Blog List

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Water-use efficiency of a poplar plantation in Northern China

Published Date
Volume 19, Issue 6pp 483–492

Original Article
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-014-0436-3

Cite this article as: 
Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., Sun, G. et al. J For Res (2014) 19: 483. doi:10.1007/s10310-014-0436-3

  • Jie Zhou
  • Zhiqiang Zhang
  • Ge Sun
  • Xianrui Fang
  • Tonggang Zha
  • Jiquan Chen
  • Asko Noormets
  • Junting Guo
  • Steve

The water-use efficiency (WUE) of an ecosystem—defined as the gross ecosystem production (GEP) divided by the evapotranspiration (ET)—is an important index for understanding the coupling of water and carbon and quantifying water–carbon trade-offs in forests. An open-path eddy covariance technique and a microclimate measurement system were deployed to investigate the WUE of a poplar plantation ecosystem in the Daxing District of Beijing, China, during the growing seasons in 2006, 2007, and 2008. We found that WUE values changed diurnally, peaking in early morning and showing a minimum between 2 pm and 3 pm. This pattern was regulated by photosynthetically active radiation, saturated vapor pressure deficit, and stomatal opening and closure. WUE had inter-daily variations but no substantial seasonal variation. The WUE decreased with increasing soil water content due to the higher sensitivity of ET than GEP to increased soil moisture. Under moist soil conditions (i.e., relative extractable water content >0.4), GEP was stable and WUE was generally low. These results suggest that the poplar plantation does not effectively use the available soil water for carbon uptake, and that soil moisture is lost to the atmosphere through ET.


