Impact Evaluation of Forest Conservation Programs: Benefit-Cost Analysis, Without the Economics

Author

Jeffrey R. Vincent (jeff.vincent@duke.edu)
Additional contact information

Environmental & Resource Economics, 2016, vol. 63, issue 2, pages 395-408

Abstract: Abstract Economists are increasingly using impact evaluation methods to measure the effectiveness of forest conservation programs. Theoretical analysis of two complementary economic models demonstrates that the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) typically reported by these studies can be related to an economic measure of program performance only under very restrictive conditions. This is because the ATT is usually expressed in purely physical terms (e.g., avoided deforestation) and ignores heterogeneity in the costs and benefits of conservation programs. For the same reasons, clinical trials are a misleading analogy for the evaluation of conservation programs. To be more useful for economic analyses of conservation programs, impact evaluations should work toward developing measures of program outcomes that are economically more relevant, data that would enable the evaluation of impacts on forest degradation (not just deforestation) and primary forests (not forests in general), better estimates of spatially disaggregated treatment effects (not program-wide averages), and better information on the accuracy of estimated treatment effects as predictors of future risks.

Keywords: Conservation economics; Deforestation; Degradation; Impact evaluation; Primary forest; Protected area (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-015-9896-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:63:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-015-9896-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman

More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from  Springer,  European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com).

For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapenreec/v_3a63_3ay_3a2016_3ai_3a2_3ad_3a10.1007_5fs10640-015-9896-y.htm