Manning Bartlett

Go for it dude!
This page still need a heap of work. But wehre should it be going, is it a definitive article? a brief summary linking to other topics? or what?Ping 08:19 May 1, 2003 (UTC)
Two weeks later and no suggestions; this page seems to be a bit of an orphan so I am giving it a goPing 11:13 May 13, 2003 (UTC)

you know since i wrote this crap i have come to think that europeans and others probably had no-glue no-nail joints too.

the list of saws needs to have a listing of japanese saws, ryoba, dozuki, etc. what the heck huh?

I just added a bunch of terminology derived from a couple glossaries in the back of some woodworking books I own. The content is original, but the words aren't :-). I also threw in a few more tools since I felt they should be there. I think that the Woodworking article needs to address a lot more than just woodworking, like all the complex tools in use, and the various traditions around the world. I'll try to add stuff as I go along. I can add some pretty specialized things, like info on American Northwest Coast aboriginal woodworking that I know a lot about, and some stuff on Japanese carpentry which I've studied.
Someone needs to ask the Dutch people to help include some of their stuff into the English version, it looks like they've got some info that is missing here. Most Nederlanders can speak English pretty well, they won't be likely to be adverse to helping.
James Crippen 23:24, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I've been working a bit on carpenter and related topics--my husband's a German carpenter, I'm an editor--I see that framer and framing are separated, but carpenter and carpentry are not. I don't care where the articles on this go, really, but I think a case can be made for keeping the profession and the worker separate. Under carpentry one can talk about the methods and types, while under carpenter one can talk about individuals, training, guild costumes, and misc. branches of the profession such as framers, roofers, shipwrights, etc. Any help and sources people here can provide (and corrections, of course!) would be much appreciated. Deirdre 18:43, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Linear Pottery culture well[edit]

I'm correcting links to the disambiguation page well and came across this term - Linear Pottery culture well. What on earth does it mean?! Could someone change the link accordingly, or if it's a dodgy term change the wording? Thanks. BigBlueFish 15:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

External Links[edit]

I have a bee in my bonnet about these links. There's no doubt some of them link to useful and/or interesting information and people love free plans. However, I don't believe that any of them conform to the policy on external links. None of them particularly expand on the topic of woodworking as an encyclopaedic subject - they are of interest to woodworkers, but not necessarily to people wishing simply to learn what the field of woodworking is about. OK, it's a line call but anyway I think they run foul of the "Wikipedia is not a collection of links" policy, so I'd like to remove them. What do others think? SilentC 23:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
I'll see your link removal, and raise you one invisotext'd caution line about NOT posting free plan sites, nore external commercial links. and waitress, another coke here at the blackjack tables? ThuranX 23:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC) (hmm... wonder if any of dem plan sites got a Blackjack table plan...)
Toss 'em all. Actually, the only one of any use in the bunch is the woodworker's central, IMNSHO, and even that one is dated. Maybe also the inside woodworking one. The others have some interesting stuff, but are either link farms or blogs. There are a gazillion wooddorking sites out there. How about putting together a bibliography instead? Joyce, Feirer, Roubo, etc. ?Luigizanasi 01:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
I'm glad to see the above, I tend to delete them all, but I hesitate since I have I have had my (exteranl link) deletions reverted in some places. So I hesitated, next time I'll beat you to it. --ArmadilloFromHell 01:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
OK, I've done it. Mwah hah hah ;) Don't know how to do the invisiotext thing (is that real, or did you dream it?) so I'll leave that for someone else if they think it's worth doing. I like the biblio idea. I've got a couple of classic texts at home, I'll add the biblio section later, unless someone with the publisher details etc. to hand beats me to it. [forever na mahal na mahal kita nikki ann cabalquinto ikaw ang babaeng pinaka mamahal ko always then i love you mwuahhhhhhh,,,,,,,,,,jhanikki_28]jan carlo d. laumoc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.8.22 (talk) 14:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
The concerns you have about External Links are not unique to woodworking. Yet this is the only article I know of with no editable external links section. Cdrobeson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdrobeson (talk •contribs) 08:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Vocab[edit]

