June 2015, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 321-327 First online: 31 March 2015 Estimation of relative illuminance within forests using small-footprint airborne LiDAR Kazukiyo Yamamoto , Yasuhisa Murase, Chikako Etou, Kenichi Shibuya

Published Date

June 2015, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 321-327

First online: 31 March 2015

Title 

Estimation of relative illuminance within forests using small-footprint airborne LiDAR

• Author 

• Kazukiyo Yamamoto 
• , Yasuhisa Murase
• , Chikako Etou
• , Kenichi Shibuya

Abstract

To evaluate canopy metrics at landscape or regional levels, remote sensing techniques have usually been employed. In particular, ratio metrics such as laser penetration index (LPI: %) calculated as the percentage of ground returns of laser pulses within the forest from light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data have proved to be closely related to canopy metrics obtained in the field. In our previous study, we successfully proposed a new methodology that automatically and easily separated the laser pulses into those of canopy and below-canopy returns. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of LPI that was calculated using our methodology to estimate relative illuminance (RI: %) and also evaluated the optimal scale to calculate LPI for estimating RI. We found that LPI was closely related to RI (P < 0.01), and might not be affected by the increase of pulse density by overlapping surveys. We further found that a radius of less than 5.0 m in the cylindrical plot to calculate LPI might not be suitable for estimating canopy metrics, especially for LiDAR data with relatively low pulse density.

References

1. Anderson MC, Neale CMU, Li F, Norman JM, Kustas WP, Jayanthi H, Chavez J (2004) Upscaling ground observations of vegetation water content, canopy height, and leaf area index during SMEX02 using aircraft and Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 92:447–464CrossRef
2. Birky AK (2001) NDVI and a simple model of deciduous forest seasonal dynamics. Ecol Mode 143:43–58CrossRef
3. Canham CD, Denslow JS, Platt WJ, Runkle JR, Spies TA, White PS (1990) Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Can J Forest Res 20:620–631
4. Canham CD, Finzi AC, Pacala SW, Burbank DH (1994) Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can J Forest Res 24:337–349CrossRef
5. Evans JS, Hudak AT (2007) A multiscale curvature algorithm for classifying discrete return LiDAR in forested environments. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 45:1029–1038CrossRef
6. Gendron F, Messier C, Comeau PG (1998) Comparison of various methods for estimating the mean growing season percent photosynthetic photon flux density in forests. Agric For Meteorol 92:55–70CrossRef
7. Gray AN, Spies TA (1996) Gap size, within-gap position and canopy structure effects on conifer seedling establishment. J Ecol 84:635–645CrossRef
8. Hagihara A, Ninomiya I, Hozumi K (1982) Evaluation of the light climate in a Chamaecyparis obtusa plantation by a chemical light-meter. J Jap For Soc 64:220–228
9. Hirata Y (2005) Influence of transmittance and sampling density of laser beams in forest measurement of a Cryptomeria japonica stand with an airborne laser scanner. Jpn J For Plan 39:81–95 (in Japanese with English summary)
10. Ishida M (2004) Automatic thresholding for digital hemispherical photography. Can J Forest Res 34:2208–2216CrossRef
11. Jakubowski MK, Guo Q, Kelly M (2013) Tradeoffs between lidar pulse density and forest measurement accuracy. Remote Sens Env 130:245–253CrossRef
12. Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D (1999) Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover, and other measures. Forestry 72:59–73CrossRef
13. Jensen JLR, Humes KS, Hudak AT, Vierling LA, Delmelle E (2011) Evaluation of the MODIS LAI product using independent lidar-derived LAI: a case study in mixed conifer forest. Remote Sens Env 115:3625–3639CrossRef
14. Monsi M, Saeki T (1953) Über den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Jpn J Bot 14:22–52
15. Morsdorf F, Kotz B, Meier E, Itten KI, Allgower B (2006) Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. Remote Sens Env 104:50–61CrossRef
16. Muraoka H, Hirota H, Matsumoto J, Nishimura S, Tang Y, Koizumi H, Washitani I (2001) On the convertibility of different light availability indices, relative illuminance and relative photon flux density. Func Ecol 15:798–803CrossRef
17. Nicotra AB, Chazdon RL, Iriarte S (1999) Spatial heterogeneity of light and woody seedling regeneration in tropical wet forests. Ecology 80:1908–1926CrossRef
18. Peduzzi A, Wynne RH, Fox TR, Nelson RF, Thomas VA (2012) Estimating leaf area index in intensively managed pine plantations using airborne laser scanner data. For Ecol Manag 270:54–65CrossRef
19. Riaño D, Valladares F, Condés S, Chuvieco E (2004) Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) in two contrasting forests. Agric For Meteorol 124:269–275CrossRef
20. Richardson JJ, Moskal LM, Kim SH (2009) Modeling approaches to estimate effective leaf area index from aerial discrete-return LIDAR. Agric For Meteorol 149:1152–1160CrossRef
21. Shimomoto M, Yoshida S, Mitsuda Y, Nishizono T, Mizoue N, Imada M (2000) Studies on the thinning experiment for the old Chamaecyparis obutsusa plantation forest in the Kyushu University Forests in Sasaguri, Fukuoka prefecture (in Japanese with English summary). Bull Kyushu Univ For 81:31–50
22. Solberg S, Næsset E, Hanssen KH, Christiansen E (2006) Mapping defoliation during a severe insect attack on Scots pine using airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ 102:364–376CrossRef
23. Spanner MA, Pierce LL, Running SW, Peterson DL (1990) The seasonality of AVHRR data of temperate coniferous forests: relationship with leaf area index. Remote Sen. Environ 33:97–112CrossRef
24. Takahashi T, Yamamoto K, Takenaka C, Umemura T (2000) The effect of topographical factors on tree height growth. Nagoya Univ For Sci 19:49–53 (in Japanese with English summary)
25. Takahashi T, Yamamoto K, Senda Y, Tsuzuku M (2005) Predicting individual stem volumes of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. J For Res 10:305–312CrossRef
26. Turner DP, Cohen WB, Kennedy RE, Fassnacht KS, Briggs JM (1999) Relationships between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites. Remote Sens Environ 70:52–68CrossRef
27. Welles JM, Cohen S (1996) Canopy structure measurement by gap fraction analysis using commercial instrumentation. J Exp Bot 47:1335–1342CrossRef
28. Wells JM, Norman JM (1991) Instrument for indirect measurement of canopy architecture. Agron J 83:818–825CrossRef
29. Wright EF, Coates KD, Canham CD, Bartemucci P (1998) Species variability in growth response to light across climatic regions in northwestern British Columbia. Can J Forest Res 28:871–886CrossRef
30. Yamamoto K, Takahashi T, Miyachi Y, Kondo N, Morita S, Nakao M, Shibayama T, Takaichi Y, Tsuzuku M, Murate N (2011) Estimation of mean tree height using small-footprint airborne LiDAR without a digital terrain model. J For Res 16:425–431CrossRef
31. Zang Y, Chen JM, Miller JR (2005) Determining digital hemispherical photograph exposure for leaf area index estimation. Agric For Meteorol 133:166–181CrossRef
32. Zao K, Popescu S (2009) Lidar-based mapping of leaf area index and its use for validating GLOBCARBON satellite LAI product in a temperate forest of the southern USA. Remote Sens Env 113:1628–1645CrossRef

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-015-0484-3