Are allometric relationships between tree height and diameter dependent on environmental conditions and management?

Published Date
August 2016, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 1429–1443

Title 

Are allometric relationships between tree height and diameter dependent on environmental conditions and management?

• Author 

• Azimeh Motallebi, 
• Ahto Kangur

Abstract

Key message

The allometric relationship of Scots pine height versus diameter is not constant and does not follow elastic similarity and geometric scaling rules in Eastern Europe.

Abstract

Scots pine is one of the most widely distributed tree species in Europe. It occurs in the boreal forest but also occupies vast areas on dry sites of the Mediterranean region and on continental sites in Central and Eastern Europe. Improved understanding of the influence of climatic factors, forest management and tree interactions on the relationship between tree height and stem diameter is necessary for sustainable forest management. The main objective of the present study was to study the changes in the stem allometry of Scots pine and to classify them using the periodic allometric coefficient of the height–diameter relationship. Periodic (annual) height and diameter increment data of 114 trees with observation periods from 40 to 115 years from three European countries including Estonia, Poland and the Czech Republic was used. Periodic allometric coefficients were calculated for the whole trees’s observation period to identify the effect of different environmental conditions and management. To classify trajectories of the allometric coefficient, eight clustering algorithms were qualified and internal validation of algorithms was carried out by three indices. The performance of a superior algorithm was compared according to five different distance measures and seven clustering methods. Study results indicated a variable allometric relationship between tree height and diameter which did not follow elasticity or geometric scaling rules across sites. Also, significant differences in allometric coefficients were found between the sites. In regard to the latitudinal difference one similar allometric coefficient trajectory for Estonia and one for Poland and the Czech Republic were found.

