Composition of hybrid larch (Larix × eurolepis Henry) forest reproductive materials: How much does hybrid percentage affect stand performance?

Author

• Gwenaël Philippe 
• , Corinne Buret
• , Stéphane Matz
• , Luc E. Pâques

Abstract

The performance of hybrid larch (Larix × eurolepis) stands may be altered by the fact that the seed lots produced in hybridization seed orchards always contain a proportion of non-hybrid seeds. We studied the effect of such hybrid/non-hybrid mixtures on the productivity and quality of young plantations, through a three-step process: determination of tree species identity with cytoplasmic DNA markers, comparison of hybrid and non-hybrid tree performance, and finally, assessment of thinning impact on hybrid percentage. Overall, we analyzed progenies from eight commercial seed orchards at three sites. Huge variations in hybrid percentage were found among orchard progenies. Globally, the results concerning survival, susceptibility to drought and to Meria laricis, growth, stem form and wood stiffness were clearly in favor of hybrids. In particular, they grew faster than the non-hybrid trees and exhibited a more homogeneous growth than the mixed progenies. Hybrid superiority was highest for orchards composed of a single maternal clone of a species which was poorly adapted to the planting site. Hybrid percentage was enhanced by successive thinnings. However, a serious loss of income is expected when planting progenies characterized by low initial hybrid percentage and high hybrid superiority. Moreover, variations in hybrid percentage proved to be problematic in seed orchard testing as seed orchard ranking may change depending on whether it is based on the performance of all trees or hybrids only. These variations reduce the reliability of the recommendations typically made to forest owners. For commercial and silvicultural reasons, we suggest setting a minimal threshold level of 60–70 % for hybrid percentage in marketed forest reproductive materials.