I have updated a lot of terminology..any of u seeing this?--jamierules btw i need somebody to check my spelling errors.--jamierules
I think this terminology section is getting out of hand. From the intro to it, it was meant to capture some arcane terms used in woodworking that have ancient origins but are still used today, like bead, flitch, cope etc. It now seems to be morphing into a general glossary of woodworking terms, many of which have articles of their own, such as dado etc. Some of the definitions given are either too general or highly debatable, if not plain incorrect, such as "drill : tool or process of cutting holes less than 1 quarter inch inch in diamneter". I think it needs to be culled, perhaps to just a selection of particularly odd words. SilentC 02:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Agreed. Let's move slowly, though... perhaps picking out ten at a time, let it sit a day for editors to see, then move on? Just to avoid revert wars. ThuranX 02:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I've had another thought on it. We should make it a separate glossary and list it here. The Architecture one looks like a good model for it. SilentC 02:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
I like the idea of a separate glossary. BTW, most of our terms are arcane and have ancient origins and might sound odd to the uninitiated, so it's not surprising that the terminology section is getting out of hand. :-) Luigizanasi 04:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
It's done, as you have already noticed ;). Thanks for adding the wikiproject tag. I always forget that. Now people can go nuts and add all the words they can think of. SilentC 04:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Woodworkers section[edit]

I think we should only list names of notable woodworkers who would warrant an article in their own right. It should be a short list of influential woodworkers or furniture makers who are famous in their own right. I think one or two names in the list now are also debatable. Scott Phillips for example. Do we need to list every person who has hosted a woodworking show on TV? Being a good host does not make them influential woodworkers who deserve to be listed next to people like Tage Frid and James Krenov. Otherwise this just becomes a list of woodworkers that editors know or have heard of. I'm not sure people like Norm or David Marks should be there either because although they are part of popular woodworking culture, they haven't really been that influential in developing a style. More in popularising the field. I don't know, what do others think? I just don't want to see a lengthy list of people who, whilst possessing admirable skill, haven't really contributed much to shaping the craft. SilentC 21:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
This whole list should go, being replaced with maybe three categories: past, 20th century, contemporary. It's far better as a category(ies) than as a list. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
So we would assign each wiki article about a notable woodworker to one of those three categories and then just have the category names listed? If so, sounds good to me. SilentC (talk) 00:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Reversion[edit]

I see no need for a list of tools on the main woodworking page. A holistic list would be pages long, listcrufty and an indiscriminate collection, and an abbreviated list would be incomplete. There are pages about tools, that's enough. Further, the notation of a few newer man-made wood materials in the lead seems pointless, and could be better expressed in a section on plywood steam-bending, or materials, perhaps hardwood, softwood, and man-made. ThuranX 03:42, 4 November 2007 (UTC) jhanikki_28 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.8.22 (talk) 13:46, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Notable Woodworkers list[edit]

Sections like this in articles are almost always a bad idea. Just to list the problems with this one;
  • No clear criteria established for notability. What makes someone worthy of inclusion other than an editor's personal opinion? What determines that someone should not be included in the list?
  • The article is Woodworking. It is not Random List of Woodworkers or [[Category:Woodworkers]].
  • If a woodworker was truly notable then they would have a Wikipedia article devoted to them. Some of these persons do not.
Consequently I would like to suggest that either a sensible criteria is established for inclusion in the list, or it is removed. Thoughts? --Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
"If a woodworker was truly notable then they would have a Wikipedia article devoted to them."
That's a serious falsehood. In particular, because it encourages the view that anything with a wiki article is necessarily notable.
That said though, I'm glad to see these lists removed. They belong better on something with a scope about woodworkers more than woodworking. Also the categorization mechanism works better there than list articles. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:07, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Saying that if someone was notable in woodworking, they would therefore have an article is not equivalent to saying, vice versa, if someone has an article, they are therefore notable in woodworking.--Escape Orbit (Talk) 08:27, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Of course it isn't. But this is Wikipedia, and such falsehoods are widely believed and argued in AfD. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

New navbox[edit]

I just started this, and don't quite know what I'm doing. Please help improve it. Then I will add it to articles. Many thanks.

For further information log on website :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Woodworking

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...