Blog List

Monday 27 June 2016

Lyctine (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) pests of timber in Australia: a literature review and susceptibility testing protocol.

Author
 Peters, B.C.
Creffield, J.W.
Eldridge, R.H.

Published Date
06/01/2002

Publication 
Name: Australian Forestry Publisher: Institute of Foresters of Australia Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Forest products industry Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2002 Institute of Foresters of Australia ISSN: 0004-9158

Abstract 

Several species of lyctine (powderpost) beetle are able to attack a range of hardwood timbers in Australia. Powderpost beetles infest only the starch-containing sapwood of certain hardwoods and do not infest softwoods. Attack by powderpost beetles on susceptible timber in Australia is almost inevitable and may continue until the food resource is completely utilised. Prevention of powderpost beetle attack is preferable to curative measures.

The Australian hardwood resource is increasingly being obtained from younger regrowth and planted forests rather than mature forests. The hardwood resource is also beginning to include species not previously used. There is no information on lyctine susceptibility of these species of eucalypts, hybrid eucalypts and some acacias. Some of these timbers are not widely utilised, yet may have unique properties for high-value niche applications on the world market. Consumer legislation places constraints on the sale and use of susceptible timber in the States of New South Wales and Queensland. Consequently, most of these timbers are regarded as provisionally susceptible in both States due to the lack of testing and historical record.

We review the biology, behaviour and management of the most common lyctine species Lyctus brunneus (Stephens) and discuss selected literature. A sampling and testing protocol to establish lyctine susceptibility of timber species is described for the first time in Australia, and its usefulness and limitations are discussed.


Introduction

Lyctine beetles belong to the sub-family Lyctinae in the family Bostrichidae. Bostrichids cannot produce cellulases and thus are restricted to sapwood, which the larvae reduce to a fine, soft powder, earning them the name powderpost beetles. The native bostrichid fauna in Australia includes several Lyctinae: Lyctus, Lyctodon, Trogoxylon, Tristaria and Minthea acanthacollis (Lawrence and Britton 1991). The sapwood of many Australian seasoned hardwood timbers is susceptible to attack by lyctine beetles (Bootle 1983; Brennan 1990; Creffield et al. 1995; Creffield 1996). The most common lyctine found attacking timber-in-service is Lyctus brunneus (Stephens) (Anon. 1935; Bootle 1983; Peters et al. 1996). The two most authoritative documents on susceptibility of the sapwood of Australian hardwoods to attack by lyctines are CSIRO Division of Forest Products (1950) and Fairey (1975). The former listed the lyctine susceptibility ratings for more than 500 species of hardwood timbers used throughout Australia, and the latter gave ratings for more than 250 commercial timbers used in New South Wales (NSW). Generally, these ratings refer to the susceptibility of sapwood to attack by L. brunneus under Australian conditions, and include both laboratory testing and information supplied by officers concerned with the utilisation of wood. Based on these ratings, the States of NSW (Timber Marketing Act 1977, TMA) and Queensland (Timber Utilisation and Marketing Act 1987, TUMA) place constraints on the sale and use of susceptible timber.

The Australian hardwood resource is, however, increasingly being obtained from younger regrowth and planted forests rather than mature forests. Creffield et al. (1995) conducted laboratory bioassays on the susceptibility of air-dried sapwood specimens, from trees of both regrowth and mature karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor F. Muell.) and jarrah (E. marginata Donn ex Sm.), to attack by L. brunneus. A revision of previously published ratings for both karri and jarrah was recommended. Furthermore, these authors recommended that a re-assessment of the susceptibility to L. brunneus of all commercially available hardwood timber species be undertaken, particularly if use of regrowth resource of these species is intended.

The hardwood resource is beginning to include species not previously utilised. There is substantial scope for inland Australian farmland to create new income streams from limited sustained harvesting and use of several naturally occurring timbers in the region. For instance, as part of the NSW Salinity Strategy, State Forests of NSW has recently initiated studies on the selection of tree species and the economic value of trees in the 500-700 mm rainfall zone of NSW. The Australian Low Rainfall Tree Improvement Group is intending to produce improved stock of a range of dryland eucalypts. Species of interest from these studies, for which there is no information on lyctine susceptibility, include E. argophloia Blakely, E. cladocalyx F. Muell., E. occidentalis Endl. and E. sideroxylon A. Cunn. ex Woolls subsp. tricarpa L. Johnson as well as a range of hybrid eucalypts and Acacia mearnsii de Willd. Some of these timbers are not widely utilised, yet may have unique properties for high-value niche applications on the world market.

One issue that has emerged from an effort to establish basic resource and market information on these selected native hardwoods is the determination of lyctine susceptibility. Processing and marketing of these timbers would become more expensive and complicated if there were a legal obligation under either TMA or TUMA to treat the sapwood with preservative, especially if it were not necessary. Currently, most of these timbers are regarded as provisionally susceptible due to the lack of testing and historical record, but recent testing (Peters and Fitzgerald, unpublished data) has indicated that some species may be nonsusceptible. For this reason, a testing procedure to establish lyctine susceptibility is necessary.


We examine aspects of the biology, behaviour and management of L. brunneus in Australia, the most common lyctine species, drawing largely on reviews by Graf (1987), Brennan (1990) and Wylie and French (1991) and selected literature from elsewhere. Other species are also discussed in less detail. For the first time in Australia, a sampling and testing protocol to establish lyctine susceptibility of timber species is described.

The powderpost beetle Lyctus brunneus (Stephens)

Description

The powderpost beetle is a cosmopolitan species which appears to have been first recorded from Brazil (Roughley and Welch 1929). Adults are up to 7 mm long, dark brown, shiny, flattened, elongate insects (Gerberg 1957a) (Fig. 1). They have a distinct head and the terminal segments on their antennae have a clubbed appearance. Larvae are cream coloured with brown head and jaws and three pairs of small jointed legs; on hatching, they are about 0.5 mm long and straight-bodied but later become C-shaped (Fig. 2). Iwata and Nishimoto (1981, 1982) give details of the external morphology and surface structure of L. brunneus eggs, larvae, pupae and adults.

Biology

Powderpost beetles are pests of the sapwood of certain hardwood timber species. Different species display minor differences in appearance, habits and longevity (Froggatt 1926).

After mating, the female beetle seeks a suitable place for egg laying and bites the wood transversely, leaving a series of grooves ('tasting marks') on the surface (Hickin 1975). These tasting marks may serve to determine whether the timber contains starch, the essential larval dietary requirement, and they also expose wood pores for subsequent egg laying (Fisher 1929; Parkin 1936; Gay 1953; Bletchly 1960a; Rosel 1969a). According to Ito and Hirose (1978) and Ito (1983), both males and females make tasting marks. Using her ovipositor the female lays into the open pores of the sapwood. In L. planicollis LeConte each egg takes about 45 s to be laid (Smith 1956). Each female may lay a total of 70 eggs, with a usual limit of three eggs in any pore (Gay 1953). The number of eggs laid is positively related to the number of tasting marks (Ito and Hirose 1978). Eggs are deposited at depths of 1.0-6.5 mm in the wood pores, preferentially from a transverse surface, but also through radial and tangential faces (Gay 1953).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Eggs hatch after about 14 days and larvae feed on the starch in the sapwood until fully grown (Beesley 1956). Tunnels usually follow the grain of the wood and only the larval stage destroys timber (Froggatt 1903). The development period for larvae varies from 2-18 months depending on temperature, humidity and the supply of starch in the sapwood. Under adverse conditions the life cycle may take from 30-48 months or longer in the Northern Hemisphere (Gerberg 1957b).

Fully-grown larvae tunnel towards the wood surface and excavate small oval cells where pupation takes place. Two to three weeks later, mature beetles begin to emerge through the surface of infested timber, making a round hole (1-2 mm diameter) as each emerges. Unlike the damage of ambrosia beetles, these exit holes have no staining around their margins (Eldridge and Fairey 1974). Small piles of frass associated with the emergence holes may collect on the surface of infested timber or fall nearby. Emerging adults push a small amount of frass out, but larvae moving within the sapwood also cause frass to continue to fall from emergence holes and from cracks in the timber. Larvae can also cause frass to fall from cracks in the timber in the absence of adult emergence holes. Adult lyctines are sexually mature upon emergence. Copulation occurs soon afterwards, often crepuscularly or nocturnally rather than diurnally (Gerberg 1957a). Egg laying begins soon thereafter. Emergence holes expose pores into which eggs can be laid (Anon. 1935). Reinfestation of timber is common and may continue until the food resource is completely used up (Veitch 1933), usually within 4-5 y of felling.

Damage

Lyctine beetles attack only the sapwood of certain hardwood (pored) timbers and do not generally attack softwood (non-pored) timbers (Boas 1947). However, the kauri pines Agathis robusta and A. palmerstonii are attacked by L. brunneus under restricted natural conditions: the presence of pith or bark in combination with abnormally high starch levels (Heather 1970). Attack by L. africanus Lesne on pine timber was induced by impregnation with soluble starch (Khalsa et al. 1962, 1965). Oviposition occurred in resin canals and on the surface, but larval development was limited by the small amount of starch added. Successful breeding was reported in an artificial 'biscuit' medium of wheat flour and yeast. Generally, lyctine beetles are readily cultured and methods for producing a large and continuous supply of test beetles which are freshly emerged, easily collected and free from parasites are based on Harris and Taylor (1960) in Great Britain, and Rosel (1962) in Australia. Other examples of culturing methods are Kuhne (1981) and Iwata and Nishimoto (1982).

