Blog List

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Resistance of thermally modified ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) wood under steam pressure against rot fungi, soil-inhabiting micro-organisms and termites

Published Date

DOI: 10.1007/s00107-016-1126-y

Cite this article as: 
Candelier, K., Hannouz, S., Thévenon, MF. et al. Eur. J. Wood Prod. (2016). doi:10.1007/s00107-016-1126-y

  • Kévin Candelier
  • Simon Hannouz
  • Marie-France Thévenon
  • Daniel Guibal
  • Philippe Gérardin
  • Mathieu Pétrissans
  • Robert Collet

Thermal modification processes have been developed to increase the biological durability and dimensional stability of wood. The aim of this paper was to study the influence of ThermoWood® treatment intensity on improvement of wood decay resistance against soil-inhabiting micro-organisms, brown/white rots and termite exposures. All of the tests were carried out in the laboratory with two different complementary research materials. The main research material consisted of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) wood thermally modified at temperatures of 170, 200, 215 and 228 °C. The reference materials were untreated ash and beech wood for decay resistance tests, untreated ash wood for soil bed tests and untreated ash, beech and pine wood for termite resistance tests. An agar block test was used to determine the resistance to two brown-rot and two white-rot fungi according to CEN/TS 15083-1 directives. Durability against soil-inhabiting micro-organisms was determined following the CEN/TS 15083-2 directives, by measuring the weight loss, modulus of elasticity (MOE) and modulus of rupture (MOR) after incubation periods of 24, 32 and 90 weeks. Finally, Reticulitermes santonensis species was used for determining the termite attack resistance by non-choice screening tests, with a size sample adjustment according to EN 117 standard directives on control samples and on samples which have previously been exposed to soil bed test. Thermal modification increased the biological durability of all samples. However, high thermal modification temperature above 215 °C, represented by a wood mass loss (ML%) due to thermal degradation of 20%, was needed to reach resistance against decay comparable with the durability classes of ‘‘durable’’ or ‘‘very durable’’ in the soil bed test. The brown-rot and white-rot tests gave slightly better durability classes than the soil bed test. Whatever the heat treatment conditions are, thermally modified ash wood was not efficient against termite attack neither before nor after soft rot degradation.


