Published Date
, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 35–42
Original Article
Cite this article as:
Hoang, H.T.N., Hoshino, S. & Hashimoto, S. J For Res (2015) 20: 35. doi:10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z
A group of smallholders in Vietnam has obtained Forest Stewardship Council certification (FSC) for their Acacia plantation forest. Although the certification aims to improve livelihoods via economic, social, and environmental benefits, there are concerns amongst smallholders regarding the outcomes from their certification decision as well as difficulties in maintaining the certification. This article assesses the benefits and challenges of forest management certification from the perspective of small household groups who have achieved FSC certification. The FSC has brought new opportunities for farmers, such as increased selling price and extended trade networks, but is also associated with significant obstacles such as high initial and annual surveillance audit fees, difficult paper work, and complicated procedures for selling wood. Additionally, the small size of the plantations and low expertise in forest management make it more difficult and costly for farmers to achieve certification. There is a heavy dependency on donors for financial and technical support. Because subsidies from organizations like the World Wide Fund for Nature Vietnam are unlikely to continue indefinitely, the benefit of certification for smallholders is uncertain. Feasible actions to increase the sustainability of the group are suggested, including increasing the responsibility of the group members, enhancing the awareness and capacity of the local people, and searching for additional support from other organizations and wood processing companies. From the macro level, a national forest stewardship council should be established so that the audit cost for certification would be reduced.
References
For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z
, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 35–42
- First Online:
- 18 November 2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z
Title
Forest stewardship council certificate for a group of planters in Vietnam: SWOT analysis and implications
A group of smallholders in Vietnam has obtained Forest Stewardship Council certification (FSC) for their Acacia plantation forest. Although the certification aims to improve livelihoods via economic, social, and environmental benefits, there are concerns amongst smallholders regarding the outcomes from their certification decision as well as difficulties in maintaining the certification. This article assesses the benefits and challenges of forest management certification from the perspective of small household groups who have achieved FSC certification. The FSC has brought new opportunities for farmers, such as increased selling price and extended trade networks, but is also associated with significant obstacles such as high initial and annual surveillance audit fees, difficult paper work, and complicated procedures for selling wood. Additionally, the small size of the plantations and low expertise in forest management make it more difficult and costly for farmers to achieve certification. There is a heavy dependency on donors for financial and technical support. Because subsidies from organizations like the World Wide Fund for Nature Vietnam are unlikely to continue indefinitely, the benefit of certification for smallholders is uncertain. Feasible actions to increase the sustainability of the group are suggested, including increasing the responsibility of the group members, enhancing the awareness and capacity of the local people, and searching for additional support from other organizations and wood processing companies. From the macro level, a national forest stewardship council should be established so that the audit cost for certification would be reduced.
References
- Araujo M, Kant S, Couto L (2009) Why Brazilian companies are certifying their forests? For Policy Econ 11:579–585CrossRef
- Auer MR (2012) Group forest certification for smallholders in Vietnam: an early test and future prospects. Hum Ecol 40:5–14CrossRef
- Bray DB, Pérez LM (2002) The rise of community forestry in Mexico: history, concepts, and lessons learned from twenty-five years of community timber production. Report to the Ford foundation, Mexico
- Cashore B, Stone M (2012) Can legality verification rescue global forest governance? Analyzing the potential of public and private policy intersection to ameliorate forest challenges in Southeast Asia. For Policy Econ 18:13–22CrossRef
- Cubbage F, Diaz D, Yapura P, Dube F (2010) Impacts of forest management certification in Argentina and Chile. For Policy Econ 12:497–504CrossRef
- Hain H, Ahas R (2007) Can forest certification improve forest management? Case study of the FSC-certified Estonian state forest management centre. Internat Forestry Rev 9:759–770CrossRef
- Helms MM, Nixon J (2010) Exploring SWOT analysis—where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. J Strategy Manag 3:215–251CrossRef
- Humphries SS, Kainer KA (2006) Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises. For Ecol Manage 235:30–43CrossRef
- Koller W, Lagan P (2007) Do certified tropical logs fetch a market premium? A comparative price analysis from Sabah, Malaysia. For Policy Econ 9:862–868CrossRef
- Kotler P (1988) Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Prentice-Hall International Edition, Englewood Cliffs
- Nguyen TQ (2007) Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements: are they contributing to better forest management and poverty reduction? Forestry Policy and Institutions Working Paper 14
- Nussbaum R, Simula M (2005) The forest certification handbook. Earthscan, United Kingdom
- Sugiura K, Yoshioka T, Inoue K (2012) Effects of acquiring FSC forest management certification for Japanese enterprises using SmartWood Audits. J Forestry Res 23:165–172CrossRef
- Tacconi L, Obidzinski K, Agung F (2004) Learning lessons to promote forest certification and control illegal logging in Indonesia. CIFOR publishcation, Indonesia
- Weihrich H (1999) Analysing the competitive advantages and disadvantages of Germany with the TOWS matrix—an alternative to Porter’s model. Eur Bus Rev 99:9–22CrossRef
For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10310-014-0472-z
No comments:
Post a Comment