Evidence of infestation

In Australia, attack by powderpost beetles on susceptible timber is almost inevitable. Most attack takes place at the sawmill, in logs or sawn timber that are drying (Tooke 1953). Evidence of infestation may not become apparent until the timber is in service and adults begin to emerge, usually within the first 18 mo of service life. Complaints from consumers result and the reputation of the supplier may suffer (Anon. 1959). Infested timber contains numerous galleries packed with fine powdery frass. The whole of the infested sapwood may be reduced to powder leaving only a shell of wood on the outside, perforated by emergence holes. Small piles of frass may be found where a gallery has broken the surface or where an adult beetle has emerged. The frass is smooth and floury (not gritty) when rubbed between the fingers and may continue to accumulate for many years after infestation has ceased. Infestation may occur anywhere in the structure where susceptible timber has been used (for example, in sub-floor areas, living space, roof space, or in furniture and artefacts). In new houses, emergence holes may appear in the lining materials (for example, in plasterboard and panelling) and joinery (Forests Commission, Victoria 1981). Adults emerging from the hardwood framing beneath make such holes. Borer damage to supporting timber in mines can be a major cause of timber failure (Yule and Kennedy 1978).

Wood variables affecting susceptibility to the powderpost beetle

Generally, three variables govern susceptibility to lyctine attack in sapwood: pore size, starch content and moisture content (Cymorek 1966).

Pore size

Only hardwoods have pores and lyctines attack only the sapwood of hardwood species with pores larger than the diameter of the ovipositor of the female. Susceptible hardwood species were originally thought to have pores larger than the diameter of the egg (Clarke 1928, 1929; Fisher 1929). Now, however, the pore-ovipositor relationship (Parkin 1934) is the favoured hypothesis (Abood et al. 1993). The average diameter of the ovipositor of L. brunneus is about 80 [micro]m (Tooke and Scott 1944) with a minimum of 56 [micro]m (Parkin 1933). No timber species with vessel diameters < 65-70 [micro]m were susceptible to L. brunneus attack (Hedjazi and Soleymani 1967). In India, the oviposition of L. africanus on the tangential and radial faces of 52 species of timber was studied (Chowdhury 1933); eggs were laid only in those pores in which both tangential and radial diameters were more than 130 [micro]m, the maximum diameter of the eggs. In China, Shi and Tan (1987) listed 168 tree species in 103 genera and 39 families attacked by 8 species of Lyctinae: Lyctus brunneus; L. africanus; L. sinensis; L. linearis; Minthea rugicollis; Lyctoxylon japonum; Trogoxylon impressum and T. aequale. Species with pores < 25 [micro]m (e.g. Aquifoliaceae, Theaceae, Hamamelidaceae and Symplocaceae) were not susceptible to attack by these lyctines. The minimum pore diameter for oviposition of L. brunneus in Australia is about 90 [micro]m (Cummins and Wilson 1934).

Starch content

Starch is the main food reserve substance of the plant and is present in the sapwood only (Wilson 1932). The quantity varies from tree species to tree species, from tree to tree, within the tree, from year to year, and, importantly, from season to season in all trees and particularly in deciduous species (Wilson 1935). For Northern-hemisphere hardwoods, starch is most abundant in winter (Wilson 1932). If felled timber is kept as a log for about a year, the starch is depleted completely from the sapwood, rendering it immune to lyctine infestation (Wilson 1932; Bletchly 1960b).

Susceptible timber species must contain sufficient starch to nourish the developing larvae (Taylor 1951). The heartwood is never infested, although adults may emerge through it. Lyctine larvae cannot digest the constituents of the cell wall (Campbell 1929) and starch is the principal component of their food (Wilson 1932, 1933). Polysaccharides can be converted effectively into sugar by the gut enzymes of lyctine larvae and used for growth and development (Campbell 1935). The degree of lyctine attack is therefore related to the starch concentration (Cummins and Wilson 1935; Bamber and Erskine 1965). Natural variation in the starch content (Bamber and Humphreys 1961) may result in the starch content being below a threshold level which can support lyctine infestation, although the thresholds are undefined.

About 55% of the 116 species listed by the NSW Division of Wood Technology as resistant to L. brunneus had a mean pore diameter >90 [micro]m (Bamber and Erskine 1965). The standard deviation increased with increasing mean pore diameter. Small pore size cannot therefore be a cause of resistance, and low starch content of the sapwood was thought to be a probable factor (Bamber and Erskine 1965). Lyctus discedens Blackburn can attack timbers with a pore size smaller than that required for L. brunneus. Consequently, the starch content of the wood is the predominantly important factor governing lyctine attacks in northern Queensland, where L. discedens occurs (Brimblecombe 1947a).

The distribution of starch along and around the bole of a spotted gum (E. maculata Hook.) tree was studied experimentally; samples taken at breast height from normally growing trees indicated the starch content throughout the bole at the time of sampling (Brimblecombe 1940). However, at least two samples taken on different aspects were recommended for reliable results. The starch concentration in the sapwood of eucalypts decreases above breast height (Hillis et al. 1962), but not in Western Australian sheoak trees Allocasuarina fraseriana (Miq.) L. Johnson (Creffield et al. 1987). Timber species in Queensland, which normally store a large amount of starch in the sapwood, do not naturally reduce the starch content to the level of Lyctus immunity (Brimblecombe 1945).

Brimblecombe (1961) studied eleven species of Eucalyptus and two of Lophostemon (Tristania) and showed that trees of the species known to be moderately or heavily attacked by L. brunneus contained abundant starch throughout the sapwood continuously during the year. The species liable to light attacks contained sufficient starch to support the insects only during periods of peak starch content. Generally, primary peaks in starch content occurred during the summer and secondary peaks in late winter. Most species showed a higher primary peak in alternate years. Lowest starch content occurred in late autumn or early winter and in this period some species were devoid of starch. Similarly, Humphreys and Humphreys (1966) demonstrated that the sapwood starch content of flooded gum (E. grandis (Hill) Maiden) followed a pattern of seasonal variation resembling that of other coastal species, reaching a peak in spring and early summer and the lowest point in late autumn. There was no relationship between starch content and flowering of eucalypts (Brimblecombe 1946a). A chemical test, using iodine, for the detection of starch in sapwood is presented in Australian Standard AS 1604.1 (2000, Appendix A). Creffield et al. (1995) used the intensity of colouration caused by the iodine reaction to grade the concentration of starch present in the sapwood of karri into not detected, low, medium or high; older trees were found to contain more starch than younger trees.


Moisture content

Wood with about 15% moisture content is most suitable for development of larvae, although the female beetle will lay within the range 8-25% (Parkin 1943a; Bootle 1983). Howick (1968) suggested a more restricted range of 10-20%. Eggs can be laid and larvae will feed and develop in comparatively moist timber (Fisher 1928). Beeson and Bhatia (1937) concluded that the larvae of L. brunneus would thrive within the range of 10-50%, the higher moisture content being the more favourable, and that wood of less than 10% moisture content would not be attacked. Higher moisture content increases total beetle emergences, but does not affect average time till emergence (Smith 1955).

Economic species

Of the species found in Australia, L. brunneus is the most destructive and most commonly encountered. Others include L. discedens Blackburn, L. planicollis LeConte, L. parallelocollis Blackburn and Tristaria grouvellei Reitter. Campbell (1963) recorded observations on the biology, especially pre-oviposition behaviour, oviposition, larval eclosion and duration of life cycle, of T. grouvellei. The Malayan powderpost beetle Minthea rugicollis (Walker), which was often found in rainforest hardwoods imported from South-East Asia (Froggatt 1920, 1924), is now established in Queensland. Minthea rugicollis is an apparently tropicopolitan species (Gerberg 1957a) of particular importance in Malaysia (Browne 1939), where it causes extensive damage to rubberwood (Norhara 1981; Abood et al. 1993). Exotic lyctines are frequently intercepted at the Port of Brisbane (Wylie and Yule 1977; Wylie and Peters 1987). A house in Cairns, Queensland, was fumigated in 1999 for Minthea reticulata Lesne, a species often mistaken for M. rugicollis (Ho 1993) (J. King pers. comm.). Similarly, a house in Bowen, Queensland was fumigated in 1998 for L. africanus (J. King pers. comm.).

Susceptibility lists

Cause et al. (1974, 1989), McDonald (1983) and Norton and Fett (1998) listed the lyctine susceptibility of Queensland timbers and Diehm (1987) the susceptibility of carving and turning timbers in Queensland. In NSW, Worley (1953), Fairey (1975) and the Forestry Commission of NSW (1987, 1988) published susceptibility lists. The CSIRO Division of Forest Products (1950), Kloot (1965) and Keating and Bolza (1982) have published national lists. Watson and Higgins (1950) listed the lyctine susceptibility of about 50 species of Australian timbers suitable for veneer production. Bolza and Keating (1972) produced a list for African timbers, Alston (1968) and Anon. (1969) for Fiji timbers and Calora (1973) for Philippine timbers.