  1. Akio E, Hiromi T, Sachiko Y, Goro F (1990) Fungal and termite resistance of etherified wood and its dimensional stability. Kinki Daigaku Nogakubu Kiyo 23:25–32Google Scholar
  2. Allegretti O, Brunetti M, Cuccui I, Ferrari S, Nocetti M, Terziev N (2012) Thermovacuum modification of spruce (Picea abies karst.) and fir (Abies albamill.) wood. BioResources 7:3656–3669Google Scholar
  3. Bal BC (2014) Some physical and mechanical properties of thermally modified juvenile and mature black pine wood. Eur. J. Wood Prod 72:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boonstra MJ, Van Acker J, Kegel E, Stevens M (2007) Optimisation of a two-stage heat treatment process: durability aspects. Wood Sci Technol 41:31–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bravery AF, Dickinson DJ (1979) Screening techniques for potential preservative chemicals. Document no. IRG/WP 2113. The International Research group of Wood Preservation, PeeblesGoogle Scholar
  6. Candelier K, Chaouch M, Dumarçay S, Petrissans A, Petrissans M, Gérardin P (2011) Utilization of thermodesorption coupled to GC–MS to study stability of different wood species to thermodegradation. J Anal Appl Pyrol 92:376–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Candelier K, Dumarçay S, Pétrissans A, Gérardin P, Pétrissans M (2013) Comparison of mechanical properties of heat treated beech woods cured under nitrogen or vacuum. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1762–1765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Candelier K, Thévenon MF, Pétrissans A, Dumarçay S, Gérardin P, Pétrissans M (2016) Control of wood thermal treatment and its effect on decay resistance: a review. Ann For Sci. doi:10.1007/s13595-016-0541-x (In press)Google Scholar
  9. Chaouch M, Pétrissans M, Pétrissans A, Gérardin P (2010) Use of wood elemental composition to predict heat treatment intensity and decay resistance of different softwood and hardwood species. Polym Degrad Stab 95:2255–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaouch M, Dumarçay S, Pétrissans A, Pétrissans M, Gérardin P (2013) Effect of heat treatment intensity on some conferred properties of different European softwood and hardwood species. Wood Sci Technol 47(4):663–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Fan Y, Gao J, Stark NM (2012) The effect of heat treatment on the chemical and color change of black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) wood flour. BioResources 7:1157–1170Google Scholar
  12. CRIQ (2003) Forest products issued from 2nd transformation processes – Wood heat treatment [in French]. Report to the ministère des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs (MRNFP) by the Centre de recherche industrielle du Québec (CRIQ)
  13. Curling S, Clausen C, Winandy J (2002) Relationships between mechanical properties, weight loss, and chemical composition of wood during incipient brown-rot decay. Forest Products Journal 52(7/8):3439Google Scholar
  14. Dilik T, Hiziroglu S (2012) Bonding strength of heat treated compressed Eastern red cedar wood. Mater Des 42:317–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doi S, Takahashi M, Yoshimura T, Kubota M, Adachi A (1998) Attraction of steamed Japanese larch (Larix leptolepis (Sieb. et Zucc.) Gord.) heartwood to the subterranean termite Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Holzforschung 52: 7-12
  16. Edlund ML, Jermer J (2004) Durability of heat-treated wood. COST Action E22 Environmental Optimisation of Wood Protection, Lisbon, Portugal, March, 22-23, 2004
  17. Elaieb MT, Candelier K, Pétrissans A, Dumarçay S, Gérardin P, Pétrissans M (2015) Heat treatment of Tunisian soft wood species: Effect on the durability, chemical modifications and mechanical properties. Maderas, Cienc. tecnol, 17 (4), 699-710
  18. EN 117 (2013) Wood preservatives - Determination of toxic values against Reticulitermes species (European termites) (Laboratory method). European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  19. EN 335 (2013) Durability of wood and wood-based products – Use classes: definitions, application to solid wood and wood-based products. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. EN 350-1 (1994) Durability of wood and wood based products – Natural durability of solid wood – Part 1: Guide to principles of testing and classification of the natural durability of wood. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  21. EN 408 (2012) Timber structures - Structural timber and glued laminated timber - Determination of some physical and mechanical properties. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  22. Esteves B, Pereira HM (2009) Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. BioResources 4(1):370–404Google Scholar
  23. Fengel D, Wegener G (1989) Wood - Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions. Berlin, Germany, Walter de Gruyter, Chapter 12 (Influence of Temperature): 319-344
  24. Finnish ThermoWood Association (2003) Manuel ThermoWood. Snellmninkatu 13, FIN-00171 Helsinki, Finland
  25. Hakkou M, Pétrissans M, Gérardin P, Zoulalian A (2006) Investigation of the reasons for fungal durability of heat treated beech wood. Polym Degrad Stab 91:393–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hannouz S (2014) Development of indicators for the mechanical characterization and durability of heat-treated wood [In French]. PhD Thesis, LaBoMaP, ENSAM-Arts et Métier ParisTech Cluny, France