References

1. Bielak K, Brzeziecki B (2006) Impact of thinning on the dynamics of mixed forest stands: an example from the Białowieża Forest, north-eastern Poland. For Wood Technol 60:117–127
2. Bonser SP, Aarssen W (1994) Plastic allometry in young sugar maple (Acer saccharum): adaptive responses to light availability. Am J Bot 81:400–406CrossRef
3. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology in R. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
4. Bragg DC (2001) Potential relative increment (PRI): a new method to empirically derive optimal tree diameter growth. Ecol Model 137:77–92CrossRef
5. Brock G, Pihur V, Datta S, Datta S (2008) clValid, an R package for cluster validation. J Stat Softw 25:1–22CrossRef
6. Calama R, Montero G (2004) Interregional nonlinear height–diameter model with random coefficient for stone pine in Spain. Can J For Res 34:150–163CrossRef
7. Cieszewski CJ, Strub MR, Zasada M (2007) New dynamic site equation that fits best the Schwappach data for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Central Europe. For Ecol Manage 243:83–93CrossRef
8. Claussen JW, Maycock CR (1995) Stem allometry in a North Queensland tropical rainforest. Biotropica 27:421–426CrossRef
9. Dalton L, Ballarin V, Brun M (2009) Clustering algorithms: on learning, validation, performance, and applications to genomics. Curr Genomics 10:430–445CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10. Damgaard C (2012) Estimating plant allometric relationships in a power model with a minimum size of allocation. Ecol Inform 8:65–67CrossRef
11. Ducey MJ (2012) Evergreenness and wood density predict height–diameter scaling in trees of the northeastern United States. For Ecol Manage 279:21–26CrossRef
12. Eastaugh CS, Kangur A, Korjus H, Kiviste A, Zlatanov T, Velichkov I, Srdjevic B, Srdjevic Z, Hasenauer H (2013) Scaling issues and constraints in modelling of forest ecosystems: a review with special focus on user needs. Balt For 19(2):316–330
13. EMHI (2013) Estonian climate. Estonian Meteorological and Hydrological Institute. http://www.emhi.ee/. Accessed 2 Feb 2013
14. Fayolle A, Doucet JL, Gillet JF, Bourland N, Lejeune P (2013) Tree allometry in Central Africa: testing the validity of pantropical multi-species allometric equations for estimating biomass and carbon stocks. For Ecol Manage 305:29–37CrossRef
15. Feldpausch TR, Banin L, Phillips OL, Baker TR, Lewis SL, Quesada CA et al (2011) Height–diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences 8:1081–1106CrossRef
16. Ferreira L, Hitchcock DB (2009) A comparison of hierarchical methods for clustering functional data. Commun Stat Simul Comput 38:1925–1949CrossRef
17. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks. http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion. Accessed 31 Dec 2013
18. Franceschini T, Schneider R (2014) Influence of shade tolerance and development stage on the allometry of ten temperate tree species. Oecologia 176(3):739–749CrossRefPubMed
19. Gayon J (2000) History of the Concept of Allometry. Amer Zool 40:748–758
20. Geng YP, Pan XY, Xu CY, Zhang WJ, Li B, Chen JK (2007) Plasticity and ontogenetic drift of biomass allocation in response to above- and below-ground resource availabilities in perennial herbs: case study of Alternanthera philoxeroides. Ecol Res 22:255–260CrossRef
21. Groot A, Brown KM, Morrison JK, Barker JE (1984) A ten-year tree and stand response of jack pine to ureafertilization and low thinning. Can J For Res 14:44–50CrossRef
22. Groll A, Tutz G (2012) Regularization for generalized additive mixed models by likelihood-based boosting. Methods Inf Med 51(2):168–177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23. Hara T, Kimura M, Kikuzawa K (1991) Growth patterns of tree height and stem diameter in populations of Abies veitchii, A. mariesii and Betula ermanii. J Ecol 79:1085–1098CrossRef
24. Henry HAL, Aarssen LW (1999) The interpretation of stem diameter–height allometry in trees: biomechanical constraints, neighbour effects, or biased regressions? Ecol Lett 2:89–97CrossRef
25. Huxley JS (1932) Problems of relative growth. Lincoln Mac Veagh Dial–The Dial Press, New York
26. Huxley JS, Teissier G (1936) Terminology of relative growth. Nature 137:780–781CrossRef
27. KAUR (2015) Estonian environment agency. http://www.ilmateenistus.ee/?lang=en. Accessed 21 Nov 2014
28. Kangur A, Korjus H, Jõgiste K, Kiviste A (2005) A conceptual model of forest stand development based on permanent sample-plot data in Estonia. Scand J For Res 20:94–101CrossRef
29. Kangur A, Sims A, Jõgiste K, Kiviste A, Korjus H, Kv Gadow (2007) Comparative modeling of stand development in Scots pine dominated forests in Estonia. For Ecol Manage 250:109–118CrossRef
30. King DA (1990) The adaptive significance of tree height. Am Nat 135:809–828CrossRef
31. King DA (1996) Allometry and life history of tropical trees. J Trop Ecol 12:25–44CrossRef
32. King DA (2005) Linking tree form, allocation and growth with an allometrically explicit model. Ecol Model 185:77–91CrossRef
33. King DA, Davies SJ, Tan S, Nur Supardi MN (2009) Trees approach gravitational limits to height in tall lowland forests of Malaysia. Funct Ecol 23:284–291CrossRef
34. Klingenberg CP (1996) Multivariate allometry. In: Marcus LF (ed) Advances in morphometrics. Plenum, New York, pp 23–49CrossRef
35. Köster K, Kangur A, Hari P, Jõgiste K (2008) Test in Estonia at the southern border of boreal zone. In: Hari P, Kulmala L (eds.) Boreal forest and climate change. Advances in global change research. Springer Science and Business Media, Berlin, pp 468–472
36. Kroon J, Andersson B, Mullin TG (2008) Genetic variation in the diameter–height relationship in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Can J For Res 38:1493–1503CrossRef