Management of infestation

Overseas, four processes based on biological requirements of the pest have been developed as management strategies. Considerable reduction or complete depletion of the starch in green timber has minimised lyctine infestation and was achieved by: ringbarking ('girdling') of the standing tree; storing logs in the round with bark intact; storing logs under water; and special kiln treatment of converted stock (Parkin 1938a,b, 1943b; Phillips 1938; Parkin and Phillips 1939; Becker and Loebe 1961; Harris 1961; Esenther 1964).

In Australia, immunity from Lyctus infestation was easily and cheaply obtained in lemon scented gum and spotted gum trees in 6 and 8 months, respectively, by a light ringbarking at the top of the commercial bole (Brimblecombe 1947b). No trees died before depletion of the starch below the ring, and some lived for several months after depletion of starch had occurred. Wartime demands for timber necessitated the holding of large reserves of logs so that sawmills could always be kept working at full capacity. To protect the logs against L. brunneus attack and to minimise end splitting, bark was kept intact where possible and any exposed wood was sprayed with a hot creosote emulsion and afterwards coated with warm crude petroleum jelly (Brimblecombe 1946b). These treatments prevented serious degrade of logs for up to 22 mo in storage. Similarly, Humphreys and Humphreys (1966) showed that if logs are left with their bark on for one month or more, the chance of E. grandis sapwood being attacked by L. brunneus was very low. Starch levels in living karri are strongly influenced by rainfall, and they decline more rapidly in girdled trees than in those felled and left with an intact crown (Simpson and Barton 1991). These authors recommended that young trees should be felled during seasons when starch levels are low and storage procedures should be adopted that promote rapid loss of starch in order to reduce susceptibility to lyctine infestation. However, starch resorption induced by high ringbarking has not developed past the experimental stage as its costs and reliability compare unfavourably with immunisation by chemicals (Taylor 1955; Bamber and Erskine 1965).

Remedial treatments

Heat (French and Johnstone 1968), freezing (Peters et al. 1996) and fumigation (Burden and McMullen 1952) are effective remedial treatments, but do not provide protection against reinfestation. However, timber so treated, usually a manufactured article, can be protected by restoring the finish or by applying paint, varnish or wax polish to all exposed surfaces soon after treatment (Snyder 1946; Gardner et al. 1984). Registered residual insecticide can be sprayed, brushed or injected (Brimblecombe 1951) to the affected parts of unfinished timber surfaces (Ito et al. 1976; Creffield et al. 1983). Aqueous ammonia has also been used (Rosel 1971). Tamblyn and Rosel (1979) reported that in most timber species, spray treatment gives only negligible penetration on the side faces. They concluded that none of the insecticides tested was effective, and prevention of powderpost beetle infestation, using preservation processes, is preferable.

Preservation

The problem of marketing many rainforest timbers, often with wide sapwoods, has long been met by legislation requiring complete penetration of all susceptible wood with approved preservatives, or alternatively the limitation of susceptible wood to a defined maximum in building timbers (Tamblyn and Rosel 1979). In addition, the use of glue-line additives is the best method for protecting plywood from powderpost beetles (Tamblyn and Gordon 1950; Taylor 1968; Van Acker et al. 1990). Preservatives have included creosote (Froggatt 1925), arsenicals (Cummins and Wilson 1936; Rosel 1969b) and borates (Brimblecombe and Cook 1945; Cokley 1948a,b, 1951, 1960, 1995; McGregor 1958; Forestry Commission of NSW 1978; Williams and Mauldin 1985; Williams and Amburgey 1987; Cookson et al. 1998). Others (Moffat 1994) are now included in the relevant legislation following laboratory testing using the methods of, for example, Taylor (1961), European Standard (1992, 1993) and Australasian Wood Preservation Committee (1997).

Consumer legislation placing constraints on the sale and use of such timber was first enacted in NSW in the 1945 Timber Marketing Act, TMA, amended in 1977, and in Queensland in the 1949 Timber Users' Protection Act, amended in 1987 to the Timber Utilisation and Marketing Act, TUMA. Other States do not have similar legislation.

Generally, under TMA and TUMA,

* the sale of lyctine-susceptible timber is restricted;

* the use of lyctine-susceptible timber in the manufacture of articles is an offence;

* the sale of an article containing susceptible timber is an offence;

* the use of lyctine-susceptible timber in a building is restricted or prohibited; and

* the sale of a building containing lyctine-susceptible timber is restricted or prohibited.

In NSW, the sale of framing timber of which more than 25% of the perimeter of any cross-section comprises untreated lyctine-susceptible timber is an offence. In Queensland and NSW, all timber sold as impregnated with an approved preservative (immunised) at a timber preservation plant, must carry a registered brand. Imported timber and re-milled timber sold in these States as immunised must also carry a brand. With increasing quantities of timber being imported into Australia, both locally grown and imported stock will require assessment. Some other provisions apply to each Act, especially with regard to moisture content (Australasian Furnishing Research and Development Institute 1997).

Neither TMA nor TUMA has provision for remedial treatments. Therefore, remedial treatment will not absolve the parties concerned from any legal liability under legislation.

Discussion

Authoritative documents on susceptibility of the sapwood of Australian hardwoods to attack by lyctines use the categories of 'immune' and 'not susceptible, NS' through to 'susceptible, S' (CSIRO Division of Forest Products 1950; Fairey 1975). Within this range, categories of 'rarely susceptible, RS' and 'moderately susceptible, MS' were used. Cause et al. (1989) listed all species legally recognised under Schedule 2 of TUMA as being nonsusceptible with the symbol 'NS'. For the purposes of TUMA, all species not so scheduled are 'legally' (but not necessarily in fact) lyctine-susceptible. Cause et al. (1989) listed these species with the symbol '(s)', except where laboratory tests have confirmed susceptibility, where the symbol 'S' was used. Creffield et al. (1995) used four categories: 'not susceptible (NS)', 'slightly susceptible (S1)', 'moderately susceptible (S2)' and 'highly susceptible (S3)'. Two themes emerge from these works: there is a gradation of lyctine susceptibility and there is no process for testing and establishing the category of 'not susceptible (NS)'. Importantly, Fairey (1975) noted that the trees used in the earlier CSIRO work were selected at random with no attention being given to whether or not the sapwood contained starch.

Details of a sampling and testing protocol to establish lyctine susceptibility of timber species, based on this literature review, are given in the Appendix. Whilst criteria by which the lyctine susceptibility of timbers can be assessed are provided, we acknowledge that the extent of field collection in space and time must be extensive before the category NS can be assigned. Practical experience from the market-place will be difficult to obtain if preservative treatment of sapwood entering the marketplace is a legal requirement.

Changing the status of species legally recognised as being nonsusceptible under TMA and TUMA is not merely a technical decision, but involves commercial and regulatory consideration. For example, Tasmanian oak E. obliqua S, mountain ash E. regnans NS, and alpine ash E. delegatensis S are sold commercially as Tasmanian oak. Under TUMA, all are categorised as susceptible because they cannot be readily distinguished anatomically from one another and the susceptibility of alpine ash varies across its natural habitat: in Tasmania, S; NSW, S; and Victoria, NS (Fairey 1975). Additionally, preservative treatment of sapwood rated S1 may be important for high value niche applications, but not for framing timber. The sampling and testing protocol is, however, likely to provide a useful tool for establishing lyctine susceptibility of timber species generally not currently utilised or being obtained from younger regrowth forests.

Appendix: Sampling and testing protocol to establish resistance of timber species to lyctine (powderpost) beetles

Foreword

A field sampling method and a laboratory testing method, which provide a basis for the assessment of natural susceptibility of timbers to lyctine attack, are described in this protocol. Lyctine (powderpost) beetles (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) infest only the starch-containing sapwood of certain hardwoods. Generally, three conditions govern susceptibility in sapwood: pore size, starch content and moisture content. Only hardwood species with pores larger than the diameter of the ovipositor of the female beetle are infested. In Australia, hardwood species with pores < 90 [micro]m appear resistant to Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Susceptible timber species must contain sufficient starch to nourish the developing larvae. The quantity of starch present varies from tree species to tree species, between trees, within the tree, from year to year, and, importantly, from season to season. Variation in the starch content may result in a starch level below the threshold necessary to support lyctine infestation. The collection, handling and preparation of timber samples for a bioassay to assess the natural susceptibility of timbers to lyctine infestation are described.

The species Lyctus brunneus has been chosen as the test species because of its cosmopolitan occurrence as an important wood destroying pest and because it can be readily cultured in the laboratory. If, for particular reasons, other lyctines are required, for example Lyctus discedens Blackburn or Minthea rugicollis (Walker), the same test procedure can be used.

Criteria by which the lyctine susceptibility of timbers can be assessed are provided. In making this assessment, the geographic extent of field collection and temporal variation should be taken into account. Results from the bioassay should be compared with practical experience, where possible.

