Blog List

Thursday, 15 June 2017

Fusarium Wilt Affecting Chickpea Crop

Author
Warda Jendoubi (war44da@yahoo.fr), Mariem Bouhadida (mariembouhadida@gmail.com), Amal Boukteb (amal.boukteb@fst.utm.tn), Mohamed Béji (mohamed.beji21@gmail.com) and Mohamed Kharrat (kharrat.mohamed@iresa.agrinet.tn)
Additional contact information
Agriculture, 2017, vol. 7, issue 3, 1-16

Abstract: Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) contributes 18% of the global production of grain legume and serves as an important source of dietary protein. An important decrease in cropping area and production has been recorded during the last two decades. Several biotic and abiotic constraints underlie this decrease. Despite the efforts deployed in breeding and selection of several chickpea varieties with high yield potential that are tolerant to diseases, the situation has remained the same for the last decade. Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (Foc) is the major soilborne fungus affecting chickpeas globally. Fusarium wilt epidemics can devastate crops and cause up to 100% loss in highly infested fields and under favorable conditions. To date, eight pathogenic races of Foc (races 0, 1A, 1B/C, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) have been reported worldwide. The development of resistant cultivars is the most effective method to manage this disease and to contribute to stabilizing chickpea yields. Development of resistant varieties to fusarium wilt in different breeding programs is mainly based on conventional selection. This method is time‐consuming and depends on inoculum load and specific environmental factors that influence disease development. The use of molecular tools offers great potential for chickpea improvement, specifically by identifying molecular markers closely linked to genes/QTLs controlling fusarium wilt.
Keywords: chickpeafusarium wiltmolecular markersgenetic resistancemolecular assisting selection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/3/23/pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/3/23/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Les Copeland
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Series data maintained by XML Conversion Team (xml-conversion@mdpi.com).
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/gamjagris/v_3a7_3ay_3a2017_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a23-_3ad_3a92617.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...