Effects of altitudinal gradients on leaf area index, soil microbial biomass C and microbial activity in a temperate mixed forest ecosystem of Northwestern Turkey

Author

Ilyas Bolat ⁽¹⁾, Melih Öztürk ⁽²⁾

Abstract: 

A high leaf area index (LAI) can provide indications of high fertility, such as optimal health and productivity in forest ecosystem. Yet, studying the microbial biomass and inherent activity in any forest ecosystem may enable better understanding of the role of microorganisms in soil quality and nutrient cycling. This study was carried out in the western Black Sea region of Turkey with the aim to determine the influence of elevation on LAI, microbial biomass and activity in a mixed forest ecosystem. Marked differences in the LAI, light transmission, soil temperature, C_org/N_total ratio, and microbial properties were found at sites sampled at different elevations along an altitudinal gradient (i.e., 1200, 1300 and 1400 m a.s.l.). The LAI was statistically (P < 0.05) higher at 1300 (3.28 m² m^-2) and 1400 m (3.20 m² m^-2) elevations compared to 1200 m (2.84 m² m^-2) elevation, whereas the light transmission was statistically (P < 0.05) lower at 1300 and 1400 m elevations than that at 1200 m elevation. The amount of microbial biomass C at 1300 m (892.26 µg g^-1) and 1400 m (725.99 µg g^-1) elevations was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that at 1200 m (650.84 µg g^-1) elevation. Basal respiration did not vary significantly (P > 0.05) along the altitudinal gradient. An increase in respiration per unit biomass (i.e., increasing the metabolic quotient - qCO₂) was also found in the sampling sites at 1200 m a.s.l. There was a positive relationship between the microbial biomass C and LAI (r = 0.612, P < 0.01) and negative relationship between the qCO₂ and LAI (r = - 0.592, P < 0.01). Our results showed that the elevation gradient has a significant influence on the LAI, microbial biomass C and microbial activity in the forest stand type analyzed. A subdivision of the forest stand types into different sub-types according to their productivity and development is advisable and recommended for forest management and administration purposes.

   

Introduction 

Leaf area index (LAI), broadly defined as the amount of leaf area (m²) in a canopy per unit ground area (m²), is a measure of canopy foliage content commonly used in studies of vegetation and ecosystem. LAI can be measured by direct biomass harvest methods, litter trapping, or indirect optical techniques like an analysis of hemispherical photographs ([7]). Knowledge of LAI is important to quantify energy and mass exchange rates of water and carbon between the vegetative canopy and atmospheric interface that contain fluxes of carbon, solar energy, and water. Interception or transmission of light is also related to LAI ([42]). In addition, LAI is a major structural characteristic of the forest ecosystem as it affects several significant ecological processes, including evapotranspiration, photosynthesis, rainfall, interception, surface albedo, and dry deposition ([28], [40]). According to Perry et al. ([35]), LAI firmly combines with litterfall, microclimate and productivity, thus directly and indirectly affecting the forest floor and soil properties.

As an ecological indicator, soil microbial biomass is the living part of soil organic matter measurements, which is useful for determining the degree of disturbance and subsequent system recovery. In terms of soil productivity, soil biomass controls the major processes of nutrient transformation and cycling, soil organic matter maintenance, and macroaggregation for favorable water and aeration characteristics ([41]) as it is responsible for the decomposition and mineralization of plant and animal residues in the soil ([6]).

The microbial biomass C to organic C ratio (C_mic/C_org) is mainly utilized to measure soil C losses during decomposition as well as the efficiency of organic C conversion into microbial C. It is a qualitative soil parameter that allows comparison across soils with different organic matter content ([43], [47]) and it can provide effective early warning for soil quality deterioration ([49]). The basal respiration of a soil reflects either the overall activity or the energy spent by the indigenous microbial pool ([3]), thereby it represents a well-established parameter to be used to determine decomposition rates ([43]), and a good indicator of soil microbial activity ([34]).

The metabolic quotient (qCO₂) or the amount of CO₂-carbon produced per unit microbial biomass carbon an equivalent unit is dominated the specific respiration rate ([43]). In other words, qCO₂ reflects the energy necessary to maintain metabolic activity in relation to the energy necessary for synthesizing biomass. Therefore, it has been used as a microbial stress indicator ([17]). In a previous study ([3]), qCO₂ has been used to elucidate issues regarding soil development, substrate (glucose, protein, carbohydrate, etc.) quality, ecosystem development and the response to stress.