  27. Hannouz S, Collet R, Buteaud JC, Bléron L, Candelier K (2015) Mechanical characterization of heat treated ash wood in relation with structural timber standards. Pro Ligno 11(2):3–10Google Scholar
  28. Hermoso E, Fernández-Golfín J, Conde M, Troya MT, Mateo R, Cabrero J, Conde M (2015) Characterization of thermally modified pinus radiata timber [In Spanish]. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología 17(3):493–504Google Scholar
  29. Hill CAS (2006) Wood modification: Chemical. Thermal and other processes, WileyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Humar M, Bucar B, Pohleven F (2006) Correlation between modulus of elasticity, mass losses and FTIR spectra of copper treated decayed wood. Document No. IRG/WP 06-10580. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Tromsoe, Norway
  31. Inari G, Petrissans M, Lambert J, Ehrhardt JJ, Gerardin P (2007) Chemical reactivity of heat-treated wood. Wood Sci Technol 41:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jämsä S, Viitaniemi P (2001) Heat treatment of wood. Better durability without chemicals. In A.O. Rapp (Ed.), Review on heat treatments of wood. Proceedings of the Special Seminar on Heat Treatments, Antibes, France, 9 February 2001 (pp. 17-22). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
  33. Junga U, Militz H (2005) Particularities in agar block tests of some modified woods caused by different protection and decay resistance. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Wood Modification, Göttignen
  34. Kamdem DP, Pizzi A, Jermannaud A (2002) Durability of heat-treated wood. Holz Roh Werkst 60:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karamanoğlu M, Akyıldız MH (2013) Colour, gloss and hardness properties of heat treated wood exposed to accelerated weathering. Pro Ligno 9(4):729–738Google Scholar
  36. Kim G, Yun K, Kim J (1998) Effect of heat treatment on the decay resistance and the bending properties of radiate pine sapwood. Material und Organismen 32(2):101–108Google Scholar
  37. Korkut S, Korkut DS, Kocaefe D, Elustondo D, Bajraktari A, Çakıcıer N (2012) Effect of thermal modification on the properties of narrow-leaved ash and chestnut. Ind Crops Prod 35(1):287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lekounougou S, Kocaefe D (2014) Effect of thermal modification temperature on the mechanical properties, dimensional stability, and biological durability of black spruce (Picea mariana). Wood Mat Sci Eng 9(2):59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mazela B, Zakrzewski R, Grześkowiak W, Cofta G, Bartkowiak M (2004) Resistance of thermally modified wood to basidiomycetes. EJPAU, Wood Technol 7(1).
  40. Mburu F, Dumarçay S, Huber F, Pétrissans M, Gérardin P (2006) Improvement of Grevillea robusta durability using heat treatment. Document No. IRG/WP 06- 40333. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Tromsoe, Norway
  41. Metsä-Kortelainen S, Viitanen U (2010) Effect of fungal exposure on the strength of thermally modified Norway spruce and Scots pine. Wood Mat Sci Eng 1:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Metsä-Kortelainen S, Viitaniemi P (2009) Decay resistance of sapwood and heartwood of untreated and thermally modified Scots pine and Norway spruce compared with some other wood species. Wood Mat Sci Eng 4(3–4):105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Metsä-Kortelainen S, Anitikainen T, Viitaniemi P (2005) The water absorption of sapwood and heartwood of Scots pines and Norway spruce heat-treated at 170 & #xB0;C, 190 & #xB0;C, 210 & #xB0;C and 230 & #xB0;C. Holz Roh-Werkst. 64(3):192–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Militz H (2002) Heat treatment of wood: European Processes and their background. Document No. IRG/WP 02- 40241. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
  45. Momohara I, Ohmura W, Kato H, Kubojima Y (2003) Effect of high-temperature treatment on wood durability against the Brown-rot fungus, Fomitopsis palustris, and the termite, Coptotermes formosanus. In: International Iufro Wood Drying Conference. s.l. Proceedings… s.l., pp. 284–287
  46. Nf, ISO 10390 International Organization for Standardization (2005) Soil quality - Determination of pH. AF.NOR, FranceGoogle Scholar
  47. Nunes L, Nobre T, Rapp A (2004) Thermally modified wood in choice tests with subterranean termites. COST E37, Reinbeck
  48. Paul W, Ohlmeyer M, Leithoff H (2006) Thermal modification of OSB-strands by a one-step heat pretreatment Influence of temperature on weight loss, hygroscopicity and improved resistance. Holz Roh- Werkst 65:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pétrissans M, Gérardin P, El Bakali I, Serraj M (2003) Wettability of heat-treated wood. Holzforschung 57(3):301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pétrissans M, Pétrissans A, Gérardin P (2007) Check the durability of heat treated beech wood [In French]. Tracés, Bulletin technique Technologie du bois de la Suisse Romande 17:12–16Google Scholar
  51. Råberg U, Geoffrey D, Terviez N (2012) Loss of strength in biologically degraded thermally modified wood. BioResources 7(4):4658–4671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rousset P, Perré P, Girard P (2004) Modification of mass transfer properties in poplar wood (P. robusta) by thermal treatment at high temperature. Holz Roh-Werkst. 62 (2): 113–119
