Published Date August 2016, Vol.214:175–183,doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.100 Title Effect of influent COD/SO42−ratios on biodegradation behaviors of starch wastewater in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor
Author
Xueqin Lu a
Guangyin Zhen b
Jialing Ni a
Toshimasa Hojo a
Kengo Kubota a
Yu-You Li a,c,,
aDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan
bNational Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0053, Japan
cGraduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan
Received 9 March 2016. Revised 10 April 2016. Accepted 20 April 2016. Available online 22 April 2016.
Highlights
•
Sulfidogenesis was essential to the UASB operation and process stability.
•
Reactor showed the high stability at COD/SO42− ratios ⩾2 with efficient removal of COD and sulfate.
•
Sulfidogenesis promoted propionate degradation and acetoclastic methanogenesis.
A lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) has been run for 250 days to investigate the influence of influent COD/SO42− ratios on the biodegradation behavior of starch wastewater and process performance. Stepwise decreasing COD/SO42−ratio enhanced sulfidogenesis, complicating starch degradation routes and improving process stability. The reactor exhibited satisfactory performance at a wide COD/SO42− range ⩾2, attaining stable biogas production of 1.15–1.17 L L−1 d−1 with efficient simultaneous removal of total COD (73.5–80.3%) and sulfate (82.6 ± 6.4%). Adding sulfate favored sulfidogenesis process and diversified microbial community, invoking hydrolysis–acidification of starch and propionate degradation and subsequent acetoclastic methanogenesis; whereas excessively enhanced sulfidogenesis (COD/SO42− ratios <2) would suppress methanogenesis through electrons competition and sulfide inhibition, deteriorating methane conversion. This research in-depth elucidated the role of sulfidogenesis in bioenergy recovery and sulfate removal, advancing the applications of UASB technology in water industry from basic science.
Published Date 20 September 2016, Vol.149:20–27,doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.082 Title Coaggregation of mineral filler particles and starch granules as a basis for improving filler-fiber interaction in paper production
aKey Laboratory of Bio-based Material Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
bCollege of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
cJiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
Received 24 February 2016. Revised 14 April 2016. Accepted 20 April 2016. Available online 22 April 2016.
Highlights
•
A concept for improving filler-fiber interactions is presented.
•
The concept involves the formation of starch-mineral hybrids by coaggregation.
•
Preaggregation resulted in enhanced filler bondability with cellulosic fibers.
Abstract
The sustainable, efficient use of renewable bio-based additives in the production of various materials fits well into the concept of sustainability. Here, the concept of coaggregation of mineral filler particles and starch granules for improving filler-fiber interaction in paper-based cellulosic networks is presented. Coaggregation of precipitated calcium carbonate filler particles and uncooked, unmodified corn starch granules by cationic polyacrylamide (a cationic high molecular weight polymer flocculant) in combination with bentonite (an anionic microparticle) prior to addition to cellulosic fiber slurry delivered enhanced filler bondability with cellulosic fibers. For instance, under the conditions studied, preaggregation resulted in an increase in filler bondability factor from 9.24 to 15.21 at starch dosage of 1% (on the basis of the dry weight of papermaking stock). The swelling and gelatinization of the starch granules in starch-filler preaggregates or hybrids enabled the “bridging” of the gaps in cellulosic networks, leading to structural consolidation and strength enhancement.
A study of cornstarch granule digestion by an unusually high molecular weightα-amylase secreted byLactobacillus amylovorus
Syed H. Imam
, Anthony Burgess-Cassler
, Gregory L. Cote
, Sherald H. Gordon
, Frederick L. Baker
Abstract
The cells ofLactobacillus amylovorus (NRRL B-4540), grown in a medium containing 2% cornstarch as the sole carbon source, secreted an amylase activity that rapidly solubilized cornstarch. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic analyses showed that 80–90% of starch was consumed by bacteria in a 10-day-old culture medium. The remnant of starch granules digested in the culture medium inoculated with the cells ofL. amylovorushave also lost their characteristic iodine-binding capacity as visualized by starch dye-binding microplate assay and light microscopy. Scanning electron miscroscopy (SEM) of granules from a 48-h culture medium showed hollow and fragmented granules with a pitting phenomenon characteristically produced byα-amylase activity. Analysis of an enzyme preparation from a culture medium ofL. amylovorus revealed that the putative enzyme appears to be a single protein band of unusually high Mr (150,000) on SDS gels stained for amylase activity. Analysis of starch digestion products by thin layer chromatography (TLC) showed enzyme activity typical ofα-amylase.