In Turkey, the forest stand type is a part of the forest which covers at least one hectare area and is distinguished from the forest or other vegetation types in the surrounding areas based on age, tree species, tree species composition, arrangement, density, growth, etc. The forest stand type is the smallest unit of both silviculture and forest management activities. It is assumed that productivity and growth of trees are similar within its boundaries as most ecological factors (e.g., climatic, edaphic and biotic factors) are supposed to be homogeneous within a forest stand type. On the other hand, it is believed that soil properties, productivity and growth within the same forest stand type may vary as a consequence of differences in elevation, which has proven to affect the aforementioned ecological factors. Therefore, we hypothesize that LAI, soil microbial biomass and inherent activity will show a decrease with increasing elevation in Turkish fir-beech mixed forest ecosystem. In particular, we expect LAI, soil microbial biomass C and basal respiration at lowest elevations to be higher compared with higher elevations. For this reason, we selected three study sites at different altitudes (1200, 1300 and 1400 m a.s.l., respectively) in order to determine any changes of the above parameters within the same forest stand type across different elevations. To our best knowledge, changes in LAI, soil microbial biomass and activity along altitudinal gradients in Turkey was not yet studied. The specific goals of this work were to: (1) investigate the effects of altitudinal gradients on LAI, light transmission, microbial biomass C, basal respiration, and metabolic quotient; and (2) analyze possibile relationships among LAI, light transmission, microbial biomass C, basal respiration and other soil characteristics.

    

Material and methods 

Site description

The study area covered about 26.65 ha near the town of Ovacuma, Karabük Province, in the Western Black Sea region of Turkey (longitude: 32° 40′ 26″ - 32° 40′ 49″ E; latitude: 41° 23′ 20″ - 41° 23′ 28" N). The area has an average elevation of 1325 m a.s.l. (range: 1200-1450 m) with an average slope of 45% and northwest aspect. Based on the Thornthwaite’s method ([44]), the study area is classified as very humid and microthermal, with little or no water deficit and a temperate-efficiency regime that is normal to megathermal (AC’₂ra’). The annual mean precipitation over the past 30 years was 1681.2 mm, and the annual mean temperature was 6.6 °C. Brown forest soils lay here on gravel and limestone parent materials belonging to clastic and carbonate rocks of Ulus and Ahmetusta formations. The study area is covered by a temperate mixed forest dominated by Bornmullerian fir (Abies nordmanniana subsp. bornmüllerianaMattf.) and Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky).

The forest stand type analyzed in this study is an uneven-aged mixed forest (young/mature Fir-Beech - GKnD), with a mean canopy closure of approx. 85% (range: 71-100%), with a a mean timber volume of 363.4 m³ ha^-1. It is fairly homogeneous in terms of tree species composition, basal area, number trees per hectare, age, productivity (mainly phytomass) and growth, and easily distinguishable from the neighboring forest stand type.

Three different sites along an altitudinal gradients were selected in the study area at 1200, 1300, and 1400 m a.s.l. Six experimental sites at a distance of 100-m each other were established at each elevation, totaling 18 different sites. The experimental sites were selected among those showing similar environmental conditions (e.g., climate, geological substrate) to better compare LAI and soil properties across different elevations.

Canopy leaf area

Hemispherical photography is a common technique used to determine the percentage of light transmission through canopy gaps ([15], [40]). Three hemispherical photographs were taken at each experimental site using a Sigma 8 mm fisheye lens mounted on a Canon EOS 5D digital SLR camera. In total, 54 hemispherical photographs were taken at the different elevation. Additional hemispherical photographs were taken at each point where soil samples were collected (see below). The exact dating and timing of each photograph was recorded. All the photographs were taken under similar weather conditions, avoiding rain or snow periods, and direct sunlight during image collection.

LAI, light transmission, and canopy gaps were assessed on digital photographs using the software package Hemisfer^®ver. 1.5.3 ([40]). According to Nobis & Hunziker ([31]), automatic thresholding was used for image analysis, while for the LAI estimation the Lang’s method was preferred ([24]). Parts of the trees other than their leaves, such as stems and branches, can influence the values of LAI; thus, the corrections recommended by Schleppi et al. ([40]) for non-linearity and slope and by Chen & Cihlar ([13]) for clumping effect were integrated into the calculations.

Soil sampling

On July 2013, soil samples of mineral topsoil (0-6.5 cm depth) were collected at 100-m distance from one another at each elevation after removing stones, plant and root debris. The soil depth of 0-6.5 cm was chosen since this layer is considered to be more easily influenced by any change compared to lower layers. At each sampling site, one sample was collected for physical and chemical analyses, and one sample for the microbial analysis, totaling 36 samples from 18 sites (6 sites per elevation). The samples collected for microbial analysis were sifted using 2 mm sieve and stored at 4 °C until the measurement of the microbial biomass C and basal respiration, while the samples for physical and chemical analyses were collected as soil cores (8.1 cm diameter), air-dried, ground and sieved (< 2 mm).

