Distribution pattern of coniferous seedlings after a partial harvest along a creek in a Canadian Pacific northwest forest

Published Date

June 2015, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 328-336

First online: 04 February 2015

Title 

Distribution pattern of coniferous seedlings after a partial harvest along a creek in a Canadian Pacific northwest forest

• Author 

• Yoshi Minami 
• , Mai Oba
• , Satoru Kojima
• , John S. Richardson

Abstract

In managed forests, partial harvest within riparian areas is one way to provide harvest opportunities and maintain some of the functions of riparian vegetation. We examined the response of coniferous seedlings to a 50 %-partial harvest in a second-growth, coniferous riparian forest in the Pacific Northwest. Partial canopy opening facilitated the establishment of Tsuga heterophylla and Thuja plicata, but Pseudotsuga menziesii did not show the same tendency. Results suggested that differences in seedling establishment were related to differences in light. Increased light availability also stimulated growth of Rubus spectabilis, especially in moist sites, and the dense cover precluded establishment of coniferous seedlings. Once R. spectabilis was established, continued stem recruitment maintained a dense stable cover, and even intense disturbance did not affect the stability of the populations. R. spectabilis would be a major competitor to constrain conifer seedlings to regenerate in riparian zones. Although Gaultheria shallon extended their cover, competition from dense G. shallon was not as severe as from R. spectabilis.

