The Communal Lifestyle of Web-Building Spiders in Tropical Forests

Author

• Toshiya Masumoto

Abstract

Most web-building spiders build their webs solitary, and they usually prevent other individuals from invading their webs. However, some web-builders make their webs communally, and these are found mostly in tropical rain forests. The advantage of communal web building is thought to be improved prey capture. The communal capture of large insect prey has been observed in a number of social web-building spiders and communal spiders have been shown to capture larger prey than do solitary spiders. Philoponella raffrayi is a communal web-building uloborid spider that is distributed throughout southeastern Asia. This study describes the colony composition, and prey capture and handling behavior of the uloborid spider P. raffrayi. It determines whether the efficiency with which this species captures large insects is higher when spiders hunt cooperatively than when they hunt alone. Although most prey was captured by individual spiders, I occasionally observed two spiders cooperatively wrapping and capturing prey. Cooperation increased prey-capture efficiency when the prey was larger than half of a spider’s body length. Furthermore, interspecific associations of P. raffrayi in the Pasoh Forest Reserve (Pasoh FR) is described.

References

1. Aviles, L. (1986) Sex-ratio bias and possible group selection in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. Am. Nat. 128:1–12.CrossRef
2. Binford, G J. & Rypstra, A. L. (1992) Foraging behavior of the communal spider, Philoponella republicana (Araneae: Uloboridae). J. Insect Behav. 5: 321–335.CrossRef
3. Breitwisch, R. (1989) Prey capture by a West African social spider (Uloboridae: Philoponella sp.). Biotropica 21: 359–363.CrossRef
4. Burgess, J. W. (1978) Social behavior in group-living spider species. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 42: 69–78.
5. Buskirk, R. E. (1981) Sociality in the Arachnida, In Hermann, H. R. (eds). Social Insects, vol. II Academic Press, London New York, pp.281–367.
6. Cangialosi, K. R. (1990). Social spider defense against kleptoparasitism. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 49–54.CrossRef
7. Caraco, T. (1981) Risk-sensitivity and foraging groups. Ecology 62: 527–531.CrossRef
8. Christenson, T. E. (1984) Behavior of colonial and solitary spiders of the theridiid species Anelosimus eximius. Anim. Behav. 32: 725–734.CrossRef
9. Frank, S. A. (1987) Demography and sex ratio in social spiders. Evolution 41:1267–1281.CrossRef
10. Hamilton, W. D. (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488.PubMedCrossRef
11. Jackson, R. R. (1979) Predatory behavior of the social spider Mallos gregalis: Is it cooperative? Insects Sociaux 26: 300–312.CrossRef
12. Jackson, R. R. & Wilcox, R. S. (1990) Aggressive mimicry, prey-specific predatory behavior and predatory behavior and predator-recognition in the predator-prey interactions of Portia fimbriata and Euryattus sp., jumping spiders from Queensland. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26:111–119.CrossRef
13. Krafft, B. (1969) Various aspects of the biology of Agelena consociata Denis when bred in the laboratory. Am. Zool. 9: 201–210.
14. Lubin, Y. D. (1986) Web building and prey capture in Uloboridae. In Shear, W. A. (ed). Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution. Stanford Univ. Press, California, pp. 132–170.
15. Lubin, Y. D. & Crozier, R. H. (1985) Electorophoretic evidence for population differentiation in a social spiderAchaearanea wau (Theridiidae). Insects Sociaux 32: 297–304.CrossRef
16. Masumoto, T. (1992) The composition of a colony of Philoponella raffrayi (Uloboridae) in Peninsular Malaysia. Acta Arachnologia 41:1–4.CrossRef
17. Masumoto, T. (1998) Cooperative prey capture in the communal web spider, Philoponella raffrayi (Araneae: Uloboridae). J. Arachnologica 26:392–396.
18. Murphy, F. & Murphy, J. (2000) An Introduction to the Spiders of South East Asia, With Notes on All the Genera. Malaysian Nature Society, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 625pp.
19. Nentwig, W (1985) Social spiders catch larger prey: a study of Anelosimus eximius (Araneae: Theridiidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17: 79–85.CrossRef
20. Opell, B. D. (1979) Revision of the Genera and Tropical American Species of the Spider Family Uloboridae. Bulletin of Museum Comparative Zoology Harvard University 148: 445–549.
21. Pasquet, A. & Krafft, B. (1992) Cooperation and prey capture efficiency in a social spider Anelosimus eximius(Araneae, Theridiidae). Ethology 90:121–133CrossRef
22. Roeloffs, R. & Riechert, S. E. (1988) Dispersal and population-genetic structure of the cooperative spider, Agelena consociata, in west african rainforest. Evolution 42:173–183.CrossRef
23. Rypstra, A. L. (1985) Aggregation of Nephila clavipes (L.) (Araneae: Araneidae) in relation to prey availability. J. Arachnol. 13: 71–78.
24. Rypstra, A. L. (1986) High prey abundance and a reduction in cannibalism: the first step to sociality in spiders (Arachnida). J. Arachnol. 14:193–200.
25. Shear, W A. (1970) The evolution of social phenomena in spiders. Bull. Br. Arachnol. Soc. 1:65–76
26. Simon, E. (1891) Observations bilogiques sur les Arachnides. I. Araignées sociables, In Voyage de M.E. Simon au Venezuela (décembre 1881-avril 1888). lie Memoire Annual Society et France 60: 5–14.
27. Smith, D. R. (1982) Reproductive success of solitary and commune Philoponella oweni (Araneae:Uloboridae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11:149–154.CrossRef
28. Uetz, G W. (1986) Web-building and prey capture in communal orb weavers, In Shear, W. A. (ed). Spiders: webs, behavior, and evolution. Stanford University Press, California, pp.207–231.
29. Uetz, G W. (1989) The “ricochet effect” and prey capture in colonial spiders. Oecologia 81: 154–159.
30. Vollrath, F. & Rohde-Arndt, D. (1983) Prey capture and feeding in the social spider Anelosimus eximius. Z. für Tierpsychol. 61: 334–340

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-4-431-67008-7_25