Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of materials in wooden boat ecodesign

Published Date
February 2016, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 265–275

Title

Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of materials in wooden boat ecodesign

• Author

• Régis Pommier, 
• Guilhem Grimaud, 
• Marion Prinçaud, 
• Nicolas Perry, 
• Guido Sonnemann

Abstract

Purpose

Wooden boatyard building was replaced in the 1970s in favor of materials which are considered cheaper and simpler to work with (such as composite or aluminum). With today’s new environmental standards, the choices of materials must also be compatible with the aims of ecodesign. We promote wood-based boats and the replacement of exotic woods with local varieties (from France). An environmental impact assessment is needed to clarify the relative position of each solution.

Methods

In order to validate the choices, we used a life cycle assessment (LCA) “from cradle to grave” of the hull. This LCA is based on the comparison of the following different materials used: aluminum, composite, exotic wood, and maritime pine. This study is based on the construction of an 18-m-long passenger transport boat. These evaluations were carried out with respect to ISO 14040 standards, beginning with an existing database and measurements taken on the building and production sites.

Results and discussion

Our results demonstrate the benefits of using a wood-based hull compared with other materials. Moreover, the results show that the maritime pine used in replacement of imported exotic woods is more favorable from both economic and environmental points of view. This LCA allowed us to characterize precisely the stages in the life cycle of a passenger boat and to propose a hierarchy of the different materials under comparison for the purposes of boat building.

Conclusions

The recommendations and lines of progress highlighted by this study will allow us to enhance the efficiency of upcoming constructions and to promote the ecodesign conception in the boatyard.

Keywords

Boat building Ecodesign Life cycle assessment Maritime pine Wood

Responsible editor: Holger Wallbaum

References

1. Bertram C, Rehdanz K (2013) On the environmental effectiveness of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Mar Policy 38:25–40CrossRef
2. Bureau Veritas (2012) Stresses and safety coefficient. Part B, Ch 7, Sec 4, pp 159–160
3. Cabezas-Basurko O, Mesbahi E, Moloney SR (2008) Methodology for sustainability analysis of ships (review). Ships Offshore Struct J 3(1):1–11CrossRef
4. Champion J-B, Houlou-Garcia A, Lesdos-Cauhapé C, Quénechdu V (2013) En 2012, 90 % des déchets industriels triés sont valorisés. INSEE National Institute of statistics and economic studies, http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/document.asp?ref_id=ip1535
5. COBAS (2010) Call for Greenboat program. http://www.agglo-cobas.fr/images/upload/bateau_propre_appel_a_projet.pdf. South Arcachon Bassin Community
6. Curran MA (2012) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. ISBN: 978-1-118-09972-8. Wiley, 640 pp
7. D’Aboville G (2009) Boating and environment. Part 2. Environmental impact of boat life cycle. Ministry of ecology. CSNPSN Council of sport and recreational boating. 72 pp
8. EcoNav network (2011) Second life for boats. Internal report University Bretagne Sud
9. EcoNav network (2012) Environmental impact analysis of pleasure boat. Internal report University Bretagne Sud
10. European Commission (2010) ILCD handbook: general guide on LCA—detailed guidance, Jt Res. 417. doi: 10.2788/38479
11. Foundation APER (2012a) Datas of boat deconstruction. Internal report. APER Environmental association for the boating sector
12. Foundation APER (2012b) Maps of authorised deconstruction society 48 sites in France. Internal report. APER Environmental association for the boating sector
13. Goedkoop MJ, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A. Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) ReCiPe 2008, A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level; First edition Report I: Characterisation; 6 January 2009, http://www.lcia-recipe.net
14. Grimaud G, Pommier R, Perry N (2013) Rapport LCA of different material to made boat hull. Internal report Project ABOVE + 2. University of Bordeaux
15. INSEE (2009) E11 shipbuilding industry in France. National Institute of statistics and economic studies.
16. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability Chapter 8: transport. Work Gr III. Inter governmental panel on climate change Berlin, p 117
17. ISO (2006) ISO 14040: life cycle assessment—principles and framework. Environ Manag 3:28. doi:10.1002/jtr
18. Jacob A (2012) Composite boat building trends. Reinf Plast 56:3
19. Lavalette A, Pommier R, Danis M, Castéra P (2012) Tension-shear (TS) failure criterion for wood composite designed for shipbuilding applications. World Conf Timber Eng Sessin 11:8
20. Levrel H, Jacob C, Bailly D et al (2014) The maintenance costs of marine natural capital: a case study from the initial assessment of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in France. Mar Policy 49:37–47CrossRef
21. Maritime International Organisation (2005) MARPOL 73/78 Annex VI : regulations for the prevention of air pollution from ships. Internal report Maritime International Organisation
22. Marsh G (2006) 50 years of reinforced plastic boats. Reinf Plast 50:16–19CrossRef
23. Mcleod E (2013) Marine protected areas: static boundaries in a changing world. Encycl Biodivers 94–104
24. Ministry of Ecology (2012) Environmental code—Natura 2000 places. Ministry of Ecology
25. Ministry of Ecology (2013) Pleasur boat marquet. Department of infrastructure and transport and sea
26. Ministry of Housing Spacial Planning and the Environment (2009) ReCiPe 2008 (first edition)—report I: characterisation. Ministry of Ecology
27. Pensec LLE, Pinon H (2007) Age and life duration of boats. http://www.dirm-memn.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/fiche8_AML-2.pdf. Ministry of ecology
28. Pommier R, Elbez G (2006) Finger-jointing green softwood: evaluation of the interaction between polyurethane adhesive and wood. Wood Mater Sci Eng 1:127–137CrossRef
29. Princaud M (2011) Development of an environmental decision support tool based on life cycle analysis integrated into a design process. PhD. Arts et Métiers ParisTech
30. Princaud M, Cornier A, Froelich D (2010) Developing a tool for environmental impact assessment and eco-design for ships. HYPERLINK "http://www.researchgate.net/journal/1475-0902_Proceedings_of_the_Institution_of_Mechanical_Engineers_Part_M_Journal_of_Engineering_for_the_Maritime_Environment". Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M. J Eng Marit Environ 224 (3):207–224
31. Ridley IG, Hutchinson KW (2012) The efficacy and acceptance of environmental impact and life cycle models within the design sector of the marine industry. International Conference on the Environmentally Friendly Ship; London; United Kingdom; 28–29 February 2012; pp 45–55. Code 91686
32. Roussel F (2012) Dossier : L’aluminium recyclé, un taux d’incorporation qui stagne à 30%. Actu-environnement.com 10:3
33. Stoyell JL, Norman P, Howarth CR, Vaughan R (1999) Results of a questionnaire investigation on the management of environmental issues during conceptual design. A case study of two large made-to-order companies. J Clean Prod 7(6):457–464CrossRef
34. Tukker DA (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards. Volume 7. TNO Institute of Strategy, Technology and Policy
35. Van der Zee SC, Dijkema MB, van der Laan J, Hoek G (2012) The impact of inland ships and recreational boats on measured NOx and ultrafine particle concentrations along the waterways. Atmos Environ 55:368–376CrossRef

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-015-1009-1