Author
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerenene/v_3a81_3ay_3a2015_3ai_3ac_3ap_3a57-61.htm
Raffaele Spinelli, Eugenio Cavallo, Lars Eliasson, Alessio Facello and Natascia Magagnotti
Renewable Energy, 2015, vol. 81, issue C, pages 57-61
Abstract: Chipper design is a main driver of production efficiency within forest fuel supply chains, but little scientific knowledge is available about the performance of different types. Two alternative drum chipper designs were tested on different feedstock types and under different knife wear conditions. The closed drum full-length knife design was more efficient than the open drum staggered-knife design, when negotiating branches, especially when knives were dull. Under these conditions, productivity was higher, fuel use lower and product quality better for the closed drum design. These differences were statistically significant. Therefore, a closed drum design is preferable when branches are the main feedstock, especially if product quality specifications are demanding. In general, the performance of both designs was significantly affected by feedstock type and knife wear.
Keywords: Biomass; Energy; Productivity; Fuel; Wood (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148115001901
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148115001901
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:renene:v:81:y:2015:i:c:p:57-61
Access Statistics for this article
Renewable Energy is currently edited by Soteris A. Kalogirou and Paul Christodoulides
More articles in Renewable Energy from Elsevier
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu (repec@elsevier.com).
Series data maintained by Dana Niculescu (repec@elsevier.com).
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeerenene/v_3a81_3ay_3a2015_3ai_3ac_3ap_3a57-61.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment