Effect of thinning on above-ground biomass accumulation in a Douglas-fir plantation in southern Italy

Published Date
December 2016, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1313–1320

Original Paper

First Online: 

03 June 2016

DOI: 10.1007/s11676-016-0247-9

Cite this article as: 

Coletta, V., Menguzzato, G., Pellicone, G. et al. J. For. Res. (2016) 27: 1313. doi:10.1007/s11676-016-0247-9

Author

• Vittoria ColettaEmail author
• Giuliano Menguzzato
• Gaetano Pellicone
• Antonella Veltri
• Pasquale Antonio Marziliano

Abstract

We investigated the effects of a long-term thinning experiment on the distribution of above-ground biomass of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco var. menziesii) in a plantation in southern Italy. Allometric equations were used to estimate biomass and partitioning to stem and crown compartments. Variation in biomass stock estimated with allometric equations were evaluated according to seven thinning treatments: geometric-systematic (1 row every 3), selective (light-moderate-heavy), mixed systematic-selective (1 row every 4, 1 row every 5), unthinned (control). Over the experimental period of 13 years, current annual increments of carbon were lower (3.4 Mg ha−1 year−1) in control plots than in treated plots. At age 30, plots subjected to light selective thinning showed higher values of above-ground biomass (249.7 Mg ha−1). The biomass harvested with this treatment was 29.3 Mg ha−1, and the mean annual increment of carbon over 13 years was 4.8 Mg ha−1. Our results showed that light thinning stimulated increase in carbon stock, with a minimal loss of carbon during the treatment and a current annual increment of carbon higher than in control sub-plots and sub-plots thinned using systematic methods. This treatment yielded least carbon emissions and we affirm it has discrete global warming mitigation potential.

