Blog List

Friday 15 July 2016

Bareroot versus container stocktypes: a performance comparison

Author

  • Steven C. Grossnickle 
  • , Yousry A. El-Kassaby

  • Abstract 

    This review examines the published work on bareroot and container stocktypes in forest restoration programs. The objective was to define overall trends between these two stocktypes and describe what they mean in terms of available information on their nursery and field performance. Stock quality assessments show bareroot seedlings have larger shoot systems because they are typically grown at lower densities, and in many instances longer timeframes, than container seedlings. Container systems typically produce seedlings having a lower shoot to root ratio and a greater root growth potential, conferring greater drought avoidance potential. However, assessments of stress resistance and nutrition found no conclusive evidence that either stocktype has a performance advantage, other than the container plug acting as a source of water and nutrient storage available for outplanting performance. Bareroot seedlings are more sensitive to handling practices of lifting, storage, transport and planting and these practices can negatively affect their performance. Container seedlings can have a higher level of field survival which is related, in part, to their greater drought avoidance potential, thereby overcoming planting stress. Bareroot and container seedlings have comparable survival rates on sites with minimal planting stress. Once seedlings are established, bareroot and container seedlings can have comparable field performance. In many instances where plant competition is the main limiting site variable, larger sized bareroot and container stocktypes have the best chance for successful stand establishment. The lack of a natural root form and root distribution for both stocktypes is a debated mechanical stability issue, though risks of windthrow have not been consistently demonstrated for either stocktype.

    References 

    1. Abrams MD (1988) Sources of variation in osmotic potentials with special reference to North American tree species. For Sci 34:1030–1046
    2. Akgul A, Messina MG, Wilson A, Weber J (2004) Performance of Slash pine bare-root seedlings and containerized root cuttings planted on five dates in Louisiana. In: Connor KF (ed) Proceedings of the 12th biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SRS-71, pp 429–432
    3. Alm AA (1983) Black and white spruce plantings in Minnesota: container vs bareroot stock and fall vs spring planting. For Chron 59:189–191CrossRef
    4. Alm AA, Cudworth KR, Dickinson SK, Olson OJ (1985) Reclamation of iron mine waste in Minnesota with trees and shrubs. North J Appl For 2:47–50
    5. Amidon TE, Barnett JP, Gallagher HP, McGilvray JM (1982) A field test of containerized seedlings under drought conditions. In: Guldin R, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the southern containerized forest tree seedling conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-37, p 139
    6. Arnott JT (1972) Influences affecting container seedling performance on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. In: Proceedings of the workshop on container planting in Canada. Canadian forest service information report DPX-X-2, pp 84–91
    7. Arnott JT (1974) Performance in British Columbia. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings, North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great plains agricultural council publications 68, Lincoln, NE, pp 283–290
    8. Arnott JT (1975) Field performance of container-grown and bareroot trees in coastal British Columbia. Can J For Res 5:186–194CrossRef
    9. Arnott JT (1978) Root development of container-grown and bareroot stock: coastal British Columbia. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium, BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 257–267
    10. Arnott JT (1981) Survival and growth of bullet, styroplug and bareroot seedlings on mid-elevation sites in coastal British Columbia. For Chron 57:65–70CrossRef
    11. Arnott JT, Burdett AN (1988) Early growth of planted western hemlock in relation to stock type and controlled-release fertilizer application. Can J For Res 18:710–717CrossRef
    12. Arnott JT, Pendl FT (1994) Field performance of several tree species and stock types planted in montane forests of coastal British Columbia. Canadian forest service information report, BC-X-347, p 45
    13. Arnott JT, Carr WW, Waines AC (1988) Establishing forest cover on winter landings in the central interior of British Columbia. For Chron 64:121–126CrossRef
    14. Baldwin VC, Barney CW (1976) Leaf water potential in planted ponderosa and Lodgepole pines. For Sci 22:344–350
    15. Balisky AC, Salonius P, Walli C, Brinkman D (1995) Seedling roots and forest floor: misplaced and neglected aspects of British Columbia’s reforestation effort? For Chron 71:59–65CrossRef
    16. Ball WJ, Kolabinski VS (1986) Performance of container and bare-root stock on prescribed burns in Saskatchewan. Canadian forest service information report NOR-X-283
    17. Balneaves JM (1989) Root collar diameter of 1/0 Radiata pine influences growth following planting. Forestry 62:125–130
    18. Barber HW Jr (1989) Planting western larch: a comparison of stocktypes and season of planting in northeast Washington. Tree Plant Notes 40:20–24
    19. Barnett JP (1975) Containerized pine seedlings thrive in wood fiber blocks. Tree Plant Notes 26:13–22
    20. Barnett JP (1983a) Containerized pine seedlings for revegetating difficult sites. J Soil Water Conserv 38:462–464
    21. Barnett JP (1983b) Relating field performance of containerized longleaf and shortleaf pine seedlings to mycorrhizal inoculation and initial size. In: Thiegles BA (ed) Proceedings of the seventh North American forest biology workshop, University of Kentucky, Lexington, pp 358–367
    22. Barnett JP (1984) Relating seedling physiology to survival and growth in container-grown southern pines. In: Duryea ML, Brown GN (eds) Seedling physiology and reforestation success. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston MA, pp 157–176CrossRef
    23. Barnett JP (1991) Effects of morphological grade on field performance of container-grown southern pine seedlings. In: Coleman SS, Neary DG (eds) Proceedings of the sixth biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SE-70, vol 1, pp 94–99
    24. Barnett JP, Brissette JC (1986) Producing southern pine seedlings in containers. USDA forest service general technical report SO-59, p 71
    25. Barnett JP, Brissette JC (2004) Stock type affects performance of shortleaf pine planted in the Ouachita Mountains through 10 years. USDA forest service general technical report SRS-71, pp 420–422
    26. Barnett JP, McGilvray JM (1993) Performance of container and bareroot loblolly pine seedlings on bottomlands in South Carolina. South J Appl For 17:80–83
    27. Barnett JP, McGilvray JM (1997) Practical guidelines for producing longleaf pine seedlings in containers. USDA forest service general technical report SRS-14, p 36
    28. Barnett JP, Lauer DK, Brissette JC (1990) Regenerating longleaf pine with artificial methods. In: Farrar R (ed) Proceedings of the symposium on the management of longleaf pine. USDA forest service general technical report SO-75, pp 72–93
    29. Baumgartner DM, Boyd RJ (eds) (1976) Tree planting in the inland northwest: short course proceedings held at Washington State University, Pullman, WSU Cooperative Extension Service, p 311
    30. Becker CA, Mroz GD, Fuller LG (1987) The effects of plant moisture stress on red pine (Pinus resinosa) seedling growth and establishment. Can J For Res 17:813–820CrossRef
    31. Bigras FJ (1996) Conifer bud dormancy and stress resistance: a forestry perspective. In: Lang GE (ed) Plant dormancy. CAB International, pp 171–192
    32. Binder WD, Fielder P, Scagel R, Krumlik GJ (1990) Temperature and time-related variation of root growth in some conifer tree species. Can J For Res 20:1192–1199CrossRef
    33. Blake TJ, Sutton RF (1987) Variation in water relations of black spruce stock types planted in Ontario. Tree Physiol 3:331–344CrossRefPubMed
    34. Boyer WD (1985) First-year survival of planted longleaf pine bare-root and container stock as affected by site preparation and release. In: Shoulders E (ed) Proceedings of the third biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-54, pp 74–78
    35. Boyer WD (1988) Effects of site preparation and release on the survival and growth of planted bare-root and container-grown longleaf pine. GA For Res Pap 76:1–7
    36. Boyer WD (1989) Response of planted longleaf pine bare-root and container stock to site preparation and release: fifth year results. In: Miller J (ed) Proceedings of the fifth biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-74, pp 165–168
    37. Brissette JC, Barnett JP (1989) Comparing first-year growth of bare-root and container plantings of shortleaf pine half-sib families. In: Twentieth southern forest tree improvement conference. Proceedings of the 20th southern forest tree improvement conference south. Forest tree improve communication publ no. 42, pp 354–361
    38. Brissette JC, Barnett JP (1992) Multifamily comparison of bare-root and container grown shortleaf pine seedlings for the Ouachita and Ozark Mountains. In: Brissette JC, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the shortleaf pine regeneration workshop. USDA forest service general technical report SO-90, pp 199–204
    39. Brissette JC, Chambers JL (1992) Leaf water status and root system water flux in shortleaf pine (Pinus echinataMill.) seedlings in relationship to new root growth after transplanting. Tree Physiol 11:289–303CrossRefPubMed
    40. Brissette JC, Roberts TC (1984) Seedling size and lifting date effects on root growth potential of loblolly pine from two Arkansas nurseries. Tree Plant Notes 35:34–38
    41. Brissette JC, Barnett JP, Landis TD (1991) Container seedlings. In: Duryea ML, Dougherty PM (eds) Forest regeneration manual. Kluwer, Netherlands, pp 117–141CrossRef
    42. Brockley RP (1988) The effects of fertilization on the early growth of planted seedling: a problem analysis. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, FRDA report 001, p 16
    43. Buchanan BA (1974) Containerized seedlings on the Lincoln National Forest. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings, North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council publications 68, Lincoln, NE, pp 359–365
