Published Date
Abstract
Glued solid wood products have gained much importance during the last years, as they allow an efficient and versatile use of the renewable timber material. Current standardized methods for bonding quality assessment consist of tests of small specimens cut from the structure during production or visual in-service inspection. Ultrasonic diagnostics are traditionally based on discrete point measurements using contact techniques. Transducers are generally pressed onto the timber surface with a coupling gel, liquid, or membrane couplant. Large glue line defects in glued timber constructions have been detected with this method (Dill-Langer et al. 2005). The disadvantages are a low precision in signal level measurements, which are highly dependent on the coupling pressure, and that the coupling agent may deteriorate the object. Better repeatability and one-dimensional continuous scanning is achieved with roller transducers, which have been applied to defect inspection in hardwood lumber (Kabir et al. 2002). Non-linear effects have been used to assess delaminations between veneer lamina and particle board (Solodov et al. 2004); a welding piezoelectric stack couples high power ultrasound into the sample and its surface is scanned with a laser vibrometer.
References
For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-90-481-9550-3_19
Date:
Title
Glue Line Nondestructive Assessment in Timber Laminates with an Air-Coupled Ultrasonic Technique
- Author
Abstract
Glued solid wood products have gained much importance during the last years, as they allow an efficient and versatile use of the renewable timber material. Current standardized methods for bonding quality assessment consist of tests of small specimens cut from the structure during production or visual in-service inspection. Ultrasonic diagnostics are traditionally based on discrete point measurements using contact techniques. Transducers are generally pressed onto the timber surface with a coupling gel, liquid, or membrane couplant. Large glue line defects in glued timber constructions have been detected with this method (Dill-Langer et al. 2005). The disadvantages are a low precision in signal level measurements, which are highly dependent on the coupling pressure, and that the coupling agent may deteriorate the object. Better repeatability and one-dimensional continuous scanning is achieved with roller transducers, which have been applied to defect inspection in hardwood lumber (Kabir et al. 2002). Non-linear effects have been used to assess delaminations between veneer lamina and particle board (Solodov et al. 2004); a welding piezoelectric stack couples high power ultrasound into the sample and its surface is scanned with a laser vibrometer.
References
- Brekhovskikh LM (1980) Waves in layered media. New York, NY, Academic
- Deutsch V, Platte M, Vogt M, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1997) Ultraschallprüfung Grundlagen und industrielle Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin
- Dill-Langer G, Bernauer W, Aicher S (2005) Inspection of glue-lines of glued-laminated timber by means of ultrasonic testing. In: Proceedings of the 14th international symposium on nondestructive testing of wood. Eberswalde, pp 49–60
- Hasenstab A (2006) Integritaetspruefung von Holz mit dem zerstoerungsfreien Ultraschallechoverfahren.Technische Universitaet Berlin. PhD Thesis
- Kabir MF, Schmoldt DL, Schafer ME (2002) Time domain ultrasonic signal characterization for defects in thin unsurfaced hardwood lumber. Wood Fiber Sci 34:165–182
- Niemz P, Sander D (1990) Prozessmesstechnik in der Holzindustrie. VEB Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig
- Schmerr LW, Song SJ (2007) Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation systems models and measurements. Springer, New York, NYCrossRef
- Solodov I, Pfleiderer K, Busse G (2004) Nondestructive characterization of wood by monitoring of local elastic anisotropy and dynamic nonlinearity. Holzforschung 58:504–510CrossRef
- Vun RY, Wu QL, Bhardwaj MC, Stead G (2003) Ultrasonic characterization of structural properties of oriented strandboard: a comparison of direct-contact and non-contact methods. Wood Fiber Sci 35(3):381–396
For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-90-481-9550-3_19
No comments:
Post a Comment