37. Latimer AM, Gelfand AE, Silander JA (2006) Building statistical models to analyze species distributions. Ecol Appl 16:33–50CrossRefPubMed
38. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Netherlands
39. Lin X (1999) Inference in generalized additive mixed models by using smoothing splines. J R Stat Soc Ser B 61:381–400CrossRef
40. Lines ER, Zavala MA, Purves DW, Coomes DA (2012) Predictable changes in aboveground allometry of trees along gradients of temperature, aridity and competition. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:1017–1028CrossRef
41. López-Serrano FR, Garcıa-Morote A, Andrés-Abellán M, Tendero A, Cerro AD (2005) Site and weather effects in allometries: a simple approach to climate change effect on pines. For Ecol Manage 215:251–270CrossRef
42. Maaten T, Kurm M, Kiviste A, Loks M (2011) The influence of seed origin on stand variables of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenance trial in Ahunapalu. For Stud (Metsanduslikud Uurim) 51:65–79
43. Martinez-Vilalta J, Vanderklein D, Mencuccini M (2007) Tree height and age-related decline in growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Oecologia 150:529–544CrossRefPubMed
44. Matías L, Jump AS (2012) Interactions between growth, demography and biotic interactions in determining species range limits in a warming world: the case of Pinus sylvestris. For Ecol Manage 282:10–22CrossRef
45. McConnaughay K, Coleman J (1999) Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80:2581–2593CrossRef
46. McMahon T (1973) Size and shape in biology: elastic criteria impose limits on biological proportions, and consequently on metabolic rates. Science 179:1201–1204CrossRefPubMed
47. Mellor AFP, Cey EE (2015) Using generalized additive mixed models to assess spatial, temporal, and hydrologic controls on bacteria and nitrate in a vulnerable agricultural aquifer. J Contam Hydrol 182:104–116CrossRefPubMed
48. Metslaid S, Sims A, Kangur A, Hordo M, Jõgiste K, Kiviste A, Hari P (2011) Growth patterns from different forest generations of Scots pine in Estonia. J For Res 17(3):237–243CrossRef
49. Morote FAG, Serrano FRL, Andrés M, Rubio E, Jiménez JLG, de las Heras J (2012) Allometries, biomass stocks and biomass allocation in the thermophilic Spanish juniper woodlands of Southern Spain. For Ecol Manage 270:85–93CrossRef
50. Müller I, Schmid B, Weiner J (2000) The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 3:115–127CrossRef
51. Mugasha W, Bollandsås A, Eid T (2013) Relationships between diameter and height of trees for natural tropical forest in Tanzania. South For 75:221–237
52. Murphy ST, Pommerening A (2010) Modelling the growth of Sitka spruce [Picea sitchensis(Bong.) Carr.] in Wales using Wenk’s model approach. Allg For und Jagdztg (German J For Res) 181:35–43
53. Nicotra AB, Atkin OK, Bonser SP, Davidson AM, Finnegan EJ, Mathesius U et al (2010) Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci 15:684–692CrossRefPubMed
54. Niklas KJ (1995) Size-dependent allometry of tree height, diameter and trunk-taper. Ann Bot 75:217–227CrossRef
55. Nilson A (2014) On growth and structure of pine stands in Estonia (Männikute ehituse ja kasvu seaduspärasusi). In: Kurm M (ed) Pine in Estonia (Mänd Eestis). Vali Press OÜ, Tartu, pp 218–295 (in Estonian with summary in English)
56. Novák J, Slodicák M, Dušek D, Kacálek D (2010) Long-term effect of thinning from above on forest-floor in Scots pine stands in Southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Austrian J For Sci 3:97–110
57. O’Brien ST, Hubbell SP, Spiro P, Condit R, Foster RB (1995) Diameter, height, crown, and age relationship in eight neotropical tree species. Ecology 76:1926–1939CrossRef
58. Pihur V, Datta S, Datta S (2014) RankAggreg: weighted rank aggregation. R package version 0.5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RankAggreg. Accessed 1 Sept 2014
59. Pilli R, Anfodillo T, Carrer M (2006) Towards a functional and simplified allometry for estimating forest biomass. For Ecol Manage 237:583–593CrossRef
60. Pommerening A, Muszta A (2015) Methods of modelling relative growth rate. For Ecosyst 2:5CrossRef
61. Pommerening A, Muszta A (2016) Relative plant growth revisited: towards a mathematical standardisation of separate approaches. Ecol Model 320:383–392CrossRef
62. Pretzsch H (2009) Forest dynamics, growth and yield; from measurement to model. Springer, Heidelberg
63. Pretzsch H (2010) Re-evaluation of allometry: state-of-the-art and perspective regarding individuals and stands of woody plants. Prog Bot 71:339–369CrossRef
64. Pretzsch H, Dieler J (2012) Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory. Oecologia 169:637–649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65. Pretzsch H, Uhl E, Biber P, Schütze G, Coates KD (2012) Change of allometry between coarse root and shoot of Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta DOUGL. ex. LOUD) along a stress gradient in the sub-boreal forest zone of British Columbia. Scand J of Forest Res 27:532–544CrossRef
66. Pretzsch H, Dauber E, Biber P (2013) Species-specific and ontogeny-related stem allometry of European forest trees: evidence from extensive stem analyses. For Sci 59:290–302
67. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed  24 Apr 2015
68. Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2008) Climate warming will reduce growth and survival of Scots pine except in the far north. Ecol Lett 11:588–597CrossRefPubMed
69. Rice SA, Bazzaz FA (1989) Quantification of plasticity of plant traits in response to light intensity: comparing phenotypes at a common weight. Oecologia 78:502–507CrossRef