References

1. Acheré V, Rampant PF, Pâques LE, Prat D (2004) Chloroplast and mitochondrial molecular tests identify European × Japanese larch hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 108:1643–1649CrossRefPubMed
2. Baltunis BS, Greenwood MS, Eysteinsson T (1998) Hybrid vigor in Larix: growth of intra- and interspecific hybrids of Larix decidua, L. laricina and L. kaempferi after 5-years. Silvae Genet 47(5–6):288–293
3. Bastien JC, Keller R (1980) Intérêts comparés du mélèze hybride (Larix × eurolepis Henry) avec les deux espèces parentes. RFF 32(6):521–530CrossRef
4. Batko S (1955) Meria laricis on Japanese and hybrid larch in Britain. Trans Br Mycol Soc 39(1):13–16CrossRef
5. Bergmann F, Ruetz W (1987) Identifizierung von Hybridlärchensaatgut aus Samenplantagen mit Hilfe eines Isoenzym-Markers. Silvae Genet 36(2):102–105
6. Biging GS, Dobbertin M (1995) Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. For Sci 41(2):360–377
7. Colas F, Perron M, Tousignant D, Parent C, Pelletier M, Lemay P (2008) A novel approach for the operational production of hybrid larch seeds under northern climatic conditions. For Chron 84(1):95–104CrossRef
8. Council Directive 1999/105/EC of 22 December 1999 on the marketing of forest reproductive material (2000) In: Official Journal of the European Communities, Brussels, 15 January 2000, L11, article 6 and annexes, pp 17–40
9. Dieckert H (1964) Einige untersuchungen zur selbststerilität und inzucht bei fichte und lärche. Silvae Genet 13:77–86
10. Edwards MV (1956) The hybrid larch Larix × eurolepis Henry. Forestry 24:29–43CrossRef
11. Ennos RA, Qian T (1994) Monitoring the output of a hybrid larch seed orchard using isozyme markers. Forestry 67(1):63–74CrossRef
12. Ferrand JC, Bastien JC (1985) Bilan à 26 ans d’une plantation comparative de mélèzes. Revue Forestière Française XXXVII 6:441–448CrossRef
13. Häcker M, Bergmann F (1991) The proportion of hybrids in seed from seed orchard composed of two larch species (L. europaea and L. leptolepis). Ann Sci For 48:631–640CrossRef
14. Hall JP, Brown IR (1977) Embryo development and yield of seed in Larix. Silvae Genet 26(2–3):77–84
15. Henry A, Flood MG (1919) History of Dunkeld hybrid larch, Larix eurolepis, with notes on other hybrid conifers. Proc R Ir Acad Sect B 35(4):55–66
16. Kosinski G (1986) Empty seed production in European larch (Larix decidua Mill.). For Ecol. Manage 19(1–4):57–63
17. Lacaze JF, Birot Y (1974) Bilan d’une expérience comparative de provenances de mélèzes à l’âge de 13 ans. Ann Sci For 22(2):321–351
18. Lanier L, Joly P, Bondoux P, Bellemère A (1976) Les maladies du mélèze. In: Mycologie et pathologie forestières, Tome II Pathologie forestière. Masson, Paris, p 478
19. Launay J, Rozenberg P, Pâques LE, Dewitte JM (2000) A new experimental device for rapid measurement of the trunk equivalent modulus of elasticity on standing trees. Ann For Sci 57:351–359CrossRef
20. Lewandowski E, Nikkanen T, Burczyk J (1994) Production of hybrid seed in a seed orchard of two larch species, Larix sibirica and Larix decidua. Scand J For Res 9(3):214–217CrossRef
21. Magnussen S (1990) Selection index: economic weights for maximum simultaneous genetic gain. Theor Appl Genet 79:289–293CrossRefPubMed
22. Miller JT, Thulin IJ (1967) Five-year survival and height compared for European, Japanese and hybrid larch in New Zealand. Research leaflet 17, New Zealand Forest Service
23. Myking T, Skoppa T (2006) Certification of forest reproductive material—is present practice sufficient? IPGRI newsletter for Europe, no 33, Nov. 2006, p 13
24. Nanson A (2004) Génétique et amélioration des arbres forestiers. Les presses agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux, p 712
25. Nanson A, Sacré E (1978) A propos de l’hétérosis de Larix × eurolepis en particulier pour les propriétés du bois. Bull Rech Agron Gembloux 13(4):323–336
26. Owens JN (1995) Reproductive biology of larch. In: Ecology and management of Larix forests: a look ahead, proceedings of an international symposium, Whitefish, Montana, USA, Oct. 5–9, 1992, Schmidt WC and McDonald KJ (compilers), pp 97–109
27. Owens JN, Blake MD (1985) Forest tree seed production. Canadian Forestry Service, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Chalk River, Ontario. Information Report PI-X-53, p 161
28. Pâques LE (1992) Performance of vegetatively propagated Larix decidua, L. kaempferi and L. laricina hybrids. Ann Sci For 49:63–74CrossRef
29. Pâques LE, Rozenberg P (2009) Ranking larch genotypes with the Rigidimeter: relationships between modulus of elasticity of standing trees and of sawn timber. Ann For Sci 66(4):1–7CrossRef
30. Pâques LE, Philippe G, Prat D (2006) Identification of European and Japanese larch and their interspecific hybrid with morphological markers: application to young seedlings. Silvae Genet 55(3):123–134
31. Pâques LE, Foffova E, Heinze B, Lelu-Walter MA, Liesebach M, Philippe G (2013) Larches (Larix sp.). In: Pâques LE (ed) Forest tree breeding in Europe: current state-of-the-art and perspectives, Part I Breeding of conifers. Springer, Netherlands, pp 13–122CrossRef
32. Pauwels D, Rondeux J (1999) Tarifs de cubage pour les petits bois de mélèze en Ardenne. Cahiers forestiers de Gembloux, no 23
33. Pauwels D, Rondeux J (2000) Le mélèze, une essence à haut potentiel de production. Silva Belg 107(3):6–10
34. Philippe G, Baldet P (1997) Electrostatic dusting: an efficient technique of pollination in larch. Ann Sci For 54:301–310CrossRef
35. Philippe G, Curnel Y, Jacques D, Lee SJ, Matz S (2002) Performances of hybrid larch (Larix × eurolepis Henry) varieties across Europe: early results for survival stem form and growth rate. In: Proceedings meeting IUFRO WP S2.02-07, compiled by Pâques LE, Gap, Auvergne & Limousin, September 16–21, 2002, pp 127–139
36. Philippe G, Baldet P, Héois B, Ginisty C (2006) Reproduction sexuée des conifères et production de semences en vergers à graines. Quae, Versailles, p 572
37. Reck S (1980) Untersuchung über das holz der hybridlärche. Allg Forst-u J Ztg 151(6/7):117–120
38. Ridley GS, Dick MA (2001) An introduction to the diseases of forest and amenity trees in New Zealand. Scion For Res Bull 220. http://​www.​nzffa.​org.​nz/​farm-forestry-model/​the-essentials/​forest-health-pests-and-diseases/​diseases/​Merialaricis/​Meria-laricisFRB220
39. Slobodnik B, Guttenberger H (2005) Zygotic embryogenesis and empty seed formation in European larch (Larix decidua Mill.). Ann For Sci 62:129–134CrossRef
40. Sylvestre G, Pâques LE, Delatour C (1999) Résistance du mélèze hybride inoculé par Lachnellula willkommii. Ann Sci For 56:485–492CrossRef
41. Sylvestre-Guinot G, Delatour C (1983) Possibilité d’appréciation de la sensibilité du genre Larix au Lechnellula willkommii (Hartig) dennis par inoculations artificielles. Ann Sci For 40:337–354CrossRef
42. Thill A, Palm R (1984) Etude dendrométrique des mélèzes. Notes du Centre d’Ecologie Forestière et Rurale no 47, Gembloux
43. van’t Leven EM (1979) De zaagaarden van Staatsbosbeher (The seed orchards of the State Forest Service). Rijkinstituut voor onderzoek in de bos-en landschapsbouw “De Dorschkamp”, Wageningen, The Netherlands, Mededeling nr 178:1–32
44. Williams CG (2007) Re-thinking the embryo lethal system within the Pinaceae. Can J Bot 85:667–677CrossRef
45. Zaczek JJ, Steiner KC, Shipman RD (1994) Performance of Japanese and hybrid larch progenies in Pennsylvania. North J Appl For 11(2):53–57

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11056-016-9530-z