    44. Burdett AN (1977) Low root growth capacity of bare root Lodgepole pine associated with the absence of fibrous roots. British Columbia Ministry of Forests, EP 746
    45. Burdett AN (1978) Control of root morphogenesis for improved mechanical stability in container-grown Lodgepole pine. Can J For Res 8:483–486CrossRef
    46. Burdett AN (1990) Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can J For Res 20:415–427CrossRef
    47. Burdett AN, Simpson DG (1984) Lifting, grading, packaging and storing. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD (eds) Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W, Junk, The Hague, pp 227–234CrossRef
    48. Burdett AN, Herring LJ, Thompson CF (1984) Early growth of planted spruce. Can J For Res 14:644–651CrossRef
    49. Burdett AN, Coates H, Eremko R, Martin PAF (1986) Toppling in British Columbia’s Lodgepole pine plantations: significance, cause and prevention. For Chron 62:433–439CrossRef
    50. Burr KE (1990) The target seedling concept: bud dormancy and cold-hardiness. In: Rose R et al (eds) Target seedling symposium: proceedings of the combined meeting of western forest nursery association. USDA forest service general technical report RM-200, pp 79–90
    51. Carlson WC (1991) Lifting, storing, and transporting southern pine seedlings. In: Duryea ML, Dougherty PM (eds) Forest regeneration manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 219–301
    52. Carlson LW, Endean F (1976) The effect of rooting volume and container configuration on the early growth of white spruce. Can J For Res 6:221–224CrossRef
    53. Carlson WC, Miller DE (1990) Target seedling root system size, hydraulic conductivity, and water use during seedling establishment. In: Rose R et al (eds) Target seedling symposium: proceedings of the combined meeting of western forest nursery association. USDA forest service general technical report RM-200, pp 79–90
    54. Carlson WC, Preisig CL, Promnitz LC (1980) Comparative root system morphologies of seeded-in-place, bareroot, and container-cultured plug Sitka spruce seedlings after outplanting. Can J For Res 10:250–256CrossRef
    55. Chavasse CGR (1977) The significance of planting height as an indicator of subsequent seedling growth. N Z J For 22:283–296
    56. Cheung KW (1977) The effect of storage duration and temperature on the physiology and survival of bareroot (2–0) and container (1–0) grown coastal Douglas-fir seedlings. BC Ministry of Forests Research Memo, EP.737.02
    57. Chirino E, Vilagrosa A, Hernández EI, Matoc A, Vallejoa VR (2008) Effects of deep container on morpho-fuctional characteristics and root colonization in Quercus suber L. seedlings for reforestation in Mediterranean climate. For Ecol Manage 256:779–785CrossRef
    58. Cleary BD, Greaves RD, Owsten PW (1978) Seedlings. In: Cleary BD et al (eds) Regenerating Oregon’s forests: a guide for the regeneration forester. OSU Extn Serv, Corvallis, pp 63–97
    59. Colby MK, Lewis GD (1973) Economics of containerized conifer seedlings. USDA forest service research paper, RM 108
    60. Cole EC, Newton M, Youngblood A (1999) Regenerating white spruce, paper birch, and willow in south-central Alaska. Can J For Res 29:993–1001CrossRef
    61. Colombo SJ, Menzies MI, O’Reilly C (2001) Influence of nursery cultural practices on cold hardiness of coniferous forest tree seedlings. In: Bigras FJ, Colombo SJ (eds) Conifer cold hardiness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 223–252CrossRef
    62. Compton VS (1996) Techniques to restore off-site slash pine stands on deep sandy soils to longleaf pine using artificial regeneration. In: Kush JS (ed) Proceedings, first longleaf alliance conference: longleaf pine, a regional perspective of challenges and opportunities. The Longleaf Alliance, pp 67–68
    63. Conner WH, Toliver JR, Askew GR (1993) Artificial regeneration of bald cypress in a Louisiana crayfish pond. South J Appl For 17:54–57
    64. Coutts MP (1981) Effects of root or shoot exposure before planting on the water relations, growth, and survival of Sitka spruce. Can J For Res 11:703–709CrossRef
    65. Coutts MP, Walker C, Burnand AC (1990). Effects of establishment method on root form of lodgepole pine and Sitka spruce and on the production of adventitious roots. Forestry 63:143–159.
    66. Cram MM, Mexal JG, Souter R (1999) Successful reforestation of South Carolina sandhills is not influenced by seedling inoculation with Pisolithus tinctorius in the nursery. South J Appl For 23:46–52
    67. Crunkilton DD, Garrett HE, Pallardy SG (1989) Growth of northern red oak seedlings planted in a central Missouri clearcut and shelterwood. In: Miller J (ed) Proceedings of the fifth biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-74, pp 81–88
    68. Crunkilton DD, Pallardy SG, Garrett HE (1992) Water relations and gas exchange of northern red oak seedlings planted in a central Missouri clearcut and shelterwood. For Ecol Manage 53:117–129CrossRef
    69. Cuesta B, Vega J, Villar-Salvador P, Rey-Benayas JM (2010a) Root growth dynamics of allepo pine (Pinus halipensis Mill.) seedlings in relation to shoot elongation, plant size and tissue nitrogen concentration. Trees 24:899–908CrossRef
    70. Cuesta B, Vega J, Villar-Salvador P, Puértolas J, Jacobs DF, Rey-Benayas JM (2010b) Why do large, nitrogen rich seedlings better resist stressful transplanting conditions? A physiological analysis in two contrasting Mediterranean forests. For Ecol Manage 20:71–78CrossRef
    71. Daniels TD, Simpson DG (1990) Seedling production and processing: bareroot. In: Lavender DP et al (eds) Regenerating British Columbia’s forests. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 206–226
    72. Davidson WH, Sowa EA (1974) Container-grown seedlings show potential for afforestation of Pennsylvania coal-mine spoils. Tree Plant Notes 25:6–9
    73. Davis AS, Jacobs DF (2004) First-year survival of northern red oak seedlings planted on former surface coal mines in Indiana. In: Barnhisel RI (ed) Proceedings of a joint conference of American society of mining and reclamation 21st annual national conference and 25th West Virginia surface mine drainage task force symposium, pp 480–502
    74. Deans JD, Lundberg C, Tabbush PM, Cannall MGR, Sheppard LJ, Murray MB (1990) The influence of desiccation, rough handling and cold storage on the quality and establishment of Sitka spruce planting stock. Forestry 63:129–141CrossRef
    75. Dey DC, Jacobs D, McNabb K, Miller G, Baldwin V, Foster G (2008) Artificial regeneration of major Oak (Quercus) species in the Eastern United States—a review of the literature. For Sci 54:77–106
    76. Dickerson BP (1973) Containerized loblolly pines promising for erosion control planting. Tree Plant Notes 24:35–37
    77. Dickerson BP, McClurkin DC (1980) A field trial of year-round planting of “bullet” seedlings. Tree Plant Notes 31:21–22
    78. Dickson JF, Yeiser JL, Kluender RA, Paschke JL (1987) Genetic family and stock type influence simulated loblolly pine yields from wet sites. Ark Acad Sci 41:32–34
    79. Dierauf TD, Chandler LA, Hixson DL (1992) Stripping of lateral roots from loblolly pine seedlings during lifting—effect on field performance. VA Department of Forest Occupation Report 105
    80. Dixon RK (1984) Growth and ectomycorrhizal development of container-grown and bareroot black oak seedlings. In: New forests for a changing world: proceedings of the 1983 convention of the Society of American Foresters, SAF Publication 84-03, pp 420–424
    81. Dixon RK, Wright GM, Garrett HE, Cox GS, Johnson PS, Sander IL (1981) Container- and nursery-grown black oak seedlings inoculated with Pisolithus tinctorius: growth and ectomycorrhizal development during seedling production period. Can J For Res 11:487–491CrossRef
    82. Dixon RK, Pallardy SG, Garrett HE, Cox GS, Sander IL (1983) Comparative water relations of container-grown and bare-root ectomycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal Quercus velutina seedlings. Can J Bot 61:1559–1565CrossRef
    83. Dobbs RC (1976) Effect of initial mass of white spruce and lodgepole pine planting stock on field performance in the British Columbia interior. Canadian forest service information report BC-X 149
    84. Doggett CA, Lawrence L, Killingsworth D (1978) Containerized seedlings: a new tool in seedling debarking weevil control. Tree Plant Notes 29:18–19
    85. Duddles RE, Owston PW (1990) Performance of conifer stocktypes on national forests in the Oregon and Washington coast ranges. In: Rose R et al (eds) Target seedling symposium: proceedings of the combined meeting of western forest nursery association. USDA forest service general technical report RM-200, pp 263–268
    86. Dumroese RK, James RL (2005) Root diseases in bareroot and container nurseries of the Pacific Northwest: epidemiology, management, and effects on outplanting performance. New For 30:185–202CrossRef
    87. Dumroese RK, Tara L, Landis TD (eds) (2009) Nursery manual for native plants: a guide for tribal nurseries—volume 1: nursery management. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 730, p 302
    88. Duryea ML (1984) Nursery cultural practices: impacts on seedling quality. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD (eds) Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 143–164CrossRef
    89. Duryea ML, Dougherty PM (1991) Forest regeneration manual, vol 36. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 440CrossRef
    90. Duryea ML, Landis TD (eds) (1984) Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague
    91. Echols RJ, Meier CE, Ezell AW, McKinley CR (1990) Dry site survival of bareroot and container seedlings of southern pines from different genetic sources given root dip and ectomycorrhizal treatments. Tree Plant Notes 41:13–21
    92. Eis S (1978) Natural root forms of western conifers. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 23–27
    93. Elam WW, Hodges JD, Moorhead DJ (1982) Production of containerized southern red oaks and their performance after outplanting. In: Guldin R, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the southern containerized forest tree seedling conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-37, pp 69–76
    94. Feret PP, Kreh RE, Mulligan C (1985) Effects of air drying on survival, height, and root growth potential of loblolly pine seedlings. South J Appl For 9:125–128
    95. Fleming RA, Wood JA (1996) Modelling the effects of herbicide release on early growth and survival of Picea mariana. N Z J For Sci 26:202–221
    96. Foiles MW, Curtis JD (1973) Regeneration of ponderosa pine in the northern Rocky Mountain-Intermountain Region. USDA forest service research paper, INT-145, 45 pp