70. Ryan MG, Yoder BJ (1997) Hydraulic limits to tree height and tree growth. Biosci J 47:235–242CrossRef
71. Russo SE, Wiser SK, Coomes DA (2007) Growth-size scaling relationships of woody plant species differ from predictions of the Metabolic Ecology Model. Ecol Lett 10:889–901CrossRefPubMed
72. Saraçli S, Doğan N, Doğan İ (2013) Comparison of hierarchical cluster analysis methods by cophenetic correlation. J Inequal App 2013:203CrossRef
73. Saundres MR, Wanger GR (2008) Height–diameter models with random coefficients and site variables for tree species on central Maine. Ann For Sci 65(2):1–10
74. Seki T, Ohta S, Fujiwara T, Nakashizuka T (2013) Growth allocation between height and stem diameter in nonsuppressed reproducing Abies mariesii trees. Plant Species Biol 28:146–155CrossRef
75. Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:667–693CrossRef
76. Simpson SL, Edwards LJ, Muller KE, Sen PK, Styner MA (2010) A linear exponent AR(1) family of correlation structures. Stat Med 29:1825–1838CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77. Sposito TC, Santos FAM (2001) Scaling of stem and crown in eight Cecropia (Cecropiaceae) species of Brazil. Am J Bot 88:939–949CrossRefPubMed
78. Strauss RE (1987) On allometry and relative growth in evolutionary studies. Syst Zool 36:72–75CrossRef
79. Sumida A, Ito H, Isagi Y (1997) Trade-off between height growth and stem diameter growth for an evergreen Oak, Quercus glauca, in a mixed hardwood forest. Funct Ecol 11:300–309CrossRef
80. Sumida A, Miyaura T, Torii H (2013) Relationships of tree height and diameter at breast height revisited: analyses of stem growth using 20-year data of an even-aged Chamaecyparis obtusa stand. Tree Physiol 33:106–118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
81. Taeger S, Zang C, Liesebach M, Schneck V, Menzel A (2013) Impact of climate and drought events on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances. For Ecol Manage 307:30–42CrossRef
82. Tarand A, Jaagus J, Kallis A (2013) Eesti kliima minevikus ja tänapäeval [Estonian climate: past and present]. Tartu Ulikooli Kirjastus, Tartu
83. Teissier G (1934) Dysharmonies et discontinuités dans la croissance. [Disharmonies and discontinuities in growth]. Actual Science et Industrielles, Hermann, Paris
84. Temesgen H, Zhang CH, Zhao XH (2014) Modelling tree height–diameter relationships in multi-species and multi-layered forests: A large observational study from Northeast China. For Ecol Manage 316:78–89CrossRef
85. Valinger E (1992) Effects of thinning and nitrogen fertilisation on stem growth and stem form of Pinus ylvestris trees. Scand J For Res 7:219–228CrossRef
86. Vospernik S, Monserud RA, Sterba H (2010) Do individual tree growth models correctly represent height:diameter ratios of Norway spruce and Scots pine? For Ecol Manage 260:1735–1753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
87. Vovides Alejandra G et al (2014) Morphological plasticity in mangrove trees: salinity-related changes in the allometry of Avicennia germinans. Trees 28(5):1413–1425CrossRef
88. Wang X, Fang J, Tang Z, Zhu B (2006) Climatic control of primary forest structure and DBH-height allometry in Northeast China. For Ecol Manage 234:264–274CrossRef
89. Waterman MS, Whiteman DE (1978) Estimation of probability densities by empirical density functions. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol 9:127–137CrossRef
90. Watt MS, Kirschbaum MUF (2011) Moving beyond simple linear allometric relationships between tree height and diameter. Ecol Model 222:3910–3916CrossRef
91. Webb AR (2003) Statistical pattern recognition. Appendix A: measures of dissimilarity, 2nd edn. Wiley, England, pp 419–429
92. Weiner J, Fishman L (1994) Competition and allometry in Kochia scoparia. Ann Bot 73:263–271CrossRef
93. Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6:207–215CrossRef
94. Weng CF (2014) First order autoregressive mixed effects Zero Inflated Poisson model for longitudinal data-A Bayesian approach. PhD dissertation, pp 12
95. Wenk G (1978) Mathematische Formulierung von Wachstumsprozessen in der Forstwirtschaft. [Mathematical formulation of growth processes in forestry]. Beitr Forstwirtsch 1:25–30
96. Wiklund K, Konoˆpka B, Nilsson LO (1995) Stem form and growth in Picea abies (L.) Karst. in response to water and mineral nutrient availability. Scand J For Res 10:326–332CrossRef
97. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca raton
98. Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc B 73(1):3–36CrossRef
99. Yang ZJ, Midmore DJ (2005) Modelling plant resource allocation and growth partitioning in response to environmental heterogeneity. Ecol Model 181:59–77CrossRef
100. Yang L, Qin G, Zhao N, Wang C, Song G (2012) Using a generalized additive model with autoregressive terms to study the effects of daily temperature on mortality. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:165CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
101. Yokozawa M, Hara T (1995) Foliage profile, size structure and stem diameter-plant height relationship in crowded plant populations. Ann Bot 76:271–285CrossRef
102. Zamora R, Gómez JM, Hódar JA, Castro J, García D (2001) Effect of browsing by ungulates on sapling growth of Scots pine in a Mediterranean environment: consequences for forest regeneration. For Ecol Manage 144:33–42CrossRef
103. Zhang H, Zhou D, Huang Y et al (2008) Plasticity and allometry of meristem allocation in response to density in three annual plants with different architectures. Botany 86:1291–1298CrossRef
104. Zohar Y, Karshon R (1984) Above-ground biomass of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehn. In Israel. S Afr For 128:26–29

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-016-1379-4