Section 1. Scope and general

1.1 Scope and application

A field sampling method and laboratory testing method, which provide a basis for the assessment of natural susceptibility of timbers to lyctine attack, are described in this protocol. Lyctus brunneus (Stephens) is used as the test powderpost beetle. This protocol is intended for use by the timber industry, assessment providers and approval authorities where the lyctine susceptibility of a timber is unknown or uncertain. Results from this protocol should be compared with practical experience, where possible. Assessments shall be undertaken by providers having the appropriate facilities, and shall be carried out by persons having relevant experience and expertise in the methodology of bioassays with insects.

1.2 Referenced documents

The following documents are referred to in this protocol.

Australasian Furnishing Research and Development Institute Limited (AFRDI) (1997) Australian Timber Seasoning Manual. Third edition, G.C. Waterson (ed.). AFRDI, Newnham, Tasmania, 206 pp.

Australian Standard AS 2929 (1990) Test Methods--Guide to the Format, Style and Content. Standards Association of Australia, Sydney, 16 pp.

Australian Standard AS 1604.1 (2000) Specification for Preservative Treatment. Part 1: Sawn and Round Timber. Standards Association of Australia, Sydney. 44 pp.

Bamber, R.K. and Erskine, R.B. (1965) Relationship of Vessel Diameter to Lyctus Susceptibility in Some New South Wales Hardwoods. Research Note No. 15, Division of Forest Management, Forestry Commission of NSW. 18 pp.

Creffield, J.W., Brennan, G.K., Chew, N. and Nguyen, N.K. (1995) Reassessing the susceptibility of karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor) and jarrah (E. marginata) sapwood to attack by the powder post borer (Lyctus brunneus). Australian Forestry 58, 72-79.

European Standard (1993) Wood Preservatives. Determination of Protective Effectiveness against Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Application by Impregnation (Laboratory Method). European Standard EN 20-2. 20 pp.

Rosel, A. (1962) Laboratory breeding of Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Pest Technology, Pest Control and Pesticides 4(4), 78-82.

1.3 Definitions

For the purposes of this protocol the definitions below apply.

Experimental control: An element of an assessment procedure that is included to demonstrate the extent of lyctine response in a lyctine-susceptible timber test specimen.

Lyctine resistance: The absence of lyctine susceptibility.

Lyctine susceptibility: The demonstration of positive results in the laboratory bioassay, demonstrated by damage to the timber sample by lyctine feeding.

Regions: Differing areas in the natural, or plantation, range of a timber species.

Test specimen: A specimen prepared by drying and size reduction from the timber sample and on which the test is actually carried out.

Timber sample: A sample of timber, collected in the field, as prepared for sending to the laboratory and intended for inspection or testing. Equivalent to laboratory sample in Australian Standard AS 2929-1990.

Timber species: The botanical taxon of species, subspecies, cultivar, clone or hybrid used to describe a timber entity.

Section 2. Field sampling and laboratory testing

2.1 Scope of section

This section sets out the methods for determining the susceptibility of hardwood timber sapwood to lyctine attack. All tests done in accordance with this protocol shall be detailed in a report, including any variations of this protocol.

2.2 Principle

The bioassay involves exposure of test specimens to adult Lyctus brunneus under controlled laboratory conditions, and should include specimens prepared from a known susceptible timber as a control. Lyctus brunneus infests only the starch-containing sapwood of certain hardwoods with pores >90 [micro]m. Natural variation in the starch content can inhibit lyctine infestation. Field collections of timber samples covering the species' geographic range and allowing for temporal variation may be necessary to allow for this variation. Depletion of starch content after sample collection can inhibit lyctine infestation. Accordingly, the appropriate collection, handling and preparation techniques of timber for a bioassay must be applied.

2.3 Field sampling

2.3.1 Location

Timber samples shall be collected from regions throughout the natural distribution and plantation estates of the species.

Note: Differences in lyctine susceptibility of some timber species collected from the natural distribution and plantation estates have been demonstrated by Creffield et al. (1995). Many tree species exhibit genetic variation in various traits between and within populations from different areas in the natural, or plantation, range (regions). Therefore, it is necessary to sample more than one region, especially in wide-ranging species with disjunct distributions. Three or four regions should be sampled, preferably near the limits and in central parts of the range.

2.3.2 Timing

Timber samples shall be collected on sampling occasions at three-monthly intervals until lyctine resistance NS or lyctine susceptibility is demonstrated in the bioassay, or for two years, whichever comes first (see Clause 2.4.6).

Note: Lyctine susceptibility can vary from season to season and from year to year. Sample collections in January, April, July and October are suggested for regions with four seasons. In other regions, different sampling times may be more useful.

2.3.3 Field starch determination

The sapwood of each intended timber sample shall be assessed for starch concentration in the field using a semi-quantitative iodine test. Timber samples should be collected only when starch is detected.

Note: A suitable semi-quantitative iodine test is described in Australian Standard AS 1604.1 (2000, Appendix A). A hand lens (x10) may be necessary for detecting starch granules in wood.

2.3.4 Number of timber samples

At least two timber samples, one from the north side and one from the south side, shall be collected from each tree. Each sample shall extend from the bark to the heartwood. The minimum longitudinal dimension of the samples shall be 100 mm. Samples may be obtained from a standing tree at breast height or from a felled tree (only within 48 hours of felling because the starch content decreases with time in a felled tree) prior to conversion of logs. Samples shall be debarked immediately in the field.

Note: The timber samples may be cut from a scarf or a disk. Scarfs or disks may be cut from the butt, middle and top of the tree trunk, consistent with milling practices and saw-log dimension.

Timber samples shall be collected from at least ten trees from one region or from at least five trees from each of three or four regions during each sampling occasion (see Clauses 2.3.1 and 2.3.2). Samples shall be stored in a cool dry environment, to avoid sweating, prior to despatch.


Note: Sweating of the timber sample may enhance fungal or mould growth, decreasing starch reserves in the sample.

2.3.5 Timber sample records

Bone fide confirmation of tree species identification shall be recorded for each tree. An audit trail shall be maintained for each timber sample.

Note: The collection data should include tree species identification, name of collector, date of collection, location description (Global Positioning System (GPS) co-ordinates may be useful), site description, width of sapwood band, results of field starch determination and relevant comments. The age of the tree may be important (Creffield et al. 1995).

2.4 Laboratory testing

2.4.1 Timber sample drying

The timber samples shall be kiln dried rapidly to equilibrium moisture content (EMC) as described in the NOTE, thereby minimising fungal growth and starch depletion. The time taken will depend on the dimensions of the sample.

Note: To avoid unnecessary starch depletion, timber samples should be low-temperature kiln dried. A drying schedule whereby green timber samples are initially exposed to a temperature of 25[degrees]C, rising to no more than 50[degrees]C, should be adopted. Reference to the most suitable low-temperature drying schedule for the candidate timber substrate should be sought (AFRDI 1997).

2.4.2 Test specimen preparation

Test specimens, containing the full sapwood depth, shall be cut from each timber sample using a tungsten-tipped saw. Test specimens shall be free of knots and kino gum. Test specimens should be at least 25 mm wide x the full sapwood depth x 100 mm long in the direction of the grain.

Note: The test specimens will be irregular in shape, and, owing to variable sapwood depths, contain different sapwood volumes.

2.4.3 Laboratory pore size determination

Where there is little information on the pore size of the timber species, measurements shall be made. The tangential diameter of 75 pores in a section of sapwood from a minimum of ten test specimens shall be measured and the individual measurement for each pore recorded (see Bamber and Erskine 1965). From these measurements the mean diameter and the standard deviation shall be calculated. Where the mean pore size of the timber species is <70 [micro]m the timber species shall be deemed to be lyctine-resistant NS, for the purposes of this protocol, and there is no need for further testing.

2.4.4 Laboratory starch determination

The sapwood of each test specimen shall be assessed for starch concentration in the laboratory using a semi-quantitative iodine test and recorded. The concentration of starch present shall be assessed with the aid of a light microscope. Using the intensity of colouration caused by the iodine reaction, the starch concentration should be graded as not detected, low, medium or high.

Note: A suitable semi-quantitative iodine test is described in Australian Standard AS 1604.1 (2000, Appendix A). The grading of low, medium or high is subjective.

2.4.5 Bioassay materials

(a) Bioassay chamber: Glass jars shall be used as bioassay chambers. Suitable material to act as a beetle foothold shall be added to the bioassay chambers. One test specimen shall be placed into each jar and allowed to condition to an EMC (11-16%) in an insectary before being inoculated with L. brunneus adult beetles. Controls shall be in separate jars.

Notes:

1. Glass jars (1.2 L vol., 100 mm x 100 mm x 150 mm high) are suitable.

2. A thin layer of forest loam is a suitable beetle foothold.

3. Jars containing soil should be heat sterilised.

4. Test specimens can be conditioned to an EMC of 14% in an insectary (26[degrees]C, 70% relative humidity) for at least 7 days. (Source: Creffield et al. 1995).