References
1.
Anderson KL, Salyers AA (1989) Biochemical evidence that starch breakdown byBacteroides thetaiotaomicroninvolves outer membrane starch-binding sites and periplasmic starch-degrading enzymes. J Bacteriol 171:3192–3298
2.
Burgess-Cassler A, Imam SH, Gould JM (1991) High molecular weight amylase activities from bacteria degrading starchplastic film. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:612–614
3.
Fitt LE, Snyder EM (1984) Photomicrographs of starches. In: Whistler J, Bemiller N, Pascall EF (eds) Starch: chemistry and technology, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, pp 675–689
4.
Gallant D, Mercier C, Guilbot A (1972) Electron microscopy of starch granules modified by bacterial amylases. Cereal Chem 49:354–365
5.
Giulian GG, Moss RL, Greaser M (1983) Improved methodology for analysis and quantitation of proteins of one-dimensional silver-stained slab gel. Anal Biochem 129:277–287
6.
Goldner WR, Boyer CD (1989) Starch-granule-bound proteins and polypeptides: The influence of the waxy mutations. Starch/Stärke 41:250–254
7.
Gould JM, Gordon SH, Dexter LB, Swanson CL (1990) Biodegradation of starch-containing plastics. In: Glass JE, Swift G (eds) Agricultural and synthetic polymers: biodegradability and utilization. ACS Symposium series No 433. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, pp 65–75
8.
Greenwell P, Schofield JD (1986) A starch granule protein associated with endoplasmic endosperm softness in wheat. Cereal Chem 63:379–380
9.
Imam SH (1989) A tightly bound Mr 55000 polypeptide in cornstarch associated with the amylose portion of the granule. J Cereal Sci 9:231–236
10.
Imam SH, Gould JM (1990) Adhesion of an amylolyticArthrobacter sp. to starch-containing plastic films. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:872–876
11.
Imam SH, Greene RV, Griffin HL (1990) Adhesive properties of a symbiotic bacterium from a wood-boring marine shipworm. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1317–1322
12.
Koch VH, Ropper H (1989) New industrial products from starch. Starch/Stärke 40:121–131
13.
Lacks SA, Springhorn SS (1980) Renaturation of enzyme after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate. J Biol Chem 255:7467–7473
14.
Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227:680–685
15.
Nakamura LK (1981)Lactobacillus amylovorus, a new starch-hydrolyzing species from cattle waste-corn fermentations. Int J Syst Bacteriol 31:56–63
16.
Robyt JF (1984) Enzyme in the hydrolysis and synthesis of starch. In: Whistler J, BeMiller N, Pascall EF (eds) Starch: chemistry and technology, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press, pp 87–122
17.
Robyt JF, White BJ (1987) Chromatographic techniques. In: Robyt JF, White BJ (eds) Biochemical techniques: theory and practice. Brooks, California: Cole Publ Company, pp 107–109
18.
Roper H, Koch VH (1988) New carbohydrate derivatives from biotechnical and chemical processes. Starch/Stärke 40:453–464
19.
Shogren RL, Thompson AR, Greene RV, Gordon SH, Cote G (1991) Polymer compatibility and biodegradation of starchpoly(ethylene-co-acrylic acid)-polyethylene blends. J Appl Polymer Sci, “in press”
20.
Tremoto Y, Kira I, Hayashida S (1989) Multiplicity and preferential inactivation by proteolysis as to raw starch-digestibility of bacterialα-amylases. Agric Biol Chem 53:601–605