Predicting load path and tensile forces during cable yarding operations on steep terrain

Published Date

First online: 28 August 2015

Title 

Predicting load path and tensile forces during cable yarding operations on steep terrain

• Author 

• Sylvain Dupire 
• , Franck Bourrier
• , Frédéric Berger

• 
  

• Abstract 

• 
  

• Cable yarding systems constitute an adapted solution for steep-slope harvesting in mountain forests. However, it requires many specific skills for both forest managers and operators. The objectives of this research were to: (1) develop a CableHelp model for the set-up of cable yarding systems where inputs are operational field data and outputs are load path and tensile forces, and (2) to validate it with field experiments. The results show a high accuracy between the data predicted by the model and field measurements. Furthermore, this work stresses the importance of taking into account both the mainline effect and the friction between skyline and intermediate supports to properly calculate the skyline tension and load path. The CableHelp model shows great adaptability and ensures highly accurate predictions for any position on the line profile and for different configurations: single-span or multiple-span profiles, uphill or downhill yarding and for different kinds of carriage. A direct application of this research is to optimize the set-up of cable lines in order to reduce equipment wear, as well as operating cost, while respecting operator safety.

• 
  

• References 

• 
  

• 1. Akay AE, Oğuz H, Karas IR, Aruga K (2008) Using LiDAR technology in forestry activities. Environ Monit Assess 151:117–125CrossRefPubMed
  2. Auban J-M, Bartoli M (1997) Forest roads in mountainous regions—assessment and technical proposals. An example in the central Pyrenees. Rev For Freel 49:235–246CrossRef
  3. Bartoli M (2007) “Lombardi in Arudy!”. A snapshot of logging in the French Pyrenees from 1916 to 1975. Rev For Fr 59:85–92
  4. Bartoli M (2008) Dossier débardage par câble. For Freel 511:20–22
  5. Bont L, Heinimann HR (2012) Optimum geometric layout of a single cable road. Eur J For Res 131:1439–1448CrossRef
  6. Brändli U-B (2010) Inventaire forestier national suisse. Résultats du troisième inventaire 2004–2006. Birmensdorf, Institut fédéral de recherches sur la forêt, la neige et le paysage WSL, Berne, Office fédéral de l’environnement
  7. Carson WW (1977) Analysis of the single cable segment. For Sci 23:238–252
  8. Carson WW, Studier DD, Lysons HH (1971) Running skyline design with a desk-top computer-plotter. Pacific North West Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture
  9. Cavalli R (2012) Prospects of research on cable logging in Forest Engineering Community. Croat J For Eng 33:339–356
  10. Charland J, Hernried A, Pyles M (1994) Cable systems with elastic supporting elements. J Struct Eng 120:3649–3665CrossRef
  11. Chung J (1987) Development of a cable logging system analysis package for micro-computers. Report of the Oregon State University
  12. Chung W (2002) Optimization of cable logging layout using a heuristic algorithm for network programming. Thesis, Oregon State University
  13. Chung W, Sessions J (2003) A computerized method for determining cable logging feasibility using a DEM. In: “Forest Operations Among Competing Forest Uses”. proceedings of the council on forest engineering (COFE), Bar Harbor. 7–10 Oct 2003
  14. Fabiano F, Marchi E, Neri F, Piegai F (2011) Skyline tension analysis in yarding operation: case studies in Italy. In: Pushing the boundaries with research and innovation in forest engineering. FORMEC 2011, proceedings of the 44th international symposium on forestry mechanisation, Graz. 9–13 Oct 2011. Institute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Graz, Austria
  15. Falk GD (1981) Predicting the payload capability of cable logging systems including the effect of partial suspension. USDA Forest Service Research, Broomall
  16. Grulois S (2013) Les systèmes d’exploitation forestière dans les Alpes françaises. In: Newfor French mid-term conference, Grenoble. 24 Oct 2013
  17. Hollaus M, Wagner W, Eberhöfer C, Karel W (2006) Accuracy of large-scale canopy heights derived from LiDAR data under operational constraints in a complex alpine environment. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 60:323–338CrossRef
  18. Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9:90–95CrossRef
  19. Irvine HM (1981) Cable structures. MIT Press, Cambridge
  20. Kato S (1964) A note on the KATO-HORI’s tension formulas for the calculation of the skyline cables. Rep Tokyo Univ For 15:14–22
  21. Kendrick D, Sessions J (1991) A solution procedure for calculating the standing skyline load path for partial and full suspension. For Prod J 41:57–60
  22. Lyons CK (2008) Considering cable stretch in logging applications. Int J For Eng 19:29–35
  23. McColl IR, Waterhouse RB, Harris SJ, Tsujikawa M (1995) Lubricated fretting wear of a high-strength eutectoid steel rope wire. Wear 185:203–212CrossRef
  24. Oliphant TE (2007) Python for scientific computing. Comput Sci Eng 9:10–20CrossRef
  25. Pestal E (1961) Seilbahnen und Seilkrane für Holz-und Materialtransport. Georg Fromme & Co, Vienna
  26. Sessions J (1976) Field measurement of cable tensions for skyline logging systems. Corvallis, Or. : Forest Research Laboratory, School of Forestry, Oregon State University
  27. Tobey AC (1980) Skyline analysis with log drag. Report of the Oregon State University
  28. Vidal C (2010) La Forêt française—Les résultats issus des campagnes d’inventaire 2005 à 2009—Rhône-Alpes. Inventaire Forestier National, Nogent-sur-Vernisson
  29. Ypma T (1995) Historical development of the Newton–Raphson method. SIAM Rev 37:531–551CrossRef
  30. Zweifel O (1960) Seilbahnberechnung bei beidseitig verankerten Tragseilen. Schweiz Bauztg 1:1–4

• 
  

• For further details log on website :

• http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-015-0503-4