(b) Bioassay chamber lid: The bioassay chambers shall have lids with a mite-proof seal. The lids shall contain a hole fitted with a mite-proof membrane, for example filter paper, which allows aeration and permits the test specimens to be maintained at EMC.

Notes:

1. A screw-top metal lid fitted with a paraffin-wax-impregnated-cardboard wad is suitable.

2. A 30 mm-diameter hole punched through the lid and the cardboard wad is suitable. (Source: Creffield et al. 1995).

(c) Lyctine collection: Recently emerged adult Lyctus brunneus adults that are robust and active shall be taken from culture at random and used in the bioassay.

Note: Culturing of Lyctus brunneus to obtain a regular supply of adults that have not already laid eggs requires care. Rosel (1962) and European Standard (1993) describe culturing techniques which experience has shown to be suitable.

(d) Insectary: An incubator (or room) shall be used with air circulation, and controlled at 26[degrees]C [+ or -] 1[degrees]C and 70% relative humidity (RH) [+ or -] 5% RH.

(e) Experimental control test specimens: At least one test specimen of known lyctine-susceptible sapwood shall be used as an experimental control during the bioassay to demonstrate continuing viability of the lyctine culture under the conditions of the bioassay. The experimental control test specimen should be at least 25 mm x 25 mm x 100 mm long in the direction of the grain.

2.4.6 Bioassay procedure

(a) Inoculations with beetles: Twenty recently-emerged L. brunneus beetles of unknown sex shall be placed onto each test and control specimen. This is the first inoculation. Three weeks after the first inoculation, a second inoculation shall be made.

Note: Replication of the inoculation provides an additional lyctine 'pressure' including, perhaps, more viable females. Additional control test specimen(s) (i.e. known susceptible species) should be included.

(b) Bioassay duration: The bioassay shall continue until adult emergence, or for at least 16 weeks, whichever occurs first.

(c) Assessment: At the termination of the bioassay, each test and control specimen shall be examined for adult emergence holes.

Note: Mature beetles emerge through the surface of infested timber, making a round hole (1-2 mm diameter) as each emerges. Small piles of frass associated with the emergence holes may collect on the surface of infested timber or fall nearby. Emerging adults push a small amount of frass out, but larvae moving within the sapwood also cause frass to continue to fall from emergence holes and from cracks in the timber. Larvae can also cause frass to fall from cracks in the timber in the absence of adult emergence holes.

In the absence of adult emergence holes, evidence of larval activity shall be examined by splitting each test specimen longitudinally and tangentially. Any larval channelling shall be recorded as number and length of tunnels. The extent of larval channelling shall be used as a semi-quantitative assessment.

(d) Assessment criteria: The assessment criteria shall be as follows.

1. The bioassay shall be deemed invalid if emergence holes are not present in the experimental control.

2. A rating of susceptible, S1 to S3, shall be given to test specimens when:

(i) emergence holes are present, S3; or

(ii) larval channelling is present, S1-S3 and further differentiated by the amount or intensity of channelling as:

* slightly susceptible, S1, attack confined to a small amount of larval channelling, with channels at least 10 mm in length along the vessel;

* moderately susceptible, S2, moderate amount of larval channelling; and

* highly susceptible, S3, complete destruction of the sapwood with broad, frass-packed larval galleries.

3. A tentative non-susceptible rating (ns) shall be given when a test specimen has no larval channelling.

2.5 Assessment report

An assessment report shall be prepared in accordance with AS 2929, and shall include the following:

(a) Name of assessment provider

(b) Name of client

(c) Dates of initiation and conclusion of assessment

(d) Name of timber species assessed

(e) Details of field sampling and laboratory testing methods

(f) Results

(g) Discussion of results, conclusions and recommendation with respect to lyctine susceptibility of the timber species assessed

(h) Date of report

(i) Number of pages; e.g. page --of--.

Acknowledgements

Helen Chamberlin and Chris Fitzgerald identified numerous databases. The Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation (FWPRDC); the Queensland Departments of Primary Industries, and Natural Resources and Mines; and State Forests of NSW provided financial support. Drs Derek Maelzer (University of Queensland), Ross Wylie and Judy King (QFRI) and Colin McKenzie (Timber Research and Development Advisory Council of Queensland, TRADAC) provided useful criticism of the manuscript. This assistance is gratefully acknowledged.

Revised manuscript received 4 March 2002


References

Abood, F., Berry, R.W. and Murphy, R.J. (1993) Minthea rugicollis (Walk.) (Coleoptera: Lyctidae): A pest of rubberwood. Paper presented at the 23rd International Research Group on Wood Preservation Annual Meeting, Harrogate, UK, Document No. IRG/ WP/1570-92. 14 pp.

Alston, A.S. (1968) Some Timbers of Fiji. Department of Forestry, Suva, Fiji. 59 pp.

Anon. (1935) Wood Borers in Australia. Part 1. Lyctus, or the Powder Post Borer. CSIR Division of Forest Products Trade Circular No.6. 2nd edn.

Anon. (1959) Lyctus Powder-post Beetles. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. Forest Product Research Laboratory Leaflet No. 3. Revised edn.

Anon. (1969) A Summary of the Properties of 34 Indigenous Timbers. Fiji Timbers, Department of Forestry, Suva No. 38. 5 pp.

Australasian Furnishing Research and Development Institute Limited (AFRDI) (1997) Australian Timber Seasoning Manual. 3rd edn. G.C. Waterson (ed.). AFRDI, Newnham, Tasmania. 206 pp.

Australasian Wood Preservation Committee (1997) Protocols for Assessment of Wood Preservatives. AWPC Publication, Melbourne, 24 pp.

Australian Standard AS 1604.1 (2000) Specification for Preservative Treatment. Part 1: Sawn and Round Timber. Standards Association of Australia: Sydney. 44 pp.

Bamber, R.K. and Erskine, R.B. (1965) Relationship of Vessel Diameter to Lyctus Susceptibility in Some New South Wales Hardwoods. Research Note No. 15, Division of Forest Management, Forestry Commission of NSW. 18 pp.

Bamber, R.K. and Humphreys, F.R. (1961) Sapwood starch levels associated with crown activity and damage. Paper presented at 10th Pacific Science Congress, Hawaii.

Becker, G. and Loebe, I. (1961) Susceptibility to heat of wood-destroying insect larvae. Anzeiger fuer Schaedlingskunde 34(10), 145-149.

Beesley, J. (1956) Common borers in building timbers. Part II. The lyctus (or powder post) borer. CSIRO Forest Products Newsletter No. 225.

Beeson, C.F.C. and Bhatia, B.M. (1937) On the biology of the Bostrychidae (Coleoptera). Indian Forestry Record (Entomology) 2, 223-323.

Bletchly, J.D. (1960a) Studying the eggs of Lyctus brunneus. Timber Technology 68, 29, 31.

Bletchly, J.D. (1960b) The susceptibility of hardwoods to Lyctus powderpost beetles and methods of control. Report of the 7th Commonwealth Entomological Conference, London, pp. 97-103.

Boas, I.H. (1947) The Commercial Timbers of Australia--Their Properties and Uses. CSIRO, Melbourne. 344 pp.

Bolza, E. and Keating, W.G. (1972) African Timbers: The Properties, Uses and Characteristics of 700 Species. CSIRO Division of Building Research, Melbourne. 723 pp.

Bootle, K.R. (1983) Wood in Australia--Types, Properties and Uses. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Sydney, Australia. 443 pp.

Brennan, G.K. (1990) Powder Post Borer (Lyctus spp.) Attack on Dry Timber--A Review. Western Australian Department of Conservation and Land Management, Wood Utilisation Research Centre. Report No. 19. 26 pp.

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1940) Determination of starch content of spotted gum trees. The Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 6, 110-113.

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1945) Investigations on starch in living trees of Queensland timber species in relation to control of the powder post beetle. Australian Timber Journal 11, 365-366, 388.

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1946a) The relationship between starch content and flowering of trees as a possible means of predicting honey flows. Australian Beekeeper 48, 93-97.

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1946b) Log storage of borer susceptible timbers. Australian Timber Journal 12, 212-213, 239.

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1947a) Lyctus (powder post) beetles in Queensland timbers. Queensland Agricultural Journal 65, 172-185. (Reprinted as Queensland Department of Agriculture and Stock Pamphlet No. 116. 15 pp).

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1947b) Starch depletion and death of spotted gum trees. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 13, 74.

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1951) Surface treatment against two common timber borers. Queensland Agricultural Journal 73, 215-217. (Reprinted as Queensland Department of Agriculture and Stock Advisory Leaflet No. 233. 3 pp.).

Brimblecombe, A.R. (1961) Seasonal starch variation in some Queensland hardwood timber species and its relation to Lyctus attack. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland 72, 59-67.

Brimblecombe, A.R. and Cook, G.L. (1945) Investigation of the boric acid treatment of white cheesewood (Alstonia scholaris). Australian Timber Journal 11, 329-331.

Browne, F.G. (1939) The common Malayan powder-post beetle, Minthea rugicollis Walk. (Coleoptera--Lyctidae). Malayan Forester 7, 107-120.

Burden, J.H. and McMullen, M.J. (1952) Immunisation of Timber by Fumigation with Methyl Bromide. Forestry Commission of New South Wales, Division of Wood Technology Project PZ-2 Final Report. 3 pp.

Calora, D.G. (1973) Susceptibility of sapwood of different Philippine woods to various species of powder-post beetles. Forpride Digest 2, 2, 53, 72.

Campbell, K.G. (1963) Notes on the biology of Tristaria grouvellei Reitter (Lyctidae: Coleoptera). Journal of the Entomological Society of Australia (NSW) 1, 28-31.

Campbell, W.G. (1929) The chemical aspect of the destruction of oak wood by powder post and death watch beetles--Lyctus spp. and Xestobium sp. Biochemical Journal 23, 1290-1293.

Campbell, W.G. (1935) The starch and related polysaccharides of certain hardwoods. Part 1. The preparation and properties of oak and walnut starch. Biochemical Journal 29, 1068-1080.

Cause, M.L., Weatherhead, T.F. and Kynaston, W.T. (1974) The Nomenclature, Density and Lyctus-Susceptibility of Queensland Timbers. Queensland Department of Forestry Pamphlet No. 13. 83 pp.

Cause, M.L., Rudder, E.J. and Kynaston, W.T. (1989) Queensland Timbers: Their Nomenclature, Density, and Lyctid Susceptibility. Queensland Forest Service Technical Pamphlet No. 2. 126 pp.

Chowdhury, K.A. (1933) The liability of some Indian timbers to Lyctus attack. Indian Forester 59, 164-170.

Clarke, S.H. (1928) On the relationship between vessel size and Lyctus attack in timber. Forestry 2, 47-53.

Clarke, S.H. (1929) Vessel size and the liability of woods to Lyctus attack. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. Forest Products Research. Bulletin No. 2. His Majesty's Stationery Office, London. 29-34.

Cokley, K.V. (1948a) Small scale commercial treatment of sawn timbers susceptible to attack by powder post beetle. Australian Timber Journal 14, 511, 560.

Cokley, K.V. (1948b) The use of borax as a lyctuscide in the treatment of susceptible timbers. Australian Timber Journal 14, 734-738, 745-751.

Cokley, K.V. (1951) Treatment schedules for the impregnation of timbers susceptible to the powder post beetle. Australian Timber Journal 17, 642-648.

Cokley, K.V. (1960) Summary of treatment processes for the preservation of timber against the powder post beetle (Lyctus brunneus Stephans). Queensland Department of Forestry. Unpublished report. 10 pp.

Cokley, K.V. (1995) Preserving our natural heritage--timber. PhD thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane. 590 pp.

Cookson, L.J., Scown, D.K. and McCarthy, K. (1998) Boron treatment methods for lyctid susceptible hardwoods grown in Tasmania. Paper presented at the 29th International Research Group on Wood Preservation Annual Meeting, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Document No. IRG/WP 98-30168. 12 pp.

Creffield, J.W. (1996) Wood Destroying Insects--Wood Borers and Termites. CSIRO Division of Forestry and Forest Products. 2nd edn. 44 pp.

Creffield, J.W., Greaves, H. and Howick, C.D. (1983) Boracol 40--a potential remedial and preventative treatment for lyctids. Paper presented at the 14th International Research Group on Wood Preservation Annual Meeting, Surfers Paradise, Australia, Document No. IRG/WP/1192. 7 pp.

Creffield, J.W., Brennan, G.K. and Chew, N. (1987) Susceptibility of air dried and high temperature dried Western Australian sheoak (Allocasuarina fraseriana) to attack by the powder post borer (Lyctus brunneus). Progress Report No. 1. CSIRO Division of Chemical and Wood Technology, Laboratory Report, 14 pp.

Creffield, J.W., Brennan, G.K., Chew, N. and Nguyen, N.K. (1995) Reassessing the susceptibility of karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor) and jarrah (E. marginata) sapwood to attack by the powder post borer (Lyctus brunneus). Australian Forestry 58, 72-79.

CSIRO Division of Forest Products (1950) Lyctus susceptibility list. Proceedings 5th Forest Products Research Conference, Melbourne, Topic 8B. 24 pp.

Cummins, J.E. and Wilson, H.B. (1934) The pore size (vessel diameter) of some Australian timbers and their susceptibility to attack by the powder post borer (Lyctus brunneus Stephens). Journal of CSIRO 7, 225-233.

Cummins, J.E. and Wilson, H.B. (1935) The starch content of some Australian hardwoods in relation to their susceptibility to attack by the powder post borer, Lyctus brunneus Stephens. Journal of CSIRO 8, 101-110.

Cummins, J.E. and Wilson, H.B. (1936) The preservation of timber against the attacks of the powder post borer (Lyctus brunneus Stephens) by impregnation with various chemicals. Journal of CSIRO 9, 37-56.

Cymorek, S. (1966) Experiments with Lyctus. Material und Organismen, Berl.: Suppl. No. 1 (Holz und Organismen), 391-413.

Diehm, W.I. (1987) Timbers for Carving and Turning. Queensland Department of Forestry Timber Note No. 22, 4 pp.

Eldridge, R.H. and Fairey, K.D. (1974) Timber Borers of Common Occurrence. Forestry Commission of New South Wales, Technical Publication No. 18. 7 pp.

Esenther, G.R. (1964) Effectiveness following kiln-drying of insecticides applied to green lumber to control Lyctus powder-post beetle attack. Forest Products Journal 14, 477-480.

European Standard (1992) Wood Preservatives. Determination of Protective Effectiveness against Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Application by Surface Treatment (Laboratory Method). European Standard EN 20-1. 20 pp.

European Standard (1993) Wood Preservatives. Determination of Protective Effectiveness against Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Application by Impregnation (Laboratory Method). European Standard EN 20-2. 20 pp.

Fairey, K.D. (1975) Lyctus susceptibility of the commercial timbers used in New South Wales. Forestry Commission New South Wales. Technical Publication No. 19. 8 pp. Revised edn.

Fisher, R.C. (1928) Timbers and their condition in relation to Lyctus attack. Forestry 2, 40-46.

Fisher, R.C. (1929) Lyctus Powder-post Beetle. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. Forest Products Research. Bulletin No. 2. His Majesty's Stationery Office, London. 1-46.

Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1978) The Immunisation of Timber against Attack by Powder Post Beetle (Lyctus brunneus) with Borates. Forestry Commission of New South Wales Technical Note No. 11 (revised by R.S. Johnstone). 5 pp.

Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1987) Timbers used in New South Wales for Domestic Buildings. Forestry Commission of New South Wales Technical Publication No. 6 (revised edn). 7 pp.

Forestry Commission of New South Wales (1988) Furniture Timbers of New South Wales. Forestry Commission of New South Wales Technical Publication No. 1 (revised edn). 4 pp.

Forests Commission, Victoria (1981) Borers in New Homes. Forests Commission, Victoria, Miscellaneous Publication. 9 pp.

French, J.R.J. and Johnstone, R.S. (1968) Heat sterilisation of blockstacked timber in wood-destroying insect control. Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 4, 42-46.

Froggatt, W.W. (1903) Some wood-boring beetles and their habits. Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales 14, 414-417.

Froggatt, W.W. (1920) The powder-post beetle and its parasite. Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales 31, 273-276.

Froggatt, W.W. (1924) Forest Insects. No. 4. Beetle borers obtained from timber imported into New South Wales from Borneo and the Philippines. Australian Forestry Journal 7, 283-286.

Froggatt, W.W. (1925) Protection from beetle depredations of timber while seasoning. Australian Forestry Journal 8, 298-299.

Froggatt, W.W. (1926) Forest insects. No. 23. Powder-post beetles of the family Lyctidae. Australian Forestry Journal 9, 204-210.

Gardner, W.D., Eldridge, R.H. and Peters, B.C. (1984) The effect of some processing operations on the lyctid susceptibility of spotted gum tool handles. Paper presented to 21st Forest Products Conference, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 6 pp.

Gay, F.J. (1953) Observation on the biology of Lyctus brunneus (Steph.). Australian Journal of Zoology 1, 102-140.

Gerberg, E.J. (1957a) A Revision of the New World Species of Powderpost Beetles Belonging to the Family Lyctidae. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 1157. 55 pp. + XIV Plates.

Gerberg, E.J. (1957b) Lyctid powder post beetle second only to termite in wood damage. Pest Control May. 2 pp.

Graf, E. (1987) Review of the literature on Lyctidae (Coleoptera). Paper presented at the 17th International Research Group on Wood Preservation Annual Meeting, Avignon, France, Doc. No. IRG/ WP/1211. 48 pp.

Harris, E.C. (1961) Kiln and air drying of European oak: effect on starch depletion and consequent susceptibility to Lyctus attack. Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 2(7), 3-14.

Harris, E.C. and Taylor, J.M. (1960) Powder-post beetles for test purposes. Timber Technology 68, 193-195, 197.

Heather, N.W. (1970) Susceptibility of Two Species of Agathis to Attack by Lyctus brunneus (Steph.). Queensland Department of Forestry Research Note No. 21. 6 pp.