    97. Fuchigami LH, Nee CC (1987) Degree growth stage model and rest-breaking mechanisms in temperate woody perennials. Hortic Sci 22:836–845
    98. Fuchigami LH, Weiser CJ, Kobayashi K, Timmis R, Gusta LV (1982) A degree growth stage (GS) model and cold -acclimation in temperate woody plants. In: Li PH, Sakai A (eds) Plant cold hardiness and freezing stress. Academic Press, NY, pp 93–116CrossRef
    99. Gardner AC (1982). Field performance of containerized seedlings in interior British Columbia. In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 299–305
    100. Girouard RM (1995) Root form and stability of outplanted trees: results of a 1989 survey. Arboricult J 19:121–146
    101. Gjerstad DH, Nelson LR, Dukes JH, Ratzlaff SA (1984) Growth response and physiology of tree species as affected by weed control. In: Duryea ML, Brown GN (eds) Seedling physiology and reforestation success. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dorchrecht, pp 247–257CrossRef
    102. Gladstone WT, Ledig FT (1990) Reducing pressure on natural forests through high-yield forestry. For Ecol Manage 35:69–78CrossRef
    103. Goodwin OC (1974) Field performance of containerized seedlings in North Carolina. In: Tinus et al (eds) Proceedings, North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council publications 68, Lincoln, NE, pp 324–328
    104. Goodwin OC (1976) Summer-planted loblolly and longleaf pine tubelings outgrow 1–0 nursery seedlings in North Carolina. J For 74:515–516
    105. Goodwin OC (1978) Containerized Fraser fir seedlings after three plus growing seasons are comparable in grade to 3 + 3 transplants. NC Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forest Research, forest note no. 35, 7 pp
    106. Goodwin OC (1979) Five year comparison of loblolly pine containerized and 1–0 nursery seedling plantations in North Carolina. NC Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forest Research, forest note no. 38, 7 pp
    107. Goodwin OC, Brenneman DL, Boyette WG (1982) Container seedling survival and growth: pine and hardwood in North Carolina. In: Guldin R, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the southern containerized forest tree seedling conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-37, pp 125–132
    108. Grossnickle SC (2000) Ecophysiology of northern spruce species: the performance of planted seedlings. NRC Research Press, Ottawa
    109. Grossnickle SC (2005a) Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New For 30:273–294CrossRef
    110. Grossnickle SC (2005b) Seedling size and reforestation success. How big is big enough? The thin green line: a symposium on the state-of-the-art in reforestation. OFRI, forest research information paper 160, pp 138–144
    111. Grossnickle SC (2012) Why seedlings survive: importance of plant attributes. New For 43:711–738CrossRef
    112. Grossnickle SC, Blake TJ (1987) Water relation patterns of bare-root and container jack pine and black spruce seedlings planted on boreal cut-over sites. New For 1:101–116CrossRef
    113. Grossnickle SC, Major JE (1994) Interior spruce seedlings compared to emblings produced from somatic embryogenesis. II. Stock quality assessment prior to field planting. Can J For Res 24:1385–1396CrossRef
    114. Grossnickle SC, Reid CPP (1984) Water relations of Engelmann spruce seedlings on a high-elevation mine site: an example of how reclamation techniques can alter microclimate and edaphic conditions. Reclam Reveg Res 3:199–221
    115. Grossnickle SC, South DB (2014) Fall acclimation and the lift/store pathway: effect on reforestation. The Open For Sci J 7:1–20
    116. Gruschow GF (1959) Observations on root systems of planted loblolly pine. J For 57:894–896
    117. Guldin RW (1982) Container-grown longleaf pine regeneration costs in the sandhills. South J Appl For 6:33–39
    118. Guldin RW (1983) Regeneration costs using container-grown southern pine seedlings. USDA research paper, SO-187
    119. Gutzwiler JR, Winjum JK (1974) Performance of containerized coniferous seedlings in recent forest regeneration trials in Oregon and Washington. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings, North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great plains agricultural cultural publications 68, Lincoln, NE, pp 291–297
    120. Gwaze DR, Melick C, Studyvin C, Hoss G (2006) Survival and growth of container and bareroot shortleaf pine seedlings in Missouri. In: Riley LE et al (eds) National proceedings, forest and conservation nursery associations. USDA forest services, RMRS-P-43, pp 123–127
    121. Hahn PF (1981) A historical overview of the use of containerized seedlings for operational reforestation—how did we get where we are today? In: Guldin R, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the southern containerized forest tree seedling conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-37, pp 7–12
    122. Hahn PF (1984) Plug + 1 seedling production. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD (eds) Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague
    123. Hahn PF, Hutchison S (1978) Root form of planted trees and their performance. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no 8, pp 235–240
    124. Hahn PF, Smith AJ (1983) Douglas-fir planting stock performance comparison after the third growing season. Tree Plant Notes 34:33–39
    125. Halter MR, Chanway CP (1993) Growth and root morphology of planted and naturally-regenerated Douglas-fir and Lodgepole pine. Ann For Sci 60:71–77CrossRef
    126. Halter MR, Chanway CP, Harper GJ (1993) Growth reduction and root deformation of containerized lodgepole pine saplings 11 years after planting. For Ecol Manage 56:131–146CrossRef
    127. Harrington CA, Brissett JC, Carlson WC (1989) Root system structure in planted and seeded loblolly pine and shortleaf pine. For Sci 35:469–480
    128. Harris HG (1982) Bare root versus containerized seedlings: a comparison of production problems and methods. In: Guldin R, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the southern containerized forest tree seedling conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-37, pp 77–80
    129. Hay RL, Keegan JK (1982) Containerized white pine cultural methods and outplanting success on the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee. In: Guldin R, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the southern containerized forest tree seedling conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-37, pp 51–58
    130. Hay RL, Rennie JC (1983) Height growth of containerized white pine on the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee. In: Jones EP Jr (ed) Proceedings, second biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SE-24, pp 128–133
    131. Hay RL, Woods FW (1974a) Root deformation correlated with sapling size for loblolly pine. J For 72:143–145
    132. Hay RL, Woods FW (1974b) Shape of root systems influence survival and growth of loblolly pine seedlings. Tree Plant Notes 25:1–3
    133. Barnett JP, Haywood, DJ, Sword MA (1996) Artificial regeneration of longleaf pine: reevaluation of technique. In: Kush JS (ed) Proceedings first longleaf alliance conference: longleaf pine, a regional perspective of challenges and opportunities, Mobile, Alabama, pp 53–54
    134. Haywood JC, Barnett JP (1994) Comparing methods of artificially regenerating loblolly and slash pine: container planting, bareroot planting, and spot planting. Tree Plant Notes 45:63–67
    135. Heidmann LJ, King RM (1992) Effect of prolonged drought on water relations of ponderosa pine seedlings growing in basalt and sedimentary soils. USDA forest services research paper, RM-301
    136. Helgerson OT (1985) Survival and growth of planted Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Dougl. ex Laws.) on a hot, dry site in southwest Oregon. Tree Plant Notes 36:3–6
    137. Helgerson OT (1990) Response of underplanted Douglas-fir to herbicide injection of sclerophyll hardwoods in southwest Oregon. West J Appl For 5:86–89
    138. Helgerson OT, Tesch SD, Hobbs SD, McNabb DH (1989) Survival and growth of ponderosa pine and Douglas-fir stocktypes on a dry low-elevation site in southwest Oregon. West J Appl For 4:124–128
    139. Helgerson OT, Tesch SD, Hobbs SD (1992) Effects of stocktype, shading, and species on reforestation of a droughty site in southwest Oregon. N W Sci 66:57–61
    140. Hellum AK (1976) What stock for what purpose in Alberta. In: Global forestry and the western role. Proceedings, annual meeting of the western reforestation coordinating committee. Western conservation associates, Portland, OR, pp 115–119
    141. Hellum AK (1978) The growth of planted spruce in Alberta. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 191–195
    142. Hite WA (1974) Container field performance in the Rockies and Plains. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings, North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great Plains Agricultural Council Publications 68, Lincoln, NE, pp 306–309
    143. Hite WA (1978) The root form of planted trees in the Northern Rockies–are the concerns economically justified? In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp. 157–161
    144. Hobbs SD (1984) The influence of species and stocktype selection on stand establishment: an ecophysiological perspective. In: Duryea ML, Brown GN (eds) Proceedings, seedling physiology and reforestation success: proceedings of the physiology working group, technical session. Forest science 14, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 179–224
    145. Hobbs SD, Wearstler KA Jr (1983) Performance of three Douglas-fir stocktypes on a skeletal soil. Tree Plant Notes 34:11–14
    146. Hobbs SD, Lavender DP, Wearstler KA Jr (1982) Performance of container-grown Douglas-fir on droughty sites in southwest Oregon. In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 373–378
    147. Hobbs SD, Crawford MS, Yelczyn BA (1989) Early development of three Douglas-fir stocktypes on a droughty skeletal soil. West J Appl For 4:21–24
    148. Hocking D, Mitchell DL (1975) The influence of rooting volume—seedling escapement and substratum density on growth of lodgepole pine, white spruce and Douglas-fir grown in extruded peat cylinders. Can J For Res 5:440–451CrossRef
    149. Howard KM, Newton M (1984) Overtopping by successional coast-range vegetation slows Douglas-fir seedlings. J For 82:178–180
    150. Hunt R (1980) Bareroot planting of Eucalyptus. Tree Plant Notes 31:20–22
    151. Hunter SC, Maki TE (1980) The effects of root-curling on loblolly pine. South J Appl For 4:45–49
