Comparing a top-down and bottom-up approach in the identification of criteria and indicators for sustainable community forest management in Nepal

Author

1. Chiranjeewee Khadka* and 
2. Harald Vacik

-Author Affiliations

1. Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, PeterJordan Strasse 82, A-1190 Vienna, Austria

1. ↵*Corresponding author. E-mail: chiranjeewee.khadka@boku.ac.at
2. 
   
3. Received July 31, 2011.

Abstract

Policy makers, scientists and civil society are involved in the development of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (SFM), reflecting the growing worldwide demand for addressing sustainable development and environmental governance management goals. Such frameworks have been largely derived from expert-led or community-based approaches. This article details the identification process of criteria and indicators (C & I) based on the international principles of SFM through the analysis of a hybrid approach that uses both a top-down (TD) and a bottom-up (BU) approach. The aim of this article is to discuss how the two approaches have worked to incorporate the different views, opinions and experiences of experts and stakeholders. National-level C & I are then compared with those at the local level, making specific reference to sustainable community forest (CF) management. For the TD approach, a Delphi survey was conducted where 121 experts shared their knowledge, experience and judgements in assessing a set of 72 indicators with regard to the applicability, practicality and importance of national, regional and CF management in Nepal. For the BU approach, C & I for CF management were developed with the direct involvement of various stakeholders. It was shown that such a hybrid approach is feasible from a methodological point of view, but a framework is needed by the government to more fully utilize the opportunities of the C & I development process in the SFM context. The results of this study also help to bridge the gap between the ad hoc planning of decision makers and the requirement for a holistic management system, which includes participatory processes. Based on the conclusions of this study, general recommendations for the methodological design of C & I development in similar studies are given.

For further details log on website :
http://forestry.oxfordjournals.org/content/85/1/145.short?rss=1&ssource=mfr