Blog List

Friday 22 July 2016

Cultural heritage and biodiversity in the present forest management of the boreal zone in Scandinavia

Published Date

First online: 

Title 

Cultural heritage and biodiversity in the present forest management of the boreal zone in Scandinavia

  • Author 
  • Jari Parviainen

Abstract 

Almost all the boreal forests in the Scandinavian peninsula have been influenced by human societies, and, therefore, natural, original forests are very rare. In this article, the interaction between the old traditional forest uses and the present management practices are analysed and discussed. Historical uncontrolled use, slash-and-burn agriculture and overexploitation of forests for saw milling industry led to the establishment of regulations, forest acts, forestry education and forest management plans to prevent devastation during the 19th century. The various uses of forests include their direct land use, preservation of landscapes, building of forest structures, historical sites, human recreation (i.e., establishing mental relationships between people and the forest), forest settlements and rural development. Current boreal forest management is based on a multifunctional approach as applied by a "close-to-nature" management style. This management style is premised upon the notion that "everyman’s right" allows them to freely roam the forest on foot or by bicycle and enjoy activities such as pick berries and mushrooms in the forests. Currently being discussed are new approaches regarding commercial use of ecosystems on private land as it relates to the "everyman’s right" to enjoy the forest. Within the context of the modern lifestyle, forests help people recover from stress and provide physical inactivity. Research efforts are underway to find bioactive components in the forest for medical products. While the forests are mainly owned by private entities and families, the challenges of the future will be the lack of management, in the means how to reach the owners and how to motivate them.

References 

  1. Aronsson M (2006) Cultural and bio-cultural heritage in Swedish forests. In: Forestry and our cultural heritage. Proc Semin, 13–15 June 2005, Sunne, Sweden. Ministerial Conference on the protection of forests in Europe, Liaison unit, Warsaw, pp 31–36
  2. Bergeron Y, Leduc A, Harvey B, Gauthier S (2002) Natural fire regime: a guide for sustainable management of the Canadian boreal forests. Silva Fenn 36:81–95CrossRef
  3. Finnish Ministry of the Environment (2013) Everyman’s right, pp 20
  4. Goldammer J (2001) Feuer und Landschaft. In: Busch B, Goldammer J, Denk A (eds) Feuer. Schriftenreihe Forum/Band 10. Elemente des Naturhaushalts II, Wienant, Köln, pp 245–268
  5. Goldammer J, Furyaev V (1996) Fire in ecosystems of Boreal Eurasia. Kluwer, The NetherlandsCrossRef
  6. Gustafson L, Bauhus J, Kouki J, Lõhmus A, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2013) Retention forestry—an integrated approach in practical use. In: Kraus D, Krumm F (eds) Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. European Forest Institute, Finland, pp 74–81
  7. Hannelius S, Kuusela K (1995) Finland—a country of evergreen forest. Forssan kirjapaino, Finland
  8. Heikinheimo O (1915) Kaskiviljelyksen vaikutus Suomen metsiin. Acta Forestalia Fennica 4:1–264
  9. Huttunen P (1980) Early land use, especially the slash-and-burn cultivation in the commune of Lammi, southern Finland, interpreted mainly using pollen and charcoal analyses. Acta Bot Fenn 113:1–45
  10. Ilvessalo Y (1927) Suomen metsät. Tulokset vuosina 1921–1924 suoritetusta valtakunnan metsien arvioimisesta. The forests of Suomi (Finland). Results of the general survey of the forests of the country carried out during the years 1921–1924. Metsät koelaitoksen Julk 11:1–421
  11. Kraus D, Krumm F (2013) Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. European Forest Institute, Finland
  12. Lankia T, Neuvonen M, Pouta E, Sievänen T (2014) Willingness to contribute to the management of recreational quality on private lands in Finland. J For Econ 20:141–160
  13. Leikola M (1987) Metsien hoidon aatehistoriaa. Silva Fenn 21(4):332–341CrossRef
  14. Leikola M (2013) Savotoilta ja uittopuroilta. Metsäkustannus, Helsinki
  15. Lier M, Parviainen J, Nivet C, Gosselin M, Gosselin F, Paillet Y (2013) European initiatives on criteria and indicators for forest biodiversity. In: Krumm F (ed) Kraus D. Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity, European Forest Institute, pp 32–43
  16. Leikola M (1987) Metsä kulttuurimaisemana. The forest as a cultural landscape. In: Reunala A, Virtanen P (eds) Metsä suomalaisten elämässä. Silva Fenn 21(4):362–373
  17. MCPFE (2006) Forestry and our cultural heritage. Proceedings of Semin 13–15 June 2005, Sunne, Sweden. Ministerial Conference on the protection of forests in Europe, Liaison unit, Warsaw
  18. Metsämaan omistus (2014) Metsätilastotiedote 6/2014. Metsäntutkimuslaitos
  19. Metsätilastollinen vuosikirja (2014) Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. Metsäntutkimuslaitos, Vammalan kirjapaino (Finnish edition 2013)
  20. Paillet Y, Parviainen J, Gosselin M, Gosselin F, Lier M (2013) Monitoring forest biodiversity in Europe: state of the art, challenges and opportunities. In: Kraus D, Krumm F (eds) Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. European Forest Institute, Finland, pp 242–252
  21. Pakkanen E, Leikola M (2011) Suomen metsien käytön historiaa, puun teollista käyttöä. Tervaa, lautaa ja paperia. Metsäkustannus, Helsinki
  22. Pakkanen E, Leikola M (2013) Suomen metsien käytön historiaa. Metsää, puuta ja kovaa työtä. Metsäkustannus, Helsinki
  23. Parviainen J (2001) Der Einfluss des Feuers auf die borealen Landschaften Europas. In: Busch B, Goldammer J, Denk A (eds) Feuer. Schriftenreihe Forum/Band 10. Elemente des Naturhaushalts II, Wienant, Köln, pp 299–312
  24. Parviainen J (2006) Forest management and cultural heritage. In: Forestry and our cultural heritage (2006) Proc Semin 13–15 June 2005 Sunne, Sweden. Ministerial Conference on the protection of forests in Europe, Liaison unit Warsaw. pp 67–76
  25. Parviainen J, Frank G (2003) Protected forests in Europe: approaches harmonizing the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making. J Environ Manag 67:27–36CrossRef
  26. Parviainen J, Västilä S (2011) State of Finland’s Forests 2011. Based on the criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 5a/2011
  27. Pyne S (1996) Wild hearth. A prolegomenon to the cultural fire history of northern Eurasia. In: Goldammer J, Furyaev V (eds.) Fire in ecosystems of boreal Eurasia, Kluwer. The Netherlands. pp 21–44
  28. Pyne S (2001) Der lange Brand, Eine Einführung in die Gesichte des Feuers und der Menscheit. Feuer, Schriftenreihe Forum/Band 10. Elemente des Naturhaushalts II, Wienant, Köln. pp 269–279
  29. Reunala A, Virtanen P (1987) Metsä suomalaisten elämässä—monitieteellinen seminaari 18–19.12.1986. The forest as a Finnish cultural entity. Silva Fenn 21(4):436–444
  30. State of Europe’s Forests (2011) Status and trends in sustainable forest management in Europe. Forest Europe, UNECE and FAO, Oslo
  31. Sténs A, Sandström C (2013) Divergent interests and ideas around property rights: the case of berry harvesting in Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 33:56–62CrossRef
  32. Tasanen T (2004) The history of silviculture in Finland from the Mediaeval to the breakthrough of forest industry in 1870s. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 920 (in Finnish)
  33. Tolonen K (1983) The post-glacial fire record. The role of fire in Northern Circumpolar ecosystems. Wiley, pp 21–44
  34. Tsunetsugu Y, Lee Y, Park B-J, Tyrväinen L, Kagawaa T, Miyazaki J (2013) Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landsc Urban Plan 113:90–93CrossRef
  35. Tyrväinen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Lanki T, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T (2014) The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: a field experiment. J Environ Psychol 38:1–9CrossRef
  36. Viitala K, Potila H, Savonen E-M, Sarjala T (2011) Health from forest – Antioxidative properties of endophytic fungi from Scots pine roots. Mushroom biology and mushroom products. Proc of the 7th Int Conf Mushroom Biol Mushroom Prod, 4–7 October, 2011, Arcachon, France. Volume 2. INRA, UR1264, Mycology and Food Safety, Bordeaux, France, pp 103–109
  37. Vilkuna K, Mäkinen E (1988) Isien työ, 10. painos. Otava, Keuruu
  38. Von Berg E (1859) Die Wälder in Finnland. Jahrb Kön Sächs Akad f Forst u Landwirthe Tharandt 1:1–118
  39. Zackrisson O (1977) Influence of forest fires on the North Swedish boreal forest. Oikos 29:22–32CrossRef

For further details log on website :

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...