Physical and chemical analyses

We determined soil moisture content gravimetrically by drying the soil samples at 105 °C in an oven until they achieved a constant weight. The hydrometer method was used to calculate the particle size distribution of the soil ([11]). The pH of the soil in a 1:2.5 soil/water suspension was measured using a pH meter, while the electrical conductivity of the soil was determined with an electrical conductivity meter using a 1:5 soil/water extract. The organic C content of the soil samples was estimated using potassium dichromate oxidation, and the total N content was measured using Kjeldahl digestion. The soil bulk density (g cm^-3) was calculated via weight-to-volume ratio using both mass and volume. The particle density (g cm^-3) was measured on soil samples using the Pycnometer method, and pore space was calculated using bulk and particle densities ([38]). Soil temperature was measured directly using a sensitive thermometer that was approximately inserted into the surface soil to a depth of 0-6.5 cm.

Biochemical analyses of soils

Soil microbial biomass C (C_mb) was determined by extracting 30 g oven-dried equivalents of field moist mineral soil samples in 0.5 M K₂SO₄ (1:4 w/v) using the chloroform fumigation extraction method, and calculated using the following equation ([46] - eqn. 1):

Cmb=KEC⋅2.64(1)$$\begin{array}{}\text{(1)}& C_{mb}{K}_{EC}2.64\end{array}$$

where K_EC refers to the difference in extractable organic C between the fumigated and unfumigated samples. The proportionality factor for the biomass C released by fumigation extraction was 2.64.

Basal respiration was determined using the sodium hydroxide (NaOH) trap method. In brief, basal respiration was measured by placing 30 g of soil into 500 ml beakers and incubating the soil in the dark at 25 °C in airtight, sealed jars along with 25 ml 1 M NaOH. After 7 days, the generated CO₂ was measured with a titration of excess NaOH with 1 M HCl ([1]). The metabolic quotient (qCO₂) was calculated as the basal respiration rate (mg CO₂-C h^-1 g^-1) of microbial biomass ([3]). All the analyses were performed with two replications.

Statistical analysis

The effect of altitude on LAI and soil characteristics was assessed by one-way ANOVA using a 95% confidence limit (α = 0.05). Duncan’s test was applied for testing the differences among means. Additionally, Pearson’s correlation analysis was carried out to assess the relationships among the considered variables. All the statistical analyses were performed using the software package SPSS^® ver. 16.00 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

    

Results and discussion 

Physical and chemical properties

Differences in the physical and chemical properties of soils at the different altitudinal ranges are summarized in Tab. 1. Although no statistically significant (P > 0.05) differences were found in soil moisture among the elevations, the soil moisture content was slightly higher at 1200 m a.s.l. when compared to elevations of 1300 and 1400 m. According to Pierce & Running ([36]), LAI is an important structural property of the forest. Because leaf surfaces are the primary sites of energy, gas and water exchanges and of important physiological processes such as photosynthesis, interception, transpiration, and evapotranspiration are a function of LAI. Hoff & Rambal ([19]) have also indicated that with increasing LAI, drainage decreases while transpiration and interception increases. Therefore, the relatively high soil moisture content at 1200 m elevation might have been due to the lower LAI. Further, the correlation between soil moisture and LAI was negative (r = - 0.287) but not significant (P > 0.05 - Tab. 2). Moreover, a significant difference in soil temperature was found among the considered altitudinal ranges.

Tab. 1 - Comparisons of the physical and chemical characteristics of the soil at different elevation of the sampling sites. Values represent the means of 18 samples ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same row indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) among means after one-way ANOVA.

Soil characteristics	Elevation (m a.s.l.)
	1200	1300	1400
Soil temperature (°C)	15.41 ± 1.23 a	13.75 ± 0.20 b	13.70 ± 0.75 b
Bulk density (g cm-3)	1.12 ± 0.14 a	1.26 ± 0.31 a	1.29 ± 0.14 a
Particle density (g cm-3)	2.66 ± 0.02 a	2.69 ± 0.06 a	2.67 ± 0.04 a
Pore space (%)	57.91 ± 5.52 a	53.27 ± 11.55 a	51.53 ± 4.64 a
Sand (%)	46.13 ± 4.41 a	44.25 ± 9.55 a	56.12 ± 5.95 b
Silt (%)	21.54 ± 4.22 a	21.15 ± 4.89 a	17.72 ± 2.09 a
Clay (%)	32.33 ± 5.97 a	34.60 ± 6.39 a	26.16 ± 3.95 b
Soil texture	Sandy clay loam	Sand clay loam	Sandy clay loam
Moisture content (%)	23.00 ± 6.89 a	16.51 ± 2.78 a	16.76 ± 5.29 a
Soil pH (H2O)	5.80 ± 0.77 a	6.43 ± 0.92 a	5.69 ± 0.36 a
Electrical conductivity (dS m-1)	0.69 ± 0.11 a	0.81 ± 0.25 a	0.71 ± 0.15 a
Organic C (%)	4.38 ± 1.15 a	4.63 ± 0.72 a	4.70 ± 0.48 a
Total N (%)	0.47 ± 0.14 a	0.34 ± 0.03 a	0.39 ± 0.13 a
Corg/Ntotal ratio	9.35 ± 0.42 a	13.79 ± 3.24 b	12.97 ± 3.61 b

Enlarge/Reduce

Tab. 2 - Pairwise correlation matrix (Pearson’s r - n = 36) for the chemical and microbiological characteristics of the soil at elevations of 1200, 1300, and 1400 m a.s.l. (*): P < 0.05; (**): P < 0.01; (ns): not significant.

Variables	Soil temperature	Soil moisture	LAI	Light transmission	Organic C	Total N	Corg/Ntotal	Microbial biomass C	Cmic/Corg  ratio	Basal respiration	qCO2
Soil temperature (°C)	1	-0.034 ns	-0.609**	0.680**	-0.402 ns	0.018 ns	-0.274 ns	-0.499*	-0.125 ns	-0.018 ns	0.335 ns
Soil moisture (%)	-	1	-0.287 ns	0.134 ns	0.463 ns	0.776**	-0.534*	-0.106 ns	-0.490*	0.499*	0.619**
Leaf area index (LAI, m-2 m-2)	-	-	1	-0.894**	0.041 ns	-0.317 ns	0.343 ns	0.612**	0.598**	-0.179 ns	-0.592**
Light transmission (%)	-	-	-	1	0.004 ns	0.265 ns	-0.250 ns	-0.595**	-0.625**	0.274 ns	0.643**
Organic C (%)	-	-	-	-	1	0.565*	0.133 ns	0.344 ns	-0.571*	0.738**	0.509*
Total N (%)	-	-	-	-	-	1	-0.727**	0.060 ns	-0.435 ns	0.446 ns	0.474*
Corg/Ntotalratio	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	0.155 ns	0.008 ns	0.046 ns	-0.133 ns
Microbial biomass C (μg g-1)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	0.508*	0.280 ns	-0.239 ns
Cmic/Corg (%)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-0.443 ns	-0.707**
Basal respiration (µg CO2-C g-1 h-1)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	0.844**
qCO2 (mg CO2-C g-1Cmic h-1)	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1

Enlarge/Reduce

Soil temperature at the elevation of 1200 m a.s.l. was significantly higher compared to 1300 and 1400 m elevations (P < 0.05). Similarly, light transmission was higher at an elevation of 1200 m compared to the other elevations (Fig. 1a). The increase in the LAI results in a lower light penetration through the gaps, leading to a decrease in soil temperature, as also reported by Öztürk & Bolat ([33]). Fassnacht et al. ([16]) stated that the LAI of a canopy determines light, thermal, and moisture conditions within that canopy. In the current study, the correlation between the soil temperature and the LAI was negative (r = - 0.609; P < 0.01 - Tab. 2), while the correlation between soil temperature and light transmission was positive (r = 0.680; P < 0.01). Additionally, large and regular gaps within or between canopies, as is the case for the sites at 1200 m altitude, permit a greater amount of light to penetrate the canopy ([18]).

Fig. 1 - Variation in the light transmission (a), leaf area index (b), and gap (c) at different elevations. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Different letters (above the bars) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between the different elevation of the sampling sites.

Enlarge/Shrink Full Size

On the other hand, the lower C_org/N_total ratio (i.e., decomposition ratio) at 1200 m elevation compared to the other elevations may have been due to high soil temperature, moisture content, and total N (Tab. 1). These factors may accelerate the decomposition of soil organic matter, which would be further harmful to soil quality in sites with lower soil organic matter ([47]). The correlations between soil moisture, total N, and temperature and the C_org/N_total ratio were positive (r = 0.619, 0.474, and 0.335, respectively - Tab. 2). In addition, a rapid decomposition of organic matter is not necessarily a favorable feature of the soil, as stable organic matter plays a considerable positive role in the soil physical and chemical characteristics ([43]).

Leaf area index, light transmission, and gap

In this study, the LAI values differed at different elevations, ranging from 2.75 to 2.84 m² m^-2 at 1200 m, from 2.95 to 3.57 m² m^-2 at 1300 m, and from 3.04 to 3.20 m² m^-2 at 1400 m a.s.l. The mean LAI values were significantly higher (P < 0.05) at an elevation of 1300 m (3.28 m² m^-2) and an elevation of 1400 m (3.20 m² m^-2) than at an elevation of 1200 m (2.84 m² m^-2 - Fig. 1b). This result was really unexpected and not consistent with the findings of other studies, indicating a reduction in LAI with elevation ([23]). However, Luo et al. ([27]) stated that LAI showed a negative quadratic relationship to elevation (r² = 0.58, P < 0.001), whereas net primary productivity (NPP) generally decreased with increasing elevation with a linear relationship (r² = 0.73, P = 0.001). Breda & Granier ([12]) and Meier & Leuschner ([29]) noted that LAI has paramount importance for forest biogeochemical fluxes since interception, radiation, canopy conductance, stand transpiration and productivity are all closely linked to LAI. Additionally, Breda & Granier ([12]) reported that a high LAI is an indication of the high site fertility and also the optimal health and productivity of the stand. Hence, the results obtained in the current study may reflect a rise in carbon gain at higher elevations and may suggest an increment in the aboveground biomass and tree height. Indeed, a high LAI at the 1300 m elevation may reflect an increase in primary productivity, biomass, and other biophysical properties in the forest ecosystem. Maass et al. ([28]) reported that LAI may also change within ecosystems depending on the site conditions, especially soil fertility, nutrients, and water supply. On the other hand, other authors have investigated the LAI in different forest ecosystems, reporting values varying from 1.7 to 5.3 m² m^-2 in a coniferous forest ([36]), from 0.5 to 8 m² m^-2 in temperate deciduous forests ([25]) and from 5.6 to 9.5 m² m^-2 in European beech stands ([26]). The latter values are greater than the LAI values obtained in the current study. According to previous studies ([12], [26]), these differences could be due to the type and age of the stand and the availability of water in the soil, which is determined by climate and the properties of the soil as well as the different methods used.

In this study maximum and minimum percentages of light transmission along the elevation gradient varied from 11.63% to 13.64% at 1200 m, from 8.19% to 11.87% at 1300 m, and from 9.30% to 11.36% at 1400 m. The mean percentage of light transmission at 1300 m (9.98%) and 1400 m (10.39%) elevation were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the percentage of light transmission at 1200 m elevation (12.53% - Fig. 1a). It is well known that understory light availability decreases as overstory density increases ([30]). In other words, light penetration through the canopy to the forest floor bounds upward based on the amount of canopy foliage, commonly defined as LAI ([45]). Others factors such as leaf size, specific leaf area, canopy form and deciduous leaf mass also affect light penetration ([14]). In the current study, there was a significant negative correlation (r = - 0.894, P < 0.01) between LAI and light transmission (Tab. 2). Similarly, Schleppi et al. ([39]) found that the LAI has a negative correlation to the light index of ground vegetation.

Gap percentages at elevations of 1200, 1300, and 1400 m were 3.01-6.26%, 2.20-5.14%, and 2.92-5.61%, respectively. Gap percentage was greater at the 1200 m elevation than at the 1300 and 1400 m elevations (4.17, 3.87, and 4.07%, respectively). However, there was no obvious difference (P > 0.05) in the mean gap percentage for the three different altitudes (Fig. 1c). According to Perry et al. ([35]), the gap is a physical opening in the canopy that allows light to reach seedlings in the forest understory and most tree species require gaps in order to reach maturity.

Microbial biomass C, C_mic:C_org percentage, basal respiration, and metabolic quotient

The mean values for microbial biomass C were 650.84 µg g^-1, 892.26 µg g^-1 and 725.99 µg g^-1 at elevations of 1200, 1300 and 1400 m, respectively. An important observation from this study is that the amount of soil microbial biomass increases as the elevation increases. Indeed, the results showed that at the elevations of 1300 and 1400 m soils comprised significantly higher microbial biomass C than soil at an elevation of 1200 m a.s.l. (Fig. 2a). Because microbial biomass C responds more rapidly and to a greater extent to changes, it can be taken into account to be a more sensitive indicator of soil quality than organic matter or TOC ([37]). Wardle & Ghani ([48]) also reported that low microbial biomass values can be characteristic of either disturbance or stress. Hence, the results obtained in this study showed that there were more favorable conditions for microbial biomass at the 1300 m and 1400 m altitudes than at the 1200 m altitude. This difference may be caused by high levels of organic C at the 1300 m and 1400 m altitudes, although there were no significant (P > 0.05) differences along the altitudinal gradient (Tab. 1). Jenkinson ([21]) indicated that the amount and activity of soil microbial biomass are extremely influenced by soil organic matter. Additionally, Anderson ([4]) stressed that every metabolic activity of organisms is dependent on available carbon sources, and found a very close quantitative relationship between microbial biomass C and the total C. Similarly, the correlation between the microbial biomass C and soil organic C in this study was positive (r = 0.344), though not significant (P > 0.05 - Tab. 2).

Fig. 2 - Variation in the microbial biomass C (a), C_mic/C_org % (b), basal respiration (c), and metabolic quotient (qCO₂- d) at different elevations . Error bars represent the standard deviation. Different letters (above the bars) indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) between the different elevation of the sampling sites.