Hedjazi, R. and Soleymani, P. (1967) The Natural Resistance of Some Wood Specimens to Lyctus brunneus. Bulletin, Faculty of Forestry, University of Teheran, Karadj No. 8. 51 pp.

Hickin, N.E. (1975) The Insect Factor in Wood Decay. 3rd edn, edited and revised by Robin Edwards. The Rentokil Library. Associated Business Programmes Ltd, London. 383 pp.

Hillis, W.E., Humphreys, F.R., Bamber, R.K. and Carle, A. (1962) Factors influencing the formation of phloem and heartwood polyphenols. Holzforschung 16, 114-121.

Ho, Y.F. (1993) Minthea reticulata, a species often mistaken for M. rugicollis in Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 6, 82-85.

Howick, C.D. (1968) Common borers in building timbers. Part VI. Bostrychid borers--'Auger' beetle. CSIRO Forest Products Newsletter No. 348.

Humphreys, F.R. and Humphreys, N. (1966) Starch levels in flooded gum sapwood. Australian Forest Research 2(1), 35-40.

Ito, T. (1983) Tasting behaviour of Lyctus brunneus (Stephens) (Coleoptera: Lyctidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 18, 289-292.

Ito, T. and Hirose, C. (1978) Observations on the selective oviposition of Lyctus brunneus (Stephens) with reference to the influence of carbohydrates. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 22, 68-73.

Ito, T., Funaki, Y. and Hirose, C. (1976) Efficacy of insecticides against lyctus powder-post beetle, Lyctus brunneus (Step). Botyu-Kagaku 41(3), 138-142.

Iwata, R. and Nishimoto, K. (1981) Observations on the external morphology and the surface structure of Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Part I--Larvae and Pupae. Kontyu 49, 542-557.

Iwata, R. and Nishimoto, K. (1982) Studies on the autecology of Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Part IV--Investigations on the composition of artificial diets for Lyctus brunneus (Stephens) (Col., Lyctidae). Materials and Organisms 17, 51-66.

Keating, W.G. and Bolza, E. (1982) Characteristics, Properties and Uses of Timbers. Volume 1. South-east Asia, Northern Australia and the Pacific. CSIRO Division of Chemical Technology, Melbourne. xxi + 362 pp.

Khalsa, H.G., Nigam, B.S. and Agarwal, P.N. (1962) Breeding of powder post beetle, Lyctus africanus Lense (Coleoptera) in an artificial medium. Indian Journal of Entomology 24, 139-142.

Khalsa, H.G., Nigam, B.S. and Agarwal, P.N. (1965) Resistance of coniferous timbers to Lyctus attack. Indian Journal of Entomology 33, 377-388.

Kloot, H. (1965) Revised strength grouping system. CSIRO Forest Products Newsletter No. 324. 4 pp.

Kuhne, H. (1981) Methods for culturing Lyctidae (Coleoptera). Material und Organismen, 16, 141-156.

Lawrence, J.F. and Britton, E.B. (1991) Coleoptera (beetles). In: CSIRO (ed.) The Insects of Australia. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne. 1137 pp.

McDonald, G. (1983) Lyctus Susceptible Species under the Timber Users Protection Act. Timber Note 8. Queensland Department of Forestry. 2 pp.

McGregor, G.H. (1958) Immunisation of timber against attack by powder post beetle (Lyctus brunneus) with borates. Forestry Commission NSW Technical Notes 11(3), 3-10.

Moffat, A.R. (1994) A determination of the toxic level of ACQ2100 wood preservative for the powder post borer Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Paper presented at the 25th International Research Group on Wood Preservation Annual Meeting, Bali, Indonesia, Document No. IRG/WP 94-20029. 5 pp.

Norhara, H. (1981) A preliminary assessment of the relative susceptibility of rubberwood to beetle infestations. Malaysian Forester 44, 482-487.

Norton, J. and Fett, S. (1998) The Timber Utilization and Marketing Act 1987: Sale and Use of Lyctid Susceptible Timber. Department of Primary Industries Forestry, Timber Note No. 31. 3 pp.

Parkin, E.A. (1933) Vessel diameter in relation to Lyctus attack. Empire Forestry Journal 12, 266.

Parkin, E.A. (1934) Observations on the biology of Lyctus powder-post beetles, with special reference to oviposition and egg. Annals of Applied Biology 21, 495-518.

Parkin, E.A. (1936) A study of the food relations of the Lyctus powderpost beetles. Annals of Applied Biology 23, 369-402.

Parkin, E.A. (1938a) The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack by Lyctus beetles. II A preliminary experiment upon the effect of girdling standing oak trees. Forestry 12, 30-37.

Parkin, E.A. (1938b) The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack by Lyctus beetles. III A second experiment upon the girdling of standing oak trees. Forestry 12, 117-124.

Parkin, E.A. (1943a) The moisture content of timber in relation to attack by Lyctus powder-post beetles. Annals of Applied Biology 30, 136-142.

Parkin, E.A. (1943b) The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack by Lyctus beetles. V The effect upon starch content of storing timber in the log. Forestry 17, 61-66.

Parkin, E.A. and Phillips, E.W.J. (1939) The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack by Lyctus beetles. IV A third experiment upon the girdling of standing oak trees. Forestry 13, 134-145.

Peters, B.C., King, J. and Wylie, F.R. (1996) Pests of Timber in Queensland. Queensland Forestry Research Institute, Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane. 175 pp.

Phillips, E.W.J. (1938) The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack by Lyctus beetles. I Starch, with special reference to its occurrence in timber. Forestry 12, 13-29.

Rosel, A. (1962) Laboratory breeding of Lyctus brunneus (Stephens). Pest Technology, Pest Control and Pesticides 4(4), 78-82.

Rosel, A. (1969a) Oviposition, egg development and other features of the biology of five species of Lyctidae (Coleoptera). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 8, 145-152.

Rosel, A. (1969b) The toxicity of arsenic to wood boring beetles of the family Lyctidae (Coleoptera). The Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 24, 44-49.

Rosel, A. (1971) A note on ammoniation and its influence on the susceptibility of starchy sapwood to Lyctus brunneus (Stephens) (Lyctidae-Coleoptera). Journal of the Institute of Wood Science 5(4), 47-48.

Roughley, T.C. and Welch, M.B. (1929) Wood Borers Damaging Timber in Australia. Technological Museum, Department of Education. Bulletin No. 8. 2nd edn. NSW Govt Printer. 27 pp.

Shi, Z.H. and Tan, S.Q. (1987) The susceptibility of Chinese hardwoods to powder post beetle attack and methods of control. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 23, 109-114.

Simpson, L.A. and Barton, A.F.M. (1991) Time dependence of starch levels in the sapwood of Eucalyptus diversicolor (karri) as: standing trees, stored saw-logs, ringbarked trees and trees felled without lopping. Holzforschung 45, 253-257.

Smith, R.H. (1955) The effect of wood moisture content on the emergence of southern lyctus beetle. Journal of Economic Entomology 48, 770-771.

Smith, R.H. (1956) A technique for studying the oviposition habits of the southern lyctus beetle and its egg and early larval stages. Journal of Economic Entomology 49, 263-264.

Snyder, T.E. (1946) Preventing Damage by Lyctus Powder-post Beetles. United States Department of Agriculture. Farmers' Bulletin No. 1477. 14 pp.

Tamblyn, N. and Gordon, A. (1950) Control of borer attack in plywood by the use of preservatives in the glue. CSIRO Forest Products News Letter No. 180, 1-2.

Tamblyn, N. and Rosel, A. (1979) Comparative tests of spray and dip-diffusion treatments for protection of eucalypt building timbers against Lyctus borers. International Journal of Wood Preservation 1, 11-14.

Taylor, J.M. (1961) Laboratory technique for testing wood preservatives. Pest Technology 3, 210-211, 215.

Taylor, J.M. (1968) Prevention of insect attack in plywood. Part 1: Lyctus attack in Obeche plywood. Part 2: Anobium attack in birch plywood. Wood 33(2), 3, 35-36, 43-44.

Taylor, K.L. (1951) What is 'Lyctus susceptible sapwood?' Forestry Commission of New South Wales, Division of Wood Technology, Technical Notes 5, 7.

Taylor, K.L. (1955) High ringing of trees to promote immunity of the sapwood to Lyctus attack. Forestry Commission of New South Wales, Division of Wood Technology Project FE-1 Final Report. 5 pp.

Timber Marketing Act (NSW) (1977) No. 72. NSW Government Printer. 25 pp. Reprinted 1989.

Timber Utilization and Marketing Act (Queensland) (1987) No. 30. Queensland Government Printer. 34 pp.

Tooke, F.G.C. (1953) The control of powder-post beetles in buildings. Farming in South Africa March. 5 pp.

Tooke, F.G.C. and Scott, M.H. (1944) Wood-boring Beetles in South Africa: Preventative and Remedial Measures. Union of South Africa Department of Agriculture and Forestry Bulletin No. 247. 37 pp.

