Blog List

Thursday, 26 May 2016

Decay resistance of some imported timbers against brown and white-rot fungi

Author
  • H. C. Nagaveni 
  • G. Vijayalakshmi
  • R. Sundararaj

Title
Decay resistance of some imported timbers against brown and white-rot fungi

Cover Date
2011-12

DOI
10.1007/s13196-012-0038-7

Print ISSN
0972-172X

Online ISSN
0976-8432

Publisher
Springer-Verlag

Author Affiliations
  • 1. Wood Biodegradation Division, Institute of Wood Science and Technology, P.O. Malleswaram, Bangalore, 560 003, India

Abstract

Investigations were carried out to determine the natural resistance of 20 commercially available imported timber species and two Indian timber species against wood decay fungi. Based on the resistance against the wood decay fungi, Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. F. sylvatica L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., and Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. with weight loss of around 40–50 % comes under “non-resistance class”. Decay was around 30 % in Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl., F. excelsior Quctnon. and Michelia champaka L. which come under “moderately resistance class”. Dryobalanops aromatica Geratin., Pterocarpus soyauxii Taub. (from two countries), Quercus robur L., Shorea laevis Ridl., Smarcoptera Dyer., SrobustaGearth., Tectona grandis L.f. (from five countries) and Xylia dolabriformis Benth. showed less than 10 % of weight loss and can be grouped under “high resistance class”.

Keywords

Natural resistance Imported-timbers Wood decay fungi Brown rot White rot
References 

  1. Ananthapadmanabha HS, Nagaveni HC, Srinivasan VV (1990) Differential natural decay resistance of Hevea brasiliensis (Rubberwood). Rubber Bull 25(4):20–21
  2. Anon (1981) Standard method of accelerated laboratory test of natural decay resistance of woods. ASTM Designation: D 2017-81
  3. Anon (2008) Methods for laboratory testing of wood preservatives against fungi. Indian Standard 4873–1968
  4. Badawi A, Faragalla AA, Dabour A (1985) The relative protective effectiveness of some wood preservatives in ground contact against subterranean termites. Int Pest Control 27(6):150–151
  5. Bakshi BK (1967) Accelerated laboratory investigation on durability of wood. Final technical report. FRI & Colleges, Dehradun
  6. Bakshi BK (1976) Forest pathology—principal and practices in forestry. FRI Publication, Dehradun
  7. Das NR, Chanola LP, Ramola BC (1965) Data on natural durability of timber species according to 1964 inspection. J Timb Dev Assoc India 11(1):6–12
  8. Eaton RA, Hale MDC (1993) Chemistry and biochemistry of decay. In: Wood decay, pests and protection. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 160–186
  9. Evans FG, Per-Otto F, Gry A (2008) Natural durability of different wood species in above ground applications—weight and MOE loss. IRG/WP 08-10667:14s
  10. Haupt MH, Leithoff DM, Puls J, Richter HG, Faix O (2003) Heartwood extractives and natural durability of plantation-grown teakwood (Tectona grandis L.)—a case study. Holz Als Roh-und Werkst 61(6):473–474CrossRef
  11. Jain JK, Narayan Virendra (1998) Termite resistance of different timber species in termite mound tests as compared to grave yard test on land. J Timb Dev Assoc India 44(1):37–41
  12. Shanbhag RR, Sundararaj R, Hemavathi TR (2009) Natural durability of some exotic timbers in accelerated field test against termites. J Indian Acad Wood Sci (NS) 6(1 & 2):12–19

For further details log on website :

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13196-012-0038-7

No comments:

Post a Comment

Advantages and Disadvantages of Fasting for Runners

Author BY   ANDREA CESPEDES  Food is fuel, especially for serious runners who need a lot of energy. It may seem counterintuiti...