Balancing wood market demand and common property rights: a case study of a community in the Italian Alps

Published Date
October 2014, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 417–426

Original Article

First Online: 

24 November 2013

DOI: 10.1007/s10310-013-0427-9

Cite this article as: 

Paletto, A., De Meo, I., Cantiani, M.G. et al. J For Res (2014) 19: 417. doi:10.1007/s10310-013-0427-9

Author

• Alessandro Paletto
• Isabella De MeoEmail author
• Maria Giulia Cantiani
• Dario Cocciardi

Abstract

Common property rights have a long tradition in the Italian Alps, dating back to the Middle Ages, when alpine village communities managed common forests. On these properties, in accordance with rules aimed at regulating the collective use of resources, shareholders have the right of common use of the land. As many mountainous areas still rely on firewood for the heating of homes, the right to gather firewood from common forests is the most important common property right. In the last few decades, renewable bio-energy production based on forest woody biomass has undergone significant development. In Italy, in communities where the right to gather wood still has economic, social, and cultural relevance, decision makers and community members have a different vision about the use of firewood. This paper focuses on this issue by presenting a case study located in the Italian Eastern Alps, characterised by a historical tradition of common property management. In order to define the optimal strategy to manage the common forests, taking into consideration the local community’s needs, a semi-structured questionnaire was submitted to the administrators of the common forests and to the shareholders. Different scenarios of wood use were developed to support managers and decision makers in identifying on-going trends in firewood demand. The results show that the economic scenario for the development of the bio-energy supply chain cannot be reconciled with the historical tradition and social needs.

References

1. Bravo G, De Moor T (2008) The commons in Europe: from past to future. Int J Commons 2:155–161Google Scholar
2. Burstein P (2003) The impact of public opinion on public policy: a review and an agenda. Polit Res Q 56:29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cole JW, Wolf ER (1974) The hidden frontier: ecology and ethnicity in an Alpine valley. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
4. De Meo I, Cantiani MG, Cocciardi D, Paletto A (2012) Comunità locali e governance del territorio: un’indagine percettiva nell’Altopiano di Pinè. Dendronatura 33:26–40Google Scholar
5. Gerber JD, Nahrath S, Reynard E, Thomi L (2008) The role of common pool resource institutions in the implementation of Swiss natural resource management policy. Int J Commons 2:222–247Google Scholar
6. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 6:1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hoffmann S (2013) Property, possession and natural resource management: towards a conceptual clarification. J Inst Econ 9:39–60Google Scholar
8. Kissling-Näf I, Volkent T, Bisang K (2002) Common properties and natural resources in the Alps: the decay of management structures? For Policy Econ 4:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Lidestav G, Poudyal M, Holmgren E, Keskitalo ECH (2012) Shareholder perceptions of individual and common benefits in Swedish forest commons. Int J Commons 1:164–182Google Scholar
10. McCay BJ (2005) Property rights, the commons, and natural resource management. Econ Leg Relatsh 5:67–82Google Scholar
11. Merlo M (1995) Common property regimes in the forest: just a relic from the past? Unasylva 46:58–63Google Scholar
12. Messerli P (1989) Mensch und Natur im alpinen Lebensraum. Risiken, Chancen, Perspektiven. Paul Haupt Bern, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
13. Nervi P (1999) I demani civici e le proprietà collettive: un diverso modo di possedere, un diverso modo di gestire. CEDAM, PadovaGoogle Scholar
14. Netting R (1981) Balancing on an Alp: ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
15. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Page B, Shapiro R (1983) Effects of public opinion on policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 77:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Paletto A, Cantiani MG, Cocciardi D, De Meo I, Sacchelli S (2011) Governance territoriale nelle proprietà collettive dell’Altopiano di Pinè: tra approccio razionale e culturale. Archivio Scialoja-Bolla 1:153–178Google Scholar
18. Paletto A, De Meo I, Ferretti F (2012a) The influence of common property rights on forest management policy: a case study in Sardinia region, Italy. For Stud 56:16–26Google Scholar
19. Paletto A, Ferretti F, De Meo I (2012b) The role of social networks in forest landscape planning. For Policy Econ 15:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Sacchelli S, De Meo I, Paletto A (2011) The analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production: a case study in Northern Italy. In: Quendler E, Kossler K (eds) Efficient and safe production processes in sustainable agriculture and forestry. Proceedings of XXXIV CIOSTA conference, Vienna, pp 508–509
21. Sacchelli S, De Meo I, Paletto A (2013) Bioenergy production and forest multifunctionality: a trade-off analysis using multiscale GIS in a case study in Italy. Appl Energy 140:10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Scotti R, Cadoni M (2007) A historical analysis of traditional common forest planning and management in Seneghe, Sardinia. Lessons for sustainable development. For Ecol Manag 249:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Sereni E (1955) Comunità rurali nell’Italia antica. Edizioni Rinascita, RomaGoogle Scholar
24. Viazzo PP (1989) Upland communities. Environment, population and social structure in the Alps Since the sixteenth century. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Wolf ER (1962) Cultural dissonance in the Italian Alps. Comp Stud Soc Hist 5:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Yamada A, Nakagoshi N (2000) Community-based management of rural pine forests in a suburban village of Hiroshima prefecture, western Japan. J For Res 5:237–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-013-0427-9