References 

1. Alméras T, Fournier M (2009) Biomechanical design and long-term stability of trees: morphological and wood traits involved in the balance between weight increase and the gravitropic reaction. J Theor Biol 256(3):370–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
2. Assmann E (1970) The principles of forest yield study. Studies in the organic production, structure, increment and yield of forest stands. Pergamon Press, Oxford, p 506Google Scholar
3. Boerner REJ, Huang JJ, Hart SC (2008) Fire, thinning, and the carbon economy: effects of fire and fire surrogate treatments on estimated carbon storage and sequestration rate. For Ecol Manag 255(8–9):3081–3097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cameron AD (2002) Importance of early selective thinning in the development of long-term stand stability and improved log quality: a review. Forestry 75(1):25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cantore V, Iovino F (1989) Effetti dei diradamenti sull’umidità del suolo in popolamenti di douglasia della Catena Costiera (Calabria). Annali dell’Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura 20:13–39Google Scholar
6. Cheng X, Yu M, Wu T (2013) Effect of forest structural change on carbon storage in a coastal Metasequoia glyptostroboides stand. Sci World J 2013:9. doi:10.1155/2013/830509Google Scholar
7. Ciancio O, Nocentini S (1978) Prove di diradamento su Pseudotsuga menziesii con il fattore distanziale di Hart-Becking. Annali dell’Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura 9:1–33Google Scholar
8. Ciancio O, Mercurio R, Nocentini S (1984) Le specie forestali esotiche e le relazioni tra arboricoltura da legno e selvicoltura. Annali dell’Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura 12:1–106Google Scholar
9. Dewar RC, Cannell MGR (1992) Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiol 11(1):49–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
10. Dicus CA, Dean TJ. 1998. Stand density effects on biomass allocation patterns and subsequent soil nitrogen demand. In: Waldrop TA (ed) Proceedings of the “9th biennial southern silvicultural research conference”. Clemson (SC, USA) 25–27 Feb 1997. General technical report SRS-20, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Ashevill, pp 564–568
11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1998) World reference base for soil resources. FAO, ISRIC, ISSS, Rome [Soil resource report n. 84]
12. Gower ST, Vogt KA, Charles C (1992) Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient. Ecol Monogr 62(1):43–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Harmon ME, Moren A, Domingo JB (2009) Effects of partial harvest on the carbon stores in Douglas-fir/western hemlock forests: a simulation study. Ecosystems 12:777–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Helmisaari HS, Makkonen K, Kellomäki S, Valtonen E, Mälkönen E (2002) Below- and above-ground biomass production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland. For Ecol Manag 165(1–3):317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei serbatoi di Carbonio—INFC (2005) Linee generali del progetto per il secondo inventario forestale nazionale italiano. In: De Natale F, Floris A, Gasparini P, Scrinzi G, Tabacchi G, Tosi V (eds) Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei serbatoi forestali di Carbonio. MiPAF—Ispettorato Generale del Corpo Forestale dello Stato ISAFA Trento
16. IPCC (2000) In: Nakicenovic M, Swart R (eds) Emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 570
17. la Marca O, Marziliano PA, Moretti N (1998) Experimental research in ageing holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) coppices: preliminary results. Annales des Sciences Forestières 55:461–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Lundqvist L (1994) Growth and competition in partially cut subalpine Norway spruce forests in northern Sweden. For Ecol Manag 65(2–3):115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Makinen H, Isomaki A (2004) Thinning intensity and growth of Norway spruce stands in Finland. Forestry 77(4):349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Marziliano PA, Menguzzato G, Scuderi A, Corona P (2012) Simplified methods to inventory the current annual increment of forest standing volume. iForest 5:276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Marziliano PA, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Davies C, Sanesi G (2013) Structural diversity and height growth models in urban forest plantations: a case-study in northern Italy. Urban For Urban Green 12(2):246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Marziliano PA, Coletta V, Menguzzato G, Nicolaci A, Pellicone G, Veltri A (2015) Effects of planting density on the distribution of biomass in a Douglas-fir plantation in southern Italy. iForest 8:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Matteucci G, Scarascia Mugnozza G (2007) Ecosistemi forestali e mitigazione dei cambiamenti ambientali: sequestro di carbonio in foreste italiane. In: Carli B, Cavarretta G, Colacino M, Fuzzi S (eds) ≪Clima e cambiamenti climatici: le attività di ricerca del CNR≫. ISBN 978-88-8080-075-0, pp 709–712
24. Menguzzato G (1989) Prove sperimentali di diradamento in popolamenti di Douglasia sulla catena costiera (Calabria). Annali dell’Istituto sperimentale per la selvicoltura 20:155–194Google Scholar
25. Menguzzato G, Tabacchi G (1986) Prove di diradamento su Pseudotsuga menziesii in Calabria, Ambiente tavole di cubatura e della biomassa epigea. Annali dell’Istituto sperimentale per la selvicoltura 17:255–293Google Scholar
26. Nocentini S (1986) Prove di diradamento su Pseudotsuga menziesii in Toscana, Serie di tavole di cubatura a una entrata per giovani impianti differenziate in base all’altezza dominante. Annali dell’Istituto sperimentale per la selvicoltura 17:295–318Google Scholar
27. Pavari A (1959) Le classificazioni fitoclimatiche ed i caratteri della stazione. Scritti di ecologia selvicoltura e botanica forestale, pp 45–116
28. Peterson DL, Johnson MC, Agee JK, Jain TB, McKenzie D, Reinhardt E (2005) Forest structure and fire hazard in dry forests of the Western United States. General technical report PNW-GTR-628. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland
29. R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
30. Reukema DL (1979) Fifty-year development of Douglas-fir Stands at various spacings. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, (Research Paper PNW 253)
31. Reukema DL, Smith JHG (1987) Development over 25 years of Douglas-fir, Western Hemlock, and Western Redcedar planted at various spacings on a very good site in British Columbia. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, (Research Paper PNW-RP381)
32. Roberts S, Harrington C (2008) Individual tree growth response to variable density thinning in coastal Pacific Northwest forests. For Ecol Manag 255(7):2771–2781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Ruiz-Peinado R, Bravo-Oviedo A, López-Senespleda E, Montero G, Río M (2013) Do thinnings influence biomass and soil carbon stocks in Mediterranean maritime pinewoods? Eur J For Res 132(2):253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Satoo T, Madgwick HAI (1982) Forest biomass. Nijhoff M. & W. Junk, The HagueGoogle Scholar
35. Schlesinger WH (1991) Biogeochemistry: an analysis of global change. Academic Press, INC./Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, San Diego, p 443Google Scholar
36. Sorensen CD, Finkral AJ, Kolb TE, Huang CH (2011) Short- and long-term effects of thinning and prescribed fire on carbon stocks in ponderosa pine stands in northern Arizona. For Ecol Manag 261(3):460–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Sullivan P, Sullivan D, Lindgren P, Ransome D (2006) Long-term responses of ecosystem components to stand thinning in young lodgepole pine forest. III. Growth of crop trees and coniferous stand structure. For Ecol Manag 228(1–3):69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—UNFCCC (1997) Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change, FCCC/CP/L7/Add.1, 10 Dec 1997. UN, New York
39. Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Mäkipää R, Mencuccini M. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs N. 4, pp. 1–2, 5–63

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11676-014-0479-5