Wednesday, 23 November 2016

Conservation status evaluation of Berberis species across the Karakoram Mountain Ranges, Pakistan using IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria

Published Date
Volume 27, Issue 6pp 1385–1390

Original Paper
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-016-0260-z

Cite this article as: 
Khan, T., Khan, I.A., Rehman, A. et al. J. For. Res. (2016) 27: 1385. doi:10.1007/s11676-016-0260-z

Author
  • Tika Khan
  • Imtiaz Ahmed Khan
  • Abdul Rehman
  • Nisar Ahmed
Abstract

Berberis species are endangered, high-value medicinal plants in Pakistan with important eco-cultural, commercial and livelihood roles in mountain communities. To assess the geographical distribution of Berberis species across the Karakoram Mountain Ranges in Pakistan, we used IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (2001) to calculate the extent of occurrence (EOO, <100 km2) and the area of occupancy (AOO, <10 km2) of Berberis pseudumbellata subsp. pseudumbellata and B. pseudumbellata subsp. gilgitica. Overgrazing and habitat loss were key population-limiting factors. The two subspecies had contrasting responses to temperature, elevation, precipitation and insect susceptibility. B. pseudumbellata subsp. gilgitica is endemic to Gilgit-Baltistan and grows in single-cropping zone (areas > 200 m a.s.l.). Status evaluation revealed that both subspecies meet the criteria set for critically endangered species. Prolonged disregard of its declining population trend might lead to its extinction; therefore, integrated conservation efforts are necessary.

References 
  1. Akeroyd J (2002) A rational look at extinction. Plant Talk 28:35–37Google Scholar
  2. Alam J, Ali SI (2010) Contribution to the red list of the plants of Pakistan. Pak J Bot 42(5):2967–2971Google Scholar
  3. Ali DSI, Alam J (2006) Contribution to the Red List of the Plants of Pakistan: Endemic Phanerogams of Gilgit and Baltistan. Retrieved from http://wwf.org.pk/sgp/pdf/species/1_redlist_plants_ofpakistan.pdf on 15 Dec 2015
  4. Andola HC (2012) Genus Berberis and berberine HPLC: an overview. J Biol Act Prod Nat 2(5):256–264Google Scholar
  5. Arlettaz R, Schaub M, Fournier J, Reichlin TS, Sierro A, Watson JE, Braunisch V (2010) From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. BioScience 60(10):835–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badola HK, Aitken S (2003) The Himalayas of India: a treasury of medicinal plants under siege. Biodiversity 4(3):3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barros A, Pickering CM (2014) Non-native plant invasion in relation to tourism use of Aconcagua Park, Argentina, the highest protected area in the southern Hemisphere. Mt Res Dev 34(1):13–26. doi:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-13-00054.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhagwat SA (2014) Himalaya: mountains of Life. Mt Res Dev 34(1):80–81. doi:10.1659/mrd.mm131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharya B (2001) ANIMAL HUSBANDRY. Geography of a Himalayan Kingdom: Bhutan. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, p 82Google Scholar
  10. Bramwell D (2002) How many plant species are there? Plant Talk 28:32–34Google Scholar
  11. Bukhari I, Hassan M, Abbasi FM, Mujtaba G, Mahmood N, Fatima A, Khan MT (2011) A study on comparative pharmacological efficacy of Berberis lycium and penicillin G. Afr J Microbiol Res 5(6):725–727Google Scholar
  12. Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Bennun LA, Shutes SM et al (2004) Measuring global trends in the status of biodiversity: Red List Indices for birds. PLoS Biol 2(12):2294–2304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butchart SHM, Stattersfield AJ, Baillie J, Bennun LA, Stuart SN (2005) Using Red List Indices to measure progress towards the 2010 target and beyond. Phil Trans Soc B 360:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. eFlora (2014) Flora of Pakistan (online as eFloras.org). Retrieved from http://www.efloras.org/browse.aspx?flora_id=5&name_str=Berberis&btnSearch=Searchon 12 Aug 2014
  15. ESRI (2014a) Online satellite map. Retrieved from http://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=dd56c4ddea0b473bbbd188fdd7b0ad72 on 29 Sept 2014
  16. ESRI (2014b) Geographic Information System (GIS). Environmental Systems Research Institute. 380 New York Street, Redlands, CA 92373-8100. Retrieved from www.esri.com/on 23 Sept 2014
  17. Gaston KJ, Fuller RA (2009) The sizes of species’ geographic ranges. J Appl Ecol 46:1–9. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01596.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gujja B (2005) WWF International’s regional approach to conserving high-altitude wetlands and lakes in the Himalaya. Mt Res Dev 25(1):76–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallingback T, Hodgetts N, Raeymaekers G, Schumacker R, Sergio C, Soderstrom L, Vana J (1998) Guidelines for application of the revised IDeN threat categories to bryophytes. In: Checklist and country status of European bryophytes—towards a new Red List for Europe. Irish Wildlife Manuals, vol 84. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland. Retrieved from http://www.npws.ie/sites/default/files/publications/pdf/IWM84.pdf on 12 Aug 2014
  20. Harris CJ, Murray BR, Hose GC, Hamilton MA (2007) Introduction history and invasion success in exotic vines introduced to Australia. Divers Distrib 13:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hilton-Taylor C (2000) 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Retrieved from https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/RL-2000-001.pdf on 20 Aug 2014
  22. Hoffmann M, Brooks TM, da Fonseca GAB, Gascon C, Hawkins AFA et al (2008) Conservation planning and the IUCN Red List. Endanger Species Res 6:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hussain A, Farooq MA, Ahmad M, Akbar M, Zafar MU (2010) Phytosociology and Structure of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) of Northern Areas of Pakistan. World Appl Sci J 9(12):1443–1449Google Scholar
  24. Ishtiaq M, Mumtaz AS, Hussain T, Ghani A (2014) Medicinal plant diversity in the flora of Leepa Valley, Muzaffarabad (AJK), Pakistan. Afr J Biotechnol 11(13):3087–3098Google Scholar
  25. IUCN-GE (2014) The International Union for the Conservation of Nature. GE Path (V 1.4.6). Retrieved from http://threatenedplants.myspecies.info/content/estimating-extent-occurrence-eoo-or-area-occupancy-aoo-google-earth-and-ge-path on 12 Jun 2013
  26. Jafri SMH (1975) Berberidaceae. In: Nasir E, Ali SI (eds) Flora of Pakistan No. 87. Department of Botany University of Karachi. Retrieved from www.eFloras.org/Pakistan on 8 July 2014
  27. Joppa LN, Butchart SH, Hoffmann M, Bachman SP, Akçakaya HR, Moat JF, Hughes A (2015) Impact of alternative metrics on estimates of extent of occurrence for extinction risk assessment. Conserv Biol 00:1–9. doi:10.1111/cobi.12591Google Scholar
  28. Karrar M, Iqbal A (2011) Gilgit City. Department of Architecture and Planning, NED University of Engineering and Technology, Karachi, pp 18–20. Retrieved from http://docslide.us/documents/final-report-5584471e4e98e.html on 3 Jun 2014
  29. Keith DA (1998) An evaluation and modification of World Conservation Union Red List criteria for classification of extinction risk in vascular plants. Conserv Biol 12(5):1076–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khan T (2014) Estimation of Genetic diversity among Berberis spp. from Karakoram Mountain Ranges using morpho-pathological and floral characters. J Biodivers Environ Sci 5(2):286–295Google Scholar
  31. Khan SW, Khatoon S (2007) Ethnobotanical studies on useful trees and shrubs of Haramosh and Bugrote valleys, in Gilgit Northern Areas of Pakistan. Pak J Bot 39(3):699–710Google Scholar
  32. Khan T, Khan IA, Ahmed K, Rehman A (2014a) Differential levels of susceptibility of Berberis species to insect attack at various altitudes in Karakoram Ranges. Int J Biosci 4(5):92–101. doi:10.12692/ijb/4.5.92-101Google Scholar
  33. Khan T, Khan IA, Rehman A, Ali S, Ali H (2014b) Zoopharmacognosy and epigenetic behavior of mountain wildlife towards Berberis species. Life Sci J 11(8):259–263Google Scholar
  34. Khan T, Khan IA, Rehman A, Bibi Z (2014c) Determination of effectiveness of berberine, a characteristic phytochemical of Berberis species, against human proteome using in silico analysis. J Biodivers Environ Sci 4(5):53–63Google Scholar
  35. Khan T, Khan IA, Ahmed N, Ahmed K, Ali S, Rehman A, Ali H, Hussain I, Ali K, Hussain SA, Hussain M (2014d) Elaboration of phylogenetic studies in Berberis spp. from Karakoram Ranges. I. Morpho-pathological data. Int J Biosci 4(11):285–293. doi:10.12692/ijb/4.11.285-293Google Scholar
  36. Khan T, Khan IA, Rehman A, Fazal N (2014e) Studies on zoopharmacological behaviour of wildlife and ethno-veterinarian practices among traditional communities in the Karakoram Range with a Special reference to Berberis spp. J Biodivers Environ Sci 5(2):341–348Google Scholar
  37. Lamoreux J, Akçakaya R, Bennun L, Collar NJ et al (2003) Value of the IUCN Red List. Trends Ecol Evol 18:214–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Litvaitis JA, Tash JP, Litvaitis MK, Marchand MN, Kovach AI, Innes R (2006) A range-wide survey to determine the current distribution of New England cottontails. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1190–1197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lobo C, Sim-Sim M, Luís L, Stech M (2011) Chorological data and threat status evaluation of Fissidens species (Fissidentaceae, Bryophyta) on Madeira Archipelago. Nova Hedwigia 92(1–2):121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murugesh KS, Yeligar VC, Maiti CB, Maity TK (2005) Hepato protective and antioxidant role of Berberis tinctoria Lesch leaves on paracetamol induced hepatic damage in rats. Iran J Pharmacol Ther 4(1):64–69Google Scholar
  41. Norris K (2008) Agriculture and biodiversity conservation: opportunity knocks. Conserv Lett 1(1):2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pauchard A, Kueffer C, Dietz H, Daehler CC, Alexander J, Edwards PJ, Are’valo JR, Cavieres LA, Guisan A, Haider S, Jakobs G, McDougall K, Millar CI, Naylor BJ, Parks CG, Rew LJ, Seipel T (2009) Ain’t no mountain high enough: plant invasions reaching new elevations. Front Ecol Environ 7:479–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Randrianasolo A, Miller JS, Consiglio TK (2002) Application of IUCN criteria and Red List categories to species of five Anacardiaceae genera in Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv 11:1289–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riba M, Rodrigo A, Colas B, Retana J (2002) Fire and species range in Mediterranean landscapes: an experimental comparison of seed and seedling performance among Centaurea taxa. J Biogeogr 29:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rodrigues ASL, Pilgrim JD, Lamoreux JL, Hoffmann M, Brooks TM (2006) The value of the Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:71–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Samant SS, Pal M (2003) Diversity and conservation status of medicinal plants in Uttaranchal State. Indian For 129(9):1090–1108Google Scholar
  47. Sarfo-Mensah P, Oduro W (2007) Traditional natural resources management practices and biodiversity conservation in Ghana: A review of local concepts and issues on change and sustainability. Nota di Lavoro, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 90:2–11. Retrieved from http://www.feem.it/userfiles/attach/Publication/NDL2007/NDL2007-090.pdf on 15 July 2014
  48. Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F, Cox NA, Hoffmann M et al (2008) The Status of the World’s Land and Marine Mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322:225–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharma P (2014) Sustainable utilization of alternative forest resources in the Himalayas: opportunities and constraints. In: Thematic papers. Retrieved from http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversity/publications/Web_version/285/ch3.htm on 12 July 2014
  50. Sheth SN, Lohmann LG, Consiglio T, Jiménez I (2008) Effects of detectability on estimates of geographic range size in Bignonieae. Conserv Biol 22:200–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Short FT, Polidoro B, Livingstone SR, Carpenter KE, Bandeira S, Bujang JS, Zieman JC (2011) Extinction risk assessment of the world’s seagrass species. Biol Conserv 144(7):1961–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solomon S, Plattner GK, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P (2009) Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(6):1704–1709PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strahm S (2012) Monitoring and management in the San Diego Multiple Species Conservation Program. In: Results from a Structured Workshop. Retrieved from http://iemm.sdsu.edu/seminars_workshops/DahlemWorkshopReport.pdf on 30 Sept 2014
  54. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sunderland T, Sunderland-Groves J, Shanley P, Campbell B (2009) Bridging the gap: how can information access and exchange between conservation biologists and field practitioners be improved for better conservation outcomes. Biotropica 41(5):549–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas CD, Gameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega- Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, William SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. WWF (2009) Land Cover Mapping of the Central Karakoram National Park, Version 2.0, WWF—Pakistan, Lahore. Retrieved from http://www.wwfpak.org/wwfprojects/pdf/190909_report_CKNP_LandCover.pdf on 28 Sept 2013
  58. Xu J, Ma ET, Tashi D, Fu Y, Lu Z, Melick D (2005) Integrating sacred knowledge for conservation: cultures and landscapes in southwest China. Ecol Soc 10(2):7Google Scholar

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11676-014-0479-5

No comments:

Post a Comment