A Sustainable Partnership Model among Supply Chain Players in Wooden Furniture Industry Using Goal Programming

Published Date
2015, Vol.3:154–158, doi:10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.01.030

International Conference on Agro-industry (IcoA): Sustainable and Competitive Agro-industry for Human Welfare Yogyakarta-INDONESIA 2014

Open Access, Creative Commons license

Title 
A Sustainable Partnership Model among Supply Chain Players in Wooden Furniture Industry Using Goal Programming ☆

Author 

Muh. Hisjam ^a,b,,

Adi Djoko Guritno ^c

Nunuk Supriyatno ^c

Shalihuddin Djalal Tandjung ^c

aPh. D Candidate in Environmental Science, The Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University, Jl. Teknika Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

bDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Fac. of Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia

cThe Graduate School, Gadjah Mada University, Jl. Teknika Utara, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

Available online 28 February 2015

Abstract

Sustainability in industry is very important. Hence we proposed a partnership of sustainable model among supply chain three players and proposed 13 goals in the model. We used goal programming to achieve the goals. To illustrate the model, we conducted a numerical trial based on our observations in export oriented wooden furniture industry in Central Java, Indonesia and we gave different weightings among the goals. The results show that more weighting to social or enviro nmental makes better goal achievements in almost all goals than the results achieved from the same weighting or the more weighting only to the economic aspects.

Keywords

sustainable partnership model

wooden furniture industry

goal programming

supply chain

sustainability.

References

1. • Armstrong, 2004
   • Armstrong, G.W., 2004. Sustainability of Timber Supply Considering the Risk of Wildfire, Forest Science 50: 5, 626-639.
2. • Casson and Obidzinski, 2002
   • Casson, A., Obidzinski, K., 2002. From New Order to Regional Autonomy: Shifting Dynamics of “Illegal” Logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development 30: 12, 2133-2151.
3. • Emerging Markets Group, 2006
   • Emerging Markets Group (EMG), 2006. EU Furniture Market Study – Summary, USAID : The United States Agency for International Development, http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADH793.pdf, retrieved on 24 Maret 2011.
4. • Ewasechko, 2005
   • Ewasechko, A.C., 2005. Upgrading the Central Java Wood Furniture Industry: A Value-Chain Approach, International Labor Organization.
5. • Guritno and Murao, 1999
   • Guritno, A.D., Murao, K., 1999. The Observation of Log Export Banning Policy in Indonesia: Conditions, Problems, and Alternative Solutions, J. For. Res. 4, 79-85.
6. • Hisjam et al., 2010
   • Hisjam, M., Ota, I., Guritno, A.D., Simon, H., Tandjung, S.D., 2010. Comparing the Practices of Forest Product Certification between Perum Perhutani And Yusuhara Forest Owner's Cooperative, 3rd Gadjah Mada – Ehime Network International Seminar : Sustainable Bio-resources for Global Welfare, August 7-8, Nusa Dua Beach Hotel, Bali, Indonesia, 85-92.
7. • Hisjam et al., 2011
   • Hisjam, M., Guritno, A.D., Simon, H., Tandjung, S.D., 2011. A Framework for The Development of Sustainable Supply Chain Management for Business Sustainability of Export-Oriented Furniture Industry in Indonesia (A Case Study of Teak Wooden Furniture in Central Java Province), 1st International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Service Science”, 20-21 September, Hotel Lor In, Solo, 285-290.
8. • Hisjam et al., 2012a
   • Hisjam, M., Guritno, A.D., Tandjung, S.D., 2012^a. The Development of Sustainable Supply Chain Model of The Relationship between Wood Supplier with Furniture Industry in Indonesia”, Teknosains 1: 2, 115-125.
9. • Hisjam et al., 2012b
   • Hisjam, M., Guritno, A.D., Supriyatno, N., Tandjung, S.D., 2012^b. A Sustainable Supply Chain Model of Manufacturer-Buyer Relationship in Export Oriented Furniture Industry in Indonesia”, Civil and Environmental Research 2: 5, 1-10.
10. • Hahn and Kühnen, 2013
    • Hahn, R., Kühnen, M., 2013. Determinants of sustainability reporting: a review of results, trends,theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research, Journal of Cleaner Production 59, 5-2.
11. • Loebis and Schmitz, 2005
    • Loebis, L., Schmitz, H., 2005. Java furniture makers: Globalisation winners or losers?, Development in Practice 15: 3 & 4, 514-521.
12. • Teuteberg and Wittstruck, 2010
    • Teuteberg, F., and Wittstruck, D., 2010. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management. Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2010, 203.
13. • United, 2005
    • United Nations General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution A/60/1, Retrieved on: 2014-06-24.

• ☆
  Peer-review under responsibility of Jurusan Teknologi Industri Pertanian, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

• ⁎ 
  Corresponding author. Tel.: +6-227-163-2110; fax: +6-227-163-2110.

For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210784315000315

Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Wooden Furniture Industry Using Multi criteria Decision Making Method ☆

Published Date
doi:10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.034

Florence “Sustainability of Well-Being International Forum”. 2015: Food for Sustainability and not just food, FlorenceSWIF2015

Open Access, Creative Commons license
Title 
Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Wooden Furniture Industry Using Multi criteria Decision Making Method ☆

Author 

MajidAzizi ^a

Nemat Mohebbi ^a

Fabio De Felice ^b,,

aWood and paper sciences and technology Department, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Daneshkadeh street, Karaj 31585-4314, Iran

bDepartment of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, G. Di Biasio 43 street, Cassino 03043, Italy

Available online 23 February 2016.

