Use of spatial pattern analysis to assess forest cover changes in the Mediterranean region of Turkey

Published Date

August 2015, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 365-374

First online: 07 June 2015

Title 

Use of spatial pattern analysis to assess forest cover changes in the Mediterranean region of Turkey

• Author 

• Nuri Bozali 
• , Fatih Sivrikaya
• , Abdullah E. Akay

• 
  

• Abstract 

Assessment and monitoring of changes in land use are among the most important means of understanding of forest ecosystem dynamics. The main objective of this study was to investigate the spatio-temporal variability of forest cover changes by use of spatial pattern analysis. The study was performed in Başkonuş Forest Enterprise in the Mediterranean city of Kahramanmaraş in Turkey. The spatio-temporal variability of forest structures from 1992 to 2012 was analyzed by use of the Geographical Information Systems tool ArcGIS 10.0 and the spatial statistical package FRAGSTATS. The results indicated that forest areas increased from 11,446 to 11,827 ha, which is approximately 2 % of the study area. There was also a substantial increase (9.7 %) in productive forests, whereas degraded forests decreased by 7.8 %. Silvicultural treatment, rehabilitation, and conversion of coppice forests to high forests were the main forces driving forest cover changes in the study area. According to FRAGSTATS results, the total number of patches increased from 554 to 1610 between 1992 and 2012. As a result, the forest ecosystem in the study area became highly fragmented over the study period, because of the increase in the number of patches and the decrease in mean patch size; this negatively affected maintenance of biodiversity in the region.