    152. Hytönen J, Jylhä P (2008) Fifteen-year response of weed control intensity and seedling type on Norway spruce survival and growth on arable land. Silva Fennica 42:355–368CrossRef
    153. Idris M, Salifu KF, Timmer VR (2004) Root plug effects on early growth and nutrition of container black spruce seedlings. For Ecol Manage 195:399–408CrossRef
    154. Iverson RD (1980) Early performance of common Douglas-fir stocktypes in coastal Oregon. In: Executive summaries of the proceedings, western forestry conference. Western forest conservation associates, p 74
    155. Iverson RD (1984) Planting stock selection: meeting biological needs and operational realities. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD (eds) Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 261–269CrossRef
    156. Jackson DP, Enebak SA, South DB (2012) Pythium species and cold storage affect the root growth potential and survival of loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) seedlings. J Hortic For 4:114–119
    157. Jaenicke H (1999) Containers. Good tree nursery practices: practical guidelines for research nurseries. International Centre Forest Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, pp 22–28
    158. Jaffe MJ (1980) Morphogenetic responses of plants to mechanical stimuli or stress. Bioscience 30:239–243CrossRef
    159. Jinks RL, Kerr G (1999) Establishment and early growth of different plant types of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. maritima) on four sites in Thetford forest. Forestry 72:293–304CrossRef
    160. Jinks R, Mason B (1998) Effects of seedling density on the growth of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. maritimaMelv.), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii Franco) in containers. Ann For Sci 55:407–423CrossRef
    161. Jobidon R, Charette L, Bernier PY (1998) Initial size and competing vegetation effects on water stress and growth of Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP seedlings planted in three different environments. For Ecol Manage 103:295–308CrossRef
    162. Jobidon R, Roy V, Cyr G (2003) Net effect of competing vegetation on selected environmental conditions and performance of four spruce seedling stock sizes after eight years in Quebec (Canada). Ann For Sci 60:691–699CrossRef
    163. Johnsen KH, Feret PP, Seiler JR (1988) Root growth potential and shoot activity of northern and southern provenances of 1–0 eastern white pine seedlings grown in a Virginia nursery. Can J For Res 18:610–614CrossRef
    164. Johnson PS (1979) Growth potential and field performance of planted oaks. In: Holt HA, Fischer BC (eds) Regenerating Oaks in upland hardwood forests. Purdue Research Foundation, West Lafayette, pp 113–119
    165. Johnson PS (1981) Early results of planting English oak in an Ozark clearcut. USDA forest service research paper, NC-204, p 6
    166. Johnson PS (1984) Responses of planted northern red oak to three overstory treatments. Can J For Res 14:536–542CrossRef
    167. Johnson JD, Cline ML (1991) Seedling quality of southern pines. In: Duryea ML, Dougherty PM (eds) Forest regeneration manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 143–162CrossRef
    168. Johnson PS, Novinger SL, Mares SW (1984) Root, shoot, and leaf area growth potentials of northern red oak planting stock. For Sci 30:1017–1026
    169. Johnson PS, Shifley SR, Rogers R (2002) The ecology and silviculture of oaks. CABI Publishing, New YorkCrossRef
    170. Jose SE, Jokela J, Miller DL (eds) (2006) The longleaf pine ecosystem: ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer series on environmental management. Springer, New York
    171. Jutras SN, Thiffault N, Munson AD (2007) Comparing large bareroot and container stock: water stress as influenced by peat and soil water availability. Tree Plant Notes 52:15–18
    172. Keane M (2006) Container plants and mechanised planting—the way forward? In: MacLennan L, Fennessy J (eds) Plant quality: a key to success in forest establishment. Proceedings of the COFROD conference, Sept 20–21, 2005, pp 67–71
    173. Kerr G (1994) A comparison of cell grown and bare-rooted oak and Beech seedlings one season after outplanting. Forestry 67:297–311CrossRef
    174. Kinghorn JM (1970) The status of container planting in western Canada. For Chron 46(6):466–469CrossRef
    175. Klawitter RA (1969) Wind damage improperly planted slash pine. Southern Lumberman 218:24
    176. Kluender RA, Yeiser JL (1987) Effects of stock type and planter experience on the time required to plant loblolly pine seedlings. Proc Ark Acad Sci 41:61–62
    177. Kokocinski GH (1968) Growing tubed seedlings in the Kenora Forest District. For Chron 44:18–20CrossRef
    178. Kormanik PP, Belanger RP, Belcher EW (1976) Survival and early growth of containerized and bareroot seedlings of cherrybark oak. Tree Plant Notes 27:9–10
    179. Kozlowski TT, Davies WJ (1975) Control of water balance in transplanted trees. Arboriculture 1:1–10
    180. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (1997) Physiology of woody plants, 2nd edn. Acedemic Press, New York
    181. Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (2002) Acclimation and adaptive response of woody plants to environmental stress. Bot Rev 68:270–334CrossRef
    182. Kramer PJ (1986) The role of physiology in forestry. Tree Physiol 2:1–16CrossRefPubMed
    183. Krasowski MJ, Coates H (1991) Static tests of mechanical stability of bareroot, container-grown, and chemically pruned lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) on one site, 11 years after planting. In: Donnelly FP, Lussenburg HW (eds) Proceedings of the 1991 Forest Nursery Association of British Columbia meeting, Sept 24–27, Prince George, BC, pp 94–102
    184. Krasowski MJ, Coates H (1992) Static tests of mechanical stability of bareroot, container-grown and chemically pruned lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) on one site 11 years after planting. In: Donnelly FP, Lussenburg HW (comps) Proceedings, 1991 forest nursery association of British Columbia, 11th Annual Meeting Prince George BC, pp 94–102
    185. Krause HH (1982) Early growth of bare-root and paperpot plantations at various locations in New Brunswick In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC Symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 355–366
    186. Kusler JA, Kentula ME (1989) Wetland creation and restoration: the status of the science. Island Press, Washington
    187. Landis TD (2007) Miniplug transplants: producing large plants quickly. USDA forest service R6-CP-TP-01-(2007), pp 5–12
    188. Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Barnett JP (1989) Seedling nutrition and irrigation. The container tree nursery manual, vol 4. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 674, Washington, DC, 87 pp
    189. Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Barnett JP (1990a) Containers and growing media. The container tree nursery manual, vol 2. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 674, Washington, DC, 88 pp
    190. Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Barnett JP (1990b) The biological component: nursery pests and mycorrhizae, vol 5. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 674, 171 pp
    191. Landis TD, Tinus RW, McDonald SE, Barnett JP (1992) Atmospheric environment. The container tree nursery manual, vol 3. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 674, Washington, DC, 145 pp
    192. Landis TD, Tinus RW, Barnett JP (1999) Seedling propagation. The container tree nursery manual, vol 6. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 674, Washington, DC, 167 pp
    193. Landis TD, Dumroese RK, Haase DL (2010) Seedling processing, storage, and outplanting. The container tree nursery manual, vol 7. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 674, 199 pp
    194. Langvall O, Nilsson U, Örlander G (2001) Frost damage to planted Norway spruce seedlings—influence of site preparation and seedling type. For Ecol Manage 141:223–235CrossRef
    195. Lantagne DO (1989) Response of three red pine seedling types to four levels of weed control after four growing seasons In: Proceedings, North Central weed science society conference, vol 44, pp 64–67
    196. Lantz CW (ed) (1985) Southern pine nursery handbook. USDA For Serv Cooperative Forestry, Southern Region
    197. Lantz CW (Coor) (1996) A guide to the care and planting of southern pine seedlings. USDA forest service regions management bulletin, RB-MB39
    198. Lautenschlager RA (1995) Competition between forest brush and planted white spruce in north-central Maine. North J of Appl For 12:163–167
    199. Lavender DP (1985) Bud dormancy. In: Duryea ML (ed) Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures and predictive abilities of major tests. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, pp 7–15
    200. Lavender DP (1989) Effects of low soil temperatures and styroblock design upon the root growth and seedling vigor of white spruce and lodgepole pine. In: Planting stock improvement research update. FRDA project F52-41-108. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services FRDA research memo 109
    201. Lavender DP, Cleary BD (1974) Coniferous seedling production techniques to improve seedling establishment. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings of the North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great plains agricultural council publications 68, Lincoln NE, pp 177–180
    202. Lavender DP, McCreary D (1983) Effects of harvest and packing techniques of Douglas-fir seedlings. In: Proceedings, western nurseryman’s conference, USDA forest service, pp 149–156
    203. LePage P, Pollack JC (1986) An all-season container and bareroot planting trial of lodgepole pine and white spruce: 14-year results. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, FRDA rep no. 004, p 28
    204. Leugner J, Jurásek A, Martincová J (2009) Comparison of morphological and physiological parameters of the planting material of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) from intensive nursery technologies with current bareroot plants. J For Sci 11:511–517
    205. Levitt J (1980) Response of plants to environmental stress, vol 1. Chilling, freezing and high temperature stress. Academic Press, New York
    206. Lindgren O, Örlander G (1978) A study on root development and stability of 6 to 7-year-old container plants. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 142–144