Enlarge/Shrink Full Size

In the current study, the C_mic:C_org percentage was higher at the elevation of 1300 m than at the elevation of 1200 and 1400 m, with averages of 1.72, 1.28, and 1.43%, respectively (Fig. 2b). This difference may be caused by the higher soil microbial biomass C amount at the 1300 m elevation. According to Anderson & Domsch ([2]), the C_mic/C_orgpercentage may indicate if the soil carbon is at equilibrium, or it increases or decreases. Such parameter is also related to the substrate quality (glucose, protein, carbohydrate, etc.) and could be used as a stability indicator for quick recognition of any environmental change ([4]). The C_mic/C_org percentage should usually range between 0.27 to 7.0% ([2]), and the values detected in this study are within this range, though they are below the equilibrium threshold for soil proposed by Jenkinson & Ladd ([22]), namely, about 2.2% of soil organic carbon were found to belong to the microbial biomass. Eventually, the high value of the C_mic/C_org percentage found at the 1300 m elevation, as compared with other elevations, pointed out high inputs and availability of organic matter for soil microorganisms, thus reflecting favorable environmental conditions for the improvement of soil microorganisms. Otherwise, despite the fact that no statistical differences were found in the soil pH among the altitudinal gradients (Tab. 1), decreasing C_mic/C_org percentages observed at both the 1200 m and 1400 m elevations could be due to increasing soil acidity. Likewise, it is reported in the literature that the C_mic/C_org percentage can remarkably decrease under acidic conditions when compared to neutral conditions ([5]).

Pascual et al. ([34]) suggested that because soil microbial activity has a direct influence on both ecosystem stability and fertility, basal respiration is a good indicator of soil microbial activity. This parameter points out the oxidative capacity of soil microorganisms and, therefore, is affected both by the number of microorganisms and the energy sources present in the soil ([8]). In the current study, mean soil basal respiration was 0.78, 0.82, and 0.59 µg CO₂-C g^-1 h^-1 for the elevation of 1200, 1300, and 1400 m, respectively. The highest basal respiration was found at the 1300 m elevation. However, there was no obvious a difference (P > 0.05) in basal respiration along the elevation gradient (Fig. 2c). The high basal respiration denoting a great biological activity at the 1300 m elevation might be explained by high soil organic carbon and microbial biomass at these sites, since the correlations between soil organic carbon and microbial biomass with soil basal respiration were positive (r = 0.738 and 0.280, respectively - Tab. 2). Indeed, Nsabimana et al. ([32]) hypothesized that soil basal respiration positively correlated with soil organic carbon and microbial biomass and substrate (glucose, protein, carbohydrate, etc.) availability can be the main factor that influences both size and activity of the microbial community. On the other hand, Islam & Weil ([20]) suggested that high rates of basal respiration can occur either as a result of a large pool of labile C substrates or rapid oxidation of a smaller pool. High basal respiration may represent either ecological stress and degradation or a high level of ecosystem productivity. Because of this ambiguity, a clearer interpretable parameter is the rate of basal respiration per unit of microbial biomass (qCO₂).

In this study, the soil metabolic quotient (qCO₂) ranged from 1.13 to 1.85 mg CO₂-C g^-1 C_mic h^-1 (mean: 1.42) at elevation 1200 m, from 0.70 to 1.50 mg CO₂-C g^-1 C_mic h^-1 (mean: 1.10) at elevation 1300 m, and from 0.76 to 1.01 mg CO₂-C g^-1 C_mic h^-1 (mean: 0.87) at elevation 1400 m (Fig. 2d). This parameter is the most straightforward index in the literature and is extensively used to evaluate ecosystem development, disturbance, or system maturity. Physiologically, this index defines the substrate (glucose, protein, carbohydrate, etc.) that is mineralized per unit of microbial biomass carbon ([8]). Additionally, Bauhus & Khanna ([9]) reported that if the qCO₂ is high (supposedly increased), available C amount and substrate (glucose, protein, carbohydrate, etc.) quality are low for microbial biomass. Therefore, less biomass can be produced because more carbon is used for respiration ([4]). In this context, our results demonstrated that there was a stress on soil microbial biomass at elevation 1200 m since there was an increase in respiration per unit biomass (i.e., increasing qCO₂). Conversely, the lower qCO₂ obtained at both 1300 and 1400 m elevation indicated a high efficiency of soil microbial biomass in the utilization of available C for respiration. Consequently, a high qCO₂reflects a high maintenance carbon demand, and if the soil system cannot replenish the carbon which is lost through respiration, microbial biomass must decline ([5]). On account of this, it has been reported that the relationship between qCO₂ and microbial biomass was negative ([48]), which is consistent with the results of our study (Tab. 2). Additionally, qCO₂ was negatively related (P < 0.05) to the C_mic/C_org percentage (Tab. 2). According to Bolat ([10]), this negative relationship denotes that relatively more C is used for growth than for respiration under favorable soil conditions, such as good substrate (glucose, protein, carbohydrate, etc.) quality. Indeed, a negative relationship between qCO₂ and the C_mic/C_org percentage has been previously reported ([6], [10]).

    

Conclusion 

Based on the results obtained in this study, altitude significantly affects the LAI and light transmission, whereas the altitudinal gradient has no significant influence on the canopy gaps. As expected, elevation can affect soil chemicals and microbiological properties by changing soil temperature, moisture, nutrient availability, metabolic quotient, microbial biomass and activity, all of which are sensitive indicators of soil quality. Consequently, the productivity and health of the same forest type at different elevations may differ, depending on stand characteristics (e.g., age, tree species, density, growth etc.) as well as on soil health and quality in Turkish forests. Therefore, a subdivision of forest stand types into different sub-types according to their productivity and development is advisable and recommended for forest management and administration purposes. Further, this study provides valuable insight into the relationship between elevation gradients and microbial biomass and activity in Turkish forest ecosystems.

    

Acknowledgements 

We are grateful to Ahmet Ergün and Kivanç Yüksel for their valuable efforts during the field and laboratory works. The authors thank the Turkish General Directorate of Forestry (TGDF) and the Turkish State Meteorological Service (TSMS) for assistance and data support throughout this study. We gratefully acknowledge the anonymous referees for their comments and constructive suggestions.

The authors declare no conflict of interest with any other persons or communities.

   

References

(1) 

Alef K (1995). Soil respiration. In: “Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry” (Alef P, Nannipieri K eds). Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 214-218.
::Google Scholar::

(2) 

Anderson JPE, Domsch KH (1989). Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 21: 471-479.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(3) 

Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1990). Application of eco-physiological quotients (qCO2, and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 22: 251-255.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(4) 

Anderson TH (2003). Microbial eco-physiological indicators to assess soil quality. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 98: 285-293.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(5) 

Anderson TH, Domsch KH (2010). Soil microbial biomass: the eco-physiological approach. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42 (12): 2039-2043.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(6) 

Araujo ASF, Silva EFL, Nunes LAPL, Carneiro RFV (2010). The effect of converting tropical native savanna to Eucalyptus grandis forest on soil microbial biomass. Land Degradation and Development 21 (6): 540-545.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(7) 

Asner GP, Scurlock JMO, Hicke JA (2003). Global synthesis of leaf area index observations: implications for ecological and remote sensing studies. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12 (3): 191-205.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(8) 

Bastida F, Zsolnay A, Hernández T, García C (2008). Past, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective. Geoderma 147 (3): 159-171.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(9) 

Bauhus J, Khanna PK (1999). The significance of microbial biomass in forest soils. In: “Going underground-ecological studies in forest soils” (Rastin N, Bauhus J eds). Research Signpost, Trivandrum, India, pp. 77-110.
::Online::Google Scholar::

(10) 

Bolat I (2014). The effect of thinning on microbial biomass C, N and basal respiration in black pine forest soils in Mudurnu, Turkey. European Journal of Forest Research 133: 131-139.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(11) 

Bouyoucos GJ (1962). Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal 54: 464-465.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(12) 

Breda N, Granier A (1996). Intra- and inter-annual variations of transpiration, leaf area index and radial growth of a sessile oak stand. Annals of Forest Science 53: 521-536.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(13) 

Chen JM, Cihlar J (1995). Quantifying the effect of canopy architecture on optical measurements of leaf area index using two gap size analysis methods. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 33: 777-787.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(14) 

Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2000). Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecological Monographs 70: 171-207.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(15) 

Dignan P, Bren L (2003). Modelling light penetration edge effects for stream buffer design in mountain ash forest in southeastern Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 179: 95-106.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(16) 

Fassnacht KS, Gower ST, Norman JM, McMurtric ER (1994). A comparison of optical and direct methods for estimating foliage surface area index in forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 71: 183-207.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(17) 

Fernandes SAP, Bettiol W, Cerri CC (2005). Effect of sewage sludge on microbial biomass, basal respiration, metabolic quotient and soil enzymatic activity. Applied Soil Ecology 30 (1): 65-77.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(18) 

Gower ST, Norman JM (1991). Rapid estimation of leaf area index in conifer and broad-leaf plantations. Ecology 72: 1896-1900.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(19) 

Hoff C, Rambal S (2003). An examination of the interaction between climate, soil and leaf area index in a Quercus ilex ecosystem. Annals of Forest Science 60 (2): 153-161.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(20) 

Islam KR, Weil RR (2000). Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 79: 9-16.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(21) 

Jenkinson DS (1988). The determination of microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in soil. In: “Advances in nitrogen cycling in agricultural ecosystems” (Wilson JR ed). CAB, Wallingford, pp. 368-386.
::Google Scholar::

(22) 

Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981). Microbial biomass in soil measurement and turnover. In: “Soil biochemistry (vol. 5)” (Paul EA, Ladd JN eds). Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, USA, pp. 415-471.
::Google Scholar::

(23) 

Kitayama K, Aiba SI (2002). Ecosystem structure and productivity of tropical rain forests along altitudinal gradients with contrasting soil phosphorus pools on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Journal of Ecology 90 (1): 37-51.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(24) 

