Blog List

Tuesday 15 November 2016

Changes in bamboo fiber subjected to different chemical treatments and freeze-drying as measured by nanoindentation

Published Date
Original article
DOI: 10.1007/s10086-016-1590-3

Cite this article as: 
Yang, X., Shang, L., Liu, X. et al. J Wood Sci (2016). doi:10.1007/s10086-016-1590-3

Author
  • Xi Yang
  • Lili Shang
  • Xing’e Liu
  • Shumin Yang
  • Genlin Tian
Abstract

The effects of chemical treatments (H2O2 + CH3COOH, acidified NaClO2, and NaOH) and freeze-drying on bamboo fibers were studied at a submicron level, to characterize chemical and mechanical changes to the secondary cell wall. Specifically, a field emission environmental scanning electron microscope (FE-ESEM) and imaging fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to demonstrate degradation in morphology and molecular structure, and nanoindentation was used to track changes in micromechanical properties. The results showed that cellular structures after chemical treatments clearly displayed wrinkles, pores, and microfibrils. The decreased bands at 1508 cm-1 and 1426 cm−1showed that lignin was degraded on treatment of H2O2 + CH3COOH and acidified NaClO2, which directly resulted in a decrease in hardness (H) in the secondary cell wall for treated fibers. In addition, a diminishing peak at 1733 cm−1 caused by NaOH solution indicated that hemicellulose was seriously degraded. It resulted in a decreased modulus (Er) by 13.71 % in bamboo fibers, while no obvious reduction was observed in the first two steps.

References

  1. B (2000) Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource? Biomass Bioenergy 19:229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Long LC, Wang ZK, Chen K (2015) Analysis of the hollow structure with functionally gradient materials of moso bamboo. J Wood Sci 61:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee SH, Wang S (2006) Biodegradable polymers/bamboo fiber biocomposite with biobased coupling agent. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37(1):80–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Osorio L, Trujillo E, Van Vuure AW, Verpoest I (2011) Morphological aspects and mechanical properties of single bamboo fibres and flexural characterisation of bamboo/epoxy composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 30(5):396–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fengel D, Wegener G (1984) Wood: chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions. Holz als Roh und Werkstoff 42(8):314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wimmer R, Lucas BN (1997) Comparing mechanical properties of secondary wall and cell corner middle lamella in spruce wood. IAWA J 18:77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gindl W, Schöberl T (2004) The significance of the elastic modulus of wood cell walls obtained from nanoindentation measurements. Compos Part A 35(11):1345–1349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiang ZH, Yu Y, Qin DC, Wang G, Zhang B, Fu YJ (2006) Pilot investigation of the mechanical properties of wood flooring paint films by in situ imaging nanoindentation. Holzforschung 60:698–701Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zou L, Jin H, Lu WY, Li X (2009) Nanoscale structural and mechanical characterization of the cell wall of bamboo fibers. Mater Sci Eng C 29(4):1375–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jäger A, Hofstetter K, Buksnowitz Ch, Gindl-Altmutter W, Konnerth J (2011) Identification of stiffness tensor components of wood cell walls by means of nanoindentation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 42(12):2101–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee SH, Wang S, Endo T, Kim NH (2009) Visualization of interfacial zones in lyocell fiber-reinforced polypropylene composite by AFM contrast imaging based on phase and thermal conductivity measurements. Holzforschung 63:240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Follrich J, Stöckel F, Konnerth J (2010) Macro- and micromechanical characterization of wood-adhesive bonds exposed to alternating climate conditions. Holzforschung 64:705–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lehringer C, Koch G, Adusumalli RB, Mook WM, Richter K, Militz H (2011) Effect of physisporinus vitreus on wood properties of Norway spruce. Part 1: aspects of delignification and surface hardness. Holzforschung 65:711–719Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu Y, Tian G, Wang H, Fei B, Wang G (2011) Mechanical characterization of single bamboo fibers with nanoindentation and microtensile technique. Holzforschung 65(1):113–119Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burgert I, Gierlinger N, Zimmermann T (2005) Properties of chemically and mechanically isolated fibres of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Part 1: structural and chemical characterisation. Holzforschung 59(2):240–246Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Molin U, Teder A (2002) Importance of cellulose/hemicellulose-ratio for pulp strength. Pulp Pap Res J Nord 17:14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen H, Cheng HT, Wang G, Yu ZX, Shi QS (2015) Tensile properties of bamboo in different sizes. J Wood Sci 61:552–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Konnerth J, Eiser M, Jäger A, Bader TK, Hofstetter K, Follrich J, Ters T, Hansmann C, Wimmer R (2010) Macro- and micro-mechanical properties of red oak wood (Quercus Rubra L.) treated with hemicellulases. Holzforschung 64(4):447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen H, Wang G, Chen HT (2011) Properties of single bamboo fibers isolated by different chemical methods. Wood Fiber Sci 43(2):111–120Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gindl W, Gupta HS (2002) Lignification of spruce tracheid secondary cell wall related to longitudinal hardness and modulus of elasticity using nano-indentation. Can J Bot 80:1029–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stanzl-Tschegg S, Beikircher W, Loidl D (2009) Comparison of mechanical properties of thermally modified wood at growth ring and cell wall level by means of instrumented indentation tests. Holzforschung 63(4):443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Burgert I, Frühmann K, Keckes J, Fratzl P, Tschegg S (2005) Properties of chemically and mechanically isolated fibers of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Part 2: twisting phenomena. Holzforschung 59(2):247–251Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7:1564–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guo J, Song K, Salmén L, Yin Y (2015) A changes of wood cell walls in response to hygro-mechanical steam treatment. Carbohydr Polym 115:207–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stevanic JS, Salmén L (2009) Orientation of the wood polymers in the cell wall of spruce wood fibres. Holzforschung 63:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salmén L (2004) Micromechanical understanding of the cell-wall structure. CR Biol 327(9–10):873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues–wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99(6):1664–1671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Das M, Chakraborty D (2006) Influence of alkali treatment on the fine structure and morphology of bamboo fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 102:5050–5056CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/journal/10086

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...