Author
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/gamjagris/v_3a6_3ay_3a2016_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a55-_3ad_3a81240.htm
Julius Juma Okello (j.okello@cgiar.org), Yuan Zhou (yuan.zhou@syngenta.com), Norman Kwikiriza (n.kwikiriza@cgiar.org), Sylvester Ochieng Ogutu(syloch2000@yahoo.co.uk), Ian Barker (ian.barker@syngenta.com), Elmar Schulte-Geldermann (e.schulte-geldermann@cgiar.org), Elly Atieno (e.o.atieno@cgiar.org) and Justin Taj Ahmed (jahmed9411@gmail.com)
Additional contact information
Additional contact information
Agriculture, 2016, vol. 6, issue 4, pages 55
Abstract: Potato yields in sub-Saharan Africa remain very low compared with those of developed countries. Yet potato is major food staple and source of income to the predominantly smallholder growing households in the tropical highlands of this region. A major cause of the low potato yields is the use of poor quality seed potato. This paper examines the factors determining the decision to use certified seed potato (CSP), as well as the intensity of its use, among potato growers with access to it. We focused on potato growers in the central highlands of Kenya and used regression analysis to test hypotheses relating to potential impediments of CSP use. The study found that the distance to the market (a proxy for transaction costs), household food insecurity, and asset endowment affect the decision to use CSP. However, the effect of the intensity of use of CSP depends on how the intensity variable is defined. Several other control variables also affect the decision and extent of CSP use. The study concludes that transaction costs, asset endowment, and household food insecurity play a major role in the decision by smallholder potato farmers to use CSP and the extent to which they do so. We also discuss the policy implications of the findings.
Keywords: smallholder farmers; seed systems; certified seed potato; use and intensity of use; Kenya (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
JEL-codes: Q1 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Q16 Q17 Q18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/6/4/55/pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/6/4/55/ (text/html)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/6/4/55/pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/6/4/55/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Access Statistics for this article
Agriculture is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Les Copeland
More articles in Agriculture from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Series data maintained by XML Conversion Team (xml-conversion@mdpi.com).
Series data maintained by XML Conversion Team (xml-conversion@mdpi.com).
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/gamjagris/v_3a6_3ay_3a2016_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a55-_3ad_3a81240.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment