Blog List

Saturday 8 April 2017

Cost–Benefit Analysis of Continuous Cover Forestry

Author
Colin Price and Martin Price

Abstract: The several different versions of continuous cover forestry provide different portfolios of market and non-market effects. The extra harvesting costs of group or shelterwood felling are likely to exceed any savings in regeneration costs. Better financial returns come from successive removal of the largest trees by single tree selection. Continuous cover forestry will not necessarily reduce adverse effects of commercial forestry on water catchment, and may increase loss of water from the forest canopy: the economic effects are estimable from required costs of capacity replacement. Some additional value from carbon retention might be derived in single tree selection systems. Whether additional recreation or biodiversity values could generally be attributed to continuous cover forestry is doubtful. Landscape benefits are also questionable, though a pilot study concluded that about €60 per hectare per year might be attributed locally. Because of the delay between the costs associated with conversion to continuous cover forestry and the benefits of a converted forest, the rate of discount affects whether conversion would be deemed worthwhile.
Keywords: Environmental Economics and PolicyLand Economics/Use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://purl.umn.edu/198787 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Access Statistics for this article
Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics is currently edited by April
More articles in Scandinavian Forest Economics: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics from  Scandinavian Society of Forest Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by AgEcon Search (aesearch@umn.edu).

For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/agsssfesf/198787.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...