    207. Lindström A, Rune G (1999) Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: effects of root growth, tree stability and stem straightness. Plant Soil 217:29–37CrossRef
    208. Long JN (1978) Root system form and its relationship to growth in young planted conifers. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 222–234
    209. Lui B, Heins R (1997) Is plant quality related to the ratio of radiant energy to thermal energy? Sci Hortic 435:171–181
    210. MacDonald GB, Weetman GF (1993) Functional growth analysis of conifer seedling responses to competing vegetation. For Chron 69:64–70CrossRef
    211. Mackinnon GE (1970) Container planting in Ontario. For Chron 46:470–472CrossRef
    212. Mann WF (1977) Status and outlook of containerization in the south. J For 75:579–581
    213. Margolis HA, Brand DG (1990) An ecophysiological basis for understanding plantation establishment. Can J For Res 20:375–390CrossRef
    214. Marion SP, Alm AA (1986) Performance of fall- and spring-planted bareroot and container-grown red pine (Pinus resinosa ait.). Tree Plant Notes 37:24–26
    215. Marx DH, Hatchell GE (1986) Root stripping of ectomycorrhizae decreases field performance of loblolly and longleaf pine seedlings. South J Appl For 10:173–179
    216. Mason E (2001) A model of juvenile growth and survival of Pinus radiata D. Don. Adding the affects of initial seedling diameter and plant handling. New For 22:133–158CrossRef
    217. Mason WL, Biggin P (1988) Comparative performance of containerized and bare-root Sitka spruce and lodgepole pine seedlings in upland Britain. Forestry 61:149–163CrossRef
    218. Matthews RG (1971) Container seedling production—a provisional manual. Canadian forest service information report BC-X 58, p 48
    219. Mattice CR (1982) Comparative field performance of paperpot and bare-root planting stock in northeastern Ontario. In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 321–330
    220. Mattsson A (1996) Predicting field performance using seedling quality assessment. New For 13:223–248
    221. McClain KM (1982) Growth, nutrition and root development of Ontario tubelings, plugs and 3 + 0 bare-root black spruce. In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 331–342
    222. McCreary DD, Lippitt L (2000) Blue Oak miniplug transplants: how they compare to standard bareroot and container stocktypes. Native Plants J 1:85–89
    223. McDonald PM (1991) Container seedlings outperform barefoot stock: survival and growth after 10 years. New For 5:147–156CrossRef
    224. McDonald PM, Gosens RD (1980) Survival and height growth of bareroot and container grown seedlings in northern California. In: Executive summaries of the proceedings, 1980 western forestry conference. Western Forest Conservation Association, Portland, OR, p 75
    225. McGuire MA, Williams HM (1998) Effects of stock type and fall fertilization on survival of longleaf pine seedlings planted in lignite mine spoil. In: Waldrop TA (ed) Proceedings of the ninth biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SRS-20, pp 329–332
    226. McKay HM (1994) Frost hardiness and cold storage tolerance of the root system of Picea sitchensis, Pseudotsuga menziessii, Larix laempferi and Pinus sylvestris bare-root seedlings. Scand J For Res 9:203–213CrossRef
    227. McKay HM (1997) A review of the effects of stresses between lifting and planting on nursery stock quality and performance. New For 13:369–399CrossRef
    228. McKay HM, Gardiner BA, Mason WL, Nelson DG, Hollingsworth MK (1993) The gravitational forces generated by dropping plants and the response of Sitka spruce seedlings to dropping. Can J For Res 23:2443–2451CrossRef
    229. McKinley CR (1991) Five-year evaluation of loblolly progeny tests established with both bare-root and containerized seedlings. In: Proceedings of the twenty-first southern forest tree improvement conference. Sponsored Publication (Southern Forest Tree Improvement Committee) no. 43, pp 288–294
    230. McLeod AA, Evans RC, Scagel RK (1993) Conversion of understocked salal sites at Woss Lake, British Columbia. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services FRDA report 194, p 15
    231. McMinn RG (1978) Root development of white spruce and lodgepole pine seedlings following outplanting. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 186–190
    232. McMinn RG (1980) Root growth capacity and field performance of various types and sizes of white spruce stock following outplanting in the central Interior of British Columbia. In: Schmidt-Vogt H (ed) Characterization of plant material proceedings, IUFRO meeting working group, S1.05.-04 Freiburg West Germany, pp 37–41
    233. McMinn RG (1982) Size of container-grown seedlings should be matched to site conditions. In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 307–312
    234. McMinn RG (1985) Successful spruce stocktypes and sizes. Interior spruce seeding performance: state of the art. North. Silvic. Comm. Seminar. Prince George, BC, 8 pp
    235. Meadows JS, Toliver JR (1987) Three-year response of pecan to six methods of seedling establishment. South J Appl For 11:56–59
    236. Mena-Petite A, Ortega-Lasuen U, Gonzãlez-Moro MB, Lacuesta M, Muñoz-Rueda A (2001) Storage duration and temperature effect on the functional integrity of container and bare-root Pinus radiata D. Don stock-types. Trees 15:289–296CrossRef
    237. Mena-Petite A, Estavillo JM, Duñabeitia M, Gonzãlez-Moro MB, Muñoz-Rueda A, Lacuesta M (2004) Effect of storage conditions on post planting water status and performance of Pinus radiata D. Don stock-types. Ann For Sci 61:695–704CrossRef
    238. Menes PA, Odlum KD, Paterson JM (1996) Comparative performance of bareroot and container-grown seedlings: an annotated bibliography. OMNR, OFRI forest research information paper no. 132
    239. Mexal JG, Burton S (1978) Root development of planted loblolly pine seedlings. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, joint report 8, pp 85–90
    240. Mexal JG, Landis TD (1990) Target seedling concepts: height and diameter. In: Rose R et al (eds) Target seedling symposium: proceedings of the combined meeting of western forest nursery association. USDA forest service general technical report RM-200, pp 17–36
    241. Mexal JG, South DB (1991) Bareroot seedling culture. In: Duryea ML, Dougherty PM (eds) Forest regeneration manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 89–115CrossRef
    242. Mitchell WK, Dunsworth G, Simpson DG, Vyse A (1990) Planting and seeding. In: Lavender DP et al (eds) Regenerating British Columbia’s forests. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 235–253
    243. Mohammed GH, McLeod GR, Menes PA, Timmer VR (2001a) Bareroot stock production. In: Wagner RG, Colombo SJ (eds) Regenerating the Canadian forest: principles and practice for Ontario. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Markham, pp 265–280
    244. Mohammed GH, McLeod GR, Menes PA, Timmer VR (2001b) A comparison of bareroot and container stock. In: Wagner RG, Colombo SJ (eds) Regenerating the Canadian forest: principles and practice for Ontario. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Markham, pp 343–348
    245. Moorhead DJ (1984) Physiological response of container-grown mycorrhizal black oak seedlings to drought. In: Johnson PS, Hodges JD (eds) Proceedings of second workshop on seedling physiology and growth problems in Oak planting. USDA forest service general technical report NC-99, 21 pp
    246. Morris DM, MacDonald GB (1991) Development of a competition index for young conifer plantations established on boreal mixedwood sites. For Chron 67:403–410CrossRef
    247. Morrissey RC, Jacobs DF, Davis AS, Rathfon RA (2010) Survival and competitiveness of Quercus rubraregeneration associated with planting stocktype and harvest opening intensity. New For 40:273–287CrossRef
    248. Nelson WR (1989) A review of the role of root pruning for container forest seedlings. S African For J 151:90–92
    249. Newton M, Cole EC (1991) Root development in planted Douglas-fir under varying competitive stress. Can J For Res 21:25–31CrossRef
    250. Newton M, Cole EC, White DE (1993) Tall planting stock for enhanced growth and domination of brush in the Douglas-fir region. New For 7:107–121CrossRef
    251. Nichols TJ, Alm AA (1983) Root development of container-reared, nursery grown, and naturally regenerated pine seedlings. Can J For Res 13:239–245CrossRef
    252. Nielsen AT (2010) A comparison of root architecture and tree stability in bare root- and Jiffy-trees (Picea abies) eight meters tall. Copnhagen University, study no. SBK08008, p 82
    253. Nilsson U, Örlander G (1995) Effects of regeneration methods on drought damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings. Can J For Res 25:790–802CrossRef
    254. Nilsson U, Örlander G (1999) Vegetation management on grass-dominated clearcuts planted with Norway spruce in southern Sweden. Can J For Res 29:1015–1026CrossRef
    255. Nunamaker C, Valachovic Y (2007) Forest stewardship series 7: forest regeneration. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, ANR communication services, p 256
    256. O’Reilly C, Harper CP, Keane M (2001) The field performance of bare-root stock compared with container stock of western hemlock and western red cedar under Irish conditions. Ir For 58:15–29
    257. O’Reilly C, Keane M, Morrissey N (2002) The importance of plant size for successful forest plantation establishment. COFORD connects reproductive material no. 5
    258. Odlum K, Scarratt J, Timmer A, Duckett S, Ross-Slomke P (2001) Container stock production. In: Wagner RG, Colombo SJ (eds) Regenerating the Canadian forest: principles and practice for Ontario. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Markham, pp 281–306
    259. Okafo OA, Hanover JW (1978) Two-year performance of barerooted and containerized trembling and bigtooth aspen seedlings. Tree Plant Notes 29:24–28
    260. Owston PW (1972) Field performance of containerized seedlings in the western United States. In: Permanent association committee proceedings. Western Forestry and Conservation Association, pp 109–111
    261. Owston PW (1974) Two-crop production of western conifers. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings, North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great plains agricultural council publications 68, Lincoln, NE pp, 104–111
    262. Owston PW (1990) Target seedling specifications: are stocktype designations useful? In: Rose R et al (eds) Target seedling symposium: proceedings of the combined meeting of western forest nursery association. USDA forest service general technical report RM-200, pp 9–16
