From Thousands to Millions: Accelerating Agricultural Intensification and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa

Author

• A. Maatman
• M.C.S. Wopereis
• K.S. Debrah
• J.J.R. Groot

Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_5

Cite this paper as: 

Maatman A., Wopereis M., Debrah K., Groot J. (2007) From Thousands to Millions: Accelerating Agricultural Intensification and Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Bationo A., Waswa B., Kihara J., Kimetu J. (eds) Advances in Integrated Soil Fertility Management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Springer, Dordrecht

Abstract

Agricultural growth rates of about 6% are required in sub-Saharan Africa to fuel economic growth. It is generally acknowledged that this will require sustainable agricultural intensification through the increased use of external inputs, in combination with locally available soil amendments, i.e., integrated soil fertility management (ISFM).

Over the last five years and in 16 pilot areas in West Africa, IFDC and its partner organizations in the Agricultural Intensification in Sub-Saharan Africa (AISSA) network have developed the Competitive Agricultural Systems and Enterprises (CASE) approach. The approach is holistic in the sense that it involves all stakeholders of the agribusiness system at the grassroots level, including smallholder farmers, local entrepreneurs, traders, bankers, and facilitating agents. It is dynamic as it fosters both technological and institutional change through experiential and social learning processes. ISFM and Commodity Chain Development are basic concepts and all project activities purposely foster empowerment and strengthen the innovative capacities of local stakeholders, without substituting for the market.

We estimate that about 60,000 farmers and 200 local entrepreneurs have benefited from AISSA-related activities on agricultural intensification in West Africa. To accelerate and extend processes of agricultural intensification, bottom-up grassroots approaches have an important role to play. However upscaling can only be sustainable when, at both local and regional scales, enabling institutional and policy environments for market development exist. IFDC is involved in a number of projects that aim to improve the conditions for ISFM-based agricultural intensification at the regional level, by means of partnerships with farmer-based organizations, traders’ associations and government structures (the fertile triangle). Collaboration with the West African Economic and Monetary Union (UEMOA) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is also instrumental in reinforcing efforts to establish common agricultural policies for West Africa, to improve the transparency and competitiveness of agricultural inputs markets, and to nurture the expansion and professionalism of the private sector. The interests of small-scale farmers are safeguarded and the environment is protected.

The approach – combining bottom-up and regional-level projects to promote and scale-up agricultural intensification processes – is not a blueprint package. It offers opportunities for effective participation of all stakeholders involved, partnerships with facilitating institutions, and perspectives to move from thousands to millions of farmers.

Reference

1. Developing Countries: Emerging Strategies for Rural Development and Poverty Alleviation. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR), The Hague, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
2. Bigman 2002b. Diversifying Agricultural Production and Exports in Africa. In: Bigman (Ed.). Globalization and the Developing Countries: Emerging Strategies for Rural Development and Poverty Alleviation. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR), The Hague, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
3. Bigman 2002c. Introduction and Overview. In: Bigman (Ed.). Globalization and the Developing Countries: Emerging Strategies for Rural Development and Poverty Alleviation. International Service for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR), The Hague, CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
4. Cohen M. 2001. 2020 Vision: The Prospects for Universal Food Security in the Next Two Decades. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual International Studies Association Convention, February 2001, Chicago. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington.Google Scholar
5. De Ridder N. and Van Keulen H. 1990. Some Aspects of the Role of Organic Matter in Sustainable Intensified Arable Farming Systems in the West-African Semi-Arid Tropics (SAT), Fertilizer Research 26: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Eicher C. 2004. Flashback: Fifty Years of Donor Aid to African Agriculture. Revised version of paper presented at the International Policy Conference, “Successes in African Agriculture: Building for the Future.” Michigan State University, U.S.A.
7. IFDC 1999. A Strategic Framework for African Agricultural Input Supply System Development. IFDC, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A.Google Scholar
8. IFDC 2002. Global and Regional Data on Fertilizer Production and Consumption, 1961/2–2000/1. Muscle Shoals, Alabama, U.S.A.Google Scholar
9. IFPRI 2002. Reaching Sustainable Food Security for All by 2020. PDF-file and PowerPoint presentation available at www.ifpri.org/2020 vision.
10. Jayne T.S., Kelly V., and Crawford E. 2003. Fertilizer Consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa. Policy Synthesis for Cooperating USAID Offices and Country Missions. USAID.
11. Maatman A. and Van Reuler H. 1999. Farming Systems Research and the Development of Integrated Nutrient Management Systems: Linking Input/Output Market and Technology Development, In: Renard G., Krieg S., Lawrence P., and Von Oppen M. (Eds). Farmers and Scientists in a Changing Environment: Assessing Research in West Africa. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim, Germany.
12. NEPAD 2003. Comprehensive Africa Development Programme. African Union, NEPAD.
13. C. Peacock, A., Jowett, A. Dorward, C. Poulton and I. Urey, 2004, Reaching the poor: a call for action. Investment in smallholder agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. FARM - Africa, HARVESTHelp, and Imperial College London.
14. Pieri C. 1989. Fertilité des terres de savannes: bilan de trente ans de recherche et de développement agricole au sud du Sahara. Ministère de la Coopération et de Développement Français, Paris, CIRAD, Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
15. Renard G., Krieg S., Lawrence P., and Von Oppen M. (Eds) 1999. Farmers and Scientists in a Changing Environment: Assessing Research in West Africa. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim, Germany.Google Scholar
16. Roe E. 1991. Development Narratives. Or, Making the Best of Blueprint Development. World Development 19 (4): 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Sanders J.H., Shapiro B.I. and Ramaswamy S. 1996. The Economics of Agricultural Technology in Semiarid Sub-Saharan Africa. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.Google Scholar
18. Schreurs M., Maatman A. and Dangbégnon C. 2002. In for a Penny, in for a Pound: Strategic Site Selection and On-Farm Client-Oriented Research to Trigger Sustainable Agricultural Intensification in West Africa. In: Vanlauwe B., Diels J., Sanginga N. and Merkx R. (Eds). Integrated Plant Nutrient Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: from Concept to Practice. CABI publishing in collaboration with the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria (pp. 65–74).Google Scholar
19. Schweigman C. 2004. Food Security: Opportunities and Responsibilities. Or: The Illusion of the Exclusive Actor. Valedictory Lecture, November 2003, CDS Research Report No. 19. University of Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
20. Sijm J. 1997. Food Security and Policy Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lessons from the Past Two Decades. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Tinbergen Institute Research Series, No. 166, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
21. Snrech 1994. Pour préparer l’avenir de l’Afrique de l’Ouest: une vision à l’horizon 2020:synthèse de l’étude des perspectives à long terme en Afrique de l’Ouest. OCDE/ OECD, Club du Sahel, BAD/ ADB et CILSS.
22. Wiggins 1995. Change in African Farming Systems between the Mid-1970s and the Mid-1980s. Journal of International Development, Vol. 7, No. 6, 807–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Yanggen D., Kelly V., Reardon T. and Naseem A. 1998. Incentives for Fertilizer Use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Review of Empirical Evidence on Fertilizer Response and Profitability.MSU International Development Working Paper No. 70, Michigan State University, U.S.A.Google Scholar

For further details log on website :
http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-5760-1_5