Van Acker, J., Stevens, M. and Pallaske, M. (1990) Insect resistance of preservative treated tropical plywood against Lyctus. Paper presented at the 21st International Research Group on Wood Preservation Annual Meeting, Rotorua, New Zealand, Document No. IRG/WP/1453. 10 pp.

Veitch, R. (1933) Timber borers. Queensland Agricultural Journal 39, 122-127. (Reprinted as Queensland Department of Agriculture and Stock Entomological Leaflet No. 24. 6 pp.).

Watson, A.J. and Higgins, H.G. (1950) Suitability of Australian Timbers for Veneer. CSIRO Australia. Bulletin No. 260. 23 pp.

Williams, L.H. and Amburgey, T.L. (1987) Integrated protection against lyctid beetle infestations. Part IV--Resistance of boron-treated wood (Virola spp.) to insect and fungal attack. Forest Products Journal 37(2), 10-17.

Williams, L.H. and Mauldin, J.K. (1985) Integrated protection against lyctid beetle infestations. Part II--Laboratory dip-diffusion treatment of unseasoned banak (Virola spp.) lumber with boron compounds. US Dept Agriculture Forest Service Research Note SO-313.

Wilson, S.E. (1932) 'Powder-post' beetles. Nature 130, 22-23.

Wilson, S.E. (1933) Changes in the cell contents of wood (xylem parenchyma) and their relationships to the respiration of wood and its resistance to Lyctus attack and to fungal invasion. Annals of Applied Biology 10, 661-690.

Wilson, S.E. (1935) The fate of reserved materials in the felled tree. Forestry 9, 96-105.

Worley, K.H. (1953) New South Wales brushwood groups. Forestry Commission NSW Technical Notes 7(1), 8-9.

Wylie, F.R. and French, J.R.J. (1991) An Annotated Bibliography of Forest Entomology in Australia to 1988. Queensland Forest Service: Brisbane. 385 pp.

Wylie, F.R. and Peters, B.C. (1987) Development of contingency plans for use against exotic pests and diseases of trees and timber 2. Problems with the detection and identification of pest insect introductions into Australia, with special reference to Queensland. Australian Forestry 50, 16-23.

Wylie, F.R. and Yule, R.A. (1977) Insect quarantine and the timber industry in Queensland. Australian Forestry 40, 154-166.

Yule, R.A. and Kennedy, M.J. (1978) Control of borers in mine timbers. Queensland Government Mining Journal 79, 357-360.

B.C. Peters (1), J.W. Creffield (2) and R.H. Eldridge (3)

(1) Queensland Forestry Research Institute, PO Box 631, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia Email: Brenton.Peters@dpi.qld.gov.au

(2) CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Private Bag 10, Clayton South, Victoria 3169, Australia

(3) State Forests of NSW, PO Box 100, Beecroft, New South Wales 2119, Australia


For further details log on website :
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/article/Australian-Forestry/197494322.html

What Is the Goal in Meditation?

What Is the Goal in Meditation?
Young woman meditating. Photo Credit Digital Vision/Digital Vision/Getty Images
Meditation is a powerful set of techniques for calming and quieting the mind. Meditation involves creating a mode of consciousness in which the practitioner is not focused on actively thinking but is instead focused on sitting and breathing, which allows him to clear his mind. Some people meditate for spiritual purposes, while others may meditate just for the sense of relaxation and calm it provides.

Spiritual Goals

Many forms of meditation have their roots in spiritual or religious disciplines. Modern meditative practices are strongly influenced by Hindu and Buddhist philosophy, but other religions also have a tradition of meditation. Within a religious or spiritual context, practitioners believe that meditation opens the mind to divine influence or serves as a form of prayer or worship. For these practitioners, the goal of meditation is an increased understanding, often a purely intuitive understanding, of spiritual truths.

Stress Relief

Modern practitioners of meditation may employ it as a form of stress reduction. Meditation often involves techniques of physical and mental relaxation, including deep breathing and sitting in a relaxed posture. For these practitioners, meditation quiets the worries of daily life and provides a sense of relaxation. As a result, they feel better able to deal with the problems they face. The goal of meditation for these practitioners is to build confidence, increase focus and concentration, and reduce anxiety.

Health Benefits

Medical evidence for the health benefits of meditation is tentatively positive. A 1992 study in the "American Journal of Psychiatry" found that meditation reduced symptoms of anxiety and panic in some people with anxiety disorders, while a 2007 report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services found some evidence that meditation helps to improve cardiovascular health. It called for further research. For some practitioners, therefore, the goal of meditation is to improve health.

Personal Goals

Meditation goals are as diverse as meditation practitioners. In addition to the common goals of stress reduction, health and spirituality, many people meditate to achieve a specific goal, such as improved performance at school, at work or in sports. In cases where someone is trying to achieve a specific goal, she may meditate on that goal, focusing her attention on it, sometimes in the form of an affirmation or short statement related to the goal.

www.livestrong.com

How do I Clean Lungs After Quitting Smoking?

How do I Clean Lungs After Quitting Smoking?
Cleaning your lungs after you quit smoking will take some time. Photo Credit thorax x-ray of the lungs image by JoLin from <a href='http://www.fotolia.com'>Fotolia.com</a>
If you have been a regular smoker, chances are that your lungs have been scarred. Because of the scarring, your breathing will be weakened and the oxygen content that your body receives will be reduced. There are a variety of natural options that can help you in your effort to detoxify your lungs. These natural remedies can begin to clear your lungs of the various toxins that have invaded the lungs after smoking for an extended period of time.

Step 1

Stay away from any unnecessary exposure to carbon monoxide and second-hand smoke. Keeping yourself away from those who are smoking will not only help you beat the temptation to smoke yourself, but will also aid in keeping your lung regeneration on track.

Step 2

Eat pineapples. Bromelin, a component found in pineapples, works as a cleanser for your lungs. It allows you to take in more oxygen and take deeper breaths by increasing the lungs' elasticity.

Step 3

Examine your eating habits and make changes when necessary. There are a number of foods, spices and herbs that have a positive effect on your lungs. Some of the foods that can be added to your diet include rosemary, avocados, thyme, cayenne, ginger and horseradish. A dietitian or doctor can give advice on the foods that will be best for you and your lungs.

Step 4

Begin a physical exercise routine. If you have been smoking for a number of years or are not accustomed to exercise, start will small amounts of exercise and gradually increase what you do over time. As you exercise, you will notice that build-up from your lungs, such as phlegm and mucus, will become discharged through coughing. This is a good thing as your lungs are naturally getting rid of these unwanted substances. To get the best results, make exercise a part of your normal daily routine.

Step 5

Perform breathing exercises. There are a number of breathing exercises that can aid in improving the functions of the lungs. Some examples include using a spirometer device, breathing through the diaphragm or the pursed lip technique. Experiment with various breathing techniques and relaxation exercises to discover which ones work best for you. Check with your physician to see about beginning a regimen in which a respiratory therapist will work with you personally to teach you various breathing techniques.


www.livestrong.com

Does Metabolism Return After Quitting Smoking?

Does Metabolism Return After Quitting Smoking?
Smoking kills 1,200 people every day in the United States. Photo Credit Stockbyte/Stockbyte/Getty Images
Despite the many well-known positive benefits of quitting smoking, potential weight gain may be a concern to those contemplating kicking the habit. Smoking increases your metabolism, and when you stop smoking your metabolism reverts back to normal. Temporary weight gain may occur as you adjust to burning calories at a slower rate than you grew accustomed to as a smoker. Lifestyle adjustments can help prevent or slow weight gain when you quit smoking.

Nicotine

Nicotine in cigarettes revs up metabolism in smokers. Nicotine in the blood is metabolized and excreted from the body quickly so it doesn't take long for the effects of nicotine deficiency to become evident. The approximate half-life of nicotine in the blood is two hours. It can linger for up to eight hours after the last cigarette since smoking has an accumulative effect and represents a multiple dosing situation, explains the American Heart Association.

Effects

Each cigarette you smoke immediately causes your body to use calories faster. As your metabolic rate slows when you quit smoking it may become quite sluggish for a few weeks or months as it adjusts to normal levels. During this period you may actually burn calories at a slower than average rate, explains SmokeFree.gov, a website published by the University of Southern Florida.

Weight Gain

Weight gain is not inevitable when you quit smoking. Putting on pounds is most common in the first six months after quitting. Approximately 50 percent of smoker gain less 10 lb. when they quit while about 10 percent put on as much as 30 lb. As a general rule heavier smokers are apt to put on more weight than lighter smokers once they call it quits. Feeling hungrier and possibly craving more high-sugar, high-fat snacks can contribute to weight gain on top of a slower metabolism. Weight loss may occur as people get used to being smoke-free.

Recommendations

Getting regular exercise and eating a nutritious diet that includes fruits, vegetables and whole grains may help stave off excess weight as you adjust to burning fewer calories each day. Physical activity can also help diminish withdrawal symptoms associated with quitting smoking, points out the Weight Control Information Network, a website published by the National Institutes of Health. You may even notice you are breathing a little easier during exercise. Aim for at least 30 minutes of aerobic activities like brisk walking or jogging most days of the week.

www.livestrong.com

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...