Effect of Plant Spacing on Growth and Grain Yield of Soybean

DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2013.410251

Author(s)    

Bhagirath S. Chauhan, Jhoana L. Opeña

ABSTRACT

In the Philippines, rice monoculture systems are common. Compared to these systems, the rice-soybean cropping system may prove more water-efficient and there is a trend of increasing soybean area in the response to water scarcity and need for crop diversification in the Philippines. A field study was conducted to evaluate the effect of row and plant to plant spacing (20 × 10, 20 × 5, 40 × 10, and 40 × 5 cm) on growth and yield of soybean. Plant height was not influenced by the plant geometry. Spacing, however, influenced leaf area and shoot biomass of soybean. Plants grown at the widest spacing (i.e., 40 × 10 cm) produced lowest leaf area and shoot biomass at 6 and 12 weeks after planting. Leaf area and shoot biomass at other three spacing were similar. There was a negative and linear relationship between weed biomass and crop shoot biomass at 6 and 12 weeks after planting. Grain yield of soybean was not affected by plant geometry and it ranged from 1.3 to 1.9 t·ha^-1 at different spacing.

References

[1]	B. S. Chauhan, “Weed Ecology and Weed Management Strategies for Dry-Seeded Rice in Asia,” Weed Technology, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-11-00105.1
[2]	G. Mahajan, B. S. Chauhan and M. S. Gill, “Dry-Seeded Rice Culture in Punjab State of India: Lessons Learned from Farmers,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 144, 2013, pp. 89-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.008
[3]	G. Mahajan, B. S. Chauhan, J. Timsina, P. P. Singh and K. Singh, “Crop Performance and Water- and Nitrogen-Use Efficiencies in Dry-Seeded Rice in Response to Irrigation and Fertilizer Amounts in Northwest India,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 134, 2012, pp. 59-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.011
[4]	T. P. Tuong and B. A. M. Bouman, “Rice Production in Water-Scarce Environments, in Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvements,” In: J. W. Kijne, R. Barker and D. Molden, Eds., CABI Publishing, Wallingford, 2003, pp. 53-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851996691.0053
[5]	M. C. R. Alberto, R. J. Buresh, T. Hirano, A. Miyata, R. Wassmann, J. R. Quilty, T. Q. Correa Jr. and J. Sandro, “Carbon Uptake and Water Productivity for Dry-Seeded Rice and Hybrid Maize Grown with Overhead Sprinkler Irrigation,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 146, 2013, pp. 51-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.006
[6]	J. E. Board and B. J. Harville, “Explanations for Greater Light Interception in Narrowvs Wide-Row Soybean,” Crop Science, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1992, pp. 198-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010041x
[7]	S. Z. Knezevic, S. P. Evans and M. Mainz, “Row Spacing Influences the Critical Timing for Weed Removal in Soybean (Glycine max),” Weed Technology, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2003, pp. 666-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT02-49
[8]	S. M. Hock, S. Z. Knezevic, A. R. Martin and J. L. Lindquist, “Soybean Row Spacing and Weed Emergence Time Influence Weed Competitiveness and Competitive Indices,” Weed Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2006, pp. 38-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-05-011R.1
[9]	B. S. Chauhan and D. E. Johnson, “Implications of Narrow Crop Row Spacing and Delayed Echinochloa colona and Echinochloa crus-galli Emergence for Weed Growth and Crop Yield Loss in Aerobic Rice,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 117, 2010, pp. 177-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.02.014
[10]	B. S. Chauhan and D. E. Johnson, “Row Spacing and Weed Control Timing Affect Yield of Aerobic Rice,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 121, 2011, pp. 226-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.12.008
[11]	D. L. Karlen and C. R. Camp, “Row Spacing, Plant Population, and Water Management Effects on Corn in the Atlantic Coastal Plain,” Agron Journal, Vol. 77, No. 3, 1985, pp. 393-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700030010x
[12]	M. J. Ottman and L. F. Welch, “Planting Patterns and Radiation Interception, Plant Nutrient Concentration and Yield in Corn,” Agron Journal, Vol. 81, 1989, pp. 167-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100020006x
[13]	M. Tollenaar, A. A. Dibo, A. Aguilera, S. F. Weise and C. J. Swanton, “Effect of Crop Density on Weed Interference in Maize,” Agron Journal, Vol. 86, No. 4, 1994, pp. 591-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600040003x
[14]	GenStat 8.0, “GenStat Release 8 Reference Manual,” VSN International, Oxford, 2005, 343 p.
[15]	J. A. Torrion, T. D. Setiyono, K. G. Cassman, R. B. Ferguson, S. Irmak and J. E. Specht, “Soybean Root Development Relative to Vegetative and Reproductive Phenology,” Agron Journal, Vol. 104, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1702-1709. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0199
[16]	B. S. Chauhan, V. P. Singh, A. Kumar and D. E. Johnson, “Relations of Rice Seeding Rates to Crop and Weed Growth in Aerobic Rice,” Field Crops Research, Vol. 121, 2011, pp. 105-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.11.019
[17]	D. Mulugeta and D. Stoltenberg, “Increased Weed Emergence and Seed Bank Depletion by Soil Disturbance in a No-Till System,” Weed Science, Vol. 45, 1997, pp. 234-241.

For further details log on website :

http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=37680