Published Date
25 December 2016, Vol.93:76–87, doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.048
Abstract
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are most commonly prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis of a purified cellulose starting material but the effects of hydrolysis conditions on CNC yield and properties are incompletely understood. In this study, we use a rotatable central composite experimental design to elucidate parameter interactions between three design factors, acid concentration (x1), hydrolysis temperature (x2), and hydrolysis time (x3), over a broad range of process conditions and determine their effect on yield and sulfate group density. Parameter ranges are 55–65 wt.% for x1, 45–65 °C for x2, and 30–180 min for x3. Regression models of the experimental yield data reveal significant two-factor interactions of x1 with each x2and x3, whereas x2 has no significant two-factor interaction with x3. The models predict maximum yields of 66–69% at optimum process conditions of 57–58 wt.% (x1), 64–67 °C (x2), and 134–156 min (x3). At these conditions, the sulfate group density is predicted to be between 241 and 265 mmol/kg. The sulfate group density is linearly dependent on acid concentration and hydrolysis temperature and not dependent on hydrolysis time. Maximum sulfate group density can only be achieved at the expense of yield. The results presented here provide a foundation for subsequent, sequential optimization using narrower parameter ranges, allowing further optimization of the hydrolysis conditions and potentially enabling higher yield.
Graphical abstract
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926669016300486
25 December 2016, Vol.93:76–87, doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.048
Nanocellulose: production, functionalisation and applications
Author
Received 20 November 2015. Revised 25 January 2016. Accepted 28 January 2016. Available online 20 February 2016.
Highlights
- •3-factor RSM study of cellulose nanocrystal production by sulfuric acid hydrolysis.
- •66–69% yield with 57–58 wt.% sulfuric acid at 64–67 °C for 134–156 min.
- •All three factors (acid concentration, temperature, time) are significant.
- •Only interaction between hydrolysis temperature and time is insignificant.
- •Sulfate group density increases linearly with acid concentration and temperature
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) are most commonly prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis of a purified cellulose starting material but the effects of hydrolysis conditions on CNC yield and properties are incompletely understood. In this study, we use a rotatable central composite experimental design to elucidate parameter interactions between three design factors, acid concentration (x1), hydrolysis temperature (x2), and hydrolysis time (x3), over a broad range of process conditions and determine their effect on yield and sulfate group density. Parameter ranges are 55–65 wt.% for x1, 45–65 °C for x2, and 30–180 min for x3. Regression models of the experimental yield data reveal significant two-factor interactions of x1 with each x2and x3, whereas x2 has no significant two-factor interaction with x3. The models predict maximum yields of 66–69% at optimum process conditions of 57–58 wt.% (x1), 64–67 °C (x2), and 134–156 min (x3). At these conditions, the sulfate group density is predicted to be between 241 and 265 mmol/kg. The sulfate group density is linearly dependent on acid concentration and hydrolysis temperature and not dependent on hydrolysis time. Maximum sulfate group density can only be achieved at the expense of yield. The results presented here provide a foundation for subsequent, sequential optimization using narrower parameter ranges, allowing further optimization of the hydrolysis conditions and potentially enabling higher yield.
Graphical abstract
Keywords
- Cellulose nanocrystals
- Acid hydrolysis
- Central composite design
- Yield
- Sulfate group density
- ⁎ Corresponding author at: Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926669016300486
No comments:
Post a Comment