Re-thinking visitor loyalty at ‘once in a lifetime’ nature-based tourism destinations: Empirical evidence from Purnululu National Park, Australia

Published Date

doi:10.1016/j.jort.2016.08.002

In Press, Corrected Proof — Note to userS

• Author 

• Emily Pinkus ^a,
• Susan A. Moore ^a,
• Ross Taplin ^b,
• Joanna Pearce ^c,,

• aSchool of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
• bSchool of Accounting, Curtin Business School, Curtin University of Technology, Kent Street, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
• cSchool of Business and Law, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Drive, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia

Received 22 September 2015. Revised 15 July 2016. Accepted 24 August 2016. Available online 6 September 2016.

Abstract

Visitor loyalty with respect to national parks has been under-researched, especially for iconic or ‘once in a lifetime’ tourism destinations. This study reports on results from a survey of 529 visitors to the remote and iconic Purnululu National Park, Australia. An investigation of the relationships between loyalty, satisfaction and service quality indicates loyalty has multiple dimensions, including word of mouth recommendations and intention to revisit, with each having a different relationship with satisfaction and service quality. These findings, plus the weak correlation between revisiting and positive word of mouth intentions, suggests a need to reconceptualise loyalty in relation to ‘once in a lifetime’ destinations. For these tourism destinations, there may be other ways for visitors to demonstrate loyalty and the associated means for measuring it, rather than intention to revisit. Loyalty may be a transferred concept, with loyalty to one iconic destination resulting in visitation to other, similar destinations.

Management implications

Traditional measures of visitor loyalty may not be applicable to iconic or ‘once in a lifetime’ tourism destinations. Managers of these types of tourism destinations may be best served measuring word of mouth recommendations or intentions of visitors to engage in positive communications about the destination as a means of determining visitor loyalty. Although potentially difficult to influence, a focus on visitor satisfaction rather than service quality would be beneficial.

Keywords

Iconic

Loyalty

National park

Satisfaction

Service quality

Visitor research

---

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

 Table 1

Table 1.

 Table 2

Table 2.

 Table 3

Table 3.

 Table 4

Table 4.

Fig. 3.

• ⁎ 
  Corresponding author.

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Note to users: Corrected proofs are Articles in Press that contain the authors' corrections. Final citation details, e.g., volume/issue number, publication year and page numbers, still need to be added and the text might change before final publication.

Although corrected proofs do not have all bibliographic details available yet, they can already be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI , as follows: author(s), article title, journal (year), DOI. Please consult the journal's reference style for the exact appearance of these elements, abbreviation of journal names and use of punctuation.

When the final article is assigned to an issue of the journal, the Article in Press version will be removed and the final version will appear in the associated published issue of the journal. The date the article was first made available online will be carried over.

For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211973613000470