Blog List

Monday 1 August 2016

Evaluating the durability performance of wood-based panels by a non-destructive bending test

Published Date
Volume 62, Issue 3, pp 263-269
First online: 

Title 

Evaluating the durability performance of wood-based panels by a non-destructive bending test

  • Author 
  • Yoichi Kojima 
  • Akira Sakakibara
  • Hikaru Kobori
  • Shigehiko Suzuki

Abstract

We evaluated the durability of wood-based panels by comparing their dynamic modulus of elasticity (Ed) when subjected to repetitive humid and dry treatments. The panels experienced 1-year and 3-month outdoor exposure periods in Shizuoka City, Japan. As the temperature increased, decrements of Ed retention increased. For the same relative humidity, deterioration of the wood-based panels increased with increasing temperature. The highest modulus of rupture (MOR) retention for all the panels was for the 40 °C treatment. As temperature increased, MOR retention tended to decrease. At the 80 °C treatment, MOR retention for particle board (PB) was less than 10 %. Compared to plywood (PW), retention of mat-formed boards declined. One of reasons is due to the difference of bonding configuration. Bonding point of plywood is plain surface, however, that of mat formed board is small point. Thus, bonding points of board are easily collapsed by the ingress of water. Furthermore, mat-formed boards are likely to spring back by water because they are strongly compressed during hot pressing. Ed retention of all the panels decreased within 2 months. After 2 months, the Ed retention of two types of oriented strandboard (OSB) and PW did not decrease significantly. Ed retention of PB gradually decreased. The deterioration behaviour of the same sample during both humid and dry treatments and the outdoor exposure test could be tracked using the non-destructive bending test. Moreover, although the mechanism of deterioration differed between the humid and dry treatment and outdoor exposure test, Ed and MOR were strongly associated (R 2 = 0.77). These results suggest that it is feasible to estimate MOR from Ed using the non-destructive test.

References

  1. 1.
    McNatt JD, Link CL (1989) Analysis of ASTM D1037 accelerated aging test. For Prod J 39:51–57
  2. 2.
    Kajita H, Mukudai J, Yano H (1991) Durability evaluation of particleboards by accelerated aging tests. Wood Sci Technol 25:239–249CrossRef
  3. 3.
    Carroll MM, Bergin EG, Fiehl AO (1969) Accelerated and 5-year exposure tests on exterior type plywood. For Prod J 19:43–51
  4. 4.
    Black JM, Lutz JF, Mraz EA (1976) Performance of softwood plywood during 10 years’ exposure to weather. For Prod J 26:24–27
  5. 5.
    Gillespie RH, River BH (1976) Durability of adhesives in plywood. For Prod J 26:21–25
  6. 6.
    Kaneda H (1977) Weatherability of plywood. I. Occurrence of surface checks and change of properties by exterior exposure (in Japanese). Wood Industry 32:387–391
  7. 7.
    Yoshida H, Taguchi T (1977) Bending properties of weathered plywood. I. Analysis of strength loss on exposed plywood (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 23:547–551
  8. 8.
    Inoue A (1992) A new method for predicting bond durability. I. Outdoor exposure test of plywood subjected to accelerated aging treatment (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 38:923–930
  9. 9.
    Biblis E (2000) Effect of weathering on surface quality and structural properties of six species of untreated commercial plywood siding after 6 years of exposure in Alabama. For Prod J 50:47–50
  10. 10.
    Lehmann WF (1977) Durability of composition board products. Proc WSU Symp Particleboard 11:351–368
  11. 11.
    Lehmann WF (1978) Cyclic moisture conditions and their effect on strength and stability of structural flakeboards. For Prod J 28:23–31
  12. 12.
    ASTM-D 1037 (1993) Standard test method for properties of wood-based fiber and particle panel materials. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken
  13. 13.
    APA PRP 108 (1994) Performance standards and qualification policy for structural-use panels. APA-The Engineering Wood Association, Tacoma
  14. 14.
    EN321 (1993) Fiberboards, cyclic tests in humid conditions. European Standard
  15. 15.
    Suzuki S, Watai J (2000) Literature review for durability performance of wood and wood-based material (in Japanese). Bull Shizuoka Univ For 24:63–70
  16. 16.
    Gressel P (1980) Testing and judging the durability of particleboard adhesives: a proposal for the establishment of generally valid testing guideline (in German). Holz Roh Werkst 38:17–35CrossRef
  17. 17.
    Dinwoodie JM (1981) Characterizing the performance of chipboard in the United Kingdom. Proc WSU Symp Particleboard 15:59–78
  18. 18.
    Kojima Y, Norita H, Suzuki S (2009) Evaluating the durability of wood-based panels using thickness swelling results from accelerated aging treatments. For Prod J 59:35–41
  19. 19.
    Kojima H, Suzuki S (2011) Evaluating the durability of wood-based panels using internal bond strength results from accelerated aging treatments. J Wood Sci 57:7–13CrossRef
  20. 20.
    Kojima H, Suzuki S (2011) Evaluation of wood-based panel durability using bending properties after accelerated aging treatments. J Wood Sci 57:126–133CrossRef
  21. 21.
    Galginatis SV, Bell ER, Fine AM, Auer G, Roy J (1954) Nondestructive testing of wood laminates. Office of Naval Research, University of Louisville, Institute of Industrial Research
  22. 22.
    Jayne BA (1959) Nondestructive test for wood laminates. Washington State Institute of Technology, bulletin no. 246. Washington State University, Division of Industrial Research
  23. 23.
    Jayne BA (1959) Vibrational properties of wood as indices of quality. For Prod J 9:413–416
  24. 24.
    Pellerin RF (1965) A vibrational approach to nondestructive testing of structural lumber. For Prod J 15:93–101
  25. 25.
    Miller DG (1963) Nondestructive testing of crossarms for strength. Canadian Department of Forest, publication no. 1021
  26. 26.
    JIS A-5908 (1994) JIS standard specification for particleboard. Japanese Standards Association, Tokyo

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10086-016-1545-8

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...