    263. Owston PW, Seidel KW (1978) Container and root treatments affect growth and root form of planted ponderosa pine. Can J For Res 8:232–236CrossRef
    264. Owston PW, Stein WI (1978) Survival, growth, and root form of containerized and bare-root Douglas-firs and noble firs seven years after planting. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 216–221
    265. Owston PW, Walters GA, Molina R (1992) Selection of planting stock, inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi, and use of direct seeding. In: Hobbs SD et al (eds) Reforestation practice in southwestern Oregon and northern California. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, pp 310–327
    266. Parker WC, Moorhead DJ, Pallardy SG, Garrett HE, Dixon RK, Sander IL (1986) Six-year field performance of container-grown and bare-root black oak seedlings inoculated with Pisolithus tinctorius and outplanted on two Ozark clear-cuts. Can J For Res 16:1339–1344CrossRef
    267. Paterson JM, Maki DS (1994) Effect of initial seedling morphology and planting practices on field performance of jack pine 6 years after planting. ON forest research report no. 130, 15 pp
    268. Paterson J, Deyoe D, Millson S, Galloway R (2001) Handling and planting of Seedlings. In: Wagner RG, Colombo SJ (eds) Regenerating the Canadian forest: principles and practice for Ontario. Fitzhenry & Whiteside, Markham, pp 325–342
    269. Payandeh B, Wood JE (1988) Identifying factors affecting plantation performance in boreal forests of Ontario. New For 2:73–87CrossRef
    270. Pendl FT, D’Anjou BN (1991) Survival and growth of 4 amabilis fir stock types on Vancouver Island. For Chron 67:147–154CrossRef
    271. Pickens B, Howell T (2003) Morphological differences of the root system of bareroot and container longleaf pine after outplanting. In: Riley LE et al (technical coordinators) National proceedings: forest and conservation nursery associations USDA forest service, RMRS-P-28, pp 17–20
    272. Pilz D, Znerold RM (1986) Comparison of survival enhancement techniques for outplanting on a harsh site in the western Oregon Cascades. Tree Plant Notes 37:24–28
    273. Pinto JR, Dumroese RK, Davis AS, Landis TD (2011) Conducting seedling stock type trials: a new approach to an old question. J For 109:293–299
    274. Poorter H, Jonas C, Bühler J, Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma JA (2012) Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct Plant Biol 39:839–850CrossRef
    275. Pope PE (1984) Influence of site and mycorrhizae on the establishment of bare-root and container-grown red oak seedlings. In: Hodges JD, Johnson PS (eds) Second workshop on seedling physiology and growth problems in oak planting. USDA forest service general technical report NC-99, p 21
    276. Preisig CL, Carlson WC, Promnitz LC (1979) Comparative root system morphologies of seed-in-place, bareroot, and containerized Douglas-fir seedlings after outplanting. Can J For Res 9:399–405CrossRef
    277. Quoreshi AM, Timmer VR (2000) Growth, nutrient dynamics and ectomycorrhizal development of container-grown Picea mariana seedlings in response to exponential nutrient loading. Can J For Res 30:191–201CrossRef
    278. Radosevich SR, Osteryoung K (1987) Principles governing plant–environment interactions. In: Walstad JD, Kuch PJ (eds) Forest vegetation management for conifer production. Wiley, NY, pp 105–156
    279. Radwan MA (1992) Production and assessment of red alder planting stock. USDA forest service research paper, PNW-450, p 13
    280. Renou F, Scallan U, Keane M, Farrell EP (2007) Early performance of native birch (Betula spp.) planted on cutaway peatlands: influence of species, stocktype and seedling size. Eur J For Res 126:545–554CrossRef
    281. Renou-Wilson F, Keane M, Farrell EP (2008) Effect of planting stocktype and cultivation treatment on the establishment of Norway spruce on cutaway peatlands. New For 36:307–330CrossRef
    282. Reynolds JP, Greene TA, Britt JR (2002) Effect of lifting method, seedling size, and herbaceous weed control on first year growth of loblolly pine seedlings. In: Outcalt KW (ed) Proceedings of the eleventh biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SRS-48, pp 51–54
    283. Riley LE, Steinfeld D (2005) Effects of bareroot nursery practices on tree seedling root development: an evolution of cultural practices at J. Herbert Stone nursery. New For 30:107–126CrossRef
    284. Ritchie GA (1984) Assessing seedling quality. In: Duryea ML, Landis TD (eds) Forest nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 243–266CrossRef
    285. Ritchie GA (2004) Container seedling storage and handling in the Pacific Northwest: answers to some frequently asked questions. In: Riley LE; Dumroese RK, Landis TD (tech coords.) Nat proceedings: forest and conservation Nursery Associations. USDA forest service proceedings RMRS-P-33, 2004, pp 3–7
    286. Ritchie GA, Dunlap JR (1980) Root growth potential: its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. N Z J For Sci 10:218–248
    287. Ritchie GA, Tanaka Y (1990) Root growth potential and the target seedling. In: Rose R, Campbell SJ, Landis TD (eds) Target seedling symposium: proceedings of the western forest nursery associations. USDA forest service general technical report RM-200, pp 37–51
    288. Rodríguez-Trejo DA, Duryea ML (2003) Indicadores de calidad de planta en Pinus palustris Mill. Agrociencia 37:299–307
    289. Rose R, Haase DL (2005) Root and shoot allometry of bareroot and container Douglas-fir seedlings. New For 30:215–233CrossRef
    290. Rose R, Ketchum JS (2003) Interaction of initial seedling diameter, fertilization and weed control on Douglas-fir growth over the first four years after planting. Ann For Sci 60:625–635CrossRef
    291. Rosner LS, Rose R (2006) Synergistic stem volume response to combinations of vegetation control and seedling size in conifer plantations in Oregon. Can J For Res 36:930–944CrossRef
    292. Rosvall O (1994) Stability in lodgepole pine and resistance to wind and snow loads. Forest Research Institute of Sweden, Redogörelse no. 2, 47 pp
    293. Rowan SJ (1987) Nursery seedling quality affects growth and survival in outplantings. GA forest research paper 70
    294. Rowe SJ (1964) Environmental preconditioning with special reference to forestry. Ecology 45:399–403CrossRef
    295. Ruehle JL (1985) Lateral-root development and spread of Pisolithus tinctorius ectomycorrhizae on bare-root and container-grown loblolly pine seedlings after planting. For Sci 31:220–225
    296. Ruehle JL, Marx DH, Barnett JP, Pawuk WH (1981) Survival and growth of container-grown and bare-root shortleaf pine seedlings with Pisolithus and Thelephora ectomycorrhizae. South J Appl For 5:20–24
    297. Rune G (2003) Slits in container wall improve root structure and stem straightness of outplanted Scots pine seedlings. Silva Fenn 37:333–342CrossRef
    298. Sakai A, Larcher W (1987) Frost survival of plants. Ecological studies, vol 62. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
    299. Sands R (1984) Transplanting stress in radiata pine. Aust For Res 14:67–72
    300. Scagel RK, Evans RC (1992) Exploratory study of root form of white spruce stocktypes. In: Kooistra CM (ed) Proceedings of the 1992 forestry nursery association of British Columbia meeting, Ministry of Forests, Vernon, BC, pp 133–136
    301. Scagel RK, Green RN, von Hahn H, Evans RC (1989) Exploratory high elevation regeneration trials in the Vancouver forest region: 10-year species performance of planted stock. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services FRDA rep no. 098, p 42
    302. Scarratt JB (1972) Effect of tube diameter and spacing on the size of tubed seedling planting stock. Canadian forest service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Info. Rep. O-X-170, p 16
    303. Scarratt JB (1974) Performance of tubed seedlings in Ontario. In: Tinus et al (eds) Proceedings, north American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great plains agricultural council publications 68, Lincoln, NE, pp 310–320
    304. Scarratt JB (1982) Container stock specifications for northern Ontario. In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 343–354
    305. Scarratt JB, Wood JE (1988) Nine-year results of a black spruce and white spruce paperpot planting trial in boreal Ontario. Canadian forest service, Great Lakes For Cen, Info Rep O-X-391, p 24
    306. Schultz RP (1973) Site treatment and planting method alter root development of slash pine. USDA forest service research paper, SE-109
    307. Schultz RP (1997) Loblolly pine: the ecology and culture of loblolly pine. USDA forest service agricultural handbook 713
    308. Segaran S, Dojack JC, Rathwell RK (1978a) Assessment of root deformities of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) planted in southeastern Manitoba. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 197–200
    309. Segaran S, Dojak JC, Rathwell RK (1978b) Studies of bareroot and container plantations: 1. assessment of root deformities of jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) planted in southeastern Manitoba. Manitoba Dept. of Renewable Resources and Transportation Services, Tree Improvement & Forest Genetics, Forest Management Section, Lands & Forest Division, Winnipeg, MB. Manuscript rep no. 78-2, p 5
    310. Seiler JR, Paganelli DJ, Cazell BH (1990) Growth and water potential of j-rooted loblolly pine and eastern white pine seedlings over three growing seasons. New For 4:147–153CrossRef
    311. Sharpe AL, Mason WL, Howes REJ (1990) Early forest performance of roughly handled Sitka spruce and Douglas-fir of different plant types. Scott For 44:257–265
    312. Shaw DV (1985) Containerized seedlings a good buy. For Farmer 45:11–12
    313. Sheedy G (1984) Mesures et observations de pin gris (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) en contenant et a racines nues, trois ans après la plantation [Measurement of and observations on containerized and barerooted Pinus banksiana three years after planting.] Gouvernement du Québec Ministrère de I’Energie des Resources Service de la recherché (Terres et Fortes) Note No 21, 13 pp
    314. Sheedy G (1990) Results of a 1989 survey on the stability of several jack pine and black spruce plantations Gouvernement du Québec Ministrère de I’Energie des Ressource (Forêts). Forest research note no. 38. 12 pp
