Blog List

Monday 1 August 2016

A Theoretical Model of Collapse Recovery

Published Date
Date: 

Title 

A Theoretical Model of Collapse Recovery

  • Author 
  • Philip Blakemore

Abstract

The theory that is thought to best explain the recovery of collapse reconditioning supposes that the S1 and S3 layers are largely responsible for providing restoring the cells to the un-collapsed shape. This is because these two layers are particularly important in providing circumferential stiffness to each individual cell lumen. Hence, it is the potential energy stored in these layers that principally provides the force to restore the cell shape. In contrast, the S2 layer is considered to be the most important for providing the inelastic material properties required to hold the cell in the collapsed or deformed state. While moisture content is important for its effect on the cell wall material properties (i.e. stiffness, creep, mechano-sorptive creep), the uptake or movement of moisture within the cell walls is not thought to be critical for collapse recovery. In this sense, the recovery phenomenon can largely be attributed to a thermal effect (Blakemore and Langrish, 2008), and hence it is the relationships with temperature for the various material properties which are critical for this modelling work. The effect of heat then is to soften the S2layer, which is holding the cell in the deformed shape, allowing the stored mechanical energy in the S1 and S3layers to restore the cell shape.

References

  1. Astley RJ, Stol KA, Harrington JJ (1998) Modelling the elastic properties of softwood. Part II: The cellular microstructure. Holz Roh Werkst 56:43–50CrossRef
  2. Blakemore P (2008) Optimisation of steam reconditioning for regrowth-ash and plantation grown eucalypt species.PhD Thesis, The University of Sydney. 327 pp. http://​hdl.​handle.​net/​2123/​2343. Accessed 3 August 2010
  3. Blakemore PA, Langrish TAG (2008) Effect of pre-drying schedule ramping on collapse recovery and internal checking with Victorian Ash eucalypts. Wood Sci Technol 42(6):473–492CrossRef
  4. Chafe SC, Barnacle JE, Hunter AJ, Ilic J, Northway RL, Rozsa AN (1992) Collapse: an introduction. CSIRO Division of Forest Products, Melbourne, 9 pp
  5. Harrington JJ, Booker R, Astley RJ (1998) Modelling the elastic properties of softwood. Part 1: The cell wall lamellae. Holz Roh Werkst. 56:37–41
  6. Innes TC (1995) Stress model of a wood fibre in relation to collapse. Wood Sci Technol 29:363–376CrossRef
  7. Innes TC (1996) Improving seasoned hardwood timber quality with particular reference to collapse. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, 207 pp
  8. Kauman WG (1964) Cell collapse in wood. CSIRO Division of Forest Products, Melbourne, 59 pp
  9. Oliver AR (1991) A model of the behaviour of wood as it dries (with special reference to Eucalypt materials). Civil and Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, 107 pp
  10. Wardrop AB, Bland DE (1959) The process of lignification on woody plants. In: Proceedings of the 4th international congress of biochemestry. Pergamon Press, New York, NY, pp 76–81
  11. Williams M.L, Landel R.F, Ferry John D (1955) The temperature dependence of relaxation mechani


For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-90-481-9550-3_5

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...