Published Date
Applied Ergonomics
November 2006, Vol.37(6):765–773, doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687005001687
Applied Ergonomics
November 2006, Vol.37(6):765–773, doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009
Received 13 January 2005. Accepted 1 November 2005. Available online 26 January 2006.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine whether school furniture dimensions match children's anthropometry. Children aged 6–18 years ( ), divided into 3 groups on the basis of the used furniture size, were subjected into anthropometric measurements (shoulder, elbow, knee and popliteal height, buttock-popliteal length and hip breadth). Combinational equations defined the acceptable furniture dimensions according to anthropometry and match percentages were computed, according to either the existing situation—where children use the size assigned for their grade—or assuming that they could use the most appropriate of the sizes available. Desk and seat height were bigger than the accepted limits for most children (81.8% and 71.5%, respectively), while seat depth was appropriate for only 38.7% of children. In conclusion, the assumption that children could use the most appropriate yet available size significantly improved the match, indicating that the limited provision of one size per cluster of grades does not accommodate the variability of anthropometry even among children of the same age.
Keywords
- Anthropometry
- School
- Furniture
- ⁎ Corresponding author. 38 Roikou st., 11743, N. Cosmos, Athens, Greece. Tel.: +30 210 727 6089-91; fax: +30 210 7276090.
For further details log on website :
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687005001687
No comments:
Post a Comment