Lang ARG (1987). Simplified estimate of leaf area index from transmittance of the sun’s beam. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 41: 179-186.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(25) 

Le Dantec V, Dufrene E, Saugier B (2000). Interannual and spatial variation in maximum leaf area index of temperate deciduous stands. Forest Ecology and Management 134: 71-81.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(26) 

Leuschner C, Voss S, Foetzki A, Clases Y (2006). Variation in leaf area index and stand leaf mass of European beech across gradients of soil acidity and precipitation. Plant Ecology 186: 247-258.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(27) 

Luo T, Pan Y, Ouyang H, Shi P, Luo J, Yu Z, Lu Q (2004). Leaf area index and net primary productivity along subtropical to alpine gradients in the Tibetan Plateau. Global Ecology and Biogeography 13 (4): 345-358.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(28) 

Maass JM, Vose JM, Swank WT, Martinez-Yrizar A (1995). Seasonal changes of leaf area index (Lai) in a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management 74: 171-180.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(29) 

Meier IC, Leuschner C (2008). Leaf size and leaf area index in Fagus sylvatica forests: competing effects of precipitation, temperature, and nitrogen availability. Ecosystems 11 (5): 655-669.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(30) 

Newsome TA, Heineman JL, Linnell-Nemec AF, Comeau PG, Arsenault A, Waterhouse M (2010). Ten-year regeneration responses to varying levels of overstorey retention in two productive southern British Columbia ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 132-145.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(31) 

Nobis M, Hunziker U (2005). Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 128: 243-25.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(32) 

Nsabimana D, Haynes RJ, Wallis FM (2004). Size, activity and catabolic diversity of the soil microbial biomass as affected by land use. Applied Soil Ecology 26: 81-92.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(33) 

Öztürk M, Bolat I (2014). Transforming Pinus pinaster forest to recreation site: preliminary effects on LAI, some forest floor, and soil properties. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186 (4): 2563-2572.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(34) 

Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez T, Moreno JL, Ros M (2000). Soil microbial activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32 (13): 1877-1883.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(35) 

Perry DA, Oren R, Hart SC (2008). Forest Ecosystems. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Maryland, USA, pp. 606.
::Online::Google Scholar::

(36) 

Pierce LL, Running SW (1988). Rapid estimation of coniferous forest leaf area index using a portable integrating radiometer. Ecology 69 (6): 1762-1767.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(37) 

Powlson DS, Prookes PC, Christensen BT (1987). Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19 (2): 159-164.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(38) 

Rowell DL (1994). Soil science: methods and applications. Longman Publishers (Pte) Ltd, Singapore, pp. 350.
::Google Scholar::

(39) 

Schleppi P, Thimonier A, Walthert L (2011). Estimating leaf area index of mature temperate forest using regressions on site and vegetation data. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 601-610.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(40) 

Schleppi P, Conedera M, Sedivy I, Thimonier A (2007). Correcting non-linearity and slope effects in the estimation of the leaf area index of forests from hemispherical photographs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 144: 236-242.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(41) 

Smith L, Paul EA (1990). The significance of soil microbial biomass estimations. In: “Soil Biochemistry” (Bollag JM, Stotzky G eds). Marcel Dekker, New York, USA, pp. 357-396.
::Online::Google Scholar::

(42) 

Spanner M, Johnson L, Miller J, McCreight R, Freemantle J, Runyon J, Gong P (1994). Remote sensing of seasonal leaf area index across the Oregon Transect. Ecological Applications 4 (2): 258-271.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(43) 

Sparling GP (1997). Soil microbial biomass, activity and nutrient cycling as indicators of soil health. In: “Biological indicators of soil health” (Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR eds). CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 97-119.
::Google Scholar::

(44) 

Thornthwaite CW (1948). An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review 38: 55-94.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(45) 

Unger M, Homeier J, Leuschner C (2013). Relationships among leaf area index, below-canopy light availability and tree diversity along a transect from tropical lowland to montane forests in NE Ecuador. Tropical Ecology 54 (1): 33-45.
::Online::Google Scholar::

(46) 

Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 19: 703-707.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(47) 

Wang XL, Jia Y, Li XG, Long RJ, Ma Q, Li FM, Song YJ (2009). Effects of land use on soil total and light fraction organic, and microbial biomass C and N in a semi-arid ecosystem of northwest China. Geoderma 153 (1): 285-290.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(48) 

Wardle DA, Ghani AA (1995). A critique of the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO₂) as a bioindicator of disturbance and ecosystem development. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 27 (12): 1601-1610.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

(49) 

Yan T, Yang L, Campbell CD (2003). Microbial biomass and metabolic quotient of soils under different land use in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Geoderma 115 (1): 129-138.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

For further details log on website :
http://www.sisef.it/iforest/contents/?id=ifor1974-009