Remedial boron treatment of difficult to access timber in buildings

Published Date
September 2016, Volume 74, Issue 5, pp 703–710

Title 

Remedial boron treatment of difficult to access timber in buildings

• Author 

• Tripti Singh, 
• Ian Simpson, 
• Dave Page

Abstract

The quest to understand remedial treatment for timber framing began following the ‘leaky building crisis’ in New Zealand which came to prominence in late 1990s. Several in situ remedial treatment products are used in New Zealand. However, effectiveness of these treatments is still unclear, particularly in situations where not all faces of the timber can be accessed. This research was conducted to establish whether a ‘double coat brush-on’ or ‘double coat brush-on plus injection treatment between studs’ system would give the most surface coverage and retention of a commonly used remedial treatment chemical, boron. Results showed that in the ‘double coat brush-on’ process, the concealed surfaces were left largely untreated resulting in variable preservative retention between components and relatively low overall preservative retention in the multiple stud units. However, the ‘brush-on plus injection treatment’ application gave much better preservative spread onto concealed surfaces of both vertical and horizontal members. Most samples tested achieved average cross-section boron retention levels of 0.4 % BAE m/m (NZS 3640, H1.2 treatment specification), although the treatment was concentrated in the outer 30 % of the timber, hence not achieving the required full sapwood penetration. Because of the variability associated with the boron injection process, it is recommended that this remediation method should only be used where there is a high degree of confidence that there is no decay present between studs or lintel members. All attempts should be made to remove any decaying timber while repairing leaky buildings.

References

1. AWPA (2013) User specification of treated wood. AWPA Standard U1-13. American Wood Preservers’ Association, Selma, AL
2. Carey J (1991) In-situ treatment of exterior joinery using boron-based implants, BRE Information Paper IP 14/91. BRE, Watford
3. Cockcroft R, Levy JF (1973) Bibliography on the use of boron compounds in the preservation of wood. J Inst Wood Sci 6:28–37
4. Cooney R (2009) Timber preservation and remediation of leaky houses. Department of Building and Housing, Wellington
5. De Groot R, Felton CC (1998) Distribution of borates around point source injections in dry wood members. Holzforschung 52:37–45CrossRef
6. Dietz NG, Schmidt EL (1987) Boron rods as an on-site remedial treatment for control of decay in wood decks. J Minn Acad Sci 53(2):22–26
7. Dirol D (1988) Borate diffusion in wood from rods and liquid product application to laminated beams. The International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, IRG/WP/3482
8. Grace JK, Yamamoto RT (1994) Simulation of remedial borate treatments intended to reduce attack on Douglas-Fir lumber by the Formosan subterranean termite. J Econ Entomol 87:1547–1554CrossRef
9. Hazleden DG, Morris PL (1999) Designing for durable wood constructions: the 4 D’S. In: Lacasse MA, Venter DJ (eds). Institute for Research in Construction, Ottawa, pp 734–745
10. Hunn D, Bond I, Kernohan D (2002) Report of the overview group on the weathertightness of buildings to the building industry authority. Building Industry Authority, Wellington
11. Kim JW, Lloyd JD (2015) Steam accelerated borate diffusion: optimizing dry tie treatment. The International Research Group on Wood Protection, IRG/WP, Stockholm, pp 15–40713
12. Lebow S, Lebow P, Halverson S (2010) Penetration of boron from topically applied borates solutions. Forest Prod J 60(1):13–22CrossRef
13. Lloyd JD, Dickinson DJ, Murphy RJ (1990) The probable mechanisms of action of boric acid and borates as wood preservatives. The International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, IRG/WP/1450
14. Morrell JJ, Freitag CM (1995) Effect of wood moisture content on diffusion of boron-based biocides through Douglas-Fir and western hemlock lumber. Forest Prod J 45(3):51–55
15. NZS 3603 (1993) Timber structures standards. Standards New Zealand, Wellington
16. NZS 3604 (2011) Timber framed buildings. Standards New Zealand, Wellington
17. NZS 3640 (2003) Chemical preservation of round and sawn timber. Standards New Zealand, Wellington
18. Page D, Singh T (2011) Remedial treatment of difficult to access framing timber; comparison of two treatment methods. Scion report for Department of Building and Housing, New Zealand
19. Price Waterhouse Coopers (2009) Weathertightness estimating—the cost. Department of Building and Housing, Wellington
20. Robinson KL (1939) A method of determination of small quantities of boron in plant material. Analyst 64:324–328CrossRef
21. Singh T, Page D, Bennett A (2014a) Effectiveness of on-site remediation treatments for framing timber. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 86:136–141CrossRef
22. Singh T, Page D, Waals J (2014b) The development of accelerated test methods to evaluate the durability of framing timber. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 94:63–68CrossRef
23. Stahlhut D (2008) Decay fungi from New Zealand leaky buildings: isolation, identification and preservative resistance. PhD Thesis, The University of Waikato, New Zealand
24. Wilson WJ (1958) The determination of boron in treated timber. Anal Chim Acta 19:516–519CrossRef

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00107-016-1061-y