Fuel Characteristics of Solid Biofuel Derived from Oil Palm Biomass and Fast Growing Timber Species in Malaysia

Published Date

March 2013, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 75-82

First online: 03 July 2012

Title 

Fuel Characteristics of Solid Biofuel Derived from Oil Palm Biomass and Fast Growing Timber Species in Malaysia

• Author 

• K. L. Chin
• , P. S. H’ng 
• , E. W. Chai
• , B. T. Tey
• , M. J. Chin
• , M. T. Paridah
• , A. C. Luqman
• , M. Maminski

Abstract

The fuel characteristics of solid biofuels derived from biomass that is abundantly available in Malaysia are presented. The objectives of the study were to characterize fuel properties of oil palm biomass (empty fruit bunch (EFB) and oil palm trunk (OPT)) and wood from a range of fast growing timber species (Albizia falcataria, Acacia spp., Endospermum spp. and Macaranga spp.), inclusive and exclusive of bark. Among the fast-growing timber species, the higher heating values ranged from 4288 cal g-1 to 4383 cal g-1 for wood inclusive of bark, and 4134 cal g-1 to 4343 cal g-1 for wood exclusive of bark. The inclusive of bark portion in the biomass sample generally increased the heating value except for Macaranga spp.Empty fruit bunch and oil palm trunk had heating values of 4315 cal g-1 and 4104 cal g-1, respectively. Ash-forming elements and trace elements were much higher in the timber species samples inclusive of bark than samples exclusive of bark. On the other hand, oil palm biomass contained higher ash-forming elements and trace elements than the wood from the fast growing timber species. The European energy crops show higher HHV, Cl and Si content but lower K, Mg, Na and P compared to the local biomass used in this study. The data obtained from this study can serve as a foundation for the selection of suitable biomass to be used as solid fuel, or as a reference on the fabrication of conversion systems for the selection of biomass solid fuel.

Keywords

Biomass solid fuel Oil palm biomass Fast growing timber species

References

1. 1.
   MPOB (2011) Overview of the Malaysian Oil Palm Industry 2010. Selangor: Malaysia Palm Oil Board. http://​econ.​mpob.​gov.​my/​economy/​Overview%202010_final.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2011
2. 2.
   Wise LE, Murphy M, Daddieco AA (1946) Chlorite holocellulose, its fractionation and bearing on summative wood analysis and on studies on the hemicelluloses. Tech Assoc Pap 29:210–218
3. 3.
   Jenkins BM, Baxter LL, Miles TR, Miles TR (1998) Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 54(1–3):17–46CrossRef
4. 4.
   Sheng CD, Azevedo JLT (2005) Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis data. Biomass Bioenerg 28(5):499–507CrossRef
5. 5.
   Senelwa KA (1997) The air gasification of woody biomass from short rotation forests—opportunities for small scale bio-mass electricity systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Massey University, New Zealand.
6. 6.
   Linak WP, Wendt JOL (1993) Toxic metal emissions from incineration: mechanisms and control. Prog Energy Combust Sci 19:145–185CrossRef
7. 7.
   Darvell LI, Jones JM, Gudka B, Baxter XC, Saddawi A, Williams A et al (2010) Combustion properties of some power station biomass fuels. Fuel 89(10):2881–2890CrossRef
8. 8.
   Rechberger P, Lotjonen T (2009) Introduction. In: Energy from field energy crops – a handbook for energy producers. Jyvaskyla: Jyvaskyla Innovation Oy, pp. 6-13.
9. 9.
   Tortosa MAA, Buhre BJP, Gupta RP, Wall TF (2007) Characterising ash of biomass and waste. Fuel Process Technol 88(11–12):1071–1081CrossRef
10. 10.
    Miles TR, Miles TR, Baxter LL, Bryers RW, Jenkins BM, Oden LL (1995) Alkali deposits found in biomass power plants: A preliminary investigation of their extent and nature. Summary Report for National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL Subcontract TZ-2-11226-1.

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12155-012-9232-0