References

1. Ares A, Berryman SD, Puettmann KJ (2009) Understory vegetation response to thinning disturbance of varying complexity in coniferous stands. Appl Veg Sci 12:472–487CrossRef
2. Beach EW, Halpern CB (2001) Controls on conifer regeneration in managed riparian forests: effects of seed source, substrate, and vegetation. Can J For Res 31:471–482CrossRef
3. Bennett JN, Blevins LL, Barker JE, Blevins DP, Prescott CE (2003) Increases in tree growth and nutrient supply still apparent 10 to 13 years following fertilization and vegetation control of salal-dominated cedar-hemlock stands on Vancouver Island. Can J For Res 33:1516–1524CrossRef
4. Boudreau S, Lawes MJ (2005) Small understorey gaps created by subsistence harvesters do not adversely affect the maintenance of tree diversity in a sub-tropical forest. Biol Conserv 126:279–286CrossRef
5. Callaway RM (1995) The positive interactions among plants. Bot Rev 61:306–349CrossRef
6. Christy EJ, Mack RN (1984) Variation in demography of juvenile Tsuga heterophylla across the substratum mosaic. J Ecol 72:75–91CrossRef
7. Dosono PJ, Nyland RD (2006) Interference to hardwood regeneration in northeastern North America: the effects of raspberry (Rubus spp.) following clearcutting and shelterwood methods. North J Appl For 23:288–296
8. Easter MJ, Spies TA (1994) Using hemispherical photography for estimating photosynthetic photon flux-density under canopies and in gaps in Douglas-fir forests of the Pacific-Northwest. Can J For Res 24:2050–2058CrossRef
9. Fahey RT, Puettmann KJ (2007) Ground-layer disturbance and initial conditions influence gap partitioning of understory vegetation. J Ecol 95:1098–1109CrossRef
10. Fraser LH, Chanway CP, Turkington R (1995) The competitive role of Gaultheria shallon on planted western hemlock and western red cedar saplings on northern Vancouver Island. For Ecol Manag 75:27–39CrossRef
11. Gómez-Aparicio L, Gómez JM, Regino Z (2005) Microhabitats shift rank in suitability for seedling establishment depending on habitat type and climate. J Ecol 93:1194–1202CrossRef
12. Gomi T, Moore RD, Dhakal AS (2006) Headwater stream temperature response to clear-cut harvesting with different riparian treatments, coastal British Columbia, Canada. Water Resour Res 42:11CrossRef
13. González-Alday J, Martínez-Ruiz C, Bravo F (2009) Evaluating different harvest intensities over understory plant diversity and pine seedlings, in a Pinus pinaster Ait. Natural stand of Spain. Plant Ecol 201:211–220CrossRef
14. Harmon ME, Franklin JF (1989) Tree seedlings on logs in Picea-Tsuga forests of Oregon and Washington. Ecology 70:48–59CrossRef
15. Harrington TB (2006) Five-year growth responses of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western redcedar seedlings to manipulated levels of overstory and understory competition. Can J For Res 36:2439–2453CrossRef
16. Hibbs DE, Giordano PA (1996) Vegetation characteristics of alder-dominated riparian buffer strips in the Oregon coast range. Northwest Sci 70:213–222
17. Hovstad KA, Ohlson M (2009) Conspecific versus heterospecific litter effects on seedling establishment. Plant Ecol 204:33–42CrossRef
18. Hughes NM, Johnson DM, Akhalkatsi M, Abdaladze O (2009) Characterizing Betula Litwinowii seedling microsites at the alpine-treeline ecotone, central Greater Caucasus Mountains, Georgia. Arct Antarct Alp Res 41:112–118CrossRef
19. Katsumata N, Okitsu S, Minami Y (2008) Influence of feather mossmat on the occurrence and growth of Abies veitchii seedlings in subalpine forest, Mt. Fuji, Japan. Lindbergia 33:50–57
20. Kennedy PG, Quinn T (2001) Understory plant establishment on old-growth stumps and the forest floor in western Washington. For Ecol Manag 154:193–200CrossRef
21. Keyes CR, Acker SA, Greene SE (2001) Overstory and shrub influences on seedling recruitment patterns in an old-growth Ponderosa pine stand. Northwest Sci 75:204–210
22. Kiffney PM, Richardson JS, Bull JP (2003) Responses of periphyton and insects to experimental manipulation of riparian buffer width along forest streams. J Appl Ecol 40:1060–1076CrossRef
23. Lecerf A, Richardson JS (2010) Litter decomposition can detect effects of high and moderate levels of forest disturbance on stream condition. For Ecol Manag 259:2433–2443CrossRef
24. Machado JL, Reich PB (1999) Evaluation of several measures of canopy openness as predictors of photosynthetic photon flux density in deeply shaded conifer-dominated forest understory. Can J For Res 29:1438–1444CrossRef
25. Mallik AU (1995) Conservation of temperate forests into heaths: role of ecosystem disturbance and ericaceous plants. Environ Manag 19:675–684CrossRef
26. Mallik AU, Prescott CE (2001) Growth inhibitory effects of salal on western hemlock and western red cedar. Agron J 93:85–92CrossRef
27. Minore D, Weatherly HG (1994) Riparian trees, shrubs, and forest regeneration in the coastal mountains of Oregon. New For 8:249–263CrossRef
28. Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Bisson PA (2000) Riparian ecology and management in the Pacific Coastal rain forest. Bioscience 50:996–1011CrossRef
29. Naiman RJ, Decamps H, McClain ME (2005) Riparia: ecology conservation and management of streamside communities. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego
30. Nakamura T (1992) Effect of bryophytes on survival of conifer seedlings in subalpine forests of central Japan. Ecol Res 7:155–162CrossRef
31. Narukawa Y, Yamamoto S (2001) Gap formation, microsite variation and the conifer seedling occurrence in a subalpine old-growth forest, central Japan. Ecol Res 16:617–625CrossRef
32. Nelson CR, Halpern CB (2005) Edge-related responses of understory plants to aggregated relation harvest in the Pacific Northwest. Ecol Appl 15:196–209CrossRef
33. Pojar J, MacKinnon A (2004) Plants of coastal British Columbia : including Washington, Oregon & Alaska. Lone Pine Publishing, Vancouver
34. Rich PM, Clark DB, Clark DA, Oberbauer SF (1993) Long-term study of solar radiation regimes in a tropical wet forest using quantum sensors and hemispherical photography. Agric For Meteorol 65:107–127CrossRef
35. Richardson JS, Naiman RJ, Swanson FJ, Hibbs DE (2005) Riparian communities associated with Pacific Northwest headwater streams: assemblages, processes, and uniqueness. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41:935–947CrossRef
36. Richardson JS, Feller MC, Kiffney PM, Moore RD, Mitchell S, Hinch SG (2010) Riparian management of small streams: an experimental trial at the Malcolm Knapp Research Forest. Streamline 13:1–16
37. Richardson JS, Naiman RJ, Bisson PA (2012) How did fixed-width buffers become standard practice for protecting freshwaters and their riparian areas from forest harvest practices? Freshw Sci 31:232–238CrossRef
38. Sugita H, Tani M (2001) Difference in microhabitat-related regeneration patterns between two subalpine conifers, Tsuga diversifolia and Abies mariesii, on mount Hayachine, northern Honshu, Japan. Ecol Res 16:423–433CrossRef
39. Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, Crisafulli CM, DellaSala DA, Hutto RL, Lindenmayer DB, Swanson FJ (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ 9:117–125CrossRef
40. Tappeiner JC, Zasada JC (1993) Establishment of salmonberry, salal, vine maple, and bigleaf maple seedlings in the coastal forests of Oregon. Can J For Res 23:1775–1780CrossRef
41. Tappeiner JC, Zasada JC, Ryan P, Newton M (1991) Salmonberry clonal and population structure: the basis for a persistent cover. Ecology 72:609–618CrossRef
42. Tappeiner JC II, Zasada JC, Huffman DW, Ganio LM (2001) Salmonberry and salal annual aerial stem production: the maintenance of shrub cover in forest stands. Can J For Res 31:1629–1638CrossRef
43. The University of British Columbia (2010) Malcolm Knapp Research Forest. http://​www.​mkrf.​ubc.​ca/​. Accessed 20 Oct 2010
44. Villarin LA, Chapin DM, Jones JE (2009) Riparian forest structure and succession in second-growth stands of the central Cascade Mountains, Washington, USA. For Ecol Manag 257:1375–1385CrossRef

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-015-0479-0