Abstract

Furniture manufacturing industry seems to be significant not only from economical and social standpoints but also from perspective of environmentally compatible industries. Accordingly, moving toward sustainable development in this sector of Iran's industry is regarded as a national necessity. The intent of the current study is to determine and prioritize the indices affecting sustainable development of Iran's wooden furniture industry by benefiting from Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. After the conducted investigations, 39 indices were identified and categories in seven general groups namely, technical, human, cultural-social, economic, materials and products, rules and regulations, and environmental. Subsequently, Analytical Hierarchy Process was applied in the form of adjusting and distributing questionnaires among professional experts. Results show that the highest priorities for attaining sustainable development in this industry respectively belong to sub-criteria of economic stability increase in the country, development of furniture industrial clusters, adjustment of furniture and wooden products importation tariffs, reduction of volatile organic compounds (VOC), marketing, reinforcement of unions, and creation of competitive environment in this industry.

Keywords

Wooden Furniture Industry

Sustainable Development

Multi criteria Decision Making Method

Analytical Hierarchy Process

Weighting Values

References

1. • Amiri, 2008
   • H. Amiri
   • Status of furniture and wood industry in Iran. Iran paper
   • furniture and wood industries magazine, Volume 18, 2008, pp. 24–26
2. • Arian, 2007
   • Arian, A. 2007. Effect of Unions on Iran Furniture Industry Guidance: p15-20.1st scientific- Functional Seminar “Development of Iran Furniture and Decoration Industry”. Senobar Press.(in Persian).
3. • De Felice and Petrillo, 2014
   • De Felice, F., Petrillo, A., 2014. Proposal of a structured methodology for the measure of intangible criteria and for decision making. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling. Volume 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 157-166. ISSN: 17402123. DOI: 10.1504/IJSPM. 2014.064392.
4. • Fathollahzade et al., 2006
   • A. Fathollahzade, S. Amiri, K. Doost Hosseini, M. Faezipoor
   • A Study Of International Trade Of Furniture In Iran Case
   • Journal of Iranian Natural Resources, Volume 58, Issue 4, 2006, pp. 237–248
5. • Gazo, 2005
   • R. Gazo
   • A review of competitive strategies of furniture manufacturers
   • Forest Product Journal, Volume 55, Issue 10, 2005, pp. 66–73
6. • Ghodsipour, 2000
   • Ghodsipour, H. 2000. Analytical Hierarchy Process. Amir Kabir Univ. press, 220p (In Persian).
7. • Gupta. and Subramanian, 2008
   • V. Gupta, R. Subramanian
   • Seven perspectives on regional clusters and the case of Grand Rapids office furniture city
   • International Business Review Journal:, Volume 17, Issue 6, 2008, pp. 371–384
   • Article
      | 
      PDF (271 K)
      | 
     View Record in Scopus
     Citing articles (17)
8. • Home, 2009
   • Home and Office Furniture Union, 2009. The Bulletin of Home and Office Furniture Union, A look at export hall of the 18st international exhibition of Hofex, 50pp.(In Persian).
9. • Iran Wood, 2009
   • Iran Wood, Furniture & Paper Industry MAG. 2009. No:44, P:30-32.
10. • Mason, 2005
    • Mason, R. 2005. Implication of Sustainable Development for UK Reproduction Furniture Manutacturers, www.bfmenvironment.co.uk.
11. • Memariani and Azar, 1995
    • A. Memariani, A. Azar
    • AHP, A new technic for group decision making
    • Science of Management, Volume 22, 1995, pp. 28–32
12. • Meydari, 2006
    • Meydari, A. 2006. Assessing laws and regulations in Iran: Necessities and Recommendations. http://nokhbeh.ir/newnokhbeh.
13. • Ratnasingam. and loras, 2003
    • J. Ratnasingam, F. loras
    • The sustainability of the Asian wooden furniture industry
    • Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff., Volume 61, 2003, pp. 233–237
    • View Record in Scopus
      Citing articles (18)
14. • Ratnasingam, 2005
    • J. Ratnasingam
    • The Asian furniture industry: the reality behind the statistics
    • Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff., Volume 63, 2005, pp. 64–67
    • View Record in Scopus
       | 
      CrossRef
      Citing articles (5)
15. • Regis, 2007
    • Regis, B. 2007 . Furniture industry sustainability programme case study Eurotek office .www.askfira.co.uk furniture Ltd.
16. • Sustainable, 2003
    • Sustainable development issues Scan office furniture industry. 2003. prepared for industry Canada. www.fivewinds.com.
17. • Saaty, 1980
    • Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill international, New York, RWS publications, Pittsburgh.
18. • Saaty, 2001
    • Saaty, T.L. (2001). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process, RWS publications, Pittsburgh, PA, pp376.
19. • Ziaie et al., 2011
    • M. Ziaie, M. Sukri, J. Ratnasingam, A. Noor, R. Saleh
    • Competitive Strategy Trends among the Malaysian Wooden Furniture Industry: An Strategic Groups Analysis
    • Journal of Applied Sciences, Volume 11, 2011, pp. 2487–2499
    • View Record in Scopus
      Citing articles (1)
20. • The, 2010
    • The World furniture outlook 2009/2010, prepared by CSIL, center for industrial studies- Milan (Italy).

• ☆
  Peer-review under responsibility of Fondazione Simone Cesaretti.

• ⁎ 
  Corresponding author. Tel.: +00 39 07762994350; fax: +00 39 0776299434.

For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210784316300341