Socioeconomic development and wood consumption

Published Date

June 2015, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 309-320

First online: 06 February 2015

Title 

Socioeconomic development and wood consumption

• Title 

• Chihiro Kayo 
• , Hiroyasu Oka
• , Seiji Hashimoto
• , Midori Mizukami
• , Shigesada Takagi

• 
  

• Abstract 

• To show the relationship between socioeconomic development and wood consumption for the investigation of future changes in wood demand in countries where socioeconomic development is expected, we analyzed panel data on per capita GDP, the human development index (HDI), and other factors in relation to per capita wood consumption for 33 OECD and 6 BRIICS countries. An increasing linear trend was found between per capita GDP and per capita consumption for sawn wood. However, the consumption declined over time when the same economic level was attained. In the case of plywood, reconstituted panels, and paper/paperboard, the results suggest that an environmental Kuznets curve, represented as an inverted-U curve, exists between per capita GDP and per capita consumption, confirming a tendency for consumption to reach saturation and then decline as economic development progresses. For wood fuel, an increasing linear trend was confirmed between economic level and per capita consumption, indicating the recent promotion of biofuel in developed countries. However, economic level alone might not be sufficient for explaining the demand for wood. The consumption of sawn wood, plywood, reconstituted panels, and paper/paperboard declined over time for a given HDI level. Rising population density and urbanization can contribute to a decrease in per capita wood consumption, whereas the larger the country’s forest area, the greater per capita wood consumption. In particular, there is an increasing tendency to use the latest forms of wood fuel under sustainable forest management.

• 
  

• References 

• 1. Binder CR, Graedel TE, Reck B (2006) Explanatory variables for per capita stocks and flows of copper and zinc, a comparative statistical analysis. J Ind Ecol 10(1–2):111–132
  2. Bringezu S, Schütz H, Steger S, Baudisch J (2004) International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth, the development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR. Ecol Econ 51:97–124CrossRef
  3. Canas Â, Ferrão P, Conceição P (2003) A new environmental Kuznets curve? Relationship between direct material input and income per capita: evidence from industrialized countries. Ecol Econ 46:217–229CrossRef
  4. Chas-Amil ML, Buongiorno J (2000) The demand for paper and paperboard, economic models for European Union. Appl Econ 32:987–999CrossRef
  5. Cole MA, Rayner AJ, Bates JM (1997) The environmental Kuznets curve: an empirical analysis. Environ Dev Econ 2:401–416CrossRef
  6. Dias RA, Mattos CR, Balestieri JAP (2006) The limits of human development and the use of energy and natural resources. Energy Policy 34:1026–1031CrossRef
  7. Erb K, Krausmann F, Lucht W, Haberl H (2009) Embodied HANPP: Mapping the spatial disconnect between global biomass production and consumption. Ecol Econ 69:328–334CrossRef
  8. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2012) FAOSTAT. (Accessed 1 Oct 2012)
  9. Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F (2006) Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions, A robustness exercise. Ecol Econ 57:152–163CrossRef
  10. Holtsmark B (2013) Quantifying the global warming potential of CO2 emissions from wood fuels. GCB Bioenergy. doi:10.​1111/​gcbb.​12110
  11. Kastner T, Erb K, Nonhebel S (2011) International wood trade and forest change: a global analysis. Glob Environ Change 21:947–956CrossRef
  12. Kayo C, Hashimoto S, Moriguchi Y (2012) Paper and paperboard demand and associated carbon dioxide emissions in Asia through 2050. J Ind Ecol 16(4):529–540CrossRef
  13. Kayo C, Tsunetsugu Y, Noda H, Tonosaki M (2014) Carbon balance assessments of harvested wood products in Japan taking account of inter-regional flows. Environ Sci Policy 37:215–226CrossRef
  14. Kitamura Y (2005) Panel data analysis. Economic Research Series of Hitotsubashi University 53. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo
  15. Koop G, Tole L (1999) Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation? J Dev Econ 58:231–244CrossRef
  16. Mao J, Graedel TE (2009) Lead in-use stock, a dynamic analysis. J Ind Ecol 13(1):112–126CrossRef
  17. McCarthy P, Lei L (2010) Regional demand for pulp and paper products. J For Econ 16:127–144
  18. Meyfroidt P, Rudel TK, Lambin EF (2010) Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20917–20922CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
  19. Michinaka T, Miyamoto M (2013) Forests and human development: an analysis of the socio-economic factors affecting global forest area changes. J For Plan 18:141–150
  20. Michinaka T, Tachibana S, Turner JA (2011) Estimating price and income elasticities of demand for forest products, cluster analysis used as a tool in grouping. For Policy Econ 13:435–445CrossRef
  21. Mills Busa JH (2013a) Dynamite in the EKC tunnel? Inconsistencies in resource stock analysis under the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecol Econ 94:116–126CrossRef
  22. Mills Busa JH (2013b) Deforestation beyond borders: addressing the disparity between production and consumption of global resources. Conserv Lett 6:192–199CrossRef
  23. Min K, Oka H (2012) Estimation of demand functions for forest products using international panel data. Bull FFPRI 11:1–11 (in Japanese with English abstract)
  24. Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working Paper WP238. Technology and Employment Programme. ILO, Geneva
  25. Simangunsong BCH, Buongiorno J (2001) International demand equations for forest products: a comparison of methods. Scand J For Res 16:155–172CrossRef
  26. Steinberger JK, Roberts JT (2010) From constraint to sufficiency: the decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecol Econ 70:425–433CrossRef
  27. Tachibana S, Oka H, Tamura K (2005) Panel data analysis on international demand for forest products. The role of forests for coming generations, Philosophy and Technology for Forest Resource Management. Japan Society of Forest Planning, Tokyo, pp 71–81
  28. UNDP (2012) International human development indicators
  29. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2011) Human Development Report (HDR) 2011
  30. Whiteman A, Broadhead J, Bahdon J (2002) The revision of woodfuel estimates in FAOSTAT. Unasylva 53:41–45
  31. Winjum JK, Brown S, Schlamadinger B (1998) Forest harvests and wood products: sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide. For Sci 44:272–284
  32. World Bank (2012) World DataBank. World development indicators and global development finance. World Bank, New York

• 
  

• For further details log on website :

• http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-015-0481-6