Author
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/gamjagris/v_3a7_3ay_3a2017_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a31-_3ad_3a94350.htm
Md Ashraful Islam (ashrafulmi@bau.edu.bd), Gulam Ferdous (anik286.bau@gmail.com), Akber Akter (aakter.akhy@gmail.com), Md Mokter Hossain (hossainmdmokter@gmail.com) and Dilip Nandwani (dnandwan@tnstate.edu)
Additional contact information
Additional contact information
Agriculture, 2017, vol. 7, issue 4, 1-6
Abstract: The impact of chemical farming and the negative consequences on the environment and human health in Bangladesh are on the rise. Organic farming is gaining attention and increasing globally because it is eco-friendly, safe and has benefits for human health. A field study was conducted at the horticulture farm of Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU), Mymensingh, to evaluate the growth and yield performance of cabbage cv. Atlas—70 using organic and inorganic fertilizers in various plant spacing arrangements. Two factor experiments were conducted on plant spacings of 60 cm × 40 cm (S 1 ), 60 cm × 50 cm (S 2 ) and 60 cm × 60 cm (S 3 ) and fertilizers vermicompost (T 1 ), biogen (T 2 ), integrated plant nutrient system (IPNS) Organic (⅔) + inorganic (⅓) (T 3 ) and inorganic (T 4 ). IPNS (T 3 ) application increased the marketable yield (54.77 t·ha −1 ) of cabbage. The highest marketable yield (48.75 t·ha −1 ) was obtained with a plant spacing of 60 cm × 40 cm (S 1 ). No significant variation was found in plant spacings S 1 and S 2 . The treatment combination of S 2 T 3 recorded the highest plant height (37.81 cm), plant spread (47.75 cm), cabbage head (21.80 cm), stem length (12.31 cm), thickness of the cabbage head (12.53 cm) and marketable yield (65.0 t·ha −1 ). The results suggest that IPNS (T 3 ) combining organic and inorganic fertilizer applications with a 60 cm × 50 cm spacing (S 2 T 3 ) increases the yield performance of cabbage.
Keywords: biogen; cabbage; growth; plant density; vermicompost; yield (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/4/31/pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/4/31/ (text/html)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/4/31/pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/4/31/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Les Copeland
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Series data maintained by XML Conversion Team (xml-conversion@mdpi.com).
For further details log on website :Series data maintained by XML Conversion Team (xml-conversion@mdpi.com).
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/gamjagris/v_3a7_3ay_3a2017_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a31-_3ad_3a94350.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment