Blog List

Friday, 22 July 2016

Cultural values and sustainable forest management: the case of Europe

Published Date

First online: 

Title 

Cultural values and sustainable forest management: the case of Europe

  • Author 
  • Mauro Agnoletti 
  • Antonio Santoro

  • Abstract 

  • The European continent still has a rich heritage of rural landscapes built up over thousands of years. The UNESCO-sCBD Florence Declaration of 2014, describes it as being predominantly a biocultural landscape, as it assimilates economic, social, cultural, and environmental processes in time and space. This definition also includes the forests, which have been affected by several centuries of human action and are also a part of the European cultural heritage. However, an approach to forest landscapes often employing the same tools used for nature conservation has led to a definition of management tools mostly based on ecological characteristics. The origin of forests and woodlands is rarely interpreted as the result of human activities and protected and managed accordingly. The three pillars on which Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) in Europe are based are ecological values, economic values, and sociocultural values. However, no political resolutions requiring countries to develop strategies and carry out actions for the preservation of cultural forests have been developed so far. The fact that cultural values currently play a limited role in SFM indicates the scant consideration given to the role of culture and history, as well as the lack of a comprehensive landscape approach. Failure to effectively and coherently address culture and history may very well be an emerging weakness that needs to be reconciled, especially now that the landscape approach is proposed on a global scale as a new perspective for sustainable development. One of the consequences of this failure has been the widespread application of an idea of ‘naturalness’ to places that are not natural, threatening the conservation of the cultural identity of local populations and the historical values of forests, and favoring processes of abandonment and renaturalization. The present paper advocates the practical implementation of existing tools for protecting cultural forest landscapes, such as the MCPFE Guidelines for Social and Cultural Values in SFM and the UNESCO-sCBD Florence Declaration.

  • References 

    1. Agnoletti M (ed) (2006) The conservation of cultural landscapes. CAB International, Wallingford-New York
    2. Agnoletti M (ed) (2013) Italian Historical Rural Landscapes. Cultural Values for the Environment and Rural Development. Springer, New York
    3. Agnoletti M (2014) Environmental Thinking and Cultural Values: a reflection on environmental globalisation and the Mediterranean Culture. Global Environment 7:257–290
    4. Andersson R, Östlund L, Kempe G (2008) How to find the rare trees in the forest. Inventory strategies for assessing culturally modified trees in boreal Sweden. Can J For Res 38:462–469CrossRef
    5. Association pour l’Iscription des Climats du Vignoble de Bourgogne (2012) Les climats du vignoble de Bourgogne. Dossier de candidature à l’insciption sur la liste du patrimoine mondial de l’Unesco
    6. Balée W (1998) Historical Ecology. Premises and postulates. In: Balée W (ed) Advances in historical ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 13–29
    7. Berger G, Kaechele H, Pfeffer H (2006) The greening of the European agricultural policy by linking the European wide obligation of set aside with voluntary agri-environmental measures on a regional scale. Environ Sci Policy 9:509–524CrossRef
    8. Brůna J, Wild J, Svoboda M, Heurich M, Müllerová J (2013) Impacts and underlying factors of landscape-scale, historical disturbance of mountain forest identified using archival documents. For Ecol Manage 305:294–306CrossRef
    9. Council of Europe (2000) The European landscape convention. Strasbourg
    10. Cunha A, Swinbank A (2011) An inside view of the CAP reform process: explaining the MacSharry, Agenda 2000 and Fischler reforms. Oxford Scholarships on line, OxfordCrossRef
    11. European Commission (2013) The common agricultural policy (CAP) and agriculture in Europe. MEMO 13/631
    12. FAO (2010) Forest Resource Assessment. FAO, Rome
    13. Forest Europe, UNECE, FAO (2011) State of Europe’s Forests 2011. Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe
    14. Fowler PJ (2003) World Heritage Cultural Landscapes. WH papers 6, UNESCO WHC, Paris
    15. Hamre LN, Domaas ST, Austad I, Rydgren K (2007) Land-cover and structural changes in a western Norwegian cultural landscape since 1865, based on an old cadastral map and a field survey. Landscape Ecol 22:1563–1574CrossRef
    16. Hibbert C (1987) The grand Tour. Methuen Publishing, York
    17. Höchtl F, Lehringer S, Konold W (2005) “Wilderness”: what it means when it becomes a reality—a case study from the southwestern Alps. Landsc Urban Plan 70:85–95CrossRef
    18. IUFRO (2007) Guidelines for the implementation of social and cultural values in sustainable forest management. A scientific contribution to the implementation of MCPFE–Vienna resolution 3. IUFRO Occasional paper 19
    19. Jedrzejewska B, Jedrzejewski W (1998) Predation in Vertebrate Communities. The Bialowieza primeval forest as a case study. Springer, DordrechtCrossRef
    20. Johann E, Agnoletti M, Axelsson AL, Bürgi M, Östlund L, Rochel X, Schmidt UE, Schuler A, Skovsgaard J-P, Winiwarter V (2004) History of secondary spruce forests in Europe. In: Spiecker H, Hansen J, Klimo E, Skovsgaard J-P, Sterba H, von Teuffel K (eds) Norway spruce conversion, option and consequences. EFI research report 18, Brill Leiden-Boston, pp25–62
    21. Krausmann F (2001) Land use and industrial modernization: an empirical analysis of human influence on the functioning of ecosystems in Austria 1830–1995. Land Use Policy 18:17–26CrossRef
    22. Larsson TB (2001) Biodiversity evaluation tools for European Forests. In: Franc A, Laroussinie O, Karjalainen T (eds) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at the forest management unit level, EFI Proceedings vol 38: pp75–82
    23. MCPFE (2003) State of Europe’s forests 2003. MCPFE Liaison Unit, Vienna
    24. MCPFE (2006) Forestry and our Cultural Heritage. Proceedings of the Seminar, 13–15 June 2005, Sunne, Sweden
    25. Mottet A, Ladet S, Coqué N, Gibon A (2006) Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: a case study in the Pyrenees. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:296–310CrossRef
    26. Parrotta J, Agnoletti M, Johann E (eds) (2006) Cultural heritage and sustainable forest management. Proceedings of the Conference, Vol I and II, 8–11 Florence, MCPFE, Warsaw
    27. Reho M (2006) Le misure per la tutela e valorizzazione del paesaggio introdotte dalla nuova PAC. Valutazioni di efficacia in relazione ai fattori di contesto e alle modalità di gestione. In: Marangon F (ed) Gli interventi paesaggistico-ambientali nelle politiche regionali di sviluppo rurale. Franco Angeli, Milano
    28. Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Araùjo MB, Carter TR, Dendoncker N, Ewert F, House JI, Kankaanpaää S, Leemans R, Metzger MJ, Schmit C, Smith P, Tuck G (2006) A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:57–68CrossRef
    29. Samojlik T (ed) (2005) Conservation and hunting. Białowieża forest in the time of kings. Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża
    30. Sauer C (1925) The morphology of landscape. University of California, Publications in Geography 2, 2
    31. Serra P, Pons X, Saurì D (2008) Land-cover and land-use change in a Mediterranean landscape: a spatial analysis of driving forces integrating biophysical and human factors. Appl Geo 28:189–209CrossRef
    32. UNESCO, sCBD (2010) UNESCO–CBD joint program between biological and cultural diversity. UNESCO, Paris
    33. UNESCO, sCBD (2014) Florence declaration on the links between biological and cultural diversity. Florence. www.​landscapeunifi.​it/​images/​pdf/​UNESCO-CBD_​JP_​Florence_​Declaration.​pdf

  • For further details log on website :

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...