Measures and Methods for a New Taxonomy in Manufacturing Enterprises

Published Date
Procedia CIRP
2015, Vol.26:287–292, doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.040
12th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing – Emerging Potentials
Open Access, Creative Commons license

• Author 

• G. Campana ^a,,
 
• B. Cimatti ^b

• aCIRI MAM (Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research), University of Bologna, V.le Risorgimento 2, 40136, Bologna, Italy
• bInstitute for Advanced Studies (ISA), University of Bologna, V. P. Miliani 7/3, 40132, Bologna, Italy

Received 25 May 2014. Accepted 14 July 2014. Available online 27 March 2015. 

Abstract 

Most popular classifications of factories are generally based on their size; the number of employees, the annual turnover and the volume of production are common indicators by which an enterprise can be categorised. Factories can also be characterized in terms of their production system, such as lean manufacturing and flexible manufacturing.

However, these methods of classification generally do not include some important aspects of the industrial production that are significant in distinguishing the different ways of fabricating goods. Several technical characteristics of the production system, for example the quantity of craftwork involved, are particularly helpful in identifying the level of sustainability of the manufacturing activity. Other important factors include the cultural value that the system can add to the product and the connection and integration of the enterprise in the territory.

Guidelines to define a quantitative method to measure the different aspects that characterize manufacturing production are here proposed in order to allow the definition of a new taxonomy in manufacturing enterprises.

Keywords

Manufacturing

Taxonomy

Production System

Craftwork

Sustainability

---

References

1. • [1]
   • Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (notified under document number C(2003) 1422) (Text with EEA relevance) (2003/361/EC), Off. J. of the European Union 20.5.2003 pp. 36-41.
2. • [2]
   • Archibugi D., Pavitt's Taxonomy sixteen years on: a review article, Econ. Innov. New Techn., vol. 10 2001 415-425.
3. • [3]
   • Freeman C., Technology Policy and Economic Performance, 1987, London: Pinter.
4. • [4]
   • Pavitt K., Sectorals patterns of technical changes: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, vol. 13 1984 343-373.
5. • [5]
   • Archibugi D., Cesaratto S., Sirilli G., Sources of innovative activities and industrial organization in Italy, Research Policy 20 1991 299-313.
6. • [6]
   • Malerba F., Orsenigo L., Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific, Research Policy 25 (3) 1996 451-478.
7. • [7]
   • Hatzichronoglou T., Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification, 1997, OECD STI Working Paper Series No.197/2, Paris.
8. • [8]
   • Arvanitis S., Hollenstein H., Innovative Activity and Firm Characteristics – A Cluster Analysis with Firm-Level Data of Swiss Manufacturing, earie 25th Annual Coference, Copenaghen, 1998 27-30 August.
9. • [9]
   • Marsili O., 2001, The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA.
10. • [10]
    • Raymond W., Mohnen P., Palm F., S. Schim van der Loeff, An Empirically-Based Taxonomy of Dutch Manufacturing: Innovation Policy Implications, 2004, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1230, pp. 38.
11. • [11]
    • de Jong J. P. J., Marsili O., The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms, Research Policy 35 2006 213-229.
12. • [12]
    • OECD, Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 2001, OECD, Paris.
13. • [13]
    • Iammarino S., McCann P., The structure and evolution of industrial cluster: transaction, technology and knowledge spillovers, Research Policy 2006 35 1018-1036.
14. • [14]
    • Franco M., Haase H., Interfirm alliances: a taxonomy for SMEs, Long Range Planning (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.007.
15. • [15]
    • Groover M. P., Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Pearson, 2008, Prentice Hall International Edition, New Jersey.
16. • [16]
    • Womack J. P., Jones D. T., Roos D., The machine that changed the world, 1990, Free Press, New York.
17. • [17]
    • Campana G., Cimatti B., The slow factory: a new paradigm for manufacturing, Proceedings of the Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, 2013, 273-277, Berlin.
18. • [18]
    • Westkämper E., Alting, Arndt, Life Cycle management and Assessment: Approaches and Visions Towards Sustainable manufacturing, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 49, Issue 2, 2000, pp. 501-526.
19. • [19]
    • Hauschild M., Jeswiet J., Alting L., From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 54, Issue 2, 2005, pp. 1-21.
20. • [20]
    • Elkington J., Cannibals with forks: triple bottom line of 21^st century business, 1997, Capstone Publishing Ltd, Oxford.
21. • [21]
    • Welford R. J., Hijacking Environmentalism: corporat responses to sustainable development, 1997, Earthscan, London.
22. • [22]
    • Welford R., Young W., Ytterhus B., Eco-Management and Auditing 5, John Wiley & Sons, 1998, pp. 38-56.
23. • [23]
    • Peneder M., Intangible investment and human resources, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 12, 2002, 107-134.
24. • [24]
    • Rugani B., Panasiuk D., Benetto E., An input-output based framework to evaluate human labour in life cycle assessment, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17, 2012, 795-812.
25. • [25]
    • Fontana S., Una valle mineraria e tre distretti industriali, 2008, Marsilio Editore, Venezia.
26. • [26]
    • ElMaraghy W. H., Urbanic R. J., Modelling of manufacturing system complexity, Annals of the CIRP, vol. 52, n. 1, 2003, pp. 363-366.
27. • [27]
    • ElMaraghy W., Urbanic R. J., Assessment of Manufacturing Operational Complexity, Annals of the CIRP, vol. 53, n. 1, 2004, 401-406.
28. • [28]
    • ElMaraghy W. H., Kuzgunkaya O., Urbanic R. J., Manufacturing System Configuration Complexity, Annals of the CIRP, vol. 54, n. 1, 2005, pp. 445-450.
29. • [29]
    • ElMaraghy W., ElMaraghy H., Tomiyama T., Monostori L., Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology 61, 2012, 793-814.

• ☆
  Peer-review under responsibility of Assembly Technology and Factory Management/Technische Universität Berlin.

• ⁎ 
  Corresponding author. Tel.: +39-339-568463; fax: +39-051-2093412.

Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827114008531