1 October 2014, Vol.133:163–172, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.019
Title
Experimental study on the effect of pyrolysis pressure, peak temperature, and particle size on the potential stability of vine shoots-derived biochar
Author
Joan J. Manyà,
Miguel A. Ortigosa
Sergio Laguarta
José A. Manso
Thermo-chemical Processes Group (GPT), Aragón Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza, Technological College of Huesca, crta. Cuarte s/n, E-22071 Huesca, Spain
Received 5 February 2014. Revised 2 May 2014. Accepted 8 May 2014. Available online 23 May 2014.
Highlights
•
A central composite design was applied to assessing the effect of selected factors.
•
Stability of the vine shoots-derived biochar was mainly determined by the particle size.
•
Using a bed of alumina represents a low-cost way to partly remove tar from the pyrolysis gas.
Abstract
This study examines the effect of three key operating factors (peak temperature, particle size and pressure) on the potential stability of the biochar produced by slow pyrolysis of vine shoots. The following response variables were considered as key indicators of the potential stability of biochar in soils: the fixed-carbon yield, the fraction of aromatic carbon, and the molar H:C and O:C ratios. Slow pyrolysis tests were conducted in a laboratory-scale fixed-bed unit and planned according to a 2-level factorial design. The behavior of the product gas yield and composition at the outlet of the secondary cracking reactor (a fixed-bed of activated alumina particles at 700 °C) was also evaluated as a function of the three factors. The results from the statistical tests revealed that the particle size is the most significant factor in determining the potential stability of biochars. Using larger particles of biomass and, in a lesser extent, operating at higher peak temperatures leads to the production of more stable materials. Unexpectedly, the absolute pressure only plays a significantly positive role in decreasing the tar content in the producer gas at the outlet of a secondary cracking reactor.
Keywords
Biochar
Pyrolysis
Vine shoots
Pressure
Particle size
Nomenclature
GHSV
gas hourly space velocity (h−1)
mbio
dry mass of biomass sample (kg)
mchar
mass of produced biochar (kg)
adjusted coefficient of determination
x1
coded variable for pressure
x2
coded variable for peak temperature
x3
coded variable for particle size
ychar
biochar yield (kg kg−1 of biomass in a dry basis)
yFC
fixed-carbon yield (kg kg−1 of biomass in a dry and ash-free basis)
ygas
yield of producer gas (kg kg−1 of biomass in a dry and N2-free basis)
ywater
yield of water (g kg−1 of biomass in a dry basis)
ytar
yield of tar (g kg−1 of biomass in a dry basis)
Greek symbols
β0
regression coefficient for the intercept term
β1
regression coefficient for the linear effect of pressure
β2
regression coefficient for the linear effect of peak temperature
β3
regression coefficient for the linear effect of particle size
β12
regression coefficient for the interaction term between pressure and peak temperature
β13
regression coefficient for the interaction term between pressure and particle size
β23
regression coefficient for the interaction term between peak temperature and particle size
β11
regression coefficient for the quadratic effect of peak temperature
May 2014, Vol.107:31–39, doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2014.01.021
Title
Influence of heating temperature and holding time on biochars derived from rubber wood sawdust via slow pyrolysis
Author
A. Shaaban a
Sian-Meng Se a,,
M.F. Dimin a
Jariah M. Juoi a
Mohd Haizal Mohd Husin b
Nona Merry M. Mitan c
aDepartment of Engineering Materials, Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
bDepartment of Automotive, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
cDepartment of Plant and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (UTeM), Hang Tuah Jaya, 76100 Durian Tunggal, Melaka, Malaysia
Received 2 November 2013. Accepted 30 January 2014. Available online 7 February 2014.
Highlights
•
Biochars were derived from rubber wood sawdust via slow pyrolysis.
•
Heating temperatures (HT) ranged from 300 to 700 °C and retention time (RT) ranged from 1 to 3 h.
•
They were characterised by XRD, FT-IR, Boehm titration, pH, BET, SEM and SEM–EDX.
•
At low HT and RT, biochar consists of more acidic groups with lower pH.
•
At high HT and RT, biochar obtained larger surface area and total pore volume.
Abstract
Biochar samples were produced from rubber wood sawdust (RWSD), which is a by-product from sawmills, via slow pyrolysis. Biochar is a potential additive for agricultural soil as a soil amendment and for agronomics. The approach proposed in the current study considers the effects of heating temperature and holding time on the surface functional groups and morphologies of RWSD-derived biochars. The pyrolysis was performed in a vertical tube furnace heated at 5 °C/min from room temperature to maximum heating temperatures of 300 °C, 400 °C, 500 °C and 700 °C under nitrogen gas purging at a rate of 30 ml/min. Two sets of biochars were produced with holding times of (i) 1 h and (ii) 3 h. Proximate and ultimate analyses were performed on the raw RWSD using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and carbon–hydrogen–nitrogen (CHN) elemental analysis. The influence of heating temperature and holding time on biochar surface functional groups and porosities was investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, Boehm titration, pH alkalinity, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and SEM with energy-dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) spectrocopy. The FT-IR spectra indicated the presence of acidic functional groups, such as carboxylic, phenolic and lactonic groups, and these groups were quantified by Boehm titration. The number of acidic functional groups decreased as the heating temperature and holding time increased. The maximum amount of acidic functional groups was determined to be 1.9 mmol/g at 300 °C for a 1-h holding time compared to 1.3 mmol/g for a 3-h holding time and 1.0 mmol/g with a 1-h holding time at 700 °C. All of the biochars produced at heating temperatures above 400 °C were alkaline, and the pH value increased as the heating temperature and holding time increased. The biochar produced at 300 °C with a 1-h holding time had a pH of 6.72 and the sample produced with a 3-h holding time had a pH of 7.67. In addition, the sample produced when the temperature was increased to 700 °C with a 1-h holding time had a pH of 11.44. The BET surface area analysis reported maximum values of 5.49 m2/g, and the total pore volume was 0.0097 cm3/g at a heating temperature of 700 °C with a 3-h holding time. SEM micrographs clearly showed the development of well-defined pores in the biochars, and the SEM–EDX spectra indicated localised carbon and oxygen content in all the samples. The results indicated that biochars produced from RWSD are potentially beneficial as soil amendments. However, an extensive study of biochar sustainability is worth investigating.