Author
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/aalabbswp/96-11.htm
No 96-11, DRUID Working Papers from DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies
Abstract: It is by now an established fact, that the so-called high technology industries have experienced growth rates way above average through most years. High technology industries share of the world manufacturers export has risen from 12 per cent in 1970 to 25 per cent in 1995. More than one-third of Japan's manufacturing export and more than 40 per cent of America's manufacturing export are products from high technology industries, and this development has increasingly led to an international obsession with high technology industries. In a number of countries R&D indicators have by now become the object of intense discussions. Great efforts are devoted to improve a bad relative standing. The aim of this paper is to questioned whether a national specialisation towards high technology industries is the only way by which the mature, developed countries can hope to sustain and augment their economic position. I claim that in contrast to much of the assumptions in contemporary politics and in the majority of the contemporary academic literature on the subject the countries without a specialisation in high technology industries are not left in the backwaters of economic development. Quite the contrary seems to be the case as many advanced, high-cost countries experience an above average economic performance even when specialising in the bottom end of the low-tech industries. The argument is illustrated with empirical material from the wooden furniture industry in general - and the rather successful Danish wooden furniture industry in particular. The possible reasons behind this apparent paradox are discussed.
Keywords: International competitiveness; industrial clusters; wooden furniture industry; level of technology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: L1 L68 O18 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (24) Track citations by RSS feed
JEL-codes: L1 L68 O18 O31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (24) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www3.druid.dk/wp/19960011.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www3.druid.dk/wp/19960011.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aal:abbswp:96-11
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DRUID Working Papers from DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies
Series data maintained by Keld Laursen (kl.ivs@cbs.dk).
Series data maintained by Keld Laursen (kl.ivs@cbs.dk).
For further details log on website :
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/aalabbswp/96-11.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment