Wood moisture content during the thermal modification process affects the improvement in hygroscopicity of Scots pine sapwood

Published Date
November 2016, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 1181–1195

Original

First Online: 

22 June 2016

DOI: 10.1007/s00226-016-0845-x

Cite this article as: 

Altgen, M., Hofmann, T. & Militz, H. Wood Sci Technol (2016) 50: 1181. doi:10.1007/s00226-016-0845-x

Author

• Michael AltgenEmail author
• Tamás Hofmann
• Holger Militz

Abstract

Elevated wood moisture contents during the thermal modification process have been shown to adversely affect the improvement in dimensional stability and hygroscopicity. This study tested the hypothesis that the effect of elevated wood moisture content is based on the impact of water on chemical reactions which determine the cell wall matrix stiffness. Samples of Scots pine sapwood (Pinus sylvestris L.) were thermally modified in saturated water vapor at different peak temperatures and durations starting either in oven-dry or in water-saturated state. For a given mass loss caused by the modification process, the improvement in maximum swelling and equilibrium moisture content was stronger for oven-dry samples. After removal of water-soluble degradation products, which caused a cell wall bulking effect, the maximum swelling even increased after modification in water-saturated state. Based on dynamic vapor sorption measurements, it was evidenced that the modification in oven-dry state increased the cell wall matrix stiffness which improved dimensional stability and hygroscopicity. Enhanced bond formation in the polymeric network, i.e., via condensation and cross-linking reactions during the treatment of oven-dry wood, is suggested as a cause for this increase in matrix stiffness. In contrast, the modification in water-saturated state enhanced the flexibility of the cell wall matrix, which increased the cell wall swelling and limited the improvement of hygroscopicity to the reduction in OH groups by removal of hemicelluloses. This enhanced matrix flexibility was potentially caused by predominant hydrolytic cleavage of bonds in case of water-saturated samples, evident from the chemical analysis of soluble degradation products, which increased the free volume between adjacent matrix polymers.

References

1. Altgen M, Willems W, Militz H (2016) Wood degradation affected by process conditions during thermal modification of European beech in a high-pressure reactor system. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. doi:10.1007/s00107-016-1045-yGoogle Scholar
2. Biziks V, Andersons B, Sansonetti E, Andersone I, Militz H, Grinins J (2015) One-stage thermo-hydro treatment (THT) of hardwoods: an analysis of form stability after five soaking-drying cycles. Holzforschung 69(5):563–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Borrega M, Kärenlampi P (2008) Effect of relative humidity on thermal degradation of Norway spruce (Picea abies) wood. J Wood Sci 54(4):323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Borrega M, Kärenlampi P (2010) Hygroscopicity of heat-treated Norway spruce (Picea abies) wood. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 68(2):233–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cermak P, Rautkari L, Horacek P, Saake B, Rademacher P, Sablik P (2015) Analysis of dimensional stability of thermally modified wood affected by re-wetting cycles. BioResources 10(2):3242–3253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Demirbaş A (2000) Mechanisms of liquefaction and pyrolysis reactions of biomass. Energ Convers Manag 41(6):633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Engelhardt F (1979) Untersuchungen über die Wasserdampfsorption durch Buchenholz im Temperaturbereich von 110 bis 170 °C. Holz Roh Werkst 37(3):99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Engelund ET, Thygesen LG, Svensson S, Hill CAS (2013) A critical discussion of the physics of wood–water interactions. Wood Sci Technol 47(1):141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Garrote G, Domínguez H, Parajó JC (1999) Hydrothermal processing of lignocellulosic materials. Holz Roh Werkst 57(3):191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. González-Pena MM, Breese MC, Hale MDC (2005) Studies on the relaxation of heat-treated wood. In: Militz H, Hill C (eds) 2nd European conference on wood modification, Göttingen, Germany, pp 87–90
11. Hill C, Ramsay J, Keating B, Laine K, Rautkari L, Hughes M, Constant B (2012a) The water vapour sorption properties of thermally modified and densified wood. J Mater Sci 47(7):3191–3197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hill CAS, Keating BA, Jalaludin Z, Mahrdt E (2012b) A rheological description of the water vapour sorption kinetics behaviour of wood invoking a model using a canonical assembly of Kelvin–Voigt elements and a possible link with sorption hysteresis. Holzforschung 66(1):35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Himmel S, Mai C (2015) Effects of acetylation and formalization on the dynamic water vapor sorption behavior of wood. Holzforschung 69(5):633–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Hoffmeyer P, Jensen SK, Jones D, Klinke HB, Felby C (2003) Sorption properties of steam treated wood and plant fibres. In: Van Acker J, Hill C (eds) 1st European conference on wood modification, Ghent, Belgium, pp 177–189
15. Hosseinpourpia R, Adamopoulos S, Mai C (2016) Dynamic vapour sorption of wood and holocellulose modified with thermosetting resins. Wood Sci Technol 50(1):165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Ishikawa A, Kuroda N, Kato A (2004) In situ measurement of wood moisture content in high-temperature steam. J Wood Sci 50(1):7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Kollmann F, Fengel D (1965) Änderungen der chemischen Zusammensetzung von Holz durch thermische Behandlung. Holz Roh Werkst 23(12):461–468Google Scholar
18. Kotilainen R (2000) Chemical changes in wood during heating at 150–160 °C. Dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
19. Kubojima Y, Suzuki Y, Tonosaki M, Ishikawa A (2003) Moisture content of green wood in high temperature water vapor. Holzforschung 57(6):634–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Lenth CA, Kamke FA (2001) Equilibrium moisture content of wood in high-temperature pressurized environments. Wood Fiber Sci 33(1):104–118Google Scholar
21. Li J, Henriksson G, Gellerstedt G (2007) Lignin depolymerization/repolymerization and its critical role for delignification of aspen wood by steam explosion. Bioresour Technol 98(16):3061–3068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
22. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31(3):426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Nuopponen M, Vuorinen T, Jämsä S, Viitaniemi P (2005) Thermal modifications in softwood studied by FT-IR and UV resonance Raman spectroscopies. J Wood Chem Technol 24(1):13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Popescu C-M, Hill CAS (2013) The water vapour adsorption–desorption behaviour of naturally aged Tilia cordata Mill. wood. Polym Degrad Stabil 98(9):1804–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Rautkari L, Hill CAS (2014) Effect of initial moisture content on the anti-swelling efficiency of thermally modified Scots pine sapwood treated in a high-pressure reactor under saturated steam. Holzforschung 68(3):323–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Rautkari L, Hill CS, Curling S, Jalaludin Z, Ormondroyd G (2013) What is the role of the accessibility of wood hydroxyl groups in controlling moisture content? J Mater Sci 48(18):6352–6356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Runkel RH (1954) Studien über die Sorption der Holzfaser.—Erste Mitteilung: Die Sorption der Holzfaser in morphologische-chemischer Betrachtung. Holz Roh Werkst 12(6):226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Runkel RH, Lüthgens M (1956) Untersuchungen über die Heterogenität der Wassersorption der chemischen und morphologischen Komponenten verholzter Zellwände. Holz Roh Werkst 14(11):424–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Seborg M, Tarkow H, Stamm AJ (1953) Effect of heat upon the dimensional stabilization of wood. J For Prod Res Soc 3(3):59–67Google Scholar
30. Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic–phosphotungstic acid reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 16(3):144–158Google Scholar
31. Skaar C (1988) Wood–water relations. Springer series in wood science. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
32. Stamm AJ, Hansen LA (1937) Minimizing wood shrinkage and swelling effect of heating in various gases. Ind Eng Chem 29(7):831–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Thygesen LG, Engelund ET, Hoffmeyer P (2010) Water sorption in wood and modified wood at high values of relative humidity. Part I: results for untreated, acetylated, and furfurylated Norway spruce. Holzforschung 64(3):315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Tjeerdsma BF, Militz H (2005) Chemical changes in hydrothermal treated wood: FTIR analysis of combined hydrothermal and dry heat-treated wood. Holz Roh Werkst 63(2):102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35. Tjeerdsma BF, Boonstra M, Pizzi A, Tekely P, Militz H (1998) Characterisation of thermally modified wood: molecular reasons for wood performance improvement. Holz Roh Werkst 56(3):149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Vrentas JS, Vrentas CM (1991) Sorption in glassy polymers. Macromolecules 24(9):2404–2412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Willems W (2014) The water vapor sorption mechanism and its hysteresis in wood: the water/void mixture postulate. Wood Sci Technol 48(3):499–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Willems W (2015) A critical review of the multilayer sorption models and comparison with the sorption site occupancy (SSO) model for wood moisture sorption isotherm analysis. Holzforschung 69(1):67–75Google Scholar
39. Willems W, Mai C, Militz H (2013) Thermal wood modification chemistry analysed using van Krevelen’s representation. Int Wood Prod J 4(3):166–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Yasuda R, Minato K, Norimoto M (1994) Chemical modification of wood by non-formaldehyde cross-linking reagents. Wood Sci Technol 28(3):209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00226-016-0845-x