  53. Sailer M, Rapp AO, Leithoff H, Peek RD (2000) Vergütung von Holz durch Anwendung einer Öl-Hitzebehandlung (Upgrading of wood by application of an oil-heat treatment) (in German). Holz Roh- Werkst 58:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salman S, Pétrissans A, Thévenon MF, Dumarçay S, Gérardin P (2016) Decay and termite resistance of pine blocks impregnated with different additives and subjected to heat treatment. Eur J Wood Prod 74(1):37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sivonen H, Nuopponen M, Maunu SL, Sundholm F, Vuorinen T (2003) Carbonthirteen cross-polarization magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance and fourier transform infrared studies of thermally modified wood exposed to brown and soft rot fungi. Appl Spectrosc 57:266–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sivrikaya H, Ekinci E, Can A, Tasdelen M, Gokmen K (2015a) Effect of heat treatment on the weathering and hardness properties of some wood species. Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the Northern European Network for Wood Sciences and Engineering (WSE), Poland
  57. Sivrikaya H, Can A, Teresa de Troya MC (2015b) Comparative biological resistance of differently thermal modified wood species against decay fungi, reticulitermes grassei and hylotrupes bajulus. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología 17(3):559–570Google Scholar
  58. Sjöström E (1981) Fundamentals and Applications, in: Wood chemistry, Wood polysaccharides. Academic Press, New York (USA), Chapter 3: 49-67
  59. Stamm AJ (1956) Thermal Degradation of Wood and Cellulose. Ind Eng Chem 48(3):413–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stamm AJ (1964) Wood and Cellulose Science. Roland Press, New York, pp 312–342Google Scholar
  61. Surini T, Charrier F, Malvestio J, Charrier B, Moubarik A, Castéra P, Grelier S (2012) Physical properties and termite durability of maritime pine Pinus pinaster Ait., heat-treated under vacuum pressure. Wood Sci Technol 46(1):487–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Šušteršic Ž, Mohareb A, Chaouch M, Pétrissans M, Petrič M, Gérardin P (2010) Prediction of decay resistance of heat treated wood on the basis of its elemental composition. Polym Degrad Stab 95:94–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Syrjänen T, Kangas E (2000) Heat treated timber in Finland. Document No. IRG/WP/00-40158. The International Research Group on Wood Protection, Kona, Hawaii, USA
  64. Talaei A, Karimi AN, Thévenon MF (2013) Influence of heat treatment medium on fungal resistance of beech wood. Document No. IRG/WP 13-40643. The International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden
  65. Temiz A, Yildiz U (2006) The use of modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture to assess wood decay in laboratory soil-bed test. Document No. IRG/WP 06-20338. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Tromsoe, Norway
  66. Tenorio C, Moya R (2013) Thermogravimetric characteristics, its relation with extractives and chemical properties and combustion characteristics of ten fast-growth species in Costa Rica. Thermochim Acta 563:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tjeerdsma BF, Stevens M, Militz H (2000) Durability aspects of hydrothermal treated wood. Document No. IRG/WP00-40160. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Kona Surf, Hawaii, USA
  68. Venäläinen M, Partanen H, Harju A (2014) The strength loss of Scots pine timber in an accelerated soil contact test. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 86 (B): 150-152
  69. Viitanen H, Jämsä S, Paajanen L, Nurmi A, Viitaniemi P (1994) The Effect of Heat Treatment on the Properties of Spruce. Document No. IRG/WP 94-40032. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia
  70. Weiland JJ, Guyonnet R (2003) Study of chemical modifications and fungi degradation of thermally modified wood using DRIFT spectroscopy. Holz Roh- Werkst 61:216–220Google Scholar
  71. Welzbacher CR, Rapp OA (2002) Comparison of thermally modified wood originating from four industrial scale process – durability. Document No. IRG/WP 02-40229. The International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
  72. Welzbacher CR, Rapp AO (2007) Durability of thermally modified timber from industrial- scale processes in different use classes: results from laboratory and field tests. Wood Mat Sci Eng 2:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Welzbacher CR, Brischke C, Rapp AO (2007) Influence of treatment temperature and duration on selected biological, mechanical, physical and optical properties of thermally modified timber. Wood Material Sci Eng 2:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. XP CEN/TS 15083-1 (2006) Durability of wood and wood-based products - Determination of the natural durability of solid wood against wood destroying fungi - Test methods - Part 1: basidiomycetes. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  75. XP CEN/TS 15083-2 (2006) Durability of wood and wood-based products - Determination of the natural durability of solid wood against wood destroying fungi - Test methods - Part 2: soft rotting micro-fungi. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  76. Yalcin M, Sahin HI (2015) Changes in the chemical structure and decay resistance of heat-treated narrow-leaved ash wood. Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología 17(2):435–446Google Scholar

For further details log on website :

No comments:

Post a Comment

Mangrove Forest Management & Restoration

The Sabah Forestry Department has conserved most if not all Mangrove Forests under Class V for marine life conservation and as a natural me...