Author
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2014.1.1.1-8
For further details log on website :
http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/9
Abstract
Forest ecosystem supports almost all of the needs of human being through its contribution of tangible and intangible values. Currently, the intangible values have gained less attention than the tangible values that cause underestimation of the total value of the forest conversion into other more tangibly profitable usages, and miss-management of the forest. One of the important intangible values is the hydrological value that has been hardly calculated until now. This research the intangible values of water for household, transportation, agriculture and fishing in Mendalam Sub Watershed, Kalimantan. The economic values calculated based on market prices, opportunity costs and consumer’s surplus methods. The results showed that based on the opportunity cost method the economic values of the hydrological services was about Rp 8,043,706,237.50 per year. Meanwhile, the economic values of the hydrological services based on the consumer’s surplus method gave lower value than the former method, i.e. Rp 8,031,351,664.60 per year. This study showed that the economic value of the hydrological services was very high, which has not been included in the calculation yet. However, without trees there would be no forest and all other values included water value would not exist. Consequently, current forest management should put forest ecosystem as important to consider.
Keywords
Intangible value; hydrological services; forest ecosystem; Mendalam; sub watershed
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bahruni. (2008). Pendekatan sistem dalam pendugaan nilai ekonomi total ekosistem hutan: studi kasus hutan alam produksi bekas tebangan (PhD Thesis). Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Barbier E.B., Acreman, M. C., & Knowler, D. (1997). Economic Valuation of Wetlands: A Guide for Policy Makers and Planners. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Bureau.
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D., & Gordon, L. J. (2009). Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 12(12), 1394–1404.
Deal, R. L., Cochran, B., & LaRocco, G. (2012). Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 17, 69–76.
Hartwick, J. M., & Olliver, N. D. (1998). The Economics of Natural Resources Use. Massachussetts: Addison – Wesley Educational Publisher Inc.
Kijazi, M. H., & Kant, S. (2010). Forest stakeholders’ value preferences in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(5), 357–369.
Kumar, M., & Kumar, P. (2008). Valuation of the ecosystem services: A psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 808–819.
Munasinghe, M. (Ed.). (1993). Environmental Economics and Natural Resource Management. Washington DC., USA: World Bank and CIDIE.
Nugroho, B., & Kartodihardjo, H. (2009). Kelembagaan PES. In Makalah pada Lokakarya Payment on Environmental Services (PES): Pengarusutamaan Imbal Jasa Lingkungan di Indonesia: Trend an Dinamikanya. Bogor, 3-4 Agustus 2009.
Nurfatriani, F. (2008). Merealisasikan pembayaran jasa lingkungan: belajar dari pengalaman di berbagai lokasi. Info Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan, 1(8), 39–50.
Nurrochmat, D. R., Solihin, I., Ekayani, M., & Hadianto, A. (2010). Neraca Pembangunan Hijau: Konsep dan Implementasi Bisnis Karbon dan Tata Air di Sektor Kehutanan. Bogor: IPB Press.
Paruelo, J. M. (2012). Ecosystem services and tree plantations in Uruguay: A reply to Vihervaara et al. (2012). Forest Policy and Economics, 22, 85–88. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.04.005
Pearce, D., & Moran, D. (1994). The Economic Value of Biodiversity. London: Earthscan Publication Ltd. Retrieved from http://books.google.co.id/s?id=RdH6DRZY0KIC&printsec=frontcover&hl=id&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Roslinda, E. (2002). Nilai Ekonomi Hutan Pendidikan Gunung Walat dan Kontribusinya terhadap Masyarakat Sekitar (PhD Thesis). Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Syaukani, H. R. (2005). Pengembangan kebijakan daerah bagi pengelolaan kawasan konservasi (Studi kasus Taman Hutan Raya Bukit Suharto) (PhD Thesis). Insitut Pertanian Bogor.
Widada. (2004). Nilai Ekonomi dan Pemanfaatan Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Bagi Masyarakat (PhD Thesis). Institut Pertanian Bogor.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2014.1.1.1-8
For further details log on website :
http://ejournal.forda-mof.org/ejournal-litbang/index.php/IJFR/article/view/9
No comments:
Post a Comment