Minimum tillage adoption among commercial smallholder cotton farmers in Zambia, 2002 to 2011

Published Date
November 2014, Vol.131:34–44, doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.001

Title 
Minimum tillage adoption among commercial smallholder cotton farmers in Zambia, 2002 to 2011

Author 

Philip P. Grabowski ^a,,

Steven Haggblade ^b,

Stephen Kabwe ^c,

Gelson Tembo ^d,

• aMichigan State University, Department of Community Sustainability, Natural Resources, 480 Wilson Rd. Rm. 131, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States
• bMichigan State University, Department of Agricultural Food and Resource Economics, 446 West Circle Dr., Rm. 207, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States
• cIndaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute, PostNet Box 99, Kabulonga, Lusaka, Zambia
• dUniversity of Zambia, Department of Agricultural Economics, Great East Road Campus, P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka 10101, Zambia

Received 7 October 2013. Revised 29 July 2014. Accepted 5 August 2014. Available online 29 August 2014.

Highlights

• •
  13% of commercial smallholder cotton farmers used some form of MT in 2011.
• •
  Among groups interviewed in both 2002 and 2011, MT use increased roughly one-third.
• •
  Ripping with oxen is the most common and fastest growing form of MT.
• •
  Use of hand-hoe basins is declining from 8% in 2002 to 4% in 2011.
• •
  Adoption rates are higher where the lead farmers are using MT on their own land.

Abstract

Despite widespread enthusiasm about conservation agriculture (CA) in Africa, empirical evidence on adoption remains fragmentary. This study examines adoption rates of a critical component of CA, minimum tillage (MT), among 135,000 Zambian cotton farmers by comparing the results of two censuses of cotton lead farmers and buyers conducted in 2002 and again in 2011. The survey results indicate that 13% of cotton farmers used some form of MT in 2011. Among farmer groups interviewed in both years, MT adoption rates increased by about one-third compared to 2002. However, the preferred MT technology packages have changed dramatically. While use of hand-hoe basins has declined, use of ox and tractor-drawn rippers plus herbicides has increased. Tobit regression estimates suggest that four key factors – lead farmer use of MT, number of years of extension efforts, availability of herbicides on credit, and availability of tractor ripper services – all positively influence MT adoption. Zambia’s experience likewise underlines the long timeframe required for testing and refining location-specific technology packages that prove both agronomically suitable and commercially attractive for farmers of differing resource endowments.

Keywords

• Conservation agriculture
• Cotton
• Herbicides
• Adoption
• Zambia
• Technology development

---

Fig. 1.

 Table 1

Table 1.

 Table 2

Table 2.

Fig. 2.

 Table 3

Table 3.

 Table 4

Table 4.

 Table 5

Table 5.

 Table 6

Table 6.

 Table 7

Table 7.

• ⁎ 
  Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 517 643 5218; fax: +1 517 353 8994.

For further details log on website :