  1. Bacon MA (2004) Water use efficiency in plant biology. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldocchi D (1994) A comparative study of mass and energy exchange rates over a closed C3 (wheat) and an open C4 (corn) crop: II. CO2 exchange and water use efficiency. Agr Forest Meteorol 67:291–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldocchi DD (2003) Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future. Glob Chang Biol 9:479–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldocchi DD, Ryu Y (2011) A synthesis of forest evaporation fluxes-from days to years-as measured with eddy covariance. Ecol Stud 216:101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldocchi D, Verma S, Rosenberg N, Blad B, Garay A, Specht J (1983) Influence of water stress on the diurnal exchange of mass and energy between the atmosphere and a soybean canopy. Agron J 75:543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barr AG, Black T, Hogg E, Griffis T, Morgenstern K, Kljun N, Theede A, Nesic Z (2007) Climatic controls on the carbon and water balances of a boreal aspen forest, 1994–2003. Glob Chang Biol 13:561–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beer C, Ciais P, Reichstein M, Baldocchi D, Law B, Papale D, Soussana J, Ammann C, Buchmann N, Frank D (2009) Temporal and among-site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 23
  8. Berbigier P, Bonnefond JM, Mellmann P (2001) CO2 and water vapour fluxes for 2 years above Euroflux forest site. Agric For Meteorol 108:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernier P, Bréda N, Granier A, Raulier F, Mathieu F (2002) Validation of a canopy gas exchange model and derivation of a soil water modifier for transpiration for sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) using sap flow density measurement. Forest Ecol Manag 163:185–196
  10. Cai T, Price DT, Orchansky AL, Thomas BR (2011) Carbon, water, and energy exchanges of a hybrid poplar plantation during the first five years following planting. Ecosystems 14:658–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao J, Zhang Y, Liu Y (2002) Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in Hainan Island over the last 20 years. Geogr Res 5:2Google Scholar
  12. Chinese Forestry Society, National Poplar Commission (2003) Forest resource, timber production and popular culture in China. In: 1st Int Conf on the Future of Poplar, Rome, Italy, 13 Nov 2003.
  13. Dewar RC (1997) A simple model of light and water use evaluated for Pinus radiata. Tree Physiol 17:259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dilling L, Doney SC, Edmonds J, Gurney KR, Harriss R, Schimel D, Stephens B, Stokes G (2003) The role of carbon cycle observations and knowledge in carbon management. Annu Rev Environ Resour 28:521–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falge E, Baldocchi D, Olson R, Anthoni P, Aubinet M, Bernhofer C, Burba G, Ceulemans R, Clement R, Dloman H, Granier A, Gross P, Grunwald T, Hollinger D, Jensen NO, Katul G, Keronen P, Kowalski A, Lai CT, Law BE, Meyers T, Moncrieff J, Moors E, Munger JW, Pilegaard K, Rannik U, Rebmann C, Suyker A, Tenhunen J, Tu K, Werma S, Vesala T, Wilson K, Wofsy S (2001) Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange. Agric For Meterol 107:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farley KA, Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2005) Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy. Glob Chang Biol 11:1565–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foken T, Göckede M, Mauder M, Mahrt L, Amiro BD, Munger JW (2004) Post-field data quality control. In: Lee X, Massman WJ, Law B (eds) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 181–208Google Scholar
  18. Gordon M, Choe N, Duffy J, Ekuan G, Heilman P, Muiznieks I, Ruszaj M, Shurtleff BB, Strand S, Wilmoth J (1998) Phytoremediation of trichloroethylene with hybrid poplars. Environ Health Perspect 106:1001PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Granier A, Bréda N, Biron P, Villette S (1999) A lumped water balance model to evaluate duration and intensity of drought constraints in forest stands. Ecol Model 116:269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Granier A, Reichstein M, Breda N, Janssens I, Falge E, Ciais P, Grünwald T, Aubinet M, Berbigier P, Bernhofer C (2007) Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003. Agric For Meteorol 143:123–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hollinger DY, Kelliher F, Byers JN, Hunt JE, McSeveny T, Weir P (1994) Carbon dioxide exchange between an undisturbed old-growth temperate forest and the atmosphere. Ecology 75:134–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hollinger D, Aber J, Dail B, Davidson E, Goltz S, Hughes H, Leclerc M, Lee J, Richardson A, Rodrigues C (2004) Spatial and temporal variability in forest–atmosphere CO2 exchange. Glob Chang Biol 10:1689–1706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh CI, Katul G, Chi TW (2000) An approximate analytical model for footprint estimation of scalar fluxes in thermally stratified atmospheric flows. Adv Water Resour 23:765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu Z, Yu G, Fu Y, Sun X, Li Y, Shi P, Wang Y, Zheng Z (2008) Effects of vegetation control on ecosystem water use efficiency within and among four grassland ecosystems in China. Glob Chang Biol 14:1609–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huber SC, Rogers HH, Mowry FL (1984) Effects of water stress on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) plants grown in the field at different CO2 levels. Plant Physiol 76:244–249PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huxman TE, Smith MD, Fay PA, Knapp AK, Shaw MR, Loik ME, Smith SD, Tissue DT, Zak JC, Weltzin JF (2004) Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature 429:651–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, et al. (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  28. Law B, Anthoni P, Aber J (2000) Measurements of gross and net ecosystem productivity and water vapour exchange of a Pinus ponderosa ecosystem, and an evaluation of two generalized models. Glob Chang Biol 6:155–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Law B, Falge E, Gu L, Baldocchi D, Bakwin P, Berbigier P, Davis K, Dolman A, Falk M, Fuentes J (2002) Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 113:97–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liang N, Maruyama K (1995) Interactive effects of CO2 enrichment and drought stress on gas exchange and water-use efficiency in Alnus firma. Environ Exp Bot 35:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang W, Hu H, Liu F, Zhang D (2006) Research advance of biomass and carbon storage of poplar in China. J For Res 17:75–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linderson ML, Iritz Z, Lindroth A (2007) The effect of water availability on stand-level productivity, transpiration, water use efficiency and radiation use efficiency of field-grown willow clones. Biomass Bioenergy 31:460–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindroth A, Cienciala E (1996) Water use efficiency of short-rotation Salix viminalis at leaf, tree and stand scales. Tree Physiol 16:257–262
  34. Liu C, Zhang Z, Sun G, Zhu J, Zha T, Shen L, Chen J, Fang X, Chen J (2009) Quantifying evapotranspiration and the biophysical regulations of a poplar plantation assessed by eddy covariance and sap flow methods. J Plant Ecol 33:706–718Google Scholar