    315. Silim SN, Lavender DP (1991) Relationship between cold hardiness, stress resistance and bud dormancy in white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss.) seedlings. In: Donnelly FP, Lussenburg HW (eds) Proceedings of the (1991) forest nursery association of British Columbia Meeting. Forest Nursery Association of British Columbia, pp 9–14
    316. Simpson DG (1988) Fixing the Edsel—can bareroot stock quality be improved? In: Landis TD (ed) Proceedings, combined meeting of the western forest nursery association. USDA forest service general technical report RM-167, pp 24–30
    317. Simpson DG (1991) Growing density and container volume affect nursery and field growth of interior spruce seedlings. North J Appl For 8:160–165
    318. Simpson DG (1994) Nursery growing density and container volume affect nursery and field growth of Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine seedlings. USDA forest service general technical report RM-257, pp 104–114
    319. Simpson DG, Thompson CF, Sutherland CD (1994) Field performance potential of interior spruce seedlings: effects of stress treatments and prediction by root growth potential and needle conductance. Can J For Res 24:576–586CrossRef
    320. Sloan JP, Jump LH, Ryker RA (1987) Container-grown ponderosa pine seedlings outperform bareroot seedlings on harsh sites in southern Utah. USDA forest service research paper, INT-384
    321. South DB, Barnett JP (1986) Herbicides and planting date affect early performance of container-grown and bare-root loblolly pine seedlings in Alabama. New For 1:17–27CrossRef
    322. South DB, Blake JI (1994) Top-pruning increases survival of pine seedlings. Ala Agric Exp Station Highlights Agric Res 41:9
    323. South DB, Donald DG (2002) Effect of nursery conditioning treatments and fall fertilization on survival and early growth of Pinus taeda seedlings in Alabama, USA. Can J For Res 32:1171–1179CrossRef
    324. South DB, Mason WL (1993) Influence of differences in planting stock size on early height growth of Sitka spruce. Forestry 66:83–96CrossRef
    325. South DB, Mitchell RJ (1999) Determining the “optimum” slash pine seedling size for use with four levels of vegetative management on flatwoods site in Georgia, USA. Can J For Res 29:1039–1046CrossRef
    326. South DB, Stumpff NJ (1990) Root stripping reduces root growth potential of loblolly pine seedlings. South J Appl For 14:196–199
    327. South DB, Boyer JN, Bosch L (1985) Survival and growth of loblolly pine as influenced by seedling grade: 13 year results. South J Appl For 9:76–81
    328. South DB, Larsen HS, Boyer JN, Williams HM (1990) Seed spacing and seedling biomass: effect on root growth potential of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). New For 4:179–192CrossRef
    329. South DB, Rakestraw JL, Lowerts GA (2001) Early gains from planting large diameter seedlings and intensive management are additive for loblolly pine. New For 21:97–110CrossRef
    330. South DB, Harris SW, Barnett JP, Hainds MJ, Gjerstada DH (2005) Effect of container type and seedling size on survival and early height growth of Pinus palustris seedlings in Alabama, U.S. For Ecol Manage 204:385–398CrossRef
    331. Sprackling JA (1977) Early field survival of bare-root, container-grown, and potted ponderosa pine seedlings in south-central Nebraska. USDA forest service research note, RM-335, 2 pp
    332. Stanclik GE (1987) Black spruce stock standards and plantation data. In: “Fitness for Purpose” stock standards and early plantation performance. Stock production development activity seminar ont. Minimum national resources, 17 pp
    333. Starkey TE, Enebak SA (2013) Nursery lifter operation affects root growth potential of pine seedlings. Tree Plant Notes 56:35–42
    334. Stein WI (1974) Improving containerized reforestation systems. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings, north American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great plains agricultural council publications 68, Lincoln, NB, pp 434–440
    335. Stein WI, Owston PW (1975) Why use container-grown seedlings? In: Global forestry and the western role. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Western Reforestation Coordination Committee Western Forestry and Conservation Association, Portland Oregon, pp 119–121
    336. Stein WI, Owston PW (1977) Containerized seedlings in western reforestation. J For 75:575–578
    337. Stein WI, Edwards JL, Tinus RW (1975) Outlook for container-grown seedling use in reforestation. J For 73:337–341
    338. Stjernberg EI (1996) Seedling transportation: effect of mechanical shocks on seedling performance. Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada, Vancouver, BC, technical report no. TR-114
    339. Stjernberg EI (1997) Mechanical shock during transportation: effects on seedling performance. New For 13:401–420CrossRef
    340. Stone EC (1955) Poor survival and the physiological condition of planting stock. For Sci 1:89–94
    341. Stroupe MC (1998) First-year survival and growth of bareroot and container water and willow oak seedlings grown at different levels of mineral nutrition. Master’s Thesis, Stephen F. Austin State University
    342. Struve D, Arnold MA, Beeson R, Ruter JM, Svenson S, Witte WT (1994) The copper connection. Am Nur 90:52–56
    343. Sundström E, Keane M (1999) Root architecture, early development and basal sweep in containerized and bare-root Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Plant Soil 217:65–78CrossRef
    344. Sung SS, Black CC, Kormanik TL, Zarnoch SJ, Kormanik PP, Counce PA (1997) Fall nitrogen fertilization and the biology of Pinus taeda seedling development. Can J For Res 27:1406–1412CrossRef
    345. Sutherland C, Newsome T (1988) Field performance of five interior spruce stock types with and without fertilization at time of planting. In: Landis TD (ed) Proceedings, combined meeting of the western forest nursery associations western forest nursery council. USDA forest service general technical report RM-167, pp 195–198
    346. Sutton RF (1969) Form and development of conifer root systems. Comm. Ag. Beur. Technical communication no. 7
    347. Sutton RF (1985) Vegetation management in Canadian forestry. Inf. Rep. 0-X-369. Department of Environment, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, ON
    348. Sutton RF, Weldon TP (1993) Jack pine establishment in Ontario: 5-year comparison of stock types ± bracke scarification, mounding, and chemical site preparation. For Chron 69(5):545–553CrossRef
    349. Sword Sayer MA, Sung SJS, Haywood J (2011) Longleaf pine root system development and seedling quality in response to copper root pruning and cavity size. South J Appl For 35:5–11
    350. Tabbush PM (1986) Rough handling reduces the root growth potential and survival of barerooted conifer transplants. Quart J For 80:185–188
    351. Tabbush PM, Ray D (1989) Effects of rough handling and microsite on the establishment of Sitka spruce on clearfelled sites in Upland Britain. Forestry 62:289–296
    352. Teclaw RM, Isebrands JG (1993a) An artificial regeneration system for establishing northern red oak on dry-mesic sites in the Lake States, USA. Ann For Sci 50:543–552CrossRef
    353. Teclaw RM, Isebrands JG (1993b) Artificial regeneration of northern red oak in the Lake States with a light shelterwood: a departure from tradition. In: Gillespie AR et al (eds) Proceedings, 9th central hardwood forest conference: proceedings. USDA forest service general technical report NC-161, pp 185–194
    354. Teskey RO, Grier CC, Hinckley TM (1984) Changes in photosynthesis and water relations with age and season in Abies amabiliis. Can J For Res 14:77–84CrossRef
    355. Thiffault N (2004) Stock type in intensive silviculture: a (short) discussion about roots and size. For Chron 80:463–468CrossRef
    356. Thiffault N, Roy V (2011) Living without herbicides in Québec (Canada): historical context, current strategy, research and challenges in forest vegetation management. Eur J For Res 130:117–133CrossRef
    357. Thiffault N, Jobidon R, Munson AD (2003) Performance and physiology of large containerized and bare-root spruce seedlings in relation to scarification and competition in Québec (Canada). Ann For Sci 60:645–655CrossRef
    358. Thiffault N, Hébert F, Jobidon R (2012a) Planted Picea mariana growth and nutrition as influenced by silviculture × nursery interactions on an ericaceous-dominated site. Silva Fennica 46:667–682CrossRef
    359. Thiffault N, Lafleur B, Roy V, DeBlois J (2012b) Large planting stock type and mechanical release effects on the establishment success of Picea glauca plantations in Quebec, Canada. Int J For Res. doi:10.​1155/​(2012)/​617392
    360. Thiffault N, Jobidon R, Munson AD (2014) Comparing large containerized and bareroot conifer stock on sites of contrasting vegetation composition in a non-herbicide scenario. New For 45:875–891CrossRef
    361. Thompson BE (1985) Seedling morphological evaluation: what you can tell by looking. In: Duryea ML (ed) Evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive ability of major tests. Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, pp 59–72
    362. Thomson AJ, McMinn RG (1989a) Effects of stock type and site preparation on growth to crown closure of white spruce and lodgepole pine. Can J For Res 19:262–269CrossRef
    363. Thomson AJ, McMinn RG (1989b) Height growth rates of young white spruce and lodgepole pine. Can J For Res 19:257–261CrossRef
    364. Timmer VR (1997) Exponential nutrient loading: a new fertilization technique to improve seedling performance on competitive sites. New For 13:279–299CrossRef
    365. Timmis R, Tanaka Y (1976) Effects of container density and plant water stress on growth and cold hardiness of Douglas-fir seedlings. For Sci 22:167–172
    366. Tinus RW (1974) Characteristics of seedlings with high survival potential. In: Tinus RW et al (eds) Proceedings, North American containerized forest tree seedling symposium. Great plains agricultural council publications 68, Lincoln, NE, pp 276–282
    367. Tinus RW (1976) Greenhouse container nurseries for better trees. In: Tinus RW (ed) Shelterbelts on the Great Plains: proceedings of the symposium. Great plains agricultural council publications 78, Lincoln, NE, pp 137–140
    368. Tinus RW (1979) Use of container-grown hardwoods for reforestation. In: Holt HA, Fischer BC (eds) Regenerating Oaks in Upland Hardwood Forests. Purdue Research Foundation, pp 120–125
    369. Tinus RW, McDonald SE (1979) How to grow tree seedlings in containers in greenhouses. USDA forest service general technical report RM-60
