Blog List

Thursday, 17 November 2016

Carbon balance of forest stands, wood products and their utilization in South Korea

Published Date
Volume 21, Issue 5pp 199–210

Special Feature: Original Article Climate Change - Mitigation, Impacts and Adaptation in the Forestry Sector
DOI: 10.1007/

Cite this article as: 
Han, H., Chung, W. & Chung, J. J For Res (2016) 21: 199. doi:10.1007/s10310-016-0529-2


Forests provide wood products and feedstock for bioenergy and bio-based products that can mitigate climate change by reducing carbon emissions. In order to assess the effects of forest products on reducing carbon emissions, we analyzed the carbon balance for individual carbon pools across the forest supply chain over a long period of time. We simulated particular forest supply chain activities pertaining to even-aged management of pine stands in South Korea to demonstrate our methods. Two different rotation scenarios (i.e., 40 and 70 years) were assessed over the 280-year time horizon in terms of temporal changes in carbon stock in each carbon pool along the supply chain, carbon transfer between carbon pools, substitution effects, and delayed carbon release by wood products. We found that the average carbon stock level was higher for the 70-year rotation scenario, but the total amount of gain in carbon was higher for the 40-year rotation at the end of the time horizon. This study confirms that forest products and energy feedstock can both reduce carbon emissions and increase carbon storage. However, the complexity of carbon accounting along the supply chain warrants a thorough evaluation from diverse perspectives when it is used to assess forest carbon management options.


  1. Aber JD, Melillo JM (1991) Terrestrial ecosystems. Saunders College Publishing, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker DR, Moseley C, Lee C (2011) A supply chain analysis frame work for assessing state-level forest biomass utilization policies in the United States. Biomass Bioenerg 35:1429–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung J, Han H, Kwon K, Seol A (2013) Development of a carbon budget assessment model for woody biomass processing and conversion. Centre for Climate Change forestry research paper. Korea Forest Service, Republic of Korea (in Korean)
  4. Eriksson E, Gillespie AR, Gustavsson L, Langvall O, Olsson M, Sathre R, Stendahl J (2007) Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practice and wood substitution. Can J For Res 37:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Green C, Avitabile V, Farrell EP, Byrne KA (2006) Reporting harvested wood products in national greenhouse gas inventories: implication for Ireland. Biomass Bioenerg 30:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. IPCC (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) National greenhouse gas inventories programme. IGES, JapanGoogle Scholar
  7. IPCC (2014) 2013 Revised supplementary methods and good practice guidance arising from the Kyoto protocol. In: Hiraishi T, Krug T, Tanabe K, Srivastava N, Baasansuren J, Fukuda M, Troxler TG (eds). IPCC, Switzerland
  8. Jeon JN, Cha JH (2011) Development of Korean protocol for forest carbon offset project of harvested wood products (HWPs) in forest management sector. Centre for Climate Change forestry research working paper 3. Korea Forest Service, Republic of Korea (in Korean)
  9. Korea Forest Research Institute (2005) Standard manual for sustainable forest management. Republic of Korea, Seoul (in Korean)Google Scholar
  10. Korea Forest Service (2009) Climate change and forestry. Republic of Korea, Daejeon (in Korean)Google Scholar
  11. Korea Forest Service (2010) Timber use survey in Korea. Republic of Korea, Daejeon (in Korean)Google Scholar
  12. Korea Forest Service (2013) Timber use survey in Korea. Republic of Korea, Daejeon (in Korean)Google Scholar
  13. Korea Ministry of Environment (2013) Waste occurrence and disposal in Korea. Republic of Korea, Sejong (in Korean)Google Scholar
  14. Kwon S, Chung J (2004) Development of individual-tree distance-independent simulation model for growth prediction of Pinus koraiensis stands. J Kor For Soc 93:43–49 (in Korean with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  15. Kwon K, Han H, Seol A, Chung H, Chung J (2013) Development of a wood recovery estimation model for the conversion processes of Larix kaempferi. J Kor For Soc 102:484–490 (in Korean with an English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee JI, Kim IS, So HJ (2009) A study on the energy utilization of woody biomass. Gyeonggi Research Institute policy report 2009-35. Republic of Korea, Suwon (in Korean)
  17. Liski J, Pussinen A, Pingoud K, Mäkipää R, Karjalainen T (2001) Which rotation length is favourable to carbon sequestration? Can J For Res 31:2004–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathieu F, François N, Nicolas R, Frédéric M (2012) Quantifying the impact of forest management on the carbon balance of the forest-wood product chain: a case study applied to even-aged oak stands in France. For Ecol Manage 279:176–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peckham SD, Gower ST (2013) Simulating the effects of harvest and biofuel production on the forest system carbon balance of the Midwest, USA. GCB Bioenerg 5:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Comnick J, Manriquez C (2005) An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood product market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood Fiber Sci 37:140–148Google Scholar
  21. Pipatti R, Svardal P, Silva Alves JW, Gao Q, López Gabrera C, Mareckova K, Oonk H, Scheehle E, Sharma C, Smith A, Yamada M (2006) Solid waste disposal. In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol. 5, waste. IGES, JapanGoogle Scholar
  22. Profft I, Mund M, Weber GE, Weller E, Schulze ED (2009) Forest management and carbon sequestration in wood products. Eur J For Res 128:339–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheehan J, Camobreco V, Duffield J, Graboski M, Shapouri H (1998) Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel for use in an urban bus. NREL/SR-580-24089, USDA final report
  24. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (2007) Contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the International Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Son YM, Lee KH, Kim RH, Pyo JK, Park IH, Son YH, Lee YJ, Kim CS (2010) Carbon emission factors on the major tree species for forest carbon inventory. Korea Forest Research Institute (KFRI) research report 10-25. Republic of Korea (in Korean)
  26. Son YM, Lee KH, Kwon SD, Pho JK (2012) Tree volume, biomass and yield table in South Korea. Korea Forest Service, Republic of Korea (in Korean)Google Scholar
  27. Van Kooten GC, Laaksonen-Craig S, Wang Y (2009) A meta-regression analysis of forest carbon offset costs. Can J For Res 39:2153–2167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Winjum JK, Brown S, Schlamadinger B (1998) Forest harvests and wood products: sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide. For Sci 44:272–284Google Scholar

For further details log on website :

No comments:

Post a Comment

Mangrove Forest Management & Restoration

The Sabah Forestry Department has conserved most if not all Mangrove Forests under Class V for marine life conservation and as a natural me...