  35. Lloyd J, Taylor J (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Funct Ecol 8:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahrt L, Vickers D (2002) Relationship of area-averaged carbon dioxide and water vapour fluxes to atmospheric variables. Agric For Meteorol 112:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Migliavacca M, Meroni M, Manca G, Matteucci G, Montagnani L, Grassi G, Zenone T, Teobaldelli M, Goded I, Colombo R (2009) Seasonal and interannual patterns of carbon and water fluxes of a poplar plantation under peculiar eco-climatic conditions. Agric For Meteorol 149:1460–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Monteith JL (1989) Steps in climatology. In: Unger PW, Jordan WR, Sneed TV, Jensen RW (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Dryland Farming. Texas A&M University, College Station
  39. Moren AS, Lindroth A, Grelle A (2001) Water-use efficiency as a means of modeling net assimilation in boreal forests. Trees Struct Funct 15:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nijs I, Impens I, Behaeghe T (1989) Effects of long-term elevated atmospheric CO2concentration on Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens canopies in the course of a terminal drought stress period. Can J Bot 67:2720–2725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Noormets A, Chen J, Crow TR (2007) Age-dependent changes in ecosystem carbon fluxes in managed forests in northern Wisconsin, USA. Ecosystems 10:187–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Noormets A, Desai A, Cook B, Euskirchen E, Ricciuto D, Davis K, Bolstad P, Schmid H, Vogel C, Carey E (2008) Moisture sensitivity of ecosystem respiration: comparison of 14 forest ecosystems in the Upper Great Lakes Region, USA. Agric For Meteorol 148:216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis S, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, McGuire AD, Piao S, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pearce AJ, Rowe LK (1979) Forest management effects on interception, evaporation and water yield. J Hydrol (NZ) 18:7387Google Scholar
  45. Peng P, Peng J, Wang C, Wang J (2003) Studies on the biomass and production of Populus schneideri var. tibetica plantation. For Sci Technol 4:004
  46. Ponton S, Flanagan LB, Alstad KP, Johnson BG, Morgenstern K, Kljun N, Black TA, Barr AG (2006) Comparison of ecosystem water-use efficiency among Douglas-fir forest, aspen forest and grassland using eddy covariance and carbon isotope techniques. Glob Chang Biol 12:294–310
  47. Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG (1982) Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 198:156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reichstein M, Tenhunen JD, Roupsard O, Ourcival J, Rambal S, Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Pecchiari M, Tirone G, Valentini R (2002) Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO2 and H2O fluxes at three mediterranean evergreen sites: revision of current hypotheses? Glob Chang Biol 8:999–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rouphael Y, Colla G (2005) Radiation and water use efficiencies of greenhouse zucchini squash in relation to different climate parameters. Eur J Agron 23:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scanlon TM, Albertson JD (2004) Canopy scale measurements of CO2 and water vapor exchange along a precipitation gradient in southern Africa. Biol 10:329–341Google Scholar
  51. Schulze E, Hall A (1982) Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. Encycl Plant Physiol 12:181–230Google Scholar
  52. Stoy PC, Katul GG, Siqueira M, Juang JY, Novick KA, Uebelherr JM, Oren R (2006) An evaluation of models for partitioning eddy covariance-measured net ecosystem exchange into photosynthesis and respiration. Agric For Meteorol 141:2–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sun G, Noormets A, Chen J, McNulty S (2008) Evapotranspiration estimates from eddy covariance towers and hydrologic modeling in managed forests in Northern Wisconsin, USA. Agric For Meteorol 148:257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tan J, Zha T, Zhang Z, Sun G, Dai W, Fang X, Xu F (2009) Effects of soil temperature and soil water on soil respiration in a poplar plantation in Daxing District of Beijing, China. Ecol Environ Sci 6:2308–2315
  55. Tang J, Bolstad PV, Ewers BE, Desai AR, Davis KJ, Carey EV (2006) Sap flux–upscaled canopy transpiration, stomatal conductance, and water use efficiency in an old growth forest in the Great Lakes region of the United States. J Geophys Res 111:G02009Google Scholar
  56. Teskey R, Gholz H, Cropper W (1994) Influence of climate and fertilization on net photosynthesis of mature slash pine. Tree Physiol 14:1215–1227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Testi L, Orgaz F, Villalobos F (2008) Carbon exchange and water use efficiency of a growing, irrigated olive orchard. Environ Exp Bot 63:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tong XJ, Li J, Yu Q, Qin Z (2009) Ecosystem water use efficiency in an irrigated cropland in the North China Plain. J Hydrol 374:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Veron SR, Paruelo JM, Sala OE, Laurenroth WK (2002) Environmental controls of primary production in agricultural systems of the Argentine Pampas. Ecosystems 5:625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vitousek PM (1991) Can planted forests counteract increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide? J Environ Qual 20:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorl Soc 106:85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilczak JM, Oncley SP, Stage SA (2001) Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms. Bound Layer Meteorol 99:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wofsy S, Goulden M, Munger J, Fan S, Bakwin P, Daube B, Bassow S, Bazzaz F (1993) Net exchange of CO2 in a mid-latitude forest. Science 260:1314–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Woodwell GM, Whitaker R, Reiners W, Likens GE, Delwich C, Botkin D (1978) The biota and the world carbon budget. Science 199:141–146
  65. Wright MS, Greene-McDowelle DM, Zeringue HJ, Bhatnagar D, Cleveland TE (2000) Effects of volatile aldehydes from Aspergillus-resistant varieties of corn on Aspergillus parasiticusgrowth and aflatoxin biosynthesis. Toxicon 38:1215–1223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xue L, Yang P (2004) Summary of research on forest biomass. J Fujian Coll For 24:283–288Google Scholar
  67. Yu GR, Wang QF, Zhuang J (2004) Modeling the water use efficiency of soybean and maize plants under environmental stresses: application of a synthetic model of photosynthesis-transpiration based on stomatal behavior. J Plant Physiol 161:303–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yu G, Song X, Wang Q, Liu Y, Guan D, Yan J, Sun X, Zhang L, Wen X (2008) Water-use efficiency of forest ecosystems in eastern China and its relations to climatic variables. New Phytol 177:927–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang Y, Zhang ZQ, Sun G, Fang XR, Zha TG, Noormets A, Chen J, McNulty SG, Liu CF, Chen LX (2014) Water balance of a poplar plantation forest in Suburban Beijing, China. J Environ Manage (in review)
  70. Zhou J, Zhang ZQ, Sun G, Fang XR, Zha TG, McNulty SG, Chen J, Jin Y, Noormets A (2013) Response of ecosystem carbon fluxes to drought events in a poplar plantation in Northern China. For Ecol Manag 300:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For further details log on website :

No comments:

Post a Comment

Mangrove Forest Management & Restoration

The Sabah Forestry Department has conserved most if not all Mangrove Forests under Class V for marine life conservation and as a natural me...