Blog List

Tuesday 12 July 2016

Soil–vegetation interactions in abandoned farmland within the temperate region of Europe

Author

  • Anda Ruskule 
  • Oļģerts Nikodemus
  • Raimonds Kasparinskis
  • Dana Prižavoite
  • Daina Bojāre
  • Guntis Brūmelis

Abstract

Forests are becoming increasingly dominant in the landscape of north-eastern Europe as a result of a decline in agriculture, land abandonment and the related trend of afforestation. This is also the case in Latvia, where former agricultural land is either artificially afforested or taken over by the natural process of secondary succession. A large spatial and temporal variety of succession and compositional diversity of tree species colonizing fields is observed in the central part of Latvia. Understanding of the possible scenarios in the development of plant communities after land abandonment is important for deciding on viable management solutions, e.g. restoration of semi-natural grasslands or forest regeneration. The aim of the research was to determine the factors affecting the course of secondary succession at its initial stage and the composition of tree species that are colonizing abandoned fields. Ten abandoned fields were surveyed, recording species composition and vegetation structure, determining soil properties and analysing correlations between these factors. The research results help to explain the mechanisms of how soil properties affect the course of succession. On fertile soils a dense herbaceous layer developed, which in abandoned fields resulted in accumulation of a thick cover of litter. Such conditions hinder establishment of typical pioneer species, e.g. grey alder Alnus incana, aspen Populus tremula and birch Betula pendula, whereas Norway spruce Picea abies is able to compete with grass species and thus can more easily establish in abandoned fields, creating favourable conditions for invasion by other tree species.