    370. Tinus RW, Owston PW (1984) Physiology research made forestation with container-grown seedlings successful. In: Duryea ML, Brown GN (eds) Seedling physiology and reforestation success: proceedings of the physiology working group, technical session. Society of American Foresters National Convention. Forestry sciences 14, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht Netherlands. pp 143–155
    371. Todd AMD (1989) Stocktypes for planting what's available, what's required. ln: Scrivener BA, MacKinnon JA (eds) Learning from the past, looking to the future. Proc N Silv Com 1988 Winter Workshop Prince George BC, BC Min For/Can For Serv, pp 24–32
    372. Toumey JW (1916) Seeding and planting. Wiley, New York
    373. van Buijtenen JP, Lowe WJ (1982) Use of containerized seedlings for progeny testing. In: Guldin R, Barnett JP (eds) Proceedings of the southern containerized forest tree seedling conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-37, pp 145–148
    374. van den Driessche R (1982) Early growth and survival of interior spruce stock. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research. Progress report EP 859.03
    375. van den Driessche R (1984) Relationship between spacing and nitrogen fertilization of seedlings in the nursery, seedling mineral nutrition, and outplanting performance. Can J For Res 14:431–436CrossRef
    376. van den Driessche R (1988) Response of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (mirb.) franco) to some different fertilizers applied at planting. New For 2:89–110CrossRef
    377. van den Driessche R (1992) Absolute and relative growth of Douglas-fir seedlings of different sizes. Tree Physiol 10:141–152CrossRef
    378. van Eerden E (1978) Roots of planted trees in central British Columbia. In: Van Eerden E, Kinghorn JM (eds) Proceedings, root form of planted trees symposium. BC Ministry of Forest/Canadian Forest Services, Victoria, BC, Jt rep no. 8, pp 201–207
    379. van Eerden E, Gates JW (1990) Seedling production and processing: containers. In: Lavender DP et al (eds) Regenerating British Columbia’s Forests. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 226–234
    380. Van Sambeek JW, Hanover JW, Williams RD (1991) Planting stock type × genotype interactions affect early outplanting performance of black walnut seedlings. In: McCormick LH, Gottschalk KW (eds) Proceedings, 8th central hardwoods forest conference. USDA forest service general technical report NE-148, pp 321–331
    381. van West PV, Morris BM, Reid B, Appiah AA, Osborne MC, Campbell TA, Shephard SJ, Gow NAR (2002) Oomycete plant pathogens use electric fields to target roots. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15:790–798CrossRefPubMed
    382. Villar-Salvador P, Penuelles R, Enriquez E, Penuelas J, Rubira JL (2004) Nursery cultivation regimes, plant functional attributes, and field performance relationship in Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex L. For Ecol Manage 196:257–266CrossRef
    383. von Althen FW (1983) Effects of age and size of sugar maple planting stock on early survival and growth. Tree Plant Notes 34:31–33
    384. von Althen FW, Prince FA (1986) Black walnut (Juglans nigra L.) establishment: six-year survival and growth of containerized and 1 + 0 seedlings. Tree Plant Notes 37:11–14
    385. Vyse A (1981) Growth of young spruce plantations in interior British Columbia. For Chron 57:174–180CrossRef
    386. Vyse A (1982) Field performance of small-volume container-grown seedlings in the central interior of British Columbia. In: Scarratt JB et al (eds) Proceedings of the Canadian containerized tree seedling symposium, COJFRC symposium O-P-10. Canadian forest service, pp 291–298
    387. Wakeley PC (1935) Artificial reforestation in the southern pine region. USDA Tech Bull 492:115
    388. Wakeley PC (1948) Physiological grades of southern pine nursery stock. Soc Am For Proc 1948:311–322
    389. Wakeley PC (1954) Planting the southern pines. Agriculture monogram no. 18. USDA forest service, Washington, DC, p 233
    390. Walker NR, Johnson HJ (1980) Containerized conifer seedling field performance in Alberta and the Northwest Territories. Information report (N For Res Cen) NOR-X-218, p 32
    391. Walter WD, Godsey LD, Garrett HE, Dwyer JP, Van Sambeek JW, Ellersieck MR (2013) Survival and 14-year growth of black, white, and swamp white oaks established as bareroot and RPM®-containerized planting stock. North J Appl For 30:43–46CrossRef
    392. Walters GA, Medlicott G (1990) Container hybrid pines survive on a harsh dam site. Tree Plant Notes 41:8–14
    393. Wang GG, Siemens JA, Keenan V, Philippot D (2000) Survival and growth of black and white spruce seedlings in relation to stock type, site preparation and plantation type in southeastern Manitoba. For Chron 76(5):775–782CrossRef
    394. Wang Y, Zhou Z, Jin G, Hong G, Wang H (2007) Growth of Taxus chinensis var. mairei for container seedlings in different media mixtures and for bare-root versus container seedlings in a young stand. J Zhejiang For College 5:27
    395. Waring RH, Franklin JF (1979) Evergreen coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. Science 204:1380–1386CrossRefPubMed
    396. Waters WE, DeMars CJ, Cobb FW (1991) Analysis of early mortality of Douglas-fir seedlings in postharvest plantings in northwestern California. For Sci 37:802–826
    397. Wendel GW (1979) Growth and survival of three hardwood species as affected by artificial regeneration method. Tree Plant Notes 30:16–19
    398. Wenger KF (1984) Silviculture. In: Wenger KF (ed) Forestry handbook, 2nd edn. SAF publication 84-01, Wiley, New York, pp 413–455
    399. Wenny DL, Liu Y, Dumroese RK, Osborne HL (1988) First year field growth of chemically root pruned containerized seedlings. New For 2:111–118CrossRef
    400. Whisenant SG (1999) Repairing damaged wildlands: a process-oriented, landscape-scale approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
    401. White DP, Schneider G, Lemmien W (1970) Hardwood plantation establishment using container grown stock. Tree Plant Notes 21:20–25
    402. Wibeck E (1923) The deformity of pine root systems as caused by bar planting (German into English translation). Meddelanden fran statens Skogsforsoksanstale 20:261–303
    403. Williams H, Stroupe M (2002) First-year survival and growth of bareroot and container water oak and willow oak seedlings grown at different levels of mineral nutrition. In: Outcalt KW (ed) Proceedings of the eleventh biennial southern silvicultural research conference. General technical report SRS-48, pp 338–341
    404. Williams HM, South DB, Webb A (1988) Effects of fall irrigation on morphology and root growth potential of loblolly pine seedlings growing in sand. S Afr For J 147:1–5
    405. Williamson DM (1978) Survival and growth of planted conifers on the dead Indian plateau east of Ashland, Oregon. USDA forest service research paper, PNW-242, p 15
    406. Wilson E, Vitols KC, Park A (2007) Root characteristics and growth potential of container and bare-root seedlings of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Ontario, Canada. New For 34:163–176CrossRef
    407. Wood JE (1983) Five-year comparison of jack pine bare-root, Ontario tube, and paperpot seedlings. Canadian Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, information report O-X-355, p 13
    408. Wood JE (1984) Black spruce outplantings in Ontario’s clay belt. Bare-root versus paperpot stock: five year results. Information report O-X-356, p 11
    409. Wood JE (1990) Black spruce and jack pine plantation performance in boreal Ontario: 10-year results. North J Appl For 7:175–179
    410. Wood JE (1995) Silvicultural treatments for black spruce establishment in boreal Ontario: effects of weed control, stock type, and planting season. NODA/NFP technical report TR-10, p 19
    411. Wood JE, Dominy SWJ (1985) Black spruce, white spruce and jack pine outplantings in boreal Ontario: bare-root vs. paperpot stock and spring vs. summer planting. Information report O -X-368.8 8 pp
    412. Wood JE, Mitchell EG (1995) Silvicultural treatments for black spruce establishment in boreal Ontario: effect of weed control, stocktype, and planting season. Canadian forest service. Technical report TR-10, 19 pp
    413. Wood JE, von Althen FW (1993) Establishment of white spruce and black spruce in Boreal Ontario: effects of chemical site preparation and post-planting weed control. For Chron 69:554–560CrossRef
    414. Wood JE, von Althen FW, Campbell RA (1990) Black spruce outplant performance: effect of winter application of hexazinone on shear-bladed sites in boreal Ontario. Can J For Res 20:1541–1548CrossRef
    415. Woods FW (1980) Growth of loblolly pine with roots planted in five configurations. South J Appl For 4:70–73
    416. Woolery PO, Jacobs DF (2011) Photosynthetic assimilation and carbohydrate allocation of Quercus rubraseedlings in response to simulated herbivory. Ann For Sci 68:617–624CrossRef
    417. Woolery PO, Jacobs DF (2014) Planting stocktype and seasonality of simulated browsing affect regeneration establishment of Quercus rubra. Can J For Res 44:732–739CrossRef
    418. Wright GM, Pope PE, Fischer BC, Holt HA, Byrnes WR (1985) Chemical weed control to establish natural and artificial oak regeneration in a mechanically thinned upland hardwood stand. In: Shoulders E (ed) Proceedings of the third biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SO-54, pp 266–272
    419. Xydias GK (1982) Factors influencing survival and early stocking trends in plantations of loblolly pine. In: Jones E Jr (ed) Proceedings, second biennial southern silvicultural research conference. USDA forest service general technical report SE-24, pp 101–108
    420. Yeiser JL, Paschke JL (1987) Regenerating wet sites with bare-root and containerized loblolly pine seedlings. South J Appl For 11:52–56
    421. Youngblood A, Cole E, Newton M (2011) Survival and growth response of white spruce stock types to site preparation in Alaska. Can J For Res 41:793–809CrossRef
    422. Yuyitung I, Simpson JA, Gordon AM (1994) Effects of rough handling on early performance of white pine and white spruce seedlings. Tree Plant Notes 45:142–146
    423. Zaczek JJ, Steiner KC, Bowersox TW (1993) Performance of northern red oak planting stock. North J Appl For 10(3):105–111
    424. Zaczek JJ, Steiner KC, Bowersox TW (1996) Northern red oak planting stock: 6-year results. New For 13(1–3):177–191

    For further details log on website :
    http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11056-015-9476-6
    at

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

    Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

    Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...