References

1. Akay AE, Sivrikaya F, Gulci S (2014) Analyzing riparian forest cover changes along the Firniz River in the Mediterranean City of Kahramanmaras in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 186:2741–2747PubMedCrossRef
2. Armenteras D, Rudas G, Rodriguez N, Sua S, Romero M (2006) Pattern and cause of deforestation in Columbian Amazon. Ecol Indic 6:353–368CrossRef
3. Barlow J, Mestre LAM, Gardner TA, Peres CA (2007) The value of primary, secondary and plantation forests for Amazonian birds. Biol Conserv 136:212–231CrossRef
4. Başkent EZ, Kadıoğulları Aİ (2007) Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in Turkey: a case study in İnegöl. Landsc Urban Plan 81:316–327CrossRef
5. Çakır G, Sivrikaya F, Terzioğlu S, Keleş S, Başkent EZ (2007) Monitoring thirty years of land cover change: secondary orest succession in the Artvin forest planning unit of northeastern Turkey. Scott Geogr J 123:209–226CrossRef
6. Çakır G, Sivrikaya F, Keleş S (2008a) Forest cover change and fragmentation using Landsat data in Maçka state forest enterprise in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 137:51–66PubMedCrossRef
7. Çakır G, Ün C, Başkent EZ, Köse S, Sivrikaya F, Keleş S (2008b) Evaluating urbanization, fragmentation and land use/land cover change pattern in Istanbul city, Turkey from 1971 to 2002. Land Degrad Dev 19:663–675CrossRef
8. Cayuela L, Rey Benayas JM, Echeverria C (2006) Clearance and fragmentation of tropical montane forests in the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico (1975–2000). For Ecol Manag 226:208–218CrossRef
9. Chen L, Wang J, Fu B, Qiu Y (2001) Land use change in a small catchment of northern loess Plateau, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 86:163–172CrossRef
10. Chhabra A, Geist HJ, Houghton RA, Haberl H, Braimoh AK, Vlek PLG et al (2006) Multiple impacts of land-use/cover change. In: Lambin EF, Geist HJ (eds) Land-use and land-cover change: local processes and global impacts. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–116CrossRef
11. Debinski D, Holt R (2000) A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv Biol 14:342–355CrossRef
12. FAO (2010) Global forest resource assessment 2010 main report. FAO, Rome
13. Farina A (2002) Landscape ecology in action. Kluwer Academic Publisher, The Netherlands
14. Feranec J, Jaffrain G, Soukup T, Hazeu G (2010) Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990–2000 using CORINE land cover data. Appl Geogr 30:19–35CrossRef
15. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:265–280CrossRef
16. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574PubMedCrossRef
17. Forman RTT (1995) Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landsc Ecol 10:133–142CrossRef
18. Gautam AP, Webb EL, Shivakoti GP, Zoebisch MA (2003) Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:83–96CrossRef
19. GDF (2006a) Forest rehabilitation action plan. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara, p 38
20. GDF (2006b) Forest conversion action plan from coppice forest to high forest, 2006–2015. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara, p 14
21. GDF (2012a) Forest management plan for Başkonuş for 2012–2021, Ankara
22. GDF (2012b) Forest inventory results-2012, Ankara
23. GDF (2013) Performance of program of General Directorate of Forestry in 2013, Ankara
24. Hu X, Wu C, Hong W, Qiu R, Li J, Hong T (2014) Forest cover change and its drivers in the upstream area of the Minjiang River, China. Ecol Indic 46:121–128CrossRef
25. Jin S, Yang L, Danielson P, Homer C, Fry J, Xian GA (2013) Comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011. Remote Sens Environ 132:159–175CrossRef
26. Kadioğullari Aİ (2013) Assessing implications of land use and land cover changes in forest ecosystems of NE Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 185:2095–2106PubMedCrossRef
27. Kadioğullari Aİ, Başkent EZ (2008) Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in Turkey: a case study in Gumushane. Environ Monit Assess 138:289–303PubMedCrossRef
28. Keleş S, Sivrikaya F, Çakır G (2007) Temporal changes in forest landscape patterns in Artvin forest planning unit, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 129:483–490PubMedCrossRef
29. Keleş S, Sivrikaya F, Çakır G, Başkent EZ, Köse S (2008) Spatial and temporal changes in forest cover in Turkey’s Artvin Forest, 1972–2002. Pol J Environ Stud 17:491–501
30. Keleş S, Kadıoğulları Aİ, Başkent EZ (2012) The effects of land-use and land-cover changes on carbon storage in forest timber biomass: a case study in Torul, Turkey. J Land Use Sci 7:125–133CrossRef
31. Lira PK, Tambosi LR, Ewers RM, Metzger JP (2012) Land-use and land-cover change in Atlantic Forest landscapes. For Ecol Manag 278:80–89CrossRef
32. Matthews HD, Weaver AJ, Meissner KJ, Gillett NP, Eby M (2004) Natural and anthropogenic climate change: incorporating historical land cover change, vegetation dynamics and the global carbon cycle. Clim Dyn 22:461–479CrossRef
33. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. US Forest Service Gen Tech Report PNW
34. Nagendra H, Munroe DK, Southworth J (2004) From pattern to process: landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:111–115CrossRef
35. Pang C, Yu H, He J, Xu J (2013) Deforestation and changes in landscape patterns from 1979 to 2006 in Suan County, DPR Korea. Forests 4:968–983CrossRef
36. Plexida SG, Sfougaris AL, İspikoudis LP, Papanastasis VP (2014) Selecting landscape metrics as indicators of spatial heterogeneity-A comparison among Greek landscapes. Int J App Earth Obs 26:26–35CrossRef
37. Powell SL, Hansen AJ (2007) Conifer cover increase in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: frequency, rates, and spatial variation. Ecosystems 10:204–216CrossRef
38. Redo DJ, Grau HR, Aide TM, Clark ML (2012) Asymmetric forest transition driven by the interaction of socioeconomic development and environmental heterogeneity in Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:8839–8844PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
39. Sivrikaya F, Çakır G, Kadıoğulları Aİ, Keleş S, Başkent EZ, Terzioğlu S (2007a) Evaluating land use/land cover changes and fragmentation in the Camili forest planning unit of northeastern Turkey from 1972 to 2005. Land Degrad Dev 18:383–396CrossRef
40. Sivrikaya F, Keleş S, Çakır G (2007b) Spatial distribution and temporal change of carbon storage in timber biomass of two different forest management units. Environ Monit Assess 132:429–438PubMedCrossRef
41. Sivrikaya F, Çakır G, Akay AE (2011) Factors of land use and cover change: a case study from Turkey. Sci Res Essays 6:3684–3696
42. Sivrikaya F, Başkent EZ, Bozali N (2013) Spatial dynamics of carbon storage: a case study from Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 185:9403–9412PubMedCrossRef
43. Thompson ID, Guariguata MR, Okabe K, Bahamondez C, Nasi R, Heymell V, Sabogal C (2013) An operational framework for defining and monitoring forest degradation. Ecol Soc 18:20
44. TSMS (Turkish State Meteorological Service) (2007) Climatic data of Kahramanmaraş between 1996–2005. Ankara, Turkey
45. Turner DP, Koerper GJ, Harmon ME, Lee JJ (1995) A carbon budget for forests of the conterminous United States. Ecol Appl 5:421–436CrossRef
46. Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill R (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York
47. van Lier OR, Luther JE, Leckie DG, Bowers WW (2011) Development of large-area land cover and forest change indicators using multi-sensor Landsat imagery: application to the Humber River Basin, Canada. Int J App Earth Obs 13:819–829CrossRef
48. Wakeel A, Rao KS, Maikhuri RK, Saxena KG (2005) Forest management and land use and cover changes in a typical micro watershed in the mid elevation zone of Central Himalaya, India. For Ecol Manag 213:229–242CrossRef
49. Watson J, Whittaker R, Dawson T (2004) Habitat structure and proximity to forest edge affect the abundance and distribution of forest-dependent birds in tropical coastal forest of southern Madagascar. Biol Conserv 120:311–327CrossRef

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-015-0493-2