References

  1. Alard D, Chabrerie O, Dutoit T, Roche P, Langlois E (2005) Patterns of secondary succession in calcerous grasslands: can we distinguish the influence of former land uses from present vegetation data? Basic Appl Ecol 6:161–173. doi:10.​1016/​j.​baae.​2005.​01.​010 CrossRef
  2. Antrop M (2006) Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landsc Urban Plan 75:187–197. doi:10.​1016/​j.​landurbplan.​2005.​02.​014 CrossRef
  3. Bartha S, Meiners SJ, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2003) Plant colonization windows in mesic old field succession. Appl Veg Sci 6:205–212. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1654-109X.​2003.​tb00581.​x CrossRef
  4. Baumann M, Kuemmerle T, Elbakidzed M, Ozdogana M, Radeloffa VC, Keulerc NS, Prishchepova AV, Kruhlovd I, Hostert P (2011) Patterns and drivers of post-socialist farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land Use Policy 28:552–562. doi:10.​1016/​j.​biocon.​2007.​08.​012 CrossRef
  5. Bowen ME, McAlpine CA, House APN, Smith GC (2007) Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: a review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna. Biol Conserv 140:273–296. doi:10.​1016/​j.​biocon.​2007.​08.​012 CrossRef
  6. Bušs M, Mangalis I (eds) (1971) Forest plantations [in Latvian: Meža kultūras]. Zvaigzne, Riga
  7. Clements F (1936) Nature and structure of the climax. J Ecol 24:252–284. http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​2256278
  8. Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144. http://​links.​jstor.​org/​sici?​sici=​0003-0147%28197711%2F12%29111%3A982%3C1119%3AMOSINC%3E2.​0.​CO%3B2-H
  9. Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ, Standish RJ (2008) What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol Evol 23:104–112. doi:10.​1016/​j.​tree.​2007.​10.​005 CrossRefPubMed
  10. Díaz GI, Nahuelhual L, Echeverría C, Marín S (2011) Drivers of land abandonment in Southern Chile and implications for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 99:207–217. doi:10.​1016/​j.​landurbplan.​2010.​11.​005CrossRef
  11. Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD, Moares C (2002) Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83:2978–2984. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2978:IIOPLU]2.0.CO;2
  12. Dybzinski R, Tilman D (2012) Seed and microsite limitation in a late-successional old field: the effects of water, adults, litter, and small mammals on seeds and seedlings. Plant Ecol 213:1003–1013. doi:10.​1007/​s11258-012-0060-2 CrossRef
  13. Egler FE (1954) Vegetation science concepts. I. Initial floristic composition—a factor in old-field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4:412–417. doi:10.​1007/​BF00275587 CrossRef
  14. Figueiredo J, Pereira HM (2011) Regime shifts in a socio-ecological model of farmland abandonment. Landsc Ecol 26:737–749. doi:10.​1007/​s10980-011-9605-3 CrossRef
  15. Forest Soil Co-Ordinating Centre (FSCC) (2006) Manual IIIa: sampling and analysis of soil. In: ICP forests, 2006: manual on methods and criteria for harmonized sampling, assessment, monitoring and analysis of the effects of air pollution on forests. Hamburg: UNECE ICP Forests Programme Co-ordinating Centre. p 26. + annexes. http://​icp-forests.​net/​page/​icp-forests-manual. Accessed 10 August 2015
  16. Harmer R, Peterken G, Kerr G, Poulton P (2001) Vegetation changes during 100 years of development of two secondary woodlands on abandoned arable land. Biol Conserv 101:291–304. doi:10.​1016/​S0006-3207(01)00072-6CrossRef
  17. Höchtl F, Lehringer S, Konold W (2005) “Wilderness”: what it means when it becomes a reality—a case study from the southwestern Alps. Landsc Urban Plan 70:85–95CrossRef
  18. Hytteborn H, Maslov AA, Nazimova DI, Rysin LP (2005) Boreal forests of Eurasia. In: Anddersson F (ed) Coniferous Forests, Ecosystems of the World, vol 6. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 23–99
  19. IUSS Working Group WRB (2014) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World soil resources reports no. 106. FAO, Rome
  20. Janišová M, Hrivnák R, Gömöry D, Ujházy K, Valachovic M, Gömöryová E, Hegedüšová K, Škodová I (2007) Changes of understorey vegetation after Norway spruce colonization of an abandoned grassland. Ann Bot Fennici 44:256–266
  21. Jensen K, Gutekunst K (2003) Effects of litter on establishment of grassland plant species: the role of seed size and successional status. Basic Appl Ecol 4:579–587. doi:10.​1078/​1439-1791-00179 CrossRef
  22. Kalinina O, Chertov O, Dolgikh AV, Goryachkin SV, Lyuri DI, Vormstein S, Giani L (2013) Self-restoration of post-agrogenic Albeluvisols: soil development, carbon stocks and dynamic of carbon pools. Geoderma 207–208:221–233. doi:10.​1016/​j.​geoderma.​2013.​05.​019 CrossRef
  23. Kasparinskis R, Nikodemus O (2012) Influence of environmental factors on the spatial distribution and diversity of forest soil in Latvia. Estonian J Earth Sci 61:48–64. doi:10.​3176/​earth.​2012.​1.​04 CrossRef
  24. Keenleyside C, Tucker G (2010) Farmland abandonment in the EU: an assessment of trends and prospects. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London
  25. Kent M, Coker P (1992) Vegetation description and analysis. A practical approach, Wiley, Chichester
  26. Kopecký M, Vojta J (2009) Land use legacies in post-agricultural forest in the Doupovské Mountains, Czech Republic. Appl Veg Sci 12:251–260. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1654-109X.​2009.​01023.​x CrossRef
  27. Korotkov VN, Logofet DO, Loreau M (2001) Succession in mixed boreal forest of Russia: Markov models and non-Markov effects. Ecol Model 142:25–38. doi:10.​1016/​S0304-3800(01)00247-2 CrossRef
  28. Krauklis A (2000) Living with diversity in Latvia: people, nature and cultural landscapes. Folia Geographica 8:1–14
  29. Kuemmerle T, Hostert P, Radeloff VC, der Linden S, Perzanowski K, Kruhlov I (2008) Cross-border comparison of post-socialist farmland abandonment in the Carpathians. Ecosystems 11:614–628. doi:10.​1007/​s10021-008-9146-zCrossRef
  30. Lesschen JP, Cammeraat LH, Kooijman AM, van Wesemael B (2008) Development of spatial heterogeneity in vegetation and soil properties after land abandonment in a semi-arid ecosystem. J Arid Environ 72:2082–2092. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jaridenv.​2008.​06.​006 CrossRef
  31. Loydi A, Eckstein RL, Otte A, Donath TW (2013) Effects of litter on seedling establishment in natural and semi-natural grasslands: a meta-analysis. J Ecol 101:454–464. doi:10.​1111/​1365-2745.​12033 CrossRef
  32. MacDonald D, Crabtree JR, Wiesinger G, Dax T, Stamou N, Fleury P, Lazpita JG, Gibon A (2000) Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. J Environ Manag 59:47–69CrossRef
  33. Myster RW (1993) Tree invasion and establishment in old fields at the Hutcheson Memorial Forest. Bot Rev 59:251–278CrossRef
  34. Navarro LM, Pereira HM (2012) Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15:900–912. doi:10.​1007/​s10021-012-9558-7 CrossRef
  35. Nikodemus O, Bell S, Grīne I, Liepiņš I (2005) The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landsc Urban Plan 70:57–67. doi:10.​1016/​j.​landurbplan.​2003.​10.​005 CrossRef
  36. Nikodemus O, Kasparinskis R, Kukuls I (2013) Influence of afforestation on soil genesis, morphology and properties in glacial till deposits. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59:449–465. doi:10.​1080/​03650340.​2011.​638290CrossRef
  37. Poyatos R, Latron J, Llorens P (2003) Land use and land cover change after agricultural abandonment: the case of a Mediterranean mountain area (Catalan Pre-Pyrenees). Mt Res Dev 23:362–368. doi:10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0362:LUALCC]2.0.CO;2
  38. Rosenthal G (2010) Secondary succession in a fallow central European wet grassland. Flora 205:153–160. doi:10.​1016/​j.​flora.​2009.​02.​003 CrossRef
  39. Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Araujo MB, Carter TR, Dendoncker N, Ewert F, House JI, Kankaanpaa S, Leemans R, Metzger MJ (2006) A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:57–68. doi:10.​1016/​j.​agee.​2005.​11.​027 CrossRef
  40. Ruskule A, Nikodemus O, Kasparinska Z, Kasparinskis R, Brūmelis G (2012) Patterns of afforestation on abandoned agriculture land in Latvia. Agrofor Syst 85:215–231. doi:10.​1007/​s10457-012-9495-7 CrossRef
  41. Ruskule A, Nikodemus O, Kasparinskis R, Bell S, Urtāne I (2013) The perception of abandoned farmland by local people and experts: landscape value and perspectives on future land use. Landsc Urban Plan 115:49–61. doi:10.​1016/​j.​landurbplan.​2013.​03.​012 CrossRef
  42. Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, de Snoo GR, Rakosy L, Ramwell C (2009) Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe—A review. J Environ Manag 91:22–46. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jenvman.​2009.​07.​005 CrossRef
  43. Sullivan J (1994) Picea abies. In: Fire effects information system. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. http://​www.​fs.​fed.​us/​database/​feis. Accessed 25 Aug 2015
  44. Tansley AG (1920) The classification of vegetation and the concept of development. J Ecol 8:118–149. http://​www.​jstor.​org/​stable/​2255529
  45. Tilman D (1987) Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients. Ecol Monogr 57:189–214. http://​cedarcreek.​umn.​edu/​biblio/​fulltext/​t1166.​pdf
  46. Tullus T, Tuulus A, Roosaluste E, Kaasik A, Lutter R, Tuulus H (2013) Understorey vegetation in young naturally regenerated and planted birch (Betula spp.) stands on abandoned agricultural land. New Forest 44:591–611. doi:10.​1007/​s11056-013-9365-9 CrossRef
  47. Tzanopoulos J, Mitchley J, Pantis JD (2007) Vegetation dynamics in abandoned crop fields on a Mediterranean island: development of succession model and estimation of disturbance thresholds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:370–376. doi:10.​1016/​j.​agee.​2006.​10.​011 CrossRef
  48. USDA National Resources Conservation Service (2004) Survey laboratory methods manual. Soil investigations report 42, Version 4.0. pp 312–317. ftp://​ftp-fc.​sc.​egov.​usda.​gov/​NSSC/​Lab_​Methods_​Manual/​SSIR42_​2004_​print.​pdfAccessed 15 Aug 2015
  49. Van Reeuwijk LP (1995) Procedures for soil analysis, 5th edn. ISRIC Technical Paper 9. Wageningen

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/search?sortOrder=newestFirst&facet-content-